The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Phosphor imaging screen

Manufactured by Bio-Rad

The Phosphor imaging screen is a versatile tool used for the detection and quantification of radioactive signals in various laboratory applications. It functions as a sensitive and high-resolution medium for capturing and storing radioactive images, which can then be analyzed using specialized imaging equipment.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

3 protocols using phosphor imaging screen

1

Quantification of Aptamer-Protein Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Filter retention assays (FRA) were used to determine dissociation constants of the aptamer selectin interactions. Therefore, DNA was radioactively labeled with [<$>\raster="rg1"<$>-32P] adenosine-5′-triphosphte (Hartmann Analytic) using T4 polynucleotide kinase (Thermo Scientific) and purified via gel extraction followed by isopropanol precipitation. For binding assays, constant amounts of radioactive DNA (<1 nM) was incubated with increasing amounts of corresponding proteins (0–1 μM) for 30 minutes at room temperature in selection buffer. Afterwards protein-aptamer complexes were filtrated (Manifold I Dot-BlotSystem, Whatman) through a pre-equilibrated (15 minutes in 0.4 M KOH) nitrocellulose membrane (Whatman) for 5 minutes in demineralized water at room temperature and then washed in selection buffer. After filtration, the nitrocellulose membrane was dried and exposed for 3 hours to a phosphor imaging screen (Bio-Rad). For quantification we used the One site-Specific binding model (Quantity One software).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Detecting Expanded CRISPR-Edited Repeats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the presence of the (CTG⋅CAG)500 repeat in CRISPR/Cas9 genome-edited DM500 myoblasts, we used PCR amplification of the (CTG⋅CAG)500 repeat-containing gene segment, followed by Southern blot hybridization. PCR products were resolved by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel, transferred by capillary transfer to a Hybond-XL nylon membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), and hybridized with 32P-labeled oligonucleotides. A DMPK oligo (5′-AGAACTGTCTTCGACTCCGGG-3′), located 5′ of the CRISPR cleavage sites, was used to visualize PCR products from both the unmodified DMPK gene and from cells with a deletion of the region between the two CRISPR sites. The oligo was 5′ end labeled using ɣ32P-ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase and hybridized to the membrane in Church-Gilbert hybridization solution overnight at 42°C. The membrane was washed, exposed to a Bio-Rad Phosphor Imaging Screen, and imaged by Phosphor-Imager analysis (Molecular Imager FX, Bio-Rad). Analysis was performed with Quantity One (Bio-Rad) and ImageJ software. After imaging, the probe was stripped from the membrane using boiling buffer (0.1 X SSC and 0.1% SDS). Subsequently, using similar conditions for hybridization, washing, and exposure analysis, 32P-end-labeled (CAG)9 probe was used to visualize PCR products containing an expanded (CTG⋅CAG)n repeat.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Measuring Mitochondrial and Cytoplasmic Protein Translation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mitochondrial or cytoplasmic protein translation was assessed by labeling with 35S-methionine/35S-cysteine (EXPRE35S35S Protein Labeling Mix; Perkin Elmer Life Sciences). 5 × 106 cells were incubated in RPMI media lacking methionine for 6 hours prior to cycloheximide (Sigma, C7698) treatment or 30 minutes prior to emetine (Millipore, 324693) and chloramphenicol (Sigma, C0378) treatment. The inhibitors (100 μg/ml) were added and cells were incubated for 15 minutes. 55 μCi 35S-methionine/35S-cysteine was then added to media and cells were incubated at 37 °C for an additional 2 hours (cycloheximide treated samples) or 1 hour (chloramphenicol and emetine treated samples). Cells were washed with ice-cold PBS and RIPA lysis buffer was added. Mitochondrial proteins (60 μg) were analyzed by SDS-PAGE using 16% tris-glycine gel in tris-glycine running buffer, and cytoplasmic proteins (20 μg) using 4–12% bis-tris gel in MES running buffer. Total protein levels were assessed by coomassie blue staining (0.1% coomassie blue in 7% acetic acid and 40% methanol), and 35S labeled proteins were assayed by autoradiography using BioMax MR film (Sigma, Z350370) or phosphor imaging screen (Bio-Rad, 170-7841).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!