The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

18 protocols using qiaxcel screengel software

1

Validation of Piper Species Primers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A set of 11 primer pairs were synthesized using the software Primer3 (Untergasser et al., 2012 (link)) and validated in 21 accessions of Piper representing 12 different species (Piper nigrum, Piper longum, Piper arboreum, Piper argyrophyllum, Piper attenuatum, Piper betel, Piper chaba, Piper hymenophyllum, Piper trichostachyon, Piper wallichi, Piper columbrinum, and Piper sarmentosum). Genomic DNA was isolated from the leaf using the cTAB DNA extraction method. The PCR reaction consisted of 1× PCR buffer, 2.5 mM of MgCl2, 1 µM of primer, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase (NEB), and 15 ng of template DNA in a total volume of 20 µl and cycled at 95°C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 1 min, annealing at 55°C for 1 min and extension at 72°C for 1 min followed by a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. The amplification products were resolved on a QIAxcel multicapillary system using QIAxcel High Resolution Kit 1200 (QIAGEN, No. 929002, New Delhi,Qiagen India Pvt. Ltd.) 50-800 bp v2.0 QX DNA size marker (QIAGEN, No. 929561, New Delhi,Qiagen India Pvt. Ltd.) and 15 bp/1,000 bp Qx alignment marker (QIAGEN No. 929521, New Delhi,Qiagen India Pvt. Ltd.) with the high-resolution run method OM700. The allelic sizes of each sample were calculated in the form of gel profiles and peaks using the QIAxcel ScreenGel software (QIAGEN, v1.5).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Toxin Profiling and PCR Ribotyping of C. difficile

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Crude bacterial template DNA for toxin profiling was prepared by resuspension of cells in a 5% (wt/vol) solution of Chelex-100 resin (Sigma-Aldrich, Castle Hill, NSW, Australia). All isolates were screened by PCR for the presence of toxin A (tcdA), toxin B (tcdB), and binary toxin (cdtA and cdtB) genes (38 (link)). PCR ribotyping was performed as previously described (52 (link)). PCR ribotyping products were concentrated using a Qiagen MinElute PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Visualisation of PCR products was performed with QIAxcel ScreenGel software (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Using the BioNumerics software package v.7.5 (Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium), the ribotyping patterns generated were compared to a reference library that consisted of over 16,000 C. difficile strains, including 54 internationally recognized RTs from the Anaerobe Reference Laboratory (ARL) (Cardiff, United Kingdom) and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) collection. Isolates that gave patterns that did not correspond to any internationally recognized RTs in our library but had previously been isolated by our laboratory were assigned an internal nomenclature prefixed with “QX.” RTs that were new to our library were assigned a new QX number.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Electrophoretic Analysis of Alpha and Beta Thalassemia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PCR products for α-thalassaemia were analysed by using agarose gel electrophoresis. PCR products of multiplex gap PCR were run on a 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis using 1× Tris-Borate-EDTA (TBE) buffer. Whereas, PCR products for α-thalassaemia from multiplex ARMS PCR were run on a 1.2% agarose gel.
The PCR products from the β globin gene, except for reaction in MARMS-A, MARMS-B and MARMS-F, were separated using 2% agarose D1, Low EEO Pronadisa (Laboratorios CONDA, Madrid, Spain) in 1X TBE buffer (Biobasic, Markham, ON, Canada). DNA band was visualized under transilluminator (Vilber Lourmat, Sud Marne-la-Vallée, France). QIAxel Advanced System (QIAGEN GmBH, Hilden, Germany) was used to analyse MARMS-A, MARMS-B, and MARMS-F which used automated capillary electrophoresis to separate the products based on their sizes and visualised on the interfaced computer system using its dedicated QIAxcel ScreenGel Software (QIAGEN GmBH, Hilden, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Determining VNTR Repeat Units

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sizes of PCR products were analyzed by capillary electrophoresis (QIAexcel, Qiagen) and determined by QIAxcel ScreenGel software (Qiagen). The DNA High Resolution Kit Gel Cartridge (Qiagen) was used in this study. The number of repeat units in each VNTR region were calculated from their product size using modeling sizes, which were defined by the sequence data of Listeria innocua CLIP 11262 strain. The sizes of PCR products obtained from capillary electrophoresis were assumed to be the closest modeling size of PCR products, and the number of repeat units were determined.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Validating NGS Mutations via Sanger Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sanger sequencing was performed for validation of mutations obtained from NGS and sample swap quality control. Sample-specific variants with high tumor allele frequency were selected for Sanger sequencing. Primer pairs were designed using Primer3Plus [22 (link)]. The specificity of the primers was validated using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) [23 (link)]. The primer sequences can be found in Table S1.
PCR amplification was conducted using AmpliTaq® Gold (ThermoFisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. PCR products were analyzed by gel electrophoresis using QIAxcel® ScreenGel software (Qiagen). PCR product clean-up was conducted prior to sequencing using FastAP™ (ThermoFisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Sequencing was conducted using the BigDye™ Terminator v1.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific) on the Applied Biosystems® 3730 DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multiplex PCR Assay for Respiratory Viruses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PCR products were sized using QIAxcel DNA Screening gel cartridge (QIAGEN) on the QIAxcel system (QIAGEN, Switzerland), which enabled high-resolution capillary electrophoresis. A 50–800 bp QX DNA Size Marker (Qiagen) was included on QIAxcel runs, and the size of the products was determined using the QIAxcel ScreenGel software (Qiagen). The QIAxcel system produces a digital gel image and an electropherogram for fragment analysis. The expected PCR product sizes of set A were 749bp (HMPV), 534 bp (HADV), 375 bp (HCOV-229E/NL63), 264 bp (HPIV-2), 188 bp HPIV-3), and 139 bp (HPIV-1), while the product sizes of set B were 754 bp (IFV-B), 578 bp (HCOV-OC43/HKU1), 394 bp (HRV-A/B), 273 bp (HRSV-A), 206 bp (IFV-A) and 143 bp (HRSV-B).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Toxin Profiling of Clostridium difficile

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Crude bacterial template DNA for toxin profiling was prepared by resuspension of cells in a 5% (wt/vol) solution of Chelex-100 resin (Bio-Rad). All isolates were screened by PCR for the presence of the toxin A (tcdA) and toxin B (tcdB) genes and the binary toxin (cdtA and cdtB) genes46 (link),47 (link) and the regulating genes of tcdC, tcdR, and tcdE. PCR ribotyping was performed as previously described48 (link). PCR ribotyping reaction products were concentrated using a Qiagen Min-Elute PCR purification kit (QIAGEN) and run on a QIAxcel capillary electrophoresis platform (QIAGEN). Visualization of PCR products was performed with QIAxcel ScreenGel software (v1.3.0; QIAGEN). PCR ribotyping banding patterns were identified by comparison of banding patterns with a reference library consisting of a collection of 24 reference strains from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), and a collection of 30 isolates from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). Interpretation of the capillary electrophoresis data (PCR ribotyping banding patterns) was performed using the BioNumerics software package v.7.6 (Applied Maths, Saint-Martens-Latem, Belgium). Isolates that could not be identified with the available reference library were designated with internal nomenclature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

FIP1L1 and OLIG3 Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The quality of the RNA was determined with the QIAxcel Advanced system and RNA screening kit (Qiagen). Some level of degradation was observed. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized from the extracted total RNA using the iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad). A 327 base pair (bp) region of the FIP1L1 cDNA and a 343 bp region of the OLIG3 cDNA were amplified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and an AmpliTaq gold DNA polymerase enzyme (Applied Biosystems). These PCR products were used as a template in further amplification, where the product sizes were 109 bp for FIP1L1 and 343 bp for OLIG3. The presence and size of the PCR product was determined by electrophoresis using the QIAxcel Advanced system and QIAxcel ScreenGel Software (Qiagen). Primer sequences are available on request.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Genotyping of SLC6A4 VNTR Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
VNTR polymorphisms in the SLC6A4 promoter (5HTTLPR) and intron 2 (STin2) regions were genotyped as described in our previous study [39 (link)]. Simultaneous genotyping of rs25531 (NG_011747.2: 3609A/G) and 5HTTLPR was based on restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of PCR products obtained using 50 ng genomic DNA, HotStart Taq DNA Polymerase (Qiagen) and the following primers (0.6 μM) each: forward, 5'-CTCCCTGTACCCCTCCTAGG-3’ (NG_011747.2: 3527–3546) and reverse, 5’-TGCAAGGAGAATGCTGGAG-3' (NG_011747.2: 3801–3819). The cycling conditions were: 95°C for 15 min; 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 60°C for 45 s, 72°C for 45; 72°C for 7 min. PCR products were digested overnight at 37°C with MspI (New England Biolab), electrophoresed using the QIAxcel system, and sized by QIAxcel ScreenGel Software (both from Qiagen). Fragments of 211 and 38 bp corresponded to the S allele, fragments of 245 and 38 bp corresponded to the La allele, while fragments of 162, 83 and 38 bp corresponded to the Lg allele. The concordance of 5HTTLPR genotypes obtained by this protocol and the previously mentioned protocol [39 (link)] was 100%. In analogy with other studies, 5HTTLPR/rs25531 haplotypes were dichotomized into high-expressing (La/La) and low-expressing (other) group [40 (link),41 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multiplex PCR for Species Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We checked the specificity of the designed primer pairs for the targeted species, by testing each primer pair in PCRs with one or two samples from among the entire set of species surveyed in Brazil (see results). A multiplex PCR was then designed, with one primer pair per species. The primers were selected by testing various primer combinations in PCR with the various Brazilian species surveyed and checking the clarity of the results obtained by electrophoresis of the PCR products. All PCRs were performed with the Multiplex PCR Master Mix (QIAGEN), with a reaction mixture consisting of 1 x PCR Master Mix and primers (0.4 µM each), made up to a final volume of 10 µl with ultrapure water. The PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation for 15 min at 95°C; followed by 35 cycles of denaturation for 30 s at 94°C, annealing for 90 s at 62°C, extension for 90 s at 72°C; and a final extension for 30 min at 72°C. PCR products were separated on a QIAxcel advanced system (QIAGEN), and analyzed with QIAxcel ScreenGel Software (QIAGEN).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!