The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ultramap anti rabbit hrp

Manufactured by Roche
Sourced in United States

Ultramap anti-rabbit HRP is a laboratory reagent used in immunohistochemistry and other immunoassays that involve the detection of rabbit-derived primary antibodies. It contains a horseradish peroxidase (HRP) enzyme conjugated to a secondary antibody that binds to rabbit immunoglobulins, facilitating the visualization of target antigens.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using ultramap anti rabbit hrp

1

Multiplex Immunofluorescence Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Triplex staining for keratin 5, keratin7 and p63 was done by automated multiplex IF using the Ventana Benchmark Discovery (Ventana Medical Systems Inc.). In brief, following deparaffinization and heat-induced antigen retrieval with CC1 (#950-500, Ventana) for 64 min at 97 °C, the tissue samples were incubated firstly with Keratin 5 antibodies for 32 min at 37 °C followed by detection with Ultramap anti-rabbit HRP (#760–4315, Ventana) for 12 min followed by visualization with Red610 for 8 min (#760-245, Ventana). Antibody denaturing was performed using CC2 (#950-123, Ventana) for 20 min at 100 °C. Secondly, Keratin 7 antibodies were incubated for 32 min at 37 °C followed by detection with Ultramap anti-rabbit HRP (#760–4315, Ventana) followed by visualization with FAM (#760-243, Ventana) for 4 min. Antibody denaturing was performed using CC2 (#950-123, Ventana) for 8 min at 100 °C. Thirdly, P63 antibodies were incubated for 32 min at 37 °C followed by detection with Ultramap anti-mouse HRP (#760–4313, Ventana) for 12 min followed by visualization with Cy5 for 12 min (#760-238, Ventana). Slides were incubated in PBS with DAPI for 15 min and covered with anti-fading medium (DAKO, S3023).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiplex Immunofluorescence for PD-L1 Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the identity of the PD‐L1‐positive cells, triple stains were performed by automated multiplex immunofluorescence using the Ventana Benchmark Discovery (Ventana Medical Systems Inc.). In brief, following deparaffinization and heat‐induced antigen retrieval with CC1 (#950‐500, Ventana) for 64 min at 97°C, the tissue samples were incubated firstly with antibodies against either CD45, gastrin, chromogranin‐A, or somatostatin for 32 min at 37°C followed by detection with either Ultramap anti‐rabbit HRP (#760‐4315, Ventana) or Ultramap anti‐mouse HRP (#760‐4313, Ventana) for 12 min, followed by visualization with Red610 for 8 min (#760‐245, Ventana). Antibody denaturing was performed using CC2 (#950‐123, Ventana) for 20 min at 100°C. Secondly, PDL1 SP263 was incubated for 32 min at 37°C followed by detection with Ultramap anti‐rabbit HRP (#760‐4315, Ventana), followed by visualization with FAM (#760‐243, Ventana) for 4 min. Slides were incubated in PBS with DAPI for 15 min and covered with an anti‐fading medium (DAKO, S3023). Antibody information can be found in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Profiling of ALK, ROS1, and c-Met

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Alk and Ros1 IHC was performed on 0.6 mm tissue cylinders as previously described [16 (link),17 (link)]. For Alk IHC, the mouse anti-human ALK monoclonal antibody was applied (clone 5A4, Leica Biosystems). Ros1 IHC was conducted using a rabbit anti-human ROS1 monoclonal antibody (clone D4D6, Cell Signaling Technology). For c-Met IHC a monoclonal rabbit anti-human Met antibody was used (clone SP44, Spring Biosciences). All buffers, including pretreatment CC1 standard incubation buffer, secondary antibody (UltraMap anti-Rabbit HRP) and detection system Discovery ChromoMap DAB, were purchased from Roche Ventana (Tucson, AZ). Immunostainings were performed on the automated immunostainer DiscoveryUltra (Roche Ventana).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Detection of ERG Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ERG IHC was performed using the anti-ERG (EPR3864) rabbit monoclonal primary antibody (1:100) (Cat#790-4576, Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA). IHC was performed using an automated protocol developed for the DISCOVERY XT automated slide staining system (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.,) using Ultramap anti-rabbit HRP (Cat#760-4315,Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.,) as secondary antibody and detected using ChromoMap DAB (Cat#760-159, Ventana Medical Systems Inc.,) for ERG. Hematoxylin (Cat#790-2208 Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.,) was used as the counterstain. ERG immunohistochemistry staining was evaluated by board certified pathologist LPK. Staining of vessels was used as a positive control and slides without staining of vessels were excluded from further analysis. ERG staining in tumor foci was either absent or diffusely strong (2–3+), unless otherwise indicated, and was reported as present/absent. Cases with documented ERG rearrangement by fluorescence in situ hybridization were used as positive control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Evaluating PTEN Expression by IHC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We have recently designed and validated a protocol for evaluating PTEN expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC).20 (link) ERG–PTEN dual IHC was performed using anti-ERG (EPR3864) rabbit monoclonal primary antibody (1:100; Cat no. 790-4576, Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA) and a rabbit monoclonal primary antibody against PTEN (1:25; 138G6- Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA). Dual IHC was performed using an automated protocol developed for the DISCOVERY XT automated slide staining system (Ventana Medical Systems) using UltraMap antirabbit HRP (Cat no. 760-4315, Ventana Medical Systems) for ERG and UltraMap anti-rabbit AP (Cat no. 760-4314, Ventana Medical Systems) for PTEN as secondary antibodies and were detected using ChromoMap DAB (Cat no. 760-159, Ventana Medical Systems) and ChromoMap Blue (Cat no. 760-161, Ventana Medical Systems) for ERG and PTEN, respectively. Nuclear Fast Red counterstain (Cat no. 780-2186 Ventana Medical Systems) was used as the counterstain. Hematoxylin II (Cat no. 790-2208 Ventana-Roche) was used as counterstain. Examples of ERG/PTEN staining in prostate cancer are shown in Figure 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of SUB1 in Prostate Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Benign and prostate cancer tissues were obtained from the radical prostatectomy series at the University of Michigan and from the Rapid Autopsy Program, both part of the University of Michigan Prostate SPORE programs, through appropriate informed consent. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained to procure and analyze the tissues used in this study. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was carried out to evaluate SUB1 expression using rabbit polyclonal antibody against SUB1 (Novus Biologicals [Littleton, CO], Cat# NBP1-82454). IHC was performed using an automated protocol developed for the DISCOVERY XT automated slide staining system (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.,) using Ultramap anti-rabbit HRP (Cat#760-4315, Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.,) and was detected using ChromoMap DAB (Cat#760-159, Ventana Medical Systems Inc.). Hematoxylin II (Cat#790-2208 Ventana-Roche, Tucson, AZ, USA) was used as the counterstain. The study pathologist Dr. Kunju (P.K.) evaluated IHC staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluating SUB1 Expression in Prostate Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Benign and prostate cancer tissues were obtained from the radical prostatectomy series at the University of Michigan and from the Rapid Autopsy Program, both part of the University of Michigan Prostate SPORE programs, through appropriate informed consent. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained to procure and analyze the tissues used in this study. Immunohistochemistry was carried out to evaluate SUB1 expression using rabbit polyclonal antibody against SUB1 (Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO, USA; cat. no. NBP1-82454). Immunohistochemistry was performed using an automated protocol developed for the DISCOVERY XT automated slide staining system (Ventana Medical Systems Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA) using Ultramap anti-rabbit HRP (cat. no. 760-4315; Ventana Medical Systems Inc.) and was detected using ChromoMap DAB (cat. no. 760-159; Ventana Medical Systems Inc.). Hematoxylin II (cat. no. 790-2208; Ventana-Roche, Tucson, AZ, USA) was used as the counterstain. The study pathologist Dr Kunju (PK) evaluated the immunohistochemical staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!