The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

16 protocols using levofloxacin

1

Antibiotic Susceptibility of Cefotaxime-Resistant E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic susceptibility of cefotaxime-resistant E. coli isolates was determined by using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion susceptibility test according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (CLSI, 2017). The susceptibility against eleven antibiotics, including ceftazidime (CAZ: 30 µg), ceftazidime/clavulanic acid (CAZ/CLA: 30/10 µg), cefotaxime (CTX: 30 µg), cefotaxime/clavulanic acid (CTX/CLA: 30/10 µg), cefepime (CPM: 30 µg), amikacin (AK: 30 µg), gentamicin (GM: 30 µg), ciprofloxacin (CIP: 5 µg), levofloxacin (LVX: 5 µg), ertapenem (ETP: 10 µg), imipenem (IMP: 10 µg) (all from MastGroup Ltd., Merseyside, United Kingdom) were examined. E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as a control sample. The double-disk synergy test (DDST) was performed according to the CLSI guidelines to detect ESBL producing isolates. Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603 and E. coli ATCC 25922 were used as positive and negative controls in the DDST method, respectively. Every strain that was resistant against at least one agent in three or more antibiotic classes, considered as the Multi-Drug Resistant (MDR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antibiotic Susceptibility Test of CRAB

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotics susceptibility of isolates was determined using the disk diffusion method according to CLSI guidelines [17 ] and against the following antibiotics: imipenem (10 mg), ceftazidime (30 mg), ceftriaxone (30 mg), amikacin (30 mg), gentamicin (10 mg), tetracycline (30 mg), piperacillin/tazobactam (110 mg), ampicillin/sulbactam (20 mg), ciprofloxacin (5 mg), levofloxacin (5 mg) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (25 mg) (Mast Group Ltd, UK). The CRAB was defined when the isolate was resistant to imipenem [16 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Acinetobacter baumannii

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method against the following antibiotic discs according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines [28 ]. Microbial susceptibility test was conducted using the following antimicrobials: gentamicin (10 μg), tobramycin (10 μg), amikacin (30 μg), imipenem (10 μg), meropenem (10 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), piperacillin/tazobactam (100/10 μg), ampicillin/sulbactam (10/10 μg) and levofloxacin (5 μg) (Mast Group Ltd., Bootle Merseyside, UK). Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC 19606 was used as the quality control strain in antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antimicrobial Resistance Profiling of K. pneumoniae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eight K. pneumoniae isolates were received from the Medical Microbiology laboratories of three hospitals in Armenia between January 2019 and August 2019. All isolates were recovered from various clinical specimens (urine, sputum, throat, blood, and stool) of hospitalized patients. The isolates were identified using a matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) as described previously (59 (link)).
All isolates were tested using a disk diffusion method for susceptibility to a panel of 11 antibiotics, including ampicillin (10 mg), piperacillin-tazobactam (30/6 mg), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (20 and 10 mg, respectively), ceftazidime (10 mg), cefepime (30 mg), norfloxacin (10 mg), levofloxacin (5 mg), amikacin (30 mg), imipenem (10 mg), meropenem (10 mg), and chloramphenicol (30 mg) (Mast Group, Merseyside, United Kingdom) according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing protocol (EUCAST v.6.0, 2017) (60 ). The antibiotics chosen were those most frequently used in clinical settings in Armenia. Isolates resistant to three or more antibiotic classes were considered multidrug resistant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed by using Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute recommendations (CLSI) [8 ]. The antimicrobial disks tested were ampicillin (AMP), cefoxitin (FOX), cefazolin (CFZ), ceftriaxone (CRO), cefotaxime (CTX), ceftazidime (CAZ), cefepime (FEP), amoxicillin-clavulanate (AMC), aztreonam (ATM), gentamicin (GEN), streptomycin (STR), amikacin (AMK), nalidixic acid (NAL), ofloxacin (OFX), ciprofloxacin (CIP), levofloxacin (LVX), chloramphenicol (CHL), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), tetracycline (TET), azithromycin (AZM), imipenem (IPM) and meropenem (MEM) (Mast Co., Bootle, Merseyside, UK). Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as the quality control strain. The MDR was defined as resistance to 3 or more unrelated antibiotics [9 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antibiotic Resistance Profiling of Bacterial Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The resistance pattern of isolates against 15 antibiotics including 5 fluoroquinolones was determined by disc diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton agar (Merck, Germany) as described by the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI 2017) guidelines36 . The antibiotic disks used were as follows: amikacin (30 μg), aztreonam (30 μg), cefepime (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), gatifloxacin (5 μg), norfloxacin (5 μg), gentamycin (10 μg), imipenem (10 μg), levofloxacin (5 μg), ofloxacin (5 μg), piperacillin (100 μg), piperacillin/tazobactam (100 μg/10 μg), and tobramycin (10 μg) (MAST Co., Berkshire, UK). Drug-resistant patterns were defined as follows: MDR isolates (resistant to at least three antibiotics belonging to different chemical classes), XDR strains (resistant to at least one agent in all but two or fewer antimicrobial groups), and PDR strains (resistant to all antimicrobial classes)37 (link). E. coli ATCC 25922 and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were used as quality control strains.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The profile of this test was investigated based on CLSI [30 (link)] and EUCAST guidelines [31 ] using VITEK 2 compact system (Biomerieux, Craponne, France) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions and Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method [32 (link)] for different antibiotics, including Ampicillin, Piperacillin-Tazobactam, Amoxiclav, Ceftriaxone, Cefotaxime, Ceftazidime, Cefepime, Meropenem, Amikacin, Ciprofloxacin and Levofloxacin (Mast Group, Bootle, England).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling of Bacterial Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the isolates was determined by the disk agar diffusion method on Muller Hinton agar (Merck, Germany) according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines21. The antibiotics included piperacillin (100 µg), piperacillin-tazobactam (100/10 µg), imipenem (10 µg), meropenem (10 µg), doripenem (10 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), levofloxacin (5 µg), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1.25-23.75 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), and cefepime (30 µg) (MAST Co., England). The susceptibility pattern of the isolates against aminoglycosides including kanamycin, amikacin, spectinomycin, netilmicin, gentamicin, streptomycin, and tobramycin was determined using the micro-broth dilution method according to the CLSI guidelines21. For interpretation of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values, we referred to the CLSI guidelines and previous studies1,21,22. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and A. baumannii ATCC 19606 were used as control strains for antibiotic susceptibility testing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of isolates was performed based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI 2022) on Mueller–Hinton agar [22 ]. Antibiotic discs based on the CLSI 2022 were chosen and included in the current study: Meropenem (10 mg), Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 mg), Levofloxacin (5 mg), Ampicillin/Sulbactam (10/10 µg), Piperacillin/Tazobactam (PTZ, 100 /10 µg), and Minocycline (30 mg) (Mast Group Ltd., UK) which was determined using Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method supplementary Fig. 1 (S1). The MICs for Ceftazidime and Chloramphenicol were determined using the E-test method (S2) based on CLSI 2022.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antibiotic Susceptibility of E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All 12 isolates were tested for their antibiotic susceptibility to a panel of 11 antibiotics, including ampicillin (10 mg), piperacillin-tazobactam (30/6 mg), amoxicillin and clavulanic acid (20/10 mg), ceftazidime (10 mg), cefepime (30 mg), norfloxacin (10 mg), levofloxacin (5 mg), amikacin (30 mg), imipenem (10 mg), meropenem (10 mg), and chloramphenicol (30 mg) (Mast Group, Merseyside, UK), using a disk diffusion method, according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing protocol (57 ). The antibiotics chosen were those that are the most frequently used in clinical settings in Armenia. E. coli isolates were identified as “ESBL-producing” upon the confirmation of their resistance to cefepime and ceftazidime antibiotics.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!