The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

241 protocols using basespace

1

Benchmarking Tumor DNA Mixture Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Illumina whole genome sequencing data of four pairs of tumor and matched normal cell line samples were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) (29 (link)) or Illumina BaseSpace (BaseSpace.illumina.com">https://BaseSpace.illumina.com). All of the 8 samples are at higher than 49x coverage, except for HCC2218BL at 37x (Table 1). Two independent normal 30X samples were also available for HCC1143 and HCC1954. For the other two samples HCC1187 and HCC2218, we generated a second ‘normal’ by downsampling the available matched normal to 30X. We will refer to these second normal samples as ‘0% mixtures’ as we will use them as a negative control to investigate whether methods detect tumor DNA in mixtures without tumor DNA.
By mixing the different amount of reads from pure tumor samples together with the ‘0% mixture’ samples (i.e. the second normal sample), a series of mixtures samples were created at 30x coverage with 5%, 20%, 40%, 60%, 80% and 95% of tumor DNA. These mixture samples were obtained as BAM files from TCGA (29 (link)) for HCC1143 and HCC1954, from Illumina BaseSpace for HCC1187 and HCC2218 (Supplementary Data). We also created an extra 10% mixture for all samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Sharing Sequencing Data with FDA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
There were three possible routes for transferring data back to the GTPT coordinating team. Laboratories with access to Illumina’s cloud service, BaseSpace, streamed their sequencing run(s) to BaseSpace, then made use of that service to share their data with the GTPT coordinating team, who could then download those data into the FDA computing environment. Non-FDA laboratories that did not have BaseSpace access transferred their raw data (fastq files) to the FDA through a secure cloud storage site. Laboratories within the FDA network transferred their run to a shared drive. All fastq files were assigned to their respective laboratory using automated workflows within a Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS), which provided data tracking and management.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

16S rRNA Taxonomic Classification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The primer sequences were removed, and reads with low quality scores (average score < 20) were filtered out using the FASTQ Toolkit within BaseSpace (Illumina, Version 2.2.0). The 16S Metagenomics app within BaseSpace (Version 1.0.1) was used to perform a taxonomic classification, using an Illumina-curated taxonomic database RefSeq RDP 16S v3 [12 (link)] and the RDP naive Bayes taxonomic classification algorithm with an accuracy of >98.2% at the species level [13 (link)]. Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise noted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Bioinformatic Analysis of Somatic Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paired-end alignment of sequencing data against the reference genome hg19 (GRCh 37) was performed using the Whole Genome Sequencing Application v2.0, based on the Isaac Alignment Tool (Raczy et al. 2013 (link)) within BaseSpace, a cloud-based analysis tool suit (Illumina).
Somatic single-nucleotide variant (SNV) and insertion/deletion (indel) variant calling analysis was performed using the Tumour-Normal Application v1.0, based on Strelka (Saunders et al. 2012 (link)), within BaseSpace. Calls were annotated using the Variant Effect Predictor v2.8 (McLaren et al. 2016 (link)), COSMIC v77 (Forbes et al. 2015 (link)), and 1000 Genomes v3 (The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium 2015 (link)). The SIFT (Kumar et al. 2009 (link)) and PolyPhen-2 (Adzhubei et al. 2010 (link)) algorithms were used to evaluate the impact of a mutation on protein structure or function as predicted by Ensembl (v84) (McLaren et al. 2016 (link)). All variants of interest were manually inspected using Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) (Robinson et al. 2011 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

At-home Microbiome Profiling via Shotgun and 16S Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At-home stool collection kits (DNA Genotek; OMR-200) were shipped directly to participants and then shipped back to DNA Genotek for processing. Microbial DNA was isolated from 200 μl of homogenized fecal material using the DNeasy PowerSoil Pro extraction kit (Qiagen, Germany) with bead beating in Qiagen Powerbead Pro plates (catalog no. 19311; Qiagen, Germany). Extracted DNA was quantified using the Quant-iT PicoGreen double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) assay kit (Invitrogen, USA), and all samples passed the quality threshold of 1 ng/μl (range, 8 to 101 ng/μl).
16S amplicon sequencing was performed as described previously in reference 7 (link). In brief, the 16S V3-V4 region was amplified and sequenced with 300-bp paired-end libraries on an Illumina MiSeq. Samples were demultiplexed using Illumina Basespace (San Diego, CA), yielding the FASTQ files used in this study.
Shallow shotgun sequencing was performed with the BoosterShot service (Corebiome, USA). In brief, single-stranded 100-bp libraries were prepared using an optimized proprietary protocol of the provider (Corebiome, USA) based on the Nextera library prep kit (Illumina, USA) and sequenced on a NovaSeq (Illumina, USA) to a minimum of 2.6 million (2.6M) reads per sample (mean 3.5M, ranging from 2.6M to 4M). Demultiplexing was performed on Basespace (Illumina, USA), yielding the final FASTQ files.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Transcriptomic Analysis of Mouse Lung Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from 16 mouse lung tumors (4 PPKY/LV, 4 PPKS/NT, 4 PPKS/M and 4 PPKS/Y) using the AllPrep DNA/RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen). Indexed libraries were generates using the KAPA mRNA HyperPrep kit and sequenced on a NextSeq500 sequencer (NextSeq 500/550 High Output Kit v2.5, 75 SE). Adapter trimming and FASTQ generation was done with Basespace (Illumina). Reads were aligned to mouse reference genome (mm10) and differential expression was determined using the RNA-Seq Alignment (v.2.0.2) and RNA-Seq Differential Expression (v1.0.1) Basespace applications (Illumina). Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was performed using the WebGestalt online portal (http://www.webgestalt.org/) and GSEAJava (v.4.1.0). Genes with an adjusted p-value (q-value) less than 0.05 were considered significant. Data visualization was performed in R (v.3.6.0) using Rstudio (v.1.1.463). Heatmaps were generated using heatmap.2 (gplots, v.3.6.3). GSEA dot plots were generated with ggplot2 (v.3.3.3). Raw data were deposited in ArrayExpress, accession E-MTAB-11122.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Transcriptome Analysis of Tumor Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA-Seq was performed on snap-frozen tumors from traditional and alternative treatment groups. First strand cDNA was synthesized using 1 μg of total RNA, using the Illumina TruSeq mRNA library prep kit, following the manufacturer’s recommendation. Libraries were sequenced on the Illumina NextSeq 550 system (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The targeted read counts were 20–35 million total reads per sample. Raw FastQ reads files were assessed and adapter trimming processed using the RNA-Seq Alignment app (Basespace, Illumina), and reads with Phred scores > 30 were retained. The resultant quality-trimmed reads were aligned to the hg38 (GrCH38.83) build of the human genome using the STAR aligner app (Basespace, Illumina). Transcript abundance quantification was performed using Cufflinks Assembly & DE analysis apps (Basespace, Illumina).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Illumina Sequencing Data Analysis Pipeline

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data sequences were uploaded onto BaseSpace (BaseSpace.illumina.com">www.BaseSpace.illumina.com) (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) to determine sequence run quality and run completion. De-multiplexed data were downloaded locally and uploaded onto QIIME2-2018.8. The sequences were demultiplexed and the amplicon variant sequence (ASV) table was created using DADA2 [20 (link)]. The representative sequences were then classified using VSEARCH, and ASVs were defined as sequences with at least 97% similarity with Greengenes v.13.8 database [21 (link)]. Sequences that were unassigned or identified as cyanobacteria, chloroplast, or mitochondria were removed. The ASV table was then rarefied at 6400 reads for even depth of analysis. Alpha diversity metrics calculated were Shannon’s diversity index, observed OTUs (operational taxonomic units), and Chao1. Beta diversity metrics that were estimated with unweighted and weighted UniFrac distance and visualized using principle coordinate analysis (PCoA). Nonparametric test ANOSIM (analysis of similarities) was used to compare the similarity between the bacterial composition of each treatment to the baseline control (T1) using UniFrac.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Microbial Profiling Using Illumina MiSeq and SMS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The MiSeq Sequencer System Software (Illumina) was used to filter raw sequence reads and remove low quality sequences. Adapter sequences were trimmed, and sequences were further filtered to remove short sequences using the fast QC APP in BaseSpace (Illumina). Sequences that passed the filter criteria (length of 280 bp with averaged quality score of 30) were used for further analysis.
For amplicon based HTS data analysis, the 16S Metagenomics analysis pipeline in BaseSpace (Illumina) was used to make taxonomic assignments and generate data summaries of the proportions of taxa present. The sequence database for the 16S rRNA gene target was Greengenes V13_5 (DeSantis et al., 2006 (link)). For SMS data analysis, the sequences were then assembled to each of the reference genome sequences using Geneious software v10.2.6 (Biomatters Ltd) to generate contigs. Additionally, shotgun data were analyzed using APD (Advanced Probiotics species Detection; Seol et al., 2019 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

SARS-CoV-2 Variant Identification Pipeline

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Illumina BaseSpace (BaseSpace.illumina.com">https://BaseSpace.illumina.com) bioinformatics pipeline was used for sequencing QC, FASTQ Generation, genome assembly, and identification of SARS-CoV-2 variants. Briefly, the Binary Base Call (BCL) raw sequencing files generated by Illumina MiniSeq® sequencing platforms were uploaded to the Illumina BaseSpace online portal and demultiplexed to FASTQ format using the FASTQ Generation (Version: 1.0.0.) application. The raw FASTQ files were trimmed, sorted, and checked for quality (Q > 30) using the FASTQ-QC application within the BaseSpace. QC passed FASTQ files were aligned against the SARS-CoV-2 reference genome (NCBI RefSeq NC_045512.2) using Bio-IT Processor (Version: 0x04261818). Then, DRAGEN COVID Lineage (Version: 3.5.4) application in BaseSpace was used to generate a single consensus FASTA file for all the samples sequenced on a single flow cell. Finally, single consensus FASTQ was also analyzed for lineage assignment using the web version of Phylogenetic Assignment of Named Global Outbreak Lineages (PANGOLIN) software (https://pangolin.cog-uk.io). Only the consensus variants identified by both applications were used for further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!