The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4710 series

Manufactured by Cole-Parmer
Sourced in United States

The 4710 series is a line of laboratory equipment produced by Cole-Parmer. The series provides basic functionality for common laboratory tasks. Detailed technical specifications and intended use are not available.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using 4710 series

1

Multimodal Nanoparticle Preparation Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Boswellic acids, curcumin, naringin-loaded NPs were prepared using two different preparation techniques. The first was single oil in water emulsion/solvent evaporation technique (F1) [66 (link)]. All drugs (5 mg from each drug) and PLGA (150 mg) were dissolved in 3.5 ml of DCM, once dissolution was complete, the organic solution was added using a syringe to 25 ml of aqueous solution of 1% w/v PVA and sonicated using an ultrasonic homogenizer equipped with a 3.2 mm probe (Cole-Parmer, 4710 series, United States). The final emulsion was stirred overnight to assist in the removal of residual organic solvents. The nanospheres collected by centrifugation were washed three times with ultra-pure water and sucrose solutions. NPs were lyophilized for 72 h using a freeze-dryer and stored at 4 °C until further use. The other preparation method was nanoprecipitation (F2) [67 (link)]. Polymer and the three drugs were dissolved in a mixture of acetone/ethanol 3:1 v/v. The drug solution was added to an aqueous solution of 0.5% v/v tween-80 under continuous stirring using a magnetic stirrer for 4 h. The nanospheres were collected using the same procedures, lyophilized, and stored as previously mentioned.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of Drug Release from Medicated Film

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A medicated film of specified area (1.77 cm2) was transferred into a beaker containing 30 mL phosphate buffer (PB) pH 5.5 and ultrasonicated for 15 minutes using ultrasonic homogenizer (Ultrasonic homogenizer, 4710 Series, Cole-Parmer Instrument Co., Chicago, USA). Then, the whole content was stirred on magnetic stirrer for 3 hours, followed by centrifugation. The supernatant was filtered using 0.45 µm filters. Spectrophotometric analysis was employed to assay the drug content at 272 nm against blank solution of plain film. Average of three determinations was estimated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Isolation of Cytosolic and Mitochondrial Fractions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cytosolic and mitochondrial fractions were prepared as described previously [35 ]. Briefly, frozen kidney tissue was homogenized in sucrose buffer (0.2 M sucrose, 1 mM EGTA, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4; Sigma) on ice, three times using a Teflon Homogenizer (Daihan Scientific, Seoul, Korea) at 1,600 rpm. The homogenate was centrifuged at 600×g for 10 min, and then the supernatant was centrifuged at 7,000×g for 10 min. The supernatant comprised the cytosolic fraction, and it was centrifuged again at 7,000×g for 10 min, to purify the cytosolic fraction. The mitochondrial pellet was washed twice with sucrose buffer and was centrifuged again at 7,000×g for 10 min. The pellet was suspended in phosphate-buffered saline, containing 0.1% Triton X-100, disrupted twice with a sonicator (4710 series; Cole-Palmer, Chicago, IL, USA) at 40% of the maximum setting for 10 s, and centrifuged at 15,000×g for 30 min. The supernatant comprised the mitochondrial fraction, and it was used to measure enzymatic activity. Equal amounts of fractionated proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to a PVDF membrane. Effective isolation of those fractions was confirmed by Western blot analysis, using antibodies against IDH2 or COX-IV protein for the mitochondrial fraction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Assessing NAD Levels in Tumor Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Interim tumors from mice in the efficacy studies were harvested two hours after the third dose of three consecutive days of treatment (n = 3 mice per group). This timepoint was selected based on the clinical dosing schedule (3-day-on/4-day-off) and known murine half-life of OT-82 (approximately 2 hours). Tissue was immediately frozen in dry ice and sonicated on ice with an ultrasonic homogenizer (4710 series, Cole-Parmer, Vernon Hills, IL). NAD analysis was performed using the NAD+/NADH Assay Kit (Abcam, Waltham, MA) per manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

NAD Quantification in Murine Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Interim tumors from mice in the efficacy studies were harvested two hours after the third dose of three consecutive days of treatment (n = 3 mice per group). This timepoint was selected based on the clinical dosing schedule (3-day-on/4-day-off) and known murine half-life of OT-82 (approximately 2 hours). Tissue was immediately frozen in dry ice and sonicated on ice with an ultrasonic homogenizer (4710 series, Cole-Parmer, Vernon Hills, IL). NAD analysis was performed using the NAD + /NADH Assay Kit (Abcam, Waltham, MA) per manufacturer's instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Nanovaccine Formulation and Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The nanovaccine was prepared by double emulsion method. In brief, 100 µL RNA (6 µg µL−1) and 92 µL PLL (10 µg µL−1) were mixed and placed on ice for 30 min to form RNA particles. Then, 100 µL tumor cell membrane fragments with the protein concentration of 6 µg µL−1 and 8 µL ultrapure water were added into the above solution, and the mixture was considered as the water phase solution. 100 mg PLGA and 4 mg Ce6 were dissolved in 1 mL dichloromethane, forming the oil phase solution. To prepare the nanoparticles, the water phase (300 µL) was added into oil phase (1 mL), and then the mixture was sonicated by ultrasonic homogenizer (Cole Parmer 4710 Series) with 50% cycle duty for 60 s. Then, the mixture was poured into 2.5 mL PVA water solution (20 mg mL−1) and sonicated for another 60 s. At the end of sonification, the above mixture was added to 40 mL PVA solution (5 mg mL−1) and stirred for 4 h at room temperature to evaporate organic solvent. The nanoparticles were collected by centrifugation at 12 000 × g for 15 min and washed three times with ultrapure water. The obtained nanoparticles were resuspended using 4% trehalose, followed by lyophilization (SCIENTZ‐18N) for 48 h. For the controls, the RNA or cell membrane was replaced by water of the same volume.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Western Blot Characterization of Irradiated Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cellsgrown in 6 well plates were harvested (~106) at 6 h following irradiation of groups treated with vehicle, 4-OHT (post-irradiation, 15 μM, 4 h), HYP (2 μM, 4 h) or 4-OHT (post-irradiation) + HYP. The lysates were sonicated in a 4710 series Cole-Palmer ultrasonic homogenizer (100% duty cycle) and boiled for 5 min at 95 °C. Appropriate amounts of lysates (15 μL maximum) were loaded onto Criterion™ TGX™ precast gels (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc.) and ran at 200 V on ice. The proteins were subsequently transferred from the gels onto nitrocellulose membranes, using a Trans-Blot® Turbo™ transfer system (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc.). The membranes were subsequently washed with TTBS and blocked with 5 w/v skimmed milk for 1 h at RT. The membranes were then incubated overnight at 4 °C with the selected primary antibodies, diluted according to their manufacturers’ recommendations in 5 w/v skimmed milk. The membranes were then washed three times in Tween-Tris-buffered Saline (TTBS, 5 min per wash) and incubated with the secondary antibodies according to the suppliers’ indications. The membranes were again washed three times with TTBS and incubated for 5 min with LumiGlo (KPL, Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, Inc.). The western blots were read at ChemiDoc™ MP Imaging System (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc.); γ-tubulin was in all cases used as a loading control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Pigment Extraction from Algae and Cyanobacteria

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two types of extraction media were used to isolate pigments from algal cells: 90 % acetone solution with respect to chlorophylls and carotenoids (Parsons et al. 1984 ) and extraction medium consisted of 0.25 M Trizma Base, hydrated 10 mM disodium EDTA (2H2O), and 2 mg cm−3 lysozyme; the initial pH 9 was adjusted to final 5.5 (HCl)—in case of extraction phycobiliproteins from cyanobacteria cells (according to Steward and Farmer 1984 ). Chlorophylls and carotenoids were extracted by mechanical grinding and sonication (2 min, 20 kHz, Cole Parmer, 4710 Series) in the darkness conditions at 4 °C for 2 h. Procedure of isolation of phycobiliproteins from cells was based on combination of a gentle mechanical grinding and enzymatic (lysozyme) reaction in order to successfully disintegrate cell walls and improve pigment extraction efficiency in darkened room conditions. Filers were then incubated at 37 °C for 2 h in a dry block heat bath (Thermoleader, Uniequip) and after that kept in dark at 4 °C for 24 h. The extract was then centrifuged (20 min, 5 °C, 3210×g, Beckman, GS-6R) to remove the filters and cellular debris.
The clarified extracts were then subjected to the chromatographic analysis in case of chlorophylls and carotenoids and spectrofluorometric measurements in case of phycobilins.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Protein Extraction and Western Blotting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pellet providing from centrifugation at 100,000 g was treated with lysozyme for 10 min and then suspended in 150 μL of Laemmli buffer (0.1% β-mercaptoethanol, 0.0005% Bromophenol blue, 10% glycerol, 2% SDS, and 63 mmol.L−1 Tris-HCl, pH 6.8). The samples were sonicated three times for 5 s each using a Cole Parmer 4710 series ultrasonic homogenizer. One hundred micrograms of the extract was subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western blotting as described above using polyclonal antibodies against XfYgiT, XfMqsR, and XfPal.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!