The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

131 protocols using uv 1900

1

Beet Juice Release Kinetics Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The kinetics of drug release was estimated using beet juice, as immersion fluid [35 (link)]. Firstly, a standard curve of beet juice concentration versus absorbance at 520 nm (Shimadzu UV-1900) [35 (link)] was obtained by measuring various dilutions (0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 1, and 1.5%). The obtained curve had the following equation: y = 0.3644x + 0.0007 and an R2 of 0.9996.
For the actual drug release assay, BCd and BCm (32.5 × 16.25 mm) membranes were loaded with concentrated beet juice overnight. The membranes, thus, prepared were immersed in 20 mL distillated water and a 2 mL solution was taken at precise time intervals (30 min; 1, 2, 3, 6, 24, 48, and 72 h), and their absorbance was measured at 520 nm (Shimadzu UV-1900) to determine the beet juice release [35 (link)]. After removing aliquots of 2 mL from each sample for analysis, the same volume of fresh distillated water was added [36 (link)]. UV absorbance was measured to determine the concentration of released beet juice at each time point [37 (link)]. The drug half-release time was obtained by plotting the released beet juice by time and computing the duration in which the pellicles release half of their total uptake [34 (link)]. All the measurements and computations were done in triplicate, and the results were expressed as mean ± SD.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Measuring Soluble Sugars and Proteins in Plant Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Soluble sugars were extracted using the method of Fairbairn [40 (link)] with slight modifications. Leaves (0.2 g) were put into a test tube, to which 10 mL of distilled water was added and mixed. After 30 min in a water bath at 100 °C, the supernatant was collected, and distilled water was added to a volume of 25 mL. The soluble sugar content was determined with the sulfuric acid anthrone method at a wavelength of 620 nm using a UV spectrophotometer (UV-1900, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan).
Leaves (0.2 g) were placed in a mortar, flash frozen with liquid nitrogen, and ground to a powder. Phosphate buffer (5 mL; 50 mM, pH 7.0) was added, and the homogenate was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 4 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was used for determination of soluble protein content according to the method of Bradford [41 (link)], using 0.1 mL of the supernatant and 4.9 mL of Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 (0.1 g·L−1). After 2 min, the absorbance was measured at 595 nm using a UV spectrophotometer (UV-1900, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan), and the soluble protein content was calculated using a standard curve (bovine serum albumin was used to make the standard curve).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Drug Loading and Release Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For drug loading experiments, sample punches (6 mm diameter) were dissolved in 2 mL of AA. After filtering the samples through 0.22 µm syringe filters, the samples were measured using UV-Vis spectrophotometry (Shimadzu UV-1900, Kyoto, Japan) at 354 nm. Drug-free samples were used as a control, and all experiments were carried out in triplicate. Drug release experiments were carried out on sample punches (6 mm diameter), which were placed in a 24-well plate in 2 mL water at 37 °C. The samples were shaken at 200 rpm (neoMix thermoshaker, neoLab, Heidelberg, Germany) for the duration of the experiments. At different time points (0 min, 5 min, 10 min, 20 min, 30 min, 1 h, 3 h, 24 h and 48 h), 1 mL was removed from the well plates and replaced with 1 mL fresh 37 °C Milli-Q water. The removed samples were filtered through a 0.22 μm syringe filter and analyzed by UV-Vis spectrophotometry (Shimadzu UV-1900, Kyoto, Japan) at 354 nm. Drug-free samples were used as controls, and measurements were conducted in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

DPPH Radical Scavenging Assay for Antioxidant Capacity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antioxidant capacity was evaluated by the DPPH radical-scavenging method [32 (link)], with a few modifications. An aliquot of 100 µL of the extract solution at different concentrations (1–25 µg/mL) was spiked with 750 µL of ethanol and 400 µL of acetate buffer (0.1 M, pH 5.5), mixed and spiked with 250 µL of DPPH ethanolic solution (0.5 × 10−3 M). After 90 min at room temperature and in the dark the absorbance at 515 nm was measured for each sample analyzed in triplicate with a UV reader Shimadzu™ UV 1900 (Shimadzu, Milano, Italia). The percentage of inhibition was calculated as expressed by Equation (2) and the results expressed as mean ± SD.
AbsblankAbssampleAbsblank×100
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

DPPH Radical Scavenging Antioxidant Capacity Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antioxidant capacity was also determined by the DPPH radical-scavenging method [31 (link)], with some modifications. An aliquot of 100 µL of the extract solution at different concentrations (1–25 µg/mL) was added to 750 µL of ethanol and 400 µL of acetate buffer (100 mM, pH 5.5), mixed and spiked with 250 µL of DPPH ethanolic solution (500 µM). After 90 min at room temperature and in the dark the absorbance at 515 nm was measured for each sample analyzed in triplicate with a UV reader Shimadzu™ UV 1900 (Shimadzu, Milano, Italia). The percentage of inhibition was calculated as expressed by Equation (3) and the results expressed as mean ± SD.
Absblank-AbssampleAbsblank×100
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Functionalized AuNRs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A UV-vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-1900) was used to collect UV-vis extinction spectra of AuNR solution and monitor the AuNR surface functionalization. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were collected using a high-resolution analytical TEM (JEOL JEM-2010). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were collected using an ultrahigh-resolution field emission SEM (JEOL JSM-7500F). A microspectrophotometer (CRAIC 308 PV) coupled to an optical microscope (Leica DM4M) was used to collect extinction spectra from NC papers with 20X objective in the range of 450–900 nm with 0.2 s exposure time in reflection mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

FRAP-Based Antioxidant Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This study involved the reduction of iron using the FRAP method (Dravie et al., 2020 ). FRAP reagent was made by reacting acetate buffer (pH 3.6), Tris Pyridyl Triazine (TPTZ, 1 mM), and FeCl3 (0.02 M) in a ratio of 10:1:1. Each extract solution (0.1% w/v) was mixed with 2 mL of FRAP reagent, and distilled water was added to make up the volume (5 mL). Incubation at room temperature for 30 min was followed by an absorbance measurement at 595 nm (Shimadzu UV-1900). The FRAP value for each extract was calculated using quercetin as the standard curve. The quercetin equivalent value per gram of extract (µMQEV/g extract) was used to estimate its antioxidant capability (Nur et al., 2019 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Modified ABTS Radical Scavenging Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A radical scavenging method based on ABTS was modified by Nur et al. (2021b) . A mixture of ABTS (7 mM in 10 mL distillate water) and potassium persulfate (2.45 mM in 10 mL distillate water) was incubated for 12–16 h in the dark to form an ABTS radical solution. The solution mixture was then diluted with ethanol to 50 mL. A working solution of ABTS was prepared by mixing it with ethanol (1:10). 1 mL of ABTS working solution was diluted to 5 mL with ethanol and incubated for 30 min as a blank solution. The absorbance was measured with a UV–visible spectrophotometer (745 nm; Shimadzu UV-1900). The serial volumes of each C. latifolia extract were reacted with 1 mL of ABTS working solution, and the volumes were made up to 5 mL with ethanol. An absorbance measurement at 745 nm was performed after incubating the mixture for 30 min in the dark at room temperature. The positive control in this study used standard quercetin and ascorbic acid.
IC50 values were calculated by comparing the percentage of inhibition of ABTS radicals across different concentrations of sample solution with the formula:
% Inhibition = (Abs. blank – Abs. sample/Abs. blank) × 100%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Material Characterization Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphologies of materials were collected on Zeiss sigma500 SEM and JEOL-JEM 2100 F transmission electron microscopy (TEM). High-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) images and elemental maps of materials were recorded on a JEOL JEM 200F TEM/STEM equipped with a spherical aberration corrector. The single crystal structure data were collected on a Bruker SMART APEX-II CCD detector system. Power XRD patterns of samples were achieved on a PANalytical X’Pert Pro diffractometer. ICP-OES (Agilent 725) was used to detect the Cu contents. Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms were recorded at 77 K in N2 atmosphere on a Micromeritics Autosorb-IQ Accelerated Surface Area and Porosimetry System. A Thermo Scientific K-Alpha+ X-ray photoelectron spectroscope was applied to probe the surface chemical compositions of samples. UVvis spectra were collected on an UVvis spectrometer (Shimadzu, UV1900). In situ Raman spectra of LSBs were collected on a Horiba LabRAM HR Evolution confocal Raman instrument. A LSBs-Raman cell (Beijing Scistar Tech. Co. Ltd.) was used in the operando Raman measurement.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Bioreduction of AgNO3 and Synthesis of Ag-NPs and ZnO-NPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
UV–visible (UV-Vis) spectroscopy (UV-1900, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) was used to track the bioreduction of the AgNO3 salt solution and to examine the production of the Ag-NPs and ZnO-NPs using P. harmala seed aqueous extract. Double-distilled water was employed as a control. All spectrophotometric analyses were carried out inside a quartz cuvette with a path length of 1 cm. The surface plasmon resonance (SPR) of the NPs was measured using a wavelength range of 800–200 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!