The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Recorder usgh software

Manufactured by Avisoft
Sourced in Germany

Avisoft Recorder USGH software is a digital audio recording and analysis program. It allows users to record and analyze high-quality audio signals. The software supports various input sources and provides tools for signal processing and visualization.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using recorder usgh software

1

Ultrasonic Vocalizations in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ultrasonic vocalizations produced by the rats were recorded using four microphones (condenser ultrasound CM16/CMPA, frequency range 10–200 kHz, Avisoft Bioacoustics, Berlin, Germany) placed under the elevated platforms (Figure 1A). Data were acquired using UltraSoundGate 416H at a sampling rate of 250 kHz and 16-bit resolution using Avisoft-RECORDER USGH software (Avisoft Bioacoustics, Berlin, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Ultrasonic Vocalizations in Mouse Pups

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ultrasonic vocalizations were recorded using Avisoft UltraSoundGate microphone and Avisoft Recorder USGH software (version 4.2, Avisoft Bioacoustics, Glienicke, Germany) and spectrograms were analyzed using Avisoft SASLab Pro software (version 5.2, Avisoft Bioacoustics) as previously described (Brielmaier et al., 2012 (link); Berg et al., 2018 (link)). Since ultrasonic vocalizations can vary within a litter (Rieger and Dougherty, 2016 (link)), all pups in the litter were analyzed using litters of 6–8 animals. Briefly, pups at P7 were removed from their home cage, placed in a separate container of corn cob bedding within a sound attenuating chamber equipped with an Avisoft UltraSoundGate microphone. Ultrasonic vocalizations were recorded for a total of 3 min. After each recording period, body mass and temperature were recorded, after which pups were returned to their home cage. The temperature of the room was maintained at 22 ± 2°C. Ultrasonic calls were manually quantified by an experienced individual without knowledge of the experimental group. The total number of calls per pups over the 3-min recording period was averaged across all pups within the litter such that each litter was assigned a single total number of ultrasonic vocalizations that was used in statistical analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Female-Male Mouse Social Vocalizations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Female-Female Social Vocalization Test: Pairs of age- and genotype-matched, non-littermate, female mice were studied. Male-Female Social Vocalization Test: A wild-type or p-Ube3a-mKO male and an unfamiliar, sexually mature, wild-type female were studied. Mice were placed simultaneously (to avoid resident-intruder aggression) into a small novel clean 25.4 cm circular plastic chamber at room temperature inside an unlit sound isolation box for 5 minutes. Vocalizations were recorded with a condenser ultrasound microphone (Avisoft-Bioacoustics CM16/CMPA), an UltraSoundGate (Avisoft Bioacoustics 116Hb) and the Avisoft Recorder USGH software (Avisoft Bioacoustics). Avisoft-SASLab Pro software was used to quantify the number of vocalizations and the time spent vocalizing. The USV detection settings were: max frequency changes (3 pixels), frequency range limit (35 – 250 kHz), min whistle duration (10 ms), hold time (20 ms), min total duration (10 ms). Sampling rate is 250,000 Hz (at 976 Hz FFT size is 256 with 0% overlap). Simultaneous video recordings were made using a webcam mounted in the lid of the container. Physical interaction (direct contact) times were measured by a trained observer blinded to genotype.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Operant Conditioning Cage Setup for Rodent Behavior

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Experiments were conducted in a modular operant conditioning cage with a grid floor, pellet receptacle, and pellet dispenser (Behavioral Test Packages for Rat, Med Associates Inc., Fairfax, VT, USA) controlled by Med-PC® V software (version 5.08, Med Associates Inc.). Additionally, there was a USV condenser microphone CM16/CMPA (UltraSoundGate, Avisoft Bioacoustics, Glienicke/Nordbahn, Germany) placed in the glass ceiling of the cage and an ultrasonic speaker (Vifa, Avisoft Bioacoustics) placed in the corner of the cage, next to the pellet receptacle, connected to an UltraSoundGate Player 116 (Avisoft Bioacoustics). Both USV-playback and recording were performed using Avisoft Recorder USGH software (version 1.0.0.1, Avisoft Bioacoustics). The locomotor activity was recorded with a FLIR® camera (Teledyne FLIR LCC, Wilsonville, OR, USA) mounted behind or above the cage and controlled via Spinnaker® SDK software (version 1.15.0.63, Teledyne FLIR LCC, Wilsonville, OR, USA); home-cage activity was recorded with a Basler camera (acA1300-60gc, Basler AG, Ahrensburg, Germany) controlled via EthoVision XT software (version 10, Noldus, Wageningen, Netherlands). Non-flavored sucrose pellets weighing 45 mg (TestDiet®, St. Louis, MO, USA) were used as rewards in conditioning. The cage was cleaned and thoroughly wiped using 10% EtOH between animals.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Rat Pup Ultrasonic Vocalization Recording

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rat pup USVs were recorded in a sound‐attenuated chamber using the Avisoft UltraSoundGate 116 microphone and Avisoft‐RECORDER USGH software (version 4.2; Avisoft Bioacoustics; Glienicke/Nordbahn, Germany, Avisoft‐RECORDER, RRID:SCR_014436) located in a temperature controlled room (22.5 ± 1.5°C). The microphone was affixed to the upper lid of the recording chamber, at a vertical distance of 20.5 cm from its floor. The recording chamber was constructed with black PVC boards (20 × 24 × 12 cm) and was lined with sound‐absorbing foam to insulate the recording environment from external noise. A heating pad (37°C) was placed on the floor of the chamber before the recordings to prevent temperature fluctuations of the animals. Pups were taken out individually from the cage in random order and placed in a 600 mL beaker that was lined on its bottom with paper towels to minimize scratching noises that would interfere with their USV signals in the recording. The pup inside the beaker was placed into the chamber for a 3‐min recording. The audio signals were sampled at 250 kHz and stored as WAV files. After the recording, the beaker was cleaned thoroughly with 70% ethanol in between every recording to minimize effects on their USV because of olfactory cues.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Ultrasonic Vocalization Measurement in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ultrasonic vocalizations were recorded in customized sound-attenuating chambers that consisted of two boxes to minimize exterior noise (Fig. 2a; inside box: 60 × 42 × 42 cm, outside box: 68 × 50 × 51 cm). A condenser ultrasound microphone (Ultramic250K, Dodotronic, Italy) was positioned at the center of top of inside chambers and suspended ~2.5 cm from the top. The microphone signals were recorded using an Avisoft-RECORDER USGH software (Avisoft Bioacoustics, Glienicke, Germany) with a sampling rate 250 kHz and a 16-bit resolution. For 50-kHz USVs, the signals were band filtered between 38 and 60 kHz and analyzed using Avisoft SASLab Pro (version 4.2, Avisoft Bioacoustics). Spectrograms were generated with a fast Fourier transform length of 512 points and an overlap of 75 percent (FlatTop window, 100 percent frame size). The spectrograms had a frequency resolution of 490 Hz and a time resolution of 0.5 milliseconds. Animals were habituated for at least 30 minutes in the chambers prior to experiments. The USVs were recorded for 20 minutes as baseline and then recorded for 40 minutes after METH (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) administration. Data are expressed as number of 50-kHz USVs for 40 minutes after METH or during every 10-minute period for 60 minutes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Acoustic Stimuli and Rat Behavior

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One day after the conditioning, the rats were transferred into individual experimental cages, identical to home cages (plastic; 37 × 25 × 16 cm), and transported to the experimental room, where under white light, in the absence of the experimenter and other rats in the room, acoustic stimuli were presented through an ultrasonic speaker (Vifa, Avisoft Bioacoustics, Berlin, Germany), placed just above the shorter side of the cage, connected to an UltraSoundGate Player 116 (Avisoft Bioacoustics). USV emitted by the rat were recorded by a CM16/CMPA condenser microphone (UltraSoundGate, Avisoft Bioacoustics) placed 33 cm above the center of the cage floor, 20 cm away from the speaker. In this configuration, calls from the speaker were still visible in the recording (monitoring of playback), but they were distinctively weaker than USV emitted from the cage. Both playback and recording were performed using Avisoft Recorder USGH software (Avisoft Bioacoustics). The locomotor activity of the animal was recorded with a camera (acA1300-60gc, Basler AG, Ahrensburg, Germany) mounted above the cage and EthoVision XT software (version 10, Noldus, Wageningen, The Netherlands). Signals from radiotelemetric transmitters were collected by receivers located under the cage floor and then recorded by Ponemah software (version 6.32, Data Sciences International, St. Paul, MN, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Synchronized Multimodal Recordings of Rat Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The experimental setup consisted of a box (‘tickle box’) lined with black foam rubber, with a plexiglass separation wall in the middle. The bottom of the separation wall was a mesh wire stripe, allowing the animals to see, hear and smell each other. The experimental environment was kept dim (∼20 lx). Video material was recorded under infrared illumination with two or three cameras: a top view and a side view camera with 30 fps (Imaging Source, Germany), and a side view with 240 fps (H5PRO – modified GoPro Hero 5, Back-bone, Ottawa, Canada). Ultrasonic vocalizations were recorded with four microphones (condenser ultrasound CM16/CMPA, frequency range 10–200 kHz, Avisoft Bioacoustics, Berlin, Germany) at a sampling rate of 250 kHz and with a 16-bit resolution using Avisoft-RECORDER USGH software (Avisoft Bioacoustics, Berlin, Germany). The microphone positioning enabled assigning calls to demonstrator and observer rat, respectively. The audio recording, video recording and electrophysiological recording were synchronized using TTL pulses. The setup is illustrated in Figure 1A.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!