The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Picoamh assay

Manufactured by Ansh Labs
Sourced in United States

The PicoAMH assay is a laboratory test used to measure the levels of Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) in biological samples. AMH is a protein produced by the ovaries and testes, and its measurement provides information about reproductive function. The PicoAMH assay is a sensitive and precise analytical tool designed to quantify AMH concentrations in a variety of sample types.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using picoamh assay

1

Serum AMH Levels in PCOS Women

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
External replication was carried out in an independent cohort. A total of 321 women from the Chicago PCOS cohort were included. The Chicago PCOS cohort was approved by the Northwestern IRB (#STU00008096). Patients were included when they met the 1990 National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria for PCOS, requiring the presence of both clinical and/or biochemical HA and OD. Cases fulfilling these criteria also meet the Rotterdam criteria for PCOS. Serum AMH levels were measured with the picoAMH assay [Ansh Labs®, Webster, TX, USA].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Disease Activity and Serum AMH Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Disease activity was measured using a tender and swollen joint count for 28 joints (disease activity score in 28 joints [DAS28]) combined with serum C‐reactive protein (CRP) levels (DAS28‐CRP) 23. Details on the measurement of RF and ACPAs can be found in the original report on the PARA study 22.
Serum samples were stored at −80°C. Serum AMH levels (μg/l or ng/ml) were measured using picoAMH assay developed by Ansh Labs 24. The limit of detection (LoD) was 0.0012 μg/l.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Measuring Disease Activity and AMH Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Disease activity was measured during the PARA study visits using the Disease Activity Score assessing 28 joints (DAS28) for tenderness and swollenness, combined with serum C reactive protein levels.23 (link)Serum samples were stored at −80°C. Serum AMH levels were measured in the samples from all preconception and 6 month postpartum PARA study assessments, as well as in the newly acquired samples from the follow-up visit.
AMH values were measured using the picoAMH assay, provided by Ansh labs (Houston, Texas, USA).24 25 (link) Interassay and intra-assay coefficients of variation were both <5%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

AMH Measurement Protocols Across Epidemiological Studies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Included studies measured AMH in either serum or plasma using different manual AMH ELISA assays. The picoAMH assay (Ansh Labs, Webster, TX) was used to measure circulating AMH levels in the Generations Study, both Nurses’ Health Studies, the Doetinchem Cohort Study and SWAN. For the Sister Study, the ultrasensitive AMH ELISA (Ansh Labs, Webster, TX, USA) was used, and for ALSPAC, AMH was measured using the Gen II AMH ELISA (Beckman Coulter UK Ltd, High Wycombe, UK). Antibodies differ between the Ansh Labs and Beckman Coulter assays (Moolhuijsen and Visser, 2020 ), but detailed information about these differences in antibodies is not available. The methodology for handling AMH measurements below the assay limit of detection (LOD) also differed across studies. A detailed overview of these study-specific details has been included in Supplementary Table SI. Across studies, the percentage of measurements under the assay-specific LODs ranged from 0% to 24.2%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Verifying AMH Assay Discrepancies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A recent case report suggested that the amino acid substitution corresponding to rs10417628 (AMH locus) reduces AMH detection by the picoAMH assay from Ansh Labs without influencing AMH bioactivity (Hoyos et al., 2020 (link)). We sought to verify this finding in a subsample of the Doetinchem Cohort Study, for which AMH was measured using both the picoAMH assay and the less sensitive Gen II assay from Beckman Coulter. In addition, we requested median AMH levels across rs10417628 genotype categories from both ALSPAC mothers and daughters, because ALSPAC also used the AMH Gen II assay from Beckman Coulter.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Detailed PCOS Diagnosis and Measurement Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In total, 655 women of reproductive age and European ancestry from the previously described Rotterdam PCOS cohort were included in this study (Day et al., 2018 (link)). The Rotterdam PCOS cohort, the CyclusOLigoAmennorroe (COLA) study, was approved by the institutional review board (Medical Ethics Committee) of the Erasmus Medical Center (04-263). PCOS was diagnosed based on the Rotterdam criteria requiring at least two out of the following three diagnostic criteria: (i) oligo- or amenorrhea, defined as chronic menstrual cycle interval >35 days or >188 days, respectively; (ii) clinical HA, defined as modified Ferriman Gallwey (FG) score above 5 and/or biochemical HA, defined as elevated (>4.5) free androgen index [testosterone × 100/SHBG] (Bui et al., 2015 (link)); and (iii) polycystic ovaries, defined as 12 or more follicles of 2–9 mm in each ovary and/or an ovarian volume >10 ml (Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group, 2004 ). Serum AMH levels were measured with the picoAMH assay [Ansh Labs®, Webster, TX, USA]. Serum testosterone was measured using radioimmunoassays (Diagnostic Products Corporation). Serum FSH and LH were measured using the Siemens Immulite 2000XPi, and total follicle count (TFC) and ovarian volume were assessed as described earlier (van Santbrink et al., 1997 (link); Kevenaar et al., 2008 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

AMH Measurement in Plasma Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The plasma samples from round 1 were stored in EDTA aliquots at –30 °C. The samples derived from rounds 2–5 were stored in EDTA aliquots at –80 °C. Prior to the current study, the samples were thawed once for additional measurements and immediately refrozen. For the current study, stored plasma samples of rounds 1–5 were utilized. In March 2015, all the available samples of each participant had been retrieved from storage and were shipped on dry ice to AnshLabs (Webster, Texas, USA), where they were temporarily stored at –20 °C until the analyses were performed. AMH levels were measured with the picoAMH assay (AnshLabs), because of its low limit of detection and the small aliquot size necessary, which is crucial for cohort studies with a limited pool of biological samples. The plasma samples of each individual were measured in a single assay run, by a single laboratory operator. In total, two laboratory operators performed all measurements. At a mean level of 91.2 pg/mL, the coefficient of variation was 4.0 %. At 290.3 pg/mL, the coefficient of variation was 4.8 %. The limit of quantification was 3.0 pg/mL and the limit of detection 1.8 pg/mL. There were no indications of plate drift, with all coefficients of variation within plate columns and rows under 5 %.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Replicating PCOS Biochemical Criteria

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Internal replication was carried out in a follow-up sample of the discovery PCOS cohort. A total of 458 women of European ancestry, diagnosed based on the Rotterdam PCOS criteria, were included. The diagnostic criteria for biochemical HA was adjusted to a cutoff value of 2.9 for patients entering the dataset after 20 August 2012, due to the use of UPLC-MS/MS instead of radioimmunoassay for the measurement of serum testosterone (Bui et al., 2015 (link)). Serum AMH levels were measured with the picoAMH assay [Ansh Labs®, Webster, TX, USA].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

PCOS Cohort Genotyping Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All genotyping specifications for the PCOS cohorts have been described earlier in a large genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis in PCOS patients (Day et al., 2018 (link)). Samples used in this study were selected from the Rotterdam PCOS cohort based on the presence of AMH levels measured by the picoAMH assay [Ansh Labs®, Webster, TX, USA] (Day et al., 2018 (link)). All two-allelic SNPs in the region Chr19:2 245 353–2 250 827 bp (Build 37, hg19) were selected. This region covers 3969 bp of the human AMH promoter and 1505 bp downstream of the protein coding region of AMH, covering the first three exons of the AMH protein. Only SNPs with a minor allele frequency (MAF) >1% and imputation quality (r2) >0.75 were included for the analysis. The quality control check analysis was described previously (Day et al., 2018 (link)). Linkage disequilibrium (LD) between SNPs was calculated using the Ensembl library 1000GENOMES:phase_3:CEU (Zerbino et al., 2018 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Serum AMH Quantification and Batch Correction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AMH was assayed using the Ansh Labs picoAMH assay (Webster, TX) with a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.01 pg/mL. All samples with values below the LOD were assigned a value of LOD/2.28 Coefficients of variation were 9% for the case-control studies and 17% for the cross-sectional study.
Because blood samples from each study were assayed in separate batches, we applied a batch correction algorithm created for NHSII to account for potential differences between the three assays.29 (link) The median AMH levels were 2.4 and 1.8 ng/mL before and after correction and the Pearson correlation coefficient between the two versions was 0.74.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!