The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

33 protocols using hinfi

1

Genomic DNA Extraction and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All genomic DNA was extracted and purified using AxyPrep Blood Genomic DNA Miniprep Kit (Axygen) according to manufacturer’s instructions. DNA concentration was measured by Nanodrop-2000. For 2D agarose gel analysis, 10μg DNA was digested overnight at 37°C with 10U HinfI (Thermo Fisher), 10U RsaI (Thermo Fisher) and 2μg/mL RNase A (Takara). The reaction was terminated with EDTA and analyzed by 2D agarose gel electrophoresis. 30U RecJf (New England Biolabs) was added for removing 5' single-stranded DNA.
For internal gaps/nicks analysis, 5μg genomic DNA was digested overnight at 37°C with 5U HinfI (Thermo Fisher), 5U RsaI (Thermo Fisher) and 1μg/mL Ribonuclease A (RNase A, Takara) and purified with QIAquick PCR Purification kit (Qiagen). Purified DNA were digested with or without 200U Exonuclease III (New England Biolabs) overnight at 37°C, and then subjected to 0.7% agarose gel electrophoresis and in gel hybridization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genotyping Tomato Chromosome 9 Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For saturation of the shr locus, 14 SSR markers from Kazusa DNA Research Institute (http://www.kazusa.or.jp/tomato/, Shirasawa et al., 2010a (link),b (link)),10 SSR markers from Veg Marks a DNA marker database for vegetables (http://vegmarks.nivot.affrc.go.jp, Last accessed in 2013) and 7 CAPS markers viz., At3g63190, C2_At4g02580, C2_At2g29210, C2_At4g02680, C2_At1g02910, C2_At4g03200, and U228448 (http://solgenomics.net) that were specific to chromosome 9 were selected and screened for polymorphism between the parental lines of mapping population (Supplementary Tables 24 for marker details). For amplification of CAPS region, 30 ng genomic DNA, 1 μL of 5 pM/ μL primer, 1X PCR buffer (10 mM Tris, 5 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.1% (w/v) gelatin, 0.005% (v/v) Tween-20, 0.005% (v/v) Np-40, pH 8.8, 0.2 mM dNTPs and 1 μL Taq polymerase were used. After confirming PCR amplification for CAPS locus by agarose gel electrophoresis, the PCR amplicons of the CAPS markers were digested using ApoI, Hinf I, DraI and MspI (Fermentas) enzymes. Digestion reactions performed according to the supplier's manual and the products were separated on 3.5% (w/v) agarose gels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Detecting HFE Gene Mutations in Hemochromatosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA of patients was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes and quantified with NanoDrop 2000c spectrophotometer, Thermo Scientific. The Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) was performed to amplify regions of exons 2 and 4 of the gene that codifies for the human hemochromatosis protein (HFE). Exon 2 was amplified with the forward primer (E2F, ACATGGTTAAGGCCTGTTGC 5'- 3') and the reverse primer E2R (GCCACATCTGGCTTGAAATT 5'-3'), and exon 4 with the foward primer E4F (TGCCTCCTTTGGTGAAGGTGAC 5'-3') and the reverse primer E4R (CTCAGGCACTCCTCTCAACC 5'-3'). All primers were manufactured by Eurofins MWG Operon. PCR products of exon 2 were digested with the restriction enzymes Bcl I (Jena Bioscience, Jena, Germany), and Hinf I (Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania), to detect mutations H63D and S65C, respectively. PCR products of exon 4 were digested with the restriction enzyme Afa I (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). PCR products were analyzed by eletrophoresis in non-denaturing 8% polyacrylamide gel stained with ethidium bromide.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Bacterial 16S rRNA Gene Cloning and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ligation and transformation of amplified 16S rRNA genes were performed as previously described [38 (link)], ultimately resulting in 16 bacterial clone libraries. For each clone library, 450 putative positive transformants were picked randomly and immersed in 30 μL of deionized H2O, and subjected to three cycles of freezing and thawing for the preparation of plasmid templates. Cloned 16S rRNA genes were re-amplified using the primer pair T7 and SP6. PCR reactions were performed in a 20 μL mixture with 0.4 μM of each primer and 1 μL of template DNA using a Taq PCR Kit (Tiangen Biotech, China) with the same PCR conditions as amplification of community DNA, with the exception that only 30 cycles were performed. Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis was used to distinguish and classify cloned 16S rRNA gene sequences. A total of 6753 positive PCR products were restricted using the enzymes HinfI and Csp6 (Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania) at 37°C for 3.5h. Restriction digests (10μL) were examined on 3.0% (w/v) agarose gels, and unique restriction patterns were identified visually. Representatives of each restriction pattern were chosen for sequencing using the vector primer pair T7 and SP6 by the Major Biotech Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

TLR4 Polymorphism Genotyping Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

TLR4 A896G (Asp299Gly, rs4986790) and TLR4 C1196T (Thr399Ile, rs4986791) polymorphisms were performed according to Folwaczny et al. [29 (link)] with modifications. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed in 10 μL final volume with 10 ng of DNA, 1.0 ng of each primer, 3.33 mM of MgCl2, 0.16 mM of dNTP (Invitrogen®, Frederick, MD, USA), 1X PCR buffer (5X Green GoTaq® Flexi Buffer, Promega, USA), and 0.75 U of Taq Polymerase (GoTaq® DNA Polymerase, Promega, USA). Cycles were performed in the Veriti thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems): one minute at 95°C; 35 cycles of 30 seconds at 95°C, 45 seconds at 60°C (to TLR4 A896G) or 62° (to TLR4 C1196T), and one minute at 72°C; at the end, 10 minutes at 72°C. PCR products were digested for 10 minutes at 37°C with NcoI (Fermentas, Canada) for TLR4 A896G and for 60 minutes at 37°C with HinfI (Fermentas, Canada) for TLR4 C1196T. The results were observed by electrophoresis on 3.5% agarose gel with SYBR Safe (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) and visualized under UV light.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Two-Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis of DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Briefly, 10 μg of genomic DNA was digested with RsaI and HinfI (Fermentas, Thermo Scientific) and loaded onto a 0.4% agarose gel61 . Electrophoresis was carried out in 1 × TBE at 1 V cm−1 for 12 h at room temperature. The lane containing DNA was excised from the gel and the gel buffer was exchanged with 1 × TBE with 0.3 μg ml−1 ethidium bromide (EB) (Sigma). The gel slice was placed and cast with 1% agarose gel in 1 × TBE containing 0.3 μg ml−1 EB. The gel was run at 4 °C for 6 h at 3 V cm−1 (refs 62 (link), 63 (link)). The hybridization was performed as above. For the ExoI experiment, genomic DNA was treated with 20 units of Exo I (NEB) for 2 h prior to 2D gel electrophoresis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Bacterial Identification via RFLP Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total DNA was extracted by GUTC (Guanidinium-Tris-CDTA buffer with celite) method (Terefework et al., 2001 (link)) from purified bacteria. 16S rDNA and intergenic spacer region (IGS) of the strains were amplified for restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Primer pairs P1, P6 and pHr(F), p23SR01(R) (Table 1) were used for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification. Amplification products (5 μl) were digested separately by four restriction enzymes HinfI, TaqI, MspI, and HaeIII following the manufacturer's instructions (Fermentas, EU). The fragments were separated by gel electrophoreses in 2% agarose with 0.5 μg ml−1 ethidium bromide at 80 V for 3 h and photographed. Amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis (ARDRA) and IGS-RFLP were done by combining the results from the four restrictions. Clustered analysis of combined ARDRA and IGS-RFLP (CACAI) was conducted by UPGM clustering algorithm in the NTSYS program (Rohlf, 1990 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Molecular Identification of Keratinophilic Fungi

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ITS1, 5.8S, and ITS2 regions were amplified using the conserved primers ITS1 (5’-TCCGTAGTGGAACCTGCGG-3’) and ITS4 (5’ TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3’)33 (link). Each PCR mixture (30 μL) contained 1 μL of genomic DNA, 1 μL of 50 pmol of each primer, 12 μL of distilled water and 15 μL of Taq PCR Master Mix Kit (Qiagen). Reaction mixtures were preheated to 95 °C for 15 min, and then 30 PCR cycles were performed under the following conditions: 95 °C for 1 min; 56 °C for 1 min; and 72 °C for 1 min. The thermal cycles were finalized by polymerization at 72 °C for 10 min34 (link). Detection of PCR products was performed by electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide and visualized by UV light. Ninety-nine PCR products of the analysed keratinophilic fungi and reference strains obtained using the ITS1 and ITS4 sets of primers were digested with the HinfI (Fermentas) restriction enzyme at 37 °C for 2 h, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Digested fragments were separated by electrophoresis in an 8% polyacrylamide gel, stained with ethidium bromide and visualized by UV light. Additionally, traditional identification was confirmed by sequencing selected PCR products (ITS1-5.8S rDNA-ITS4) of A. keratinophilus strains. The results obtained were compared with GenBank data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

MTHFR C677T Genotyping Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The genotyping of MTHFR C677T was performed with slight changes to the protocol of Reljic et al. [26 (link)].
The primers set used for MTHFR C677T genotyping were:
Forward: 5′- TGAAGGAGAAGGTGTCTGGGGGA-3′
Reverse: 5′- AGGACGGTGCGGTGAGAGTG-3′.
The PCR conditions were 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 61 °C and 1 min at 72 °C, for 30 cycles. The final extension was at 72 °C for 2 min. The amplified DNA fragment had 198 bp. The PCR product was digested by 1 U of HinfI (Fermentas, St. Leon-Rot, Germany) restriction endonuclease for 16 h. Digested fragments were electrophoresed through 3% agarose gels stained with GreenSafe Premium (NZYTech, Lisbon, Portugal). Homozygous wild type CC genotype was identified by the non-digested fragment of 198 bp; homozygous TT genotype was identified by two digested fragments of 175 bp and 23 bp; heterozygous CT genotype was defined by presence of all fragments 198 bp, 175 bp and 23 bp.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Bacterial 16S rDNA Profiling by RFLP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from purified endophytic bacterial strains, following the procedure by Chen et al. (2018 (link)). Then, full length 16S rDNA was PCR amplified by the primer pairs 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492R (5′-TACGGCTACCTTGTTACGAC TT-3′) in a 30 μL PCR reaction mixture by the following procedure: one cycle at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 50°C for 30 s, 72°C for 2 min, and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. The PCR products (~1,500 bp) were checked in 1% agarose gel and purified for restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. Three restriction enzymes (HaeIII, Hinf I, and TaqI) were used for the digestion of 16S rDNA, following the manufacturer's instructions (Fermentas, EU). Fragments from the digestion were separated by gel electrophoresis in 2% agarose at 80 V for 3 h and photographed. The 16S rDNA-RFLP analysis was carried out by combining the results of three restriction enzymes. Then, the cluster analysis of 16S rDNA-RFLP was conducted by the UPGM clustering algorithm in a NTSYS program (Chen et al., 2018 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!