The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using af2724

1

Exosome Protein Characterization by Western Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isolated or immunocaptured exosomes were tested for the presence of CD63, CD81, CD34, GAPDH, CD200, CD44 and CD105 using western blots as previously described [14] (link). Briefly, 10 µg of exosomes were lysed with Laemmli sample buffer (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA), separated on 7–15% SDS/PAGE gels and transferred onto PVDF membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) for western blot analysis. Membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with antibodies specific for: CD63 (1∶200, sc-15363, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), CD34 (1∶2000, ab81289, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), CD81 (1∶200, PA5-13582, Thermo Fisher, Pittsburgh, PA, USA), GAPDH (1∶500, FL-335, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), CD200 (1∶2000, AF2724, R&D, Minneapolis, MN, USA), CD44 (1∶1000, ab41478, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), CD105 (1∶1000, ab169545, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), platelet IIb/IIIa (1∶200, sc-73544, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Next, the HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1∶5000, Pierce, Thermo Fisher, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) was added for 1 hr at room temperature (RT) and blots were developed with ECL detection reagents (GE Healthcare Biosciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). The intensities of the bands on exposed films were quantified using Image J software (NIH, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Immunophenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For flow cytometry analysis, followed by dissociation of the expanded MSCs, 1 × 105 cells were suspended in 100 μl of 2% FBS in PBS and incubated with primary antibody (diluted 200×) (CD45-PE-CyTM7 (368510, Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA); CD90-APC (328114, Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA); CD29-APC (17-0299-42, Invitrogen, USA); CD105-PE (85-12-1057-42, eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA); and CD200 (0.25 μg/106 cells, AF2724, R&D Systems, USA); Msx1 (diluted 200×, NBP2-57969, NOVUS, USA).) for 1 h on ice. The cells were then washed and suspended in 100 μl of 2% FBS in PBS containing secondary antibody (diluted 1000×) for 30 min on ice. Fluorescence was detected using a CytoFLEX S flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter) and data were analyzed using the FlowJo software. Gating strategy used for analyses is available in Supplementary Fig. 14.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Staining for CD200L and CD200R

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The procedure for staining tissue sections for CD200L and CD200R was adapted from Cawkwellet al. [9 (link)]. Antibodies were a polyclonal goat CD200L antibody (AF2724; R&D Systems, Abingdon, UK), normal goat IgG control (AB-108-C; R&D Systems), mouse monoclonal IgG1 anti-human CD200R (OX108, MCA 2282T; AbD Serotec/Bio-Rad, Kidlington, UK) and mouse monoclonal control IgG1 antibody (MOPC-21, 400101; Biolegend, London, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!