The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using cd11b fitc clone m1 70

1

Assessing Macrophage Polarization and Mitochondrial ROS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess the polarization of macrophages, LPS-treated macrophages were incubated for 24 hours. Cells were incubated with anti-mouse CD16/CD32 Ab, followed by cell surface staining with CD11b-FITC (clone M1/70, Thermo Fisher), F4/80-PerCPCy5.5 (clone BM8, Thermo Fisher), and CD11c-AF700 (clone N418, Thermo Fisher). After fixation and permeabilization, intracellular NOS2 was stained with NOS2-PE eF610 (clone CXNFT, Thermo Fisher).
To test the levels of mtROS, macrophages were incubated with MitoSOX (5 μM) and LPS for 12 hours and washed. Data from FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences) were analyzed with FlowJo software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After splenocyte recovery treatment, aliquots of 106~108 cells/mL assessed using Trypan Blue were stained with saturating amounts of CD3-FITC (clone 17A2), CD4-eFlour 450 (clone GK1.5), CD19-PerCP-Cyanine5.5 (clone eBio1D3), and CD11b-FITC (clone M1/70) antibodies (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for 30 min at 4 °C, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The eBioscience™ Fixable Viability Dye was used for staining dead cells. After permeabilization, samples were washed twice, resuspended with PBS and immediately analyzed on an LSRFortessa Flow Cytometer (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The flow data were processed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Inc., Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Tumor-Immune Landscape

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single cell suspensions were prepared from freshly isolated CT26-HER2 tumors and spleens at sacrifice. The tumor specimens were minced and digested with collagenase (1 mg/mL) for 1 h at 37 °C. The resulting cell suspensions were passed through 70 μm cell strainer and rinsed with flow cytometry buffer (PBS+2% FBS). Spleens were processed directly by means of the cell strainer, and the red blood cells in splenic specimens were lysed by means of ACK buffer (150 mM NH4Cl, 10 mM NaHCO3, 1 mM EDTA), samples were pelleted and resuspended in flow cytometry buffer. For each sample, 2 × 106 cells were blocked with α-CD16/32 Ab (clone 93, eBioscience-Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and then reacted with the antibodies CD4-FITC (clone GK1.5, eBioscience), CD8a-PE (clone 53–6.7, eBioscience), CD45-FITC (clone 30-F11, eBioscience), CD45-Percp-Cy7 (clone 30-F11, eBioscience), FoxP3-PE (clone 150d/e4, eBioscience), CD11b-FITC (clone M1/70, eBioscience), PD-L1-APC (clone MIH5, BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), and HER2-APC (clone 9G1D4B10, Sinobiological, Beijing, China). The data were acquired by means of BD C6 Accuri. Only the samples that provided at least 1 × 105 events were included in subsequent analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry of Tumor Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single cell suspensions were prepared from freshly isolated HER2-LLC1 tumors and spleens at sacrifice. Tumors were minced in small pieces and digested with collagenase (1 mg/ml) for 1.5 h at 37°C. The resulting cell suspensions were passed through 70 μm cell strainer and rinsed with flow cytometry buffer. Spleens were processed as described above, and then treated as the tumor samples. Red blood cells in spleen and tumor specimens were lysed by means of ACK buffer, samples were pelleted and resuspended in flow cytometry buffer. Subsequently for each sample 2x106 cells were blocked with α-CD16/32 Ab (clone 93, eBioscience), and then reacted with the antibodies CD4-FITC (clone GK1.5, eBioscience), CD8a-PE (clone 53–6.7, eBioscience), CD45-FITC (clone 30-F11, eBioscience), CD45-Percp-Cy7 (clone 30-F11, eBioscience), CD335-PE (clone 29A1.4, eBioscience), FoxP3-PE (clone 150d/e4, eBioscience), CD11b-FITC (clone M1/70, eBioscience), PD-L1-APC (clone MIH5, BD), CD141-PE (clone LS17-9, eBioscience) and CD69-PercP (clone H1-2F3, eBioscience). Data were acquired on BD C6 Accuri. Only samples which provided at least 100000 events were included in subsequent analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Ferret Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry assays were performed as previously described [18 (link)]. Briefly, cells were blocked with Fc blocking antibody (Clone 2.4G2, Cat Nu 553142, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and stained with monoclonal antibodies recognizing ferret CD4 (clone 02 –PE, Sino Biological Inc., Beijing, China), or cross-reacting with ferret CD8 (clone OKT8 –eFluor 450, eBioscience, San Diego, CA), CD11b (clone M1/70 –FITC, eBioscience), anti-MHC class II (clone CAT82A –unconjugated, Kingfisher Biotech, St. Paul, MN), CD3 (clone PC3/188A –FITC and AlexaFluor 647, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), and CD79a (clone HM47 –PerCP-Cy5.5, eBioscience). The anti-MHC class II antibody was biotinylated (cat# 130-093-385, Miltenyi Biotec, San Diego, CA) prior to use and detected with streptavidin-eFluor 450 (eBioscience). Unstained cells and isotype controls (eBioscience, San Diego, CA) were included for all antibodies. Data were acquired using a FACSCanto II flow cytometer (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA), and analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantification of Marginal Zone Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The method of Rose et al. was used to quantify numbers of marginal zone macrophages [24 (link)]. Briefly, spleens were harvested and a cell suspension was made after dicing spleens and treatment with DNase I and collagenase D. 1 × 106 to 2 × 106 cells were pelleted at 1500 rpm for 3 min and supernatant discarded. Cell suspension was incubated with 0.5 µg Fc Block (BD Biosciences, San Jose, USA) for 10 min at RT, followed by a wash with FACS buffer (0.5% BSA in saline). Supernatant was discarded once again and the following antibodies were added to each well: CD45R (B220) clone RA3-6B2 PE-Texas Red (1:400, BD Biosciences), Ly6C clone AL-21 APC-Cy7 (1:500, BD Biosciences), Ly6G clone 1A8 PE (1:400, BD Biosciences), NK1.1 clone PK136 APC (1:300, BD Biosciences), CD11b clone M1/70 FITC (1:160, eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), CD11c clone HL3 PE-Cy7 (1:125, BD Biosciences) with 20% 7-AAD in FACS buffer. The stain and cell mixture was incubated for 20 min on ice in the dark, and washed twice in FACS buffer. Lastly, samples were resuspended in FACS buffer and kept on ice, in the dark, until being run on a FACS Aria flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Mean and standard deviation were calculated for PBS and the 33 μL treatment group, and Student’s t-test was used to determine if differences between these groups was significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!