The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using gf 1 ambiclean kit

1

Sequencing protocol for ompB, ompA, and gltA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 106 positive PCR products obtained after ompB, ompA, and gltA PCRs were randomly selected and purified using the GF-1 Ambi Clean kit (Vivantis, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Purified DNA amplicons were sequenced in both directions, using the same primers as for the single gltA PCR and the second PCR of each nested PCR amplification targeting ompA and ompB genes. The Big Dye Terminator cycle sequencing ready reaction kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA) and an ABI3730XL automated DNA sequencer (Macrogen Europe, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) were employed.
The chromatograms were evaluated with Chromas Lite v 2.01 (http://www.technelysium.com.au/chromas_lite.html). To obtain maximal data accuracy, sequences were determined on both forward and reverse strands. Indeed, the complementary strands of each sequenced product were manually assembled by using the DNAMAN software (Version 5.2.2; Lynnon Biosoft, Que., Canada). The primer region sequences were automatically removed and the overlapping parts were selected.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Staphylococcus Identification via SodA Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sequencing was carried out as described by Poyart et al. [68 (link)]. The DNA samples were amplified for the sodA gene with the primer sodA-F (5′ CCITAYICITAYGAYGCIYTIGARCC-3′) and sodA-R (5′-ARRTARTAIGCRT GYTCCCAIACRTC-3′). Briefly, 50 µL of the reaction mixture was used, which contained 25 µL of 2x MytaqTM HS Red Mix (Bioline Reagents Ltd.; London, UK), sterile deionized water, 0.75 µM of each primer, and 100 ng of bacterial DNA sample. Thermal cycling reaction conditions consisted of initial denaturing at 95 °C for 3 min and then being subjected to 35 cycles of amplification, denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 37 °C for 60 s, and elongation at 72 °C for 45 s. The PCR amplicons were purified using a GF-1 AmbiClean Kit (Vivantis Technologies Sdn Bhd; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia) and then sequenced at 1st BASE products and services company, Malaysia. The Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLASTN) was used to identify species of staphylococci using a cut-off value of ≥97% [69 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Bacterial 16S rDNA Amplification and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GF-1 bacterial DNA extraction kit (Cat. # GF-BA-100, Vivantis, Malaysia) was used for all bacterial DNA extraction as described in a previous study (Naas et al., 2019 (link)). The 16S rDNA gene was amplified using the forward primer: S-D-Bact-0341-b-S-17 5'-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3' and reverse primer: S-D-Bact-0785-a-A-21 5'-GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3' (Herlemann et al., 2011 ). GF-1 Ambi Clean kit (Cat. # GF-GC-100, Vivantis, Malaysia) was used to get the amplified 16S rDNA PCR fragment (464 bp) from the gel (Azwai et al., 2016 (link)). The purified 16S rDNA amplicon was analyzed in cycle sequencing with Big Dye® Terminator v1.1 kit (AB Applied Bioscience, TECHNE, TC-512, Waltham, MA) and sequenced on a four-capillary ABI PRISM® 3130-Avant Genetic Analyzer at Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Della Lombardia e dell ‘Emilia Romagna (IZSLER) in Brescia, Italy. Sequences were assembled and edited using SeqMan module within the Laser gene package, (DNA Star Inc., Madison, WI). The obtained consensus sequences were subjected to BLAST search at both NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed) and at 16S bacterial cultures Blast Server for the identification of prokaryotes (http://bioinfo.unice.fr/blast/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cloning and Sequencing of Amplicon

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The specific amplicon was purified with the GF-1 AmbiClean Kit (Vivantis, Malaysia). The products were subsequently cloned into the pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega, USA) according to the manufacturer′s instructions. The recombinant plasmids were transformed into E. coli (DH5α) competent cells and screened for positive colonies. Plasmids were extracted using the GF-1 Plasmid DNA Extraction Kit (Vivantis, Malaysia). All sequencing reactions were performed on both strands using the sequencing service from Macrogen Inc., Seoul, Korea.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Identification of Ethanol-Producing Yeast Strain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A yeast strain that produced the largest amount of ethanol from xylose was identified by nucleotide sequencing of the D1/D2 domain from the large-subunit (LSU) rRNA gene. Genomic DNA was extracted as described previously [41 (link)]. Forward primer NL-1 (5′-GCATATCAATAA GCGGAGGAAAAG-3′) and reverse primer NL-4 (5′-GGTCCGTGTTTCAAGACGG-3′) were used to generate the PCR product of the D1/D2 domain [42 ]. The PCR product was checked by agarose gel electrophoresis and purified by using a GF-1 AmbiClean Kit (Vivantis, Malaysia). The sequences of the PCR product were determined by 1st BASE (Selangor, Malaysia) and examined via a BLAST homology search [43 (link)]. The evolutionary history was inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method [44 (link)]. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Kimura 2-parameter method [45 (link)]. Evolutionary analyses were conducted using MEGA7 software [46 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genomic Identification of Actinobacterial Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA extraction was performed following the method of Kudo et al. (1998) (link). Genomic DNA was used as the template for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) following the method of Lee et al. (2014) (link). 27F (5′ AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG 3′) and 1492R (5′ TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT 3′) primers were used to amplify 16S rRNA gene. The PCR amplicons were purified by GF-1 AmbiClean Kit (Vivantis®) following the manufacturer instruction. The 16S rRNA sequencing was performed by commercial service at First BASE Laboratories Sdn Bhd, Malaysia. Identification of all actinobacterial isolates was achieved by BLAST analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences using EzBiocloud database1. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree was constructed using BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor version 7.2 and MEGA7 (Kumar et al., 2016 (link)). Tree topology was evaluated using the bootstrap resampling method at 1000 bootstrap. Strain CMU55-4 was also identified based on whole genome sequence analysis. The ANI value was calculated and compared in JSpeciesWS (Ritcher et al., 2016 (link)), web server tool, using ANI-Blast (ANIb) and ANI-MUMmer (ANIm) algorithms (Ritcher and Rosselló-Móra, 2009 (link)) within the web service. The Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator (GGDC 2.1) with the BLAST + method (Meier-Kolthoff et al., 2013 (link)) was used to evaluate the digital DNA-DNA hybridisation (dDDH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Confirming ALE Strain Adaptation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After obtaining the adapted strains from the ALE process, nucleotide sequencing of the D1/D2 domain from the large subunit (LSU) rRNA gene was conducted to verify for confirming that such observations were not a result of unintentional contaminations. Genomic DNA extraction was performed as described previously [38 (link)]. The forward primer NL-1 (5′-GCATATCAATAAGCGGAGGAAAAG-3′) and reverse primer NL-4 (5′-GGTCCGTGTTTCAAGACGG-3′) were utilized to generate the PCR product of the D1/D2 domain [39 ]. The PCR product was verified by agarose gel electrophoresis and purified by using a GF-1 AmbiClean Kit (Vivantis, Malaysia). The sequences of the PCR product were determined by 1st BASE (Selangor, Malaysia) and subjected to a BLAST homology search [40 (link)]. The determined nucleotide sequence was deposited in the DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Amplification and Sequencing of ompA Gene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primers for amplification of the ompA gene were synthesised by Macrogen Co., Ltd., Korea. The gene was amplified using Taq DNA polymerase (PrimeSTAR GXL DNA Polymerase, Takara Bio. Inc., Japan) with the forward (OMPA-F, 5′-AGGATCCATGAAAAAAACAGCAATTGCATTGA-3′) and reverse (OMPA-R, 5′-TCTCGAGTTATTTGTTACCTTTAACAGCGATTTC-3′) primers; the sequences of these primers were modified from Gao et al. [49 ]. The PCRs contained 5 μl of 50 ng/μl genomic DNA, 10 μl of 5X PCR buffer, 5 μl of 2 mM dNTPs, 1 μl (5 U) of Taq DNA polymerase, and 5 μl of each of 2 μM forward and reverse primers in a total volume of 50 μl. The reaction mixtures were incubated for 30 cycles consisting of initial denaturation at 98 °C for 3 min; denaturation at 98 °C for 10 s, annealing at 55 °C for 15 s, extension at 68 °C for 1 min; and final extension at 68 °C for 3 min. The PCR products were purified using a GF-1 Ambiclean kit (Vivantis Technologies Sdn. Bhd., Malaysia), and the cleaned products were subjected to sequencing with both primers using an Applied Biosystems automatic sequencer (ABI 3730XL) (Macrogen Co., Ltd., Korea). The sequence chromatograms were checked for quality, and the ompA sequences were confirmed using the BLASTN program.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Phylogenetic Analysis of Sequenced Amplicons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All positive amplicons were purified using the GF-1 Ambi Clean kit (Vivantis) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and sequenced in both directions on an ABI 3730xl DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems). All obtained DNA sequences were assembled and edited using BioEdit (Alzohairy 2011 ). Edited sequences were assembled into a contig using SeqMan software (DNASTAR, Lasergene), and thus were subjected to BLASTn analysis (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) to find sequence similarity to known sequences. Phylogenetic analyses were performed using the maximum parsimony method (PAUP v. 4.0b1) and bootstrap analysis was calculated with 1,000 replicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Amplicon Sequencing for Anaplasma ovis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four selected PCR amplicons, two from the first sampling date (one lamb and one ewe) and two from the ninth sampling date (one lamb and one ewe), were purified with the GF-1 Ambi Clean kit (Vivantis, California, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Purified amplicons were sequenced in both directions using the same primers as for the A. ovis msp4-specific PCR amplifications (Table 1). The reaction was realized with a conventional Big Dye Terminator cycle sequencing ready reaction kit (Perkin Elmer, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA) and ABI3730XL automated DNA sequencer by Macrogen Europe (Amsterdam, The Netherlands). The evaluation of chromatograms was performed by using Chromas Lite v 2.01.
Multiple sequence alignments of the amplicons and nucleotides’ translation were performed using DNAMAN program (Version 5.2.2; Lynnon Biosoft, Quebec, Canada). A BLAST analysis was performed in GenBank to compare the published sequences with ours (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 24 June 2022) [25 (link)]. The DNAMAN program was used to build a phylogenetic tree based on the distance method using the neighbor-joining (NJ) algorithm of Saitou and Nei (1987) [26 (link)] with a bootstrap of 1000 iterations. Four msp4 amplicons were submitted to GenBank under accession numbers from MZ073666 to MZ073669.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!