The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

14 protocols using imipenem

1

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Susceptibility of isolates to various antibiotics was determined by Disk Diffusion Agar and Broth microdilution methods as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [18 ].
The following antibiotic disks (Mast Diagnostics- UK), were tested: Amikacin (AK), Gentamicin (GM), Meropenem (MEM), Imipenem (IMI), Ceftazidime (CAZ), Cefepime (CMP) and Polymixine B (PB). Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as a control for susceptibility testing.
The MICs of Amikacin (Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, USA) and Ceftazidime (Jaber Ebne Hayyan Co, Iran) were determined by CLSI broth microdilution method (MIC range,0.5 to 256 μg/ml). P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were used as a control for quality assurance of the test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Isolation of Bacteria from Root Rhizospheres

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isolation of the bacteria from root rhizospheres was performed following the methods of Bollet et al. (32 (link)) with slight modifications. About 1 g of the plant root sections were collected and inoculated into 10 mL of nutrient broth (bio-Merieux, Marcy-l’Etoile, France), supplemented with 0.5 mg of DL-methionine (Sigma Chemicals, South Africa) per mL. After 24 hours of incubation at 37°C, 0.1 mL was inoculated unto Mueller Hinton agar, spread to dry using a glass spreader, and allowed to stand for 15 minutes. Thereafter, four discs of 10 µg imipenem (MAST Diagnostics, Merseyside, UK) were aseptically placed on the surface of the inoculated agar. After 18 hours of incubations at 37°C, colonies that grew around the disc were subcultured for purity and subjected to preliminary identification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibiogram Assay of Salmonella Species

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2017 guidelines [13 ], an antibiogram assay was performed on the isolated Salmonella spp. colonies. The antibiotic discs contained nalidixic acid (30 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), cotrimoxazole (25 μg), ampicillin (10 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), cefixime (5 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), ceftizoxime (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), cefepime (30 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), azithromycin (15 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg) and imipenem (10 μg) (Mast Diagnostics, United Kingdom).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We determined antimicrobial drug susceptibility by the disk-diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton agar plates as recommended by the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute [19 ]. We tested the following antimicrobial agents: ampicillin 10 μg, tetracycline 30 μg, oxy-tetracycline 30 μg, which were used in the farms and the following agents used in the management of E.coli infections; amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 10 μg, cephalothin 30 μg, cefotaxime 30 μg, ceftazidime 30 μg, imipenem 10 μg, norfloxacin 10 μg, ciprofloxacin 5 ug, enrofloxacin 5 μg, amikacin 30 ug, chloramphenicol 10 μg, kanamycin 30 μg, streptomycin 10 μg, gentamicin 10 μg and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (cotrimoxazole) 25 μg (Mast Diagnostics). Results obtained were used to classify isolates as being resistant or susceptible to a particular antibiotic using standard reference values [19 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of A. baumannii

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed on Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) (Merck, Co., Germany) by agar disk diffusion (DD) method as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI document M100-S14) [17 ]. The tested antibiotics were as follows: amikacin (AK; 30 μg), ciprofloxacin (CP; 5 μg), ceftazidime (CAZ; 30 μg), gentamicin (GM; 10 μg), imipenem (IMP; 10 μg), meropenem (MER; 10 μg) and piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ; 100/10 μg) (MAST diagnostics, Merseyside, UK). A. baumannii ATCC 17978 was used as a positive quality control (PQC) and P. aeruginosa ATCC 25853 and E. coli ATCC 25922 were used as a negative quality control (NQC) in this study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antimicrobial Activity of Camel Lactoferrins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Standard discs of 17 antibiotics were obtained from Mast Diagnostics (Merseyside, Liverpool, UK) to be used in this assay; amikacin (30 µg), ampicillin (10 µg), augmentin (30 µg), aztreonam (30 µg), cefoxitin (30 µg), cefepime (30 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), cephalothin (30 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), cotrimoxazole (25 µg), fucidic acid (10 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), imipenem (10 µg), oxacillin (1 µg), piperacillin (100 µg), and vancomycin (30 µg).
Antimicrobial activity of four cLfs isolated from milk of four different breeds of Saudi camels (cLf1, cLf2, cLf3, and cLf4), bLf, hLf, and the standard antibiotics against S. typhimurium and S. sonnei was tested by agar disc-diffusion technique. Plates of Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar were overlaid with 2 × 106 CFU/ml of Salmonella typhimurium LT2 and Shigella sonnei. Wells of about 5 mm diameter were made on inoculated plates then different concentrations of lactoferrins (0.00, 0.125, 0.250, 0.50, 0.750, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, and 3 mg/ml) were added, and left to diffuse in agar at 4 °C for 2 h before plates finally incubated overnight at 37 °C. The diameters of clear inhibition zones were measured in millimeters. Antibacterial effects of different lactoferrins on growth of S. typhimurium and S. sonnei after 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h of incubation at 37 °C were monitored spectrophotometrically (measuring OD at 620 nm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antibiotic Resistance Profiling of Shigella spp.

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic resistance of Shigella spp. isolates was determined using the disk diffusion method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2016 guidelines.9 The antibiotic discs used contained cotrimoxazole (25 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), ampicillin (10μg), ceftizoxime (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), cefixime (5 μg), cefotaxime (30μg), tetracycline (30 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), nalidixic acid (30 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), azithromycin (15 μg) and imipenem (10 μg) (Mast Diagnostics, Bootle, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antimicrobial Resistance Profiling of E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 67 isolates were selected which included one representative E. coli isolate per product type found from each supplier and tested further for antimicrobial resistance or susceptibility against seven antibiotic classes using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion technique (Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute [CLSI], 2018). The antibiotics included ampicillin (10 µg), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid/augmentin (20 µg/10 µg), amoxicillin (10 µg), trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole/cotrimoxazole (1.25 µg/23.75 µg), cefoxitin (30 µg), cefepime (30 µg), imipenem (10 µg), neomycin (10 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), gentamycin (10 µg), and chloramphenicol (30 µg) (Mast Diagnostics, Randburg, South Africa ) (CLSI, 2018) . Break points measured were compared to those outlined by the CLSI (2018) for Enterobacteriaceae. Isolates resistant to three or more antimicrobial classes were regarded as multidrug resistant. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was included as a control (CLSI, 2018).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline (10 ), using the Kirby Bauer disk diffusion assay on Mueller-Hinton agar. The susceptibility profiles were determined for seven antibiotics including piperacillin (PIP, 100 µg), cefotaxime (CTX, 30 µg), ceftazidime (CAZ, 30 µg), gentamicin (GE N, 10 µg), amikacin (AMK, 30 µg), ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 µg), and imipenem (IPM, 10 µg) (Mast Diagnostics, Mast Group Ltd, Merseyside, UK). Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27835 was used as quality control in each antimicrobial susceptibility assay. The results were interpreted as susceptible or resistance according to the criteria recommended by the CLSI and the manufacture’s protocols (Mast Companies, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Bacterial Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
According to the clinical and laboratory standards Institute protocol (CLSI; M100-S14) [13 ], the antibiotic susceptibility was tested by disk agar diffusion method on the Mueller-Hinton agar plates (MHA) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for ceftazidime (CAZ: 30 µg), cefotaxime (CTX: 30 µg), imipenem (IPM: 10 µg), meropenem (MEM: 10 µg), ciprofloxacin (CIP: 5 µg), cefepime (FEP: 30 µg), ceftriaxone (CRO: 30 µg), amikacin (AN: 30 µg), gentamicin (GM; 10 µg), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT; 5 µg) (MAST Diagnostics, Merseyside, UK).
Strains non-susceptible to at least three or more antimicrobial classes were defined as MDR, and those non-susceptible to at least one agent in all but two or more antimicrobial categories were considered as possible XDR, and the strains that non-susceptibility to all agents in all antimicrobial categories were defined as possible pan drug-resistant (PDR) [14 (link)]. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as control organism in susceptibility testing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!