The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

33 protocols using truseq pcr free kit

1

Whole Genome Sequencing Library Prep

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA for founder and control samples was extracted from spleens, tail tips or ear punches using phenol:chloroform or kit according to manufacturer’s suggestions. DNA was quantified using fluorescence-based detection on a Qubit (Thermofisher) or by UV absorbance. Whole genome sequencing libraries were prepared at The Centre for Applied Genomics (The Hospital of Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario) following standard practices. Briefly, 700 ng of genomic DNA was sheared to an average size of 400 bp using a Covaris LE220 and was used as input to generate a whole-genome library using the TruSeq PCR-free kit (Illumina). The resulting DNA libraries were sequenced on Illumina Hi-seq X instrument to generate 2x150bp paired-end reads.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Tobacco Genome Sequencing and Assembly

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
VAM DNA was extracted independently from eight plantlets using a Qiagen Dneasy kit, checked for concentration and mixed together. Libraries were prepared with an Illumina TruSeq PCR‐free kit and sequenced on one lane of HiSeq 3000 (paired‐end 2 × 150 pb) generating 176 403 416 paired‐end reads. Data were imported in CLC Genomic Workbench, as well as the N. tabacum v1.0 reference genome (Edwards et al, 2017) available on the Solanaceae Genomics Network (SGN; https://solgenomics.net). The function ‘Map Read to Contigs’ was used. The parameters used were as default, with length fraction = 1 and similarity fraction = 0.98.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Stranded mRNA Sequencing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The RNA sequencing library strategy is described in (Nielsen et al. 2019 (link)). Briefly, an mRNA sequencing library was produced for each of the eight replicates with the Truseq stranded mRNA kit (Illumina, San Diego, California, United States) and SuperscriptII reverse transcriptase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). 1 µg total RNA was used for each of the eight mRNA library preparations. DNase was not used to avoid breakdown of long transcripts and because the stranded protocol minimizes the influence of DNA contamination. The efficiency of the protocol was assessed using the directionality of reads. A PCR-free DNA sequencing library was produced using the Illumina TruSeq PCR-Free kit according to protocol. DNA was sheared in a Covaris E210 with the following settings: Intensity: 4, Duty cycle 10%, Cycles per burst: 200, Treatment time: 70 s intended to produce fragments of 350nt.
The library cluster forming molarity of all samples was evaluated using the KAPA qPCR system (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and samples were run on a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) to evaluate the fragment length.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Shotgun Metagenomics of Environmental Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each treatment, three samples were selected for shotgun metagenomics, resulting in a total of 18 sequenced samples. Libraries were prepared with a TruSeq PCR-free kit (Illumina). Samples were sequenced on a NovaSeq 6000 with a 2 × 151 setup, resulting in 800 million pair-reads. Low quality reads and adapters were removed with Trimmomatic v0.3970 (link). Co-assembly of short reads was done with Megahit71 (link) using the --presets meta-large setting, resulting in 1,975,712 contigs of ≥1 kb, and N50 of 4375 bp. Reads were mapped to the co-assembly using Bowtie2 v2.3.572 (link). Protein coding sequences in all the assembled contigs were identified with Prodigal v.2.6.373 (link), using the meta prediction mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Resequencing Biparental Progenies for Structural Variation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The differentiation and structural variation studies were based on resequencing of four pools of DNA: two pools of male or female progenies from the two biparental populations 74F × Kabusa (36 females and 38 males) and 74F × 14 M (32 females and 46 males). Each pool consisted of eight leaf punches per flowering progeny to balance the DNA quantity and by choosing leaves close to flowers to avoid vine mixing. DNA extraction and quality checks were carried out as previously described at the GenoAgap platform (CIRAD, Montpellier, France). Library preparation and sequencing was conducted using the Illumina TruSeq PCR-Free kit. Paired-end (2 × 150 bp) sequencing was conducted on an Illumina HiSeq3000 system. Both library preparation and sequencing were performed at the GeT-PlaGe platform (INRAe, Castanet-Tolosan, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Gut Microbiome Metagenomic Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA isolated from the cecal contents of 5 mice per treatment group was used for metagenomic analysis. Libraries were prepared using the Illumina TruSeq PCR-free kit following vendor protocols and sequenced at the University of Wisconsin Biotechnology Center’s DNA Sequencing Facility. All samples were run on a single NovaSeq6000 2 × 150 S4-Flowcell lane. The resulting sequences were trimmed for quality using Trimmomatic (version 0–39) and then aligned against reference host genomes (Mus musculus GRCm38_Rel98) with bowtie2 (version 2.3.4) to remove host reads (average host alignment rate was 5.3%) leaving only high-quality, non-host reads. Cleaning ultimately resulted in an average of 29.4 million paired-end reads per sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Whole Genome Sequencing of Cherry Trees

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA of eight representative trees of the SU collection and one of the parental trees of the mapping population, ‘Yama-Zakura’, were digested with NEBNext dsDNA Fragmentase (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) for whole genome shotgun library preparation using the Illumina TruSeq PCR-free Kit. The sequences were determined on the Illumina NextSeq platform. Read trimming, read mapping to the CYE_r3.1 sequence and SNP identification were performed as described above. Effects of SNPs on gene functions were evaluated using SnpEff v. 4.2.61 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Nile Tilapia Genomic DNA Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One hundred Nile tilapia broodstock samples from the 15th generation of the core GIFT Nile tilapia-breeding nucleus of WorldFish at the Aquaculture Extension Center in Jitra (Kedah, Malaysia) were used for DNA sequencing for SNP discovery. Caudal fin clips were sampled and preserved in absolute ethanol at -20° until shipment from Malaysia to The Roslin Institute (University of Edinburgh, UK) for DNA extraction, sequencing and genetic analysis.
Genomic DNA was isolated from the tilapia fin clips using a salt-based extraction method (Aljanabi and Martinez 1997 (link)). The integrity of the DNA samples was assessed by performing an agarose gel electrophoresis. DNA quality was also evaluated by estimating the 260/280 and 260/230 ratios on a NanoDrop 1000 UV spectrophotometer. The concentration of the DNA extractions was measured with the Qubit dsDNA BR assay kit (Invitrogen, Life technologies). Samples were diluted to 50 ng/ul and then combined in equimolar concentrations to generate two pools of 50 (different) individuals each. Library preparation and sequencing services were provided by Edinburgh Genomics (University of Edinburgh, UK). DNA pools were prepared for sequencing using a TruSeq PCR-free kit (Illumina, San Diego). The two pools were then sequenced at a minimum 90X depth of coverage on an Illumina HiSeq X platform with a 2x150 bp read length.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive genomic profiling of hESCs and iPSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole-genome sequence data and genotype calls for 121 hESC lines were obtained from Merkle et al.19 . We denote these as “Merkle_batch1”. Nine additional hESCs were sequenced in another batch from Merkle et al.19 , denoted as “Merkle_batch2”. We further used whole-genome sequence data from 326 iPSC lines from the HipSci Project20 (link) (ENA accession number: PRJEB15299), denoted as “HipSci”. We sequenced an additional 15 hESCs and 17 iPSCs (dbGaP accession number: phs001957), denoted as “in_house_hESC” and “in_house_iPSC”, respectively.
For the in-house datasets, DNA was extracted using the MasterPure Complete DNA and RNA Purification Kit (Lucigen). Sequencing libraries were prepared using the Illumina TruSeq PCR-free kit and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq X Ten to ~16-fold coverage with 150 × 2 paired-end reads. Sequencing was performed at GeneWiz (South Plainfield, NJ). Reads were aligned to GRCh37 using BWA, and genetic variants were called following the GATK Best Practices. Variants were filtered using GATK’s variant quality score recalibration, such that SNPs had a 99.9% sensitivity to true variants (HapMap 3.3 and Omni 2.5M)58 (link) and a 99.0% sensitivity to true indels (Mills / 1000 Genomes indels)59 (link),60 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Genomic DNA Extraction and Library Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was prepared from anaerobic 24 h liquid cultures using the media described above before extraction using the Powersoil DNA extraction kit (MoBio), PureLink genomic DNA minikit (ThermoFisher) or DNeasy UltraClean Microbial kit (Qiagen). Libraries were prepared with either an Apollo 324 instrument, the Nextera XT kit (Illumina), or TruSeq PCR-free kit (Illumina). Libraries were sequenced according to the platform and chemistry listed in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!