The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

1400 flash

Manufactured by JEOL
Sourced in Japan

The JEOL 1400 Flash is a transmission electron microscope designed for high-resolution imaging and analysis of a wide range of samples. The instrument is equipped with a high-brightness electron source and advanced optics to provide exceptional image quality and resolution.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using 1400 flash

1

Ultrastructural Analysis of Bacteria-Host Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples seeded on the transwell plate were dedicated to transmission electron microscopy (TEM) following 45 minute bacterial inoculation. Ninety minutes after bacterial inoculation (Tucker et al., 2000 (link)), cells were fixed in cacodylate buffered (.05M) glutaraldehyde (3%) for one hour, washed three times in buffer and then post-fixed in 2% buffered osmium tetroxide for one hour. After post-fixation, samples were washed in water three times over 30 minutes and then dehydrated in an ethanol gradient (10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 95%, 100%) 15 minutes per step, with two final steps in 100% propylene oxide. Following dehydration, samples were embedded in epoxy (EMBed 812) using the following routine:
Samples were then placed in fresh EMBed 812 in flat embedding molds and the epoxy was cured overnight in an oven at 68° C. Ultrathin sections (~100nm) were cut on a Leica UC7 ultra-microtome using a diamond knife (Diatome). Sections were mounted on copper grids and stained with 50% methanolic uranyl acetate (45min) washed in water and post-stained with Reynolds lead citrate (5minutes), washed and completely dried. Sections were imaged with a JEOL 1400-Flash (JEOL, USA) operating at 120kV. Images were recorded with a GATAN One View camera.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transmission Electron Microscopy of Nanostructures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 3 μL droplet
of nanostructures/uranyl acetate mixture solution was applied to the
copper grid with continuous carbon film (Ted Pella, Inc.) The droplet
was blotted using a filter paper from the edge of the grid. Images
were obtained from a grid with dried nanostructures using the JEOL-1400Flash
(JEOL, Inc. Japan) with a Gatan Oneview camera at room temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunogold Labeling Protocol for Transmission Electron Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The labelled replicas were examined using a transmission electron microscope (JEOL‐1400Flash) equipped with a digital high‐sensitivity scientific Complementary Metal–Oxide–Semiconductor (sCMOS) camera, and images captured at magnifications of 30,000×. The antibody used in this study was visualised by immunoparticles on the exoplasmic face (E‐face), consistent with the extracellular location of the epitopes. Non‐specific background labelling for anti‐GluN1 was estimated by counting immunogold particles on the protoplasmic face (P‐face) surfaces in WT mice. This value was on average 1.2 immunoparticles/μm2 and was not subtracted from values for specific labelling, given the low value. Digitised images were then modified for brightness and contrast using Adobe PhotoShop CS5 (Mountain View, CA, USA) to optimise them for quantitative analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Ultrastructural Analysis of Shriveled Pollen

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For transmission electron microscopy, anthers were placed in a fixative solution of 3.7% paraformaldehyde and 2.5% glutaraldehyde, Na2HPO4 0.1 M, NaH2PO4 0.1 M overnight and postfixed in 1% OsO4, Na2HPO4 0.1 M, NaH2PO4 0.1 M. Anthers were dehydrated through a graded ethanol series from 30% to 100% and embedded in SPURR resin. Sections were made using an ultramicrotome Leica UC7 at 70–80 nm and poststained with acetate uranyle 5% (in ethanol), lead citrate (in NaOH). Pollen was observed using a transmission electron microscope Jeol 1400 Flash. For the genotypes pi4kα1-1, npg1-2+/− npgr1−/− npgr2-2−/−, hyc1, and efop3-1−/− efop4-2−/−, shriveled pollen grains were selected for imaging and compared with the wild-type pollen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Visualization of α-Synuclein Fibril Formation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TEM was utilized
to detect fibril formation at the end of ThT kinetics of fibril formation
as mentioned in previous publication.7 (link),13 (link),14 (link) A volume of 10 μL was applied on a 400-mesh
Formvar carbon-coated copper grid (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield,
PA). The grids were incubated in contact with α-syn samples
for 1 min. Grids were washed three times with distilled water. They
were carefully air-dried and incubated for 1 min in a fresh solution
of 1% uranyl acetate. After removal of excess stain, acquisition of
pictures was performed with the following settings using a transmission
electron microscope (JEOL 1400 Flash, Japan): accelerating voltage
of 100 kV and magnification of 40k.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Imaging Amyloid Fibrils in Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After α-syn was immunoprecipitated from pars intermedia tissue (all three groups) and after kinetics of fibril formation with synthetic fragment peptides was completed, 10 µL of fragment peptide was applied to a 400-mesh Formvar-carbon-coated copper grid (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) to confirm presence or absence of fibrils. Grids were incubated for 1 min and washed three times with distilled water. After air-drying, grids were incubated for 1 min in a fresh solution of 1% uranyl acetate. Grids were air-dried again and imaged via transmission electron microscopy (JEOL 1400 Flash, Japan). Pictures were acquired at an accelerating voltage of 100 kV and magnification of 40 and 80 k.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Transmission Electron Microscopy of Mutant Pollen

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For transmission electron microscopy, anthers were placed in a fixative solution of 3.7% paraformaldehyde and 2.5% glutaraldehyde, Na2HPO4 0.1 M, NaH2PO4 0.1 M overnight and postfixed in 1% OsO4, Na2HPO4 0.1 M, NaH2PO4 0.1 M. Anthers were dehydrated through a graded ethanol series from 30% to 100% and embedded in SPURR resin. Sections were made using an ultramicrotome Leica UC7 at 70-80nm and poststained with Acetate Uranyle 5% (in Ethanol), Lead Citrate (in NaOH). Pollen were observed using a transmission electron microscope Jeol 1400 Flash. For the following genotype: pi4kα1-1, npg1-2+/-npgr1-/-npgr2-2-/-, hyc1 and efop3-1-/-efop4-2-/-, shrivelled pollen grains were selected for imaging and compared with wild-type pollen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Saliva Fixation and TEM Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Saliva samples were fixed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature in a BSL3 facility. Fixed samples were adsorbed to ionised collodion-carbon coated grids for 5 min, washed with PBS, and exposed for 30 s at 37°C to a drop of 2% uranyl acetate. We analysed specimens using a Jeol 1400 Flash transmission electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Electron Microscopic Analysis of SAA1 Peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In a 1.5 ml microcentrifuge test tube, SAA1 signal peptides were incubated at 37 °C for 7 days. Peptide concentrations used were 100 μM and 500 μM using 50 mM Tris buffer (pH 8) or 50% HFIP in 25 mM Tris buffer. For peptides containing 50% HFIP, each tube was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min prior to grid preparation. The supernatant was discarded and 100 μL of phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4) was added to remove the HFIP and preserve the grid integrity. For the peptide solubilized in 50 mM tris buffer (in the absence of HFIP), the centrifugation and wash steps were not applied. A small volume of the peptide solution (10 μL) was deposited on the grid. The grids utilized were 400-mesh Formvar-carbon-coated copper grids (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA). Grids were washed three times with distilled water after an incubation of 1 min at room temperature. Water was removed with filter paper and grids were air-dried. A fresh solution of 1% uranyl acetate (1–2 μL) was deposited on each grid for 1 min. Visualization of the grids was performed with transmission electron microscopy (JEOL 1400 Flash, Japan). Acquisition of pictures was performed with accelerating voltage of 100 kV and magnification of 40 k.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Tau and α-Syn Aggregation Visualization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tau isoform 2N4R (6 μM, resourced from rPeptide) mixed with DMSO (0.25 %) was incubated in a 10 mM PBS buffer (pH 7.4) for 72 h at 37 °C. α-Syn samples (at 2 μM) recovered from kinetic investigations of ThT fibril formation were also examined. A volume of 10 μL of each sample was put to a 400-mesh Formvar-carbon-coated copper grid (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) to prepare the grids for TEM analysis. The sample was incubated with the grids for 1 min before being rinsed three times with distilled water. A new solution of 1 % uranyl acetate was then applied for 1 min after being air-dried. The filter paper was used to absorb the solution, then grids were dried in the air. A transmission electron microscope (JEOL 1400 Flash, Japan) was used to analyze the grids, and micrographs were taken at a magnification of 40 k and an acceleration voltage of 100 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!