The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

17 protocols using carbon tab

1

SEM Analysis of Film Specimen

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A small film specimen was carefully deposited onto carbon tabs (Agar Scientific, Stansted, UK) and coated with carbon (Agar turbo carbon coater) to improve conductivity. Scanning electron microscope analysis (SEM) was performed on a FEI Quanta 3D 200 dual beam Focused Ion Beam Scanning Electron Microscope (FIB-SEM). The images were acquired using secondary electron imaging at an accelerating voltage of 5–15 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Particle Size and Shape Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To characterize particle size/shape, Scanning Electron Microscope EVO LS 15 (Zeiss, Rugby, UK) was used. The powders were scattered onto the surface of aluminum stubs (6 mm height/12.5 mm disc diameter) (Agar scientific, Stansted, UK) using carbon tabs (Agar scientific, UK), followed by a layer of gold coating (15 nm thickness). The samples were measured at four magnifications (30×, 100×, 500× and 1000×).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Visualizing Ionic Gold Effects on Pseudomonas

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All P. aeruginosa strains were inoculated in 10 mL TSB and incubated overnight at 37 °C with constant shaking (200 rpm). After incubation, the optical density of the bacterial suspension was adjusted to 0.5 (OD600 nm) and treated with ionic gold at the predetermined MIC concentration, for 2 h and 18 h. An untreated aliquot was used as a negative control. The cultures were centrifuged for 7 min at 1721 × g and washed with PBS. Aliquots of 25 μL of culture were placed on sterile stainless steel (316L) (1 cm × 1 cm) and dried for 1 h at room temperature. The samples were immersed in 4% glutaraldehyde (Agar Scientific, UK) at 4 ºC for 18 h. The samples were dehydrated by sequential submersion in an ethanol gradient of increasing concentrations (10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, 90% and absolute ethanol). The dehydrated samples were placed onto carbon tabs (Agar Scientific, UK). Samples were dried by desiccation over 24 h and were sputter coated with gold (Polaron, UK) for 30 s (parameters: power 5 mA, 30 s, 800 V, vacuum 0.09 mbar, argon gas) prior to imaging using a JEOL JSM 5600LV scanning electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Egg Damage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A descriptive approach was used to observe potential damage to the egg morphology caused by the removal of eggs using tape by making observations through scanning electron microscopy (6010LV, JEOL (UK) Ltd., Herts, UK). Sections (10 mm2) of egg loaded tape of each type and treatment, plus controls, was cut away and attached to 12.5 mm SEM stubs using carbon tabs (Agar Scientific Ltd., Essex, UK). Samples were then coated in gold for 4 min (~ 4 nm) using a sputter coater (Q150R ES, Quorum Technologies Ltd., East Sussex, UK). Eggs were left in situ throughout this process. Samples were viewed in high vacuum mode where accelerated voltage = 10 kV, WD = 12 and spot size = 50.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Bread Crust Microstructural Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bread crust samples were cut in circular shapes (⍉10 mm) and carefully deposited onto carbon tabs (Agar Scientific, Stansted, UK), coated with carbon (Agar turbo carbon coater) and placed on the stage of a FEI Quanta 3D 200 dual beam Focused Ion Beam Scanning Electron Microscope (FIM-SEM, FEI, Hillsboro, USA). Images were acquired using secondary electron imaging at an accelerating voltage of 5–15 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Tracheal Cartilage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples (two to three cartilage rings in length) from newborn piglet tracheas were fixed in modified Karnovsky's fixative (2% paraformaldehyde, 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.05 M sodium cacodylate buffer, pH 7.2) for 24 h at 4 °C. Postfixation was performed in 1% OsO4 at 4 °C three times with intervening 1% thiocarbohydrazide steps. The samples were dehydrated with increasing concentrations of ethanol followed by hexamethyldisilazane that was allowed to evaporate. Samples were mounted on aluminum specimen pin stubs (Cat# AGG301, Agar Scientific, Stansted, Essex, UK) with carbon tabs (Cat# AGG3347N, Agar Scientific, Stansted, Essex, UK) and conductive silver paint (Cat# 16040-30, Ted Pella, Redding, CA). To decrease charging, samples were sputter-coated with palladium before imaging at 3 kV in a field emission scanning electron microscope (Zeiss DSM 982 Gemini or Zeiss Leo Ultra 55, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Freeze-Drying Hydrogel Structural Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The as‐synthesized hydrogels were allowed to swell in deionized water for 24 h before being placed into a freezer, set at −80°C, for 1 h, to maintain the swollen structure of the gels. The frozen samples were subsequently freeze dried in an Edwards EF4 Modulyo vacuum freeze dryer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, UK). The freeze‐dried samples were mounted onto aluminum stubs using carbon tabs (Agar Scientific, UK) and then gold‐coated using an Emitech K550X sputter‐coater set at 40 mA for 1 min. The morphology of the hydrogels was then observed with a Zeiss EVO 50 field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM), using an acceleration voltage of 20.0 kV, a spot size of 400 and a working distance of 24.5 mm. Average pore size diameters were calculated using ImageJ software (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

FIB-SEM Imaging of Powder Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A small amount of powder was carefully deposited onto carbon tabs (Agar Scientific, Stansted, UK), coated with carbon (Agar turbo carbon coater) and placed on the stage of a FEI Quanta 3D 200 dual beam Focused Ion Beam Scanning Electron Microscope (FIB-SEM; FEI, Hillsboro, USA). Images were acquired using secondary electron imaging at an accelerating voltage of 5–15 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Effect of Holding Temperature on PDMS-PEEK Curing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess the effect of holding temperature on cure rate and geometrical accuracy, PDMS-PEEK cylindrical samples (Ø14.5 mm and thickness 6.25 mm) were held in an oven (WF200, Lenton, U.K.) at 70°C (same as in previously study) and 150°C (in-line with manufacturer's recommendation) until full cure, before being removed and left to cool at RT [21] (link). Specimen dimensions were then measured with Vernier calliper (Digital 150 mm, Duratool, U.K.).
Sections of spatially graded PDMS-PEEK composites were removed by scalpel and placed onto aluminium stubs (Agar Scientific, Stansted, U.K.) pre-installed with carbon tabs (Agar Scientific, U.K.) and sputter-coated for 60 s with Au-Pd (80:20). Topology and cross-sectional area of virgin specimens were then captured with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (TM3030, Hitachi, Düsseldorf, DEU) and then assessed by ImageJ software to determine strut feature size of the specimens. N=5 samples per composite material were employed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Biocomposites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The scanning electron microscope was used to observe the surface morphology of G∕C∕P biocomposites. Samples were attached to aluminum SEM stubs using carbon tabs (Agar Scientific). Specimens were sputter coated with gold prior to examination using a HITACHI®S-3000N scanning electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!