The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

40 protocols using ciprofloxacin

1

Antibiotic Susceptibility of Cefotaxime-Resistant E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic susceptibility of cefotaxime-resistant E. coli isolates was determined by using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion susceptibility test according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (CLSI, 2017). The susceptibility against eleven antibiotics, including ceftazidime (CAZ: 30 µg), ceftazidime/clavulanic acid (CAZ/CLA: 30/10 µg), cefotaxime (CTX: 30 µg), cefotaxime/clavulanic acid (CTX/CLA: 30/10 µg), cefepime (CPM: 30 µg), amikacin (AK: 30 µg), gentamicin (GM: 30 µg), ciprofloxacin (CIP: 5 µg), levofloxacin (LVX: 5 µg), ertapenem (ETP: 10 µg), imipenem (IMP: 10 µg) (all from MastGroup Ltd., Merseyside, United Kingdom) were examined. E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as a control sample. The double-disk synergy test (DDST) was performed according to the CLSI guidelines to detect ESBL producing isolates. Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603 and E. coli ATCC 25922 were used as positive and negative controls in the DDST method, respectively. Every strain that was resistant against at least one agent in three or more antibiotic classes, considered as the Multi-Drug Resistant (MDR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antibiotic Susceptibility Test of CRAB

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotics susceptibility of isolates was determined using the disk diffusion method according to CLSI guidelines [17 ] and against the following antibiotics: imipenem (10 mg), ceftazidime (30 mg), ceftriaxone (30 mg), amikacin (30 mg), gentamicin (10 mg), tetracycline (30 mg), piperacillin/tazobactam (110 mg), ampicillin/sulbactam (20 mg), ciprofloxacin (5 mg), levofloxacin (5 mg) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (25 mg) (Mast Group Ltd, UK). The CRAB was defined when the isolate was resistant to imipenem [16 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Salmonella Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic susceptibility profiling of the Salmonella isolates was determined by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method [16 (link)]. Seven different antibiotics were used in this study, namely, tetracycline (30 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole (25 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), nalidixic acid (30 μg), ampicillin (10 μg), and ceftriaxone (30 μg) (Mast Group Ltd, Merseyside, UK). Antimicrobial susceptibility was done on Muller Hinton agar (Mast Group Ltd, Merseyside, UK) and Escherichia coli ATCC 25329 control strain was used. The diameter of zonal clearance was measured in millimeters and results were recorded as susceptible (S), intermediate (I), and resistant (R) according to CLSI, performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing [17 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antimicrobial Resistance Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All isolates were examined for resistance to routine antimicrobial agents by standard disk diffusion method using Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) and Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) as control strains (17 ). The antibiotics tested were gentamicin, amikacin, ceftazidime, ceftizoxime, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, imipenem, ciprofloxacin, co-trimoxazole, chloramphenicol, penicillin, oxacillin, ampicillin, vancomycin, rifampicin and erythromycin (Mast Co, the UK). Isolates showing intermediate levels of susceptibility were classified as nonsusceptible.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of K. pneumoniae Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out for all K. pneumoniae isolates for 12 antibiotics using standard disk diffusion test according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (CLSI) (14 ). The antibiotic disks used in the study were imipenem (10 ug), meropenem (10 ug), piperacillin (30 ug), piperacillin-tazobactam (100-10 ug), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 ug), ceftazidime (30 ug), cefepime (30 ug), ampicillin-sulbactam (10–10 ug), aztreonam (30 ug), ciprofloxacin (5 ug), gentamicin (10 ug), and tetracycline (30 ug) (MAST Group Ltd, Merseyside, UK). Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were used as quality controls strains for antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antibiotic Resistance Profiling of NDM-1 Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility of the blaNDM-1 positive isolates was determined by the Kirby–Bauer method as recommended by the CLSI. The 11 standard antibiotic disks used include: imipenem (10 µg), meropenem (10 µg), ertapenem (10 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), cefepime (30 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), piperacillin/tazobactam (100/10 µg), amikacin (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg) and aztreonam (30 µg) (Mast Group Ltd, UK). The ESBL phenotype was identified using combined disk method by disks of ceftazidime (30 mg) with (10 mg) and without clavulanic acid (Mast Group Ltd, UK), applied to all blaNDM−1 positive isolates (15). Moreover, the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of imipenem (10 µg/ml) [≤ 2 mg/L (susceptible), 4 mg/L (intermediate), and ≥ 8 mg/L (resistant)] (Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy) were applied by gradient test strips to blaNDM−1 positive P. aeruginosa isolates [18 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antimicrobial Resistance Profiling of E. coli and K. pneumoniae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates was performed by the Kirby Bauer disk diffusion method according to the CLSI guideline [19 ]. The antimicrobial disks used for testing were ampicillin (10 µg) [tested only for E. coli], Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (20/10 µg), piperacillin-tazobactam (100/10 µg), cefazolin (30 µg), cefuroxime (30 µg). cefixime (5 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), cefepime (30 µg), imipenem (10 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), trimethoprim sulphamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 µg), nitrofurantoin (300 µg), and amikacin (30 µg). Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, and imipenem disks were purchased from the manufacturer Mast (Mast group Ltd, Liverpool, UK) with the remainder from HiMedia (HiMedia, India). The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ciprofloxacin was determined by E-test (0.002-32 µg/mL) (HiMedia, India), and those isolates with MIC ≥ 32 µg/mL were further tested by agar dilution method following the procedures described by CLSI [20 ]. An isolate was defined to display multidrug resistance (MDR) if non-susceptible to ≥ 1 agent in ≥ 3 antimicrobial categories [21 (link)]. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used for quality control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Acinetobacter baumannii

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method against the following antibiotic discs according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines [28 ]. Microbial susceptibility test was conducted using the following antimicrobials: gentamicin (10 μg), tobramycin (10 μg), amikacin (30 μg), imipenem (10 μg), meropenem (10 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), piperacillin/tazobactam (100/10 μg), ampicillin/sulbactam (10/10 μg) and levofloxacin (5 μg) (Mast Group Ltd., Bootle Merseyside, UK). Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC 19606 was used as the quality control strain in antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Enterococci

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antimicrobial susceptibilities of 175 E. faecalis and 67 E. faecium strains were examined by using the disk agar diffusion (DAD) method in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines.17 18 Erythromycin (15 µg), Tetracycline (30 µg), Ciprofloxacin (5 µg), Vancomycin (30 µg), Teicoplanin (30 µg), Norfloxacin (10 µg), Nitrofurantoin (300 µg), Quinopristin-Dalfopristin [Synercid (15 µg)] (Mast Co., UK), Chloramphenicol (30 µg), Gentamicin (10 µg), Linezolid (30 µg), and Ampicillin (10 µg) (HiMedia Mumbai Co., India) were used for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST).
In addition, minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of the glycopeptide antibiotics i.e. Vancomycin and Teicoplanin (Sigma-Aldrich, Poole, Co., UK) against the E. faecalis and E. faecium isolates were determined using the microdilution broth method.17 18
E. faecalis ATCC 29212 (Vancomycin sensitive), E. faecalis ATCC 51299 (vanB positive), E. faecalis E206 (vanA positive) were used as quality control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Pseudomonas

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DST was performed using disk diffusion method (Kirby-Bauer) on Mueller-Hinton agar (Merck, Germany) plates according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline [13 ]. The tested antibiotic disks were: imipenem (10μg), meropenem (10μg), amikacin (30μg), ciprofloxacin (5μg), ceftriaxone(30μg), ceftazidime (30μg), colistin-sulfate (10μg), pipracillin-tazobactam (100/10μg), and gentamicin (10μg) [Mast Co., UK]. P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 was used as a control strain for DST.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!