The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

33 protocols using qiamp dna stool kit

1

Rectal Swab DNA Extraction and 16S rRNA Amplification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rectal swabs were thawed, and DNA was extracted using a QIAmp DNA Stool kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer instructions with a minor modification. The rectal swabs were dissolved in 1 ml Buffer ASL and shaken at 1,000 rpm (Mixing Block MB-102, CaRlibiotech S.r.l. Rome, Italy) continuously until the stool samples were homogenized. DNA quality and quantity were assessed with a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA), and the isolated DNA was stored at −20°C until use.
Bacterial DNA was amplified by targeting the V3–V4 hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene (23 (link)). PCR amplification of each sample was performed in a 25-μl volume. A total of 12.5 μl of KAPA HIFI Master Mix 2× (Kapa Biosystems, Inc., MA, USA) were used. Then, 0.2 μl of each primer (100 μM) was added to 2 μl of genomic DNA (5 ng/μl). Blank controls (no DNA template) were also included. Amplification and library quantification were carried out as described previously (24 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Intestinal Bacterial DNA Isolation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Large intestines were homogenized in sterile PBS. Bacterial DNA isolation was performed using the QIAmp DNA Stool Kit (QIAGEN) with optional high temperature step37 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Gut Microbiome Analysis by 16S rRNA Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total genomic bacterial DNA from fresh feces was extracted using the QIAmp DNA Stool Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). DNA solutions were stored at −80 °C until further processing. Using gDNA, the V4 region of the 16S rRNA encoding gene was amplified with barcoded universal bacterial primers followed by sequencing on Ion Torrent platform [19 (link)]. The resulting raw sequence files (.fastq.gz) are being submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database. The raw sequences were analyzed using Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME)-2 pipeline [38 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Tiger Identification from Scat Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from scat samples using a commercially available QIAmp DNA Stool Kit (QIAGEN Inc., Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Species identification polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using tiger-specific primers (TIF/TIR) (S1 Table) [41 (link)] that amplify a 162 bp mtDNA cytochrome b fragment. The genetically identified tiger samples were further processed for sex identification (S1 and S2 Tables) [42 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

ETEC K88 Detection in Piglet Feces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fecal samples from challenged piglets were examined for ETEC K88 6 h after the challenge. Bacterial DNA was extracted using a QIAmp DNA stool kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Adhesin gene F4 was detected by PCR using forward primer 5′-GCTGCATCTGCTGCATCTGGTATGG-3′ and reverse primer 5′-CCACTGAGTGCTGGTAGTTACAGCC-3′, as described previously [26 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Microbial DNA Extraction from Stool and Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA from stool and/or intestinal tissue was extracted from thawed samples using
the QIAmp DNA stool Kit (Qiagen) as previously described [18 (link)]. For detection of 16S rRNA genes,
modifications to enrich detection including additional steps of homogenization
in bead tubes (UltraClean fecal DNA bead tubes, Mo Bio Laboratories) in
400/360μL of ASL/ATL buffer using a Mini-Beadbeater for 1 minute, 30/40 μL of
Proteinase K for stool/tissue homogenates, and incubation of tissues at 56°C for
two hours [70 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Genomic DNA Extraction and PCR Amplification from Diverse Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from fecal, blood and tissue samples using the QIAmp DNA Stool Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and the Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), respectively, following the manufacturer’s protocol with modifications from [46 (link)]. Resulting extracts were quantified using a Qubit dsDNA BR Assay (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). For each sample, a 5-10uL aliquot of the extract was included in 25uL PCR reactions that included the following reagents: 12.5uL of PCR Master Mix (Promega, Madison, WI), 0.8uL of the forward primer (10uM), 0.8uL of the reverse primer (10uM), 0.8uL BSA and finally PCR-grade water to bring the final volume to 25uL. Primers were designed from alignments of published platyrrhine sequences, with preference for primers to match the Cebus imitator genome from GenBank (Table 1). PCR cycling conditions for all exons were: (1) an initial denaturing at 94°C for 2 minutes followed by (2) 35 cycles of: 94°C for 30 seconds, 58°C for 40 seconds and 72°C for 1 minute, then (3) a final extension at 72°C for 7 minutes. The PCR product was visualized on a 1.5% agarose gel to confirm the presence of fragments of the expected size.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Noninvasive Tiger Identification via Scat DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We extracted DNA from scat samples using a commercially available QIAmp DNA Stool Kit (QIAGEN Inc., Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Each batch of DNA extraction included a negative extraction control. Extracted DNA was stored at -20°C. Tigers were identified using PCR assay that used tiger specific mtDNA Cytochrome-b (CYT-B) primers [63 (link)]. Individual tigers were identified by microsatellite analysis using a panel of eight microsatellite markers developed from the domestic cat (Felis catus) and tiger genomes [64 (link)–66 (link)] as described in Thapa et al. [32 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Gut Microbiome DNA Extraction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All samples were kept frozen at −80°C until use. Prior to DNA extraction of the distal colon samples, the mucosal layer was gently scraped with a razor blade. The scraped material was placed in a microtube. At that time, DNA from fecal samples and intestinal samples (scraped material) was extracted using the QIAmp DNA Stool kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Modifications in the disruption step were made to the supplied protocol to ensure lysis of Gram-positive bacteria. In short, 200 mg of sample were transferred to a microtube containing 0.2 g of autoclaved glass beads (11 micron in diameter, Sigma) and 1.4 mL of ASL solution (Qiagen). Next, samples were homogenized in a TissueLyser II instrument (Qiagen, Valencia, Ca) at 25 Hz for 2 min. Following steps were performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

DNA Extraction from Caecal and Eggshell

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All collected samples were stored at −20 °C before DNA purification and the storage never exceeded 3 months, to minimise sample degradation. Each sample was homogenised using a MagnaLyser (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and the homogenate was subjected to DNA purification. QIAmp DNA Stool kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was used for DNA purification from caecal contents, while DNeasy tissue kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was used for DNA purification from eggshell or bacterial mass collected from agar plates. Purified DNA was stored at −20 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!