The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Meshmixer version 3

Manufactured by Autodesk
Sourced in United States

MeshMixer, Version 3.5 is a software tool that enables users to manipulate and edit 3D mesh data. The core function of the software is to provide users with a set of tools for combining, modifying, and optimizing 3D models.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using meshmixer version 3

1

Digital Workflow for Surgical Guide Fabrication

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The digital workflow consisted of loading the digital scan and the set‐up into the dental design software (CARES Visual) and defining the outline for the surgical guide. The digital outline had to extend from the mandibular left second molar to the mandibular right second premolar and had to be placed above the undercuts on the digital scan. The file of the surgical guide was then transferred to another software (MeshMixer, Version 3.5, Autodesk, San Rafael, CA, United States) to create the drill hole. The position of the drill hole was determined by means of a three‐dimensional shape in the diameter of a pilot‐drill and then trimmed from the surgical guide (Boolean difference). Subsequently, the file of the surgical guide with drill hole was exported to a 3D printer (NextDent 5100, 3D Systems, Rock Hill, SC, United States) and printed with resin (NextDent SG, 3D Systems). The sequence of the digital workflow is summarized in Table 1 and illustrated in Figure 1a–f.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Autologous Bone Flap Volume

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Our institute has used 1-mm slice bone setting images in default brain CT protocol since 2015. We used the first postoperative CT scan as the control point and the following CT scans for the BFR analysis. DICOM data of the brain CT was exported to generate a 3D model of the autologous bone flap of the CP using open-source 3D Slicer version 4.10.2 (http://www.slicer.org; Isomics, Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA). The same threshold level was used for each patient to render the whole skull 3D model and the autologous bone flap was precisely segmented using editing tools. Extracted bone flaps from each CT scans were exported in stereolithography file format and then imported to open-source Meshlab version 2016 (Visual Computing Lab; ISTI - CNR, Pisa, Italy) for volume measurement. If the 3D model of the autologous bone flap cannot be trimmed clearly from the 3D slicer, meshmixer version 3.5 (meshmixer.com">http://www.meshmixer.com; Autodesk, Inc., San Rafael, CA, USA) was used for additional modification of the autologous bone flap 3D models.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Soft Tissue Scanning for Volume Augmentation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To design an STS for volume augmentation, STL file of each scanned cast was imported into the software (3Shape dental designer Version19, 3Shape; Copenhagen; Denmark). The outline of the STS was designed according to the incision line, which was placed 1.5 mm away from the adjacent teeth to protect the papilla and extended 4 mm down to the vestibular side (Figure 1B). The shape and the thickness of each STS were adapted to optimally fill the defect on top of the residual tissue and, thus, achieve the desired final soft‐tissue volume (Figure 1C). The designed STS together with the cast was exported as one entity into the software (Meshmixer Version 3.5, Autodesk) in order to extract the STS file from the cast file, while maintaining the same coordinate system (Figure 1D). The extracted STS was subsequently imported into the 3D analysis software (GOM Inspect) for further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Measuring Tooth Contact Points using 3D Scans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We scanned the orthodontic casts using a three-dimensional (3D) surface scanner (D-800, 3-shape, Denmark). First, upper and lower casts were scanned separately, and then they were aligned together and scanned for registration of occlusion [Figure 1]. The resulted STL files were exported to 3D software for measurement and analysis (Meshmixer™ version 3.5, Autodesk®, USA). The images were analyzed to measure the distance between mesial to distal contact points of each tooth separately.
In a top view of the image, initial contact points were marked at the two ends of a mesiodistal line over the occlusal surface. We zoomed the image and coincided the contact points with a guiding sphere drawn from the mesiodistal line; this procedure was done from occlusal and buccal aspects of the tooth, and an accurate position of contact points in both mesial and distal surfaces was determined [Figure 2].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!