The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using anti myc

1

Protein Expression and Co-IP Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For protein expression analysis, total proteins were extracted from N. benthamiana tissues with buffer containing 150 mM Tris–HCl, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM CaCl2, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.15% NP-40, 0.1% Triton X-100 (pH 7.5), 10 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), plant protease inhibitor cocktail (VWR), and 20 μM MG132. Protein samples were separated on 10% Bis-Tris PAGE gels, transferred electrophoretically to 0.45-μm Amersham Protran Premium nitrocellulose membranes (GE Healthcare), and detected with anti-GFP (Takara), anti-HA, anti-FLAG, or anti-Myc (BioLegend) antibodies.
For co-IP assays, protein extracts were incubated with an anti-Myc antibody (1:2000, Sigma-Aldrich) at 4°C for 16 h followed by incubation at 4°C for 4 h with protein A/G magnetic beads (VWR) equilibrated with the extraction buffer. The beads were washed six times with 1 ml of extraction buffer, and immunoprecipitated samples were analyzed by western blotting with anti-HA, anti-FLAG, or anti-Myc (BioLegend) antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Not4 Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Log-phase cells were harvested, washed, and stored at −80°C. Cells were disrupted by bead beating using a BeadBlaster 24 (Benchmark Scientific) in lysis buffer (0.2 M Tris base, 0.39 M ammonium sulfate, 10 mM MgSO4, 1.0 mM EDTA, 20% glycerol, 1× Protease inhibitor cocktail at pH 7.9). The clarified lysate was dialyzed in dialysis buffer (20 mM HEPES, 10 mM MgOAc, 200 mM KOAc, 2 mM EGTA, 20% glycerol, 1× Protease inhibitor cocktail at pH 7.9) for 3–4 h at 4°C. Protein (0.75 mg) was diluted to 2 mg/mL using dialysis buffer and incubated with Not4 antiserum and protein-A sepharose overnight at 4°C. Beads were washed three times with immunoprecipitation wash buffer (dialysis buffer containing 0.03% NP-40) and once with NaCl immunoprecipitation wash buffer (25 mM Tris-HCL at pH 7.5 , 0.10 M NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 0.03% NP-40). Samples were loaded onto 7.5% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to membranes. Blots were probed with antimyc (BioLegend, 9E10) and Not4 antiserum. One-fifteenth of the input sample was loaded to the gel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunoblotting of Tagged Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells expressing TAP-tagged or myc-tagged proteins were grown in YPD to mid-log phase. Cells were lysed using lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% NP-40) with protease inhibitors (Pepstatin A 1 μM, Aprotinine 0.3 μM, Leupeptin 1 μM, PMSF 1 mM) and glass beads. Protein concentration was quantitated by Bradford assay. For SDS-PAGE and western blot analyses, 15–30 μg of whole cell extracts was used. Proteins were separated in SDS-PAGE and transferred onto a PVDF membrane (Millipore). The blots were visualized on film with SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Anti-TAP (Sigma, P1291) or anti-Myc (BioLegend, 626802) was used for western blot analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Transient Transfection and Immunoprecipitation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
COS1 cells were transiently transfected by FLAG-tagged Foxc1/Foxc2 or Myc-tagged Tbx1 expression vectors with Lipofetctamine LTX and Plus reagent (Invitrogen), collected after 48 h in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH8.0, 137 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 2 mM EDTA, 1 μg/mL Leupeptin, 1 mM PMSF, 1 μM pepA, and 50 μM E-64), incubated with anti-c-Myc antibody (mouse IgG1κ, clone 9E10, 6 mg/mL, BioLegend) and protein G Sepharose beads (GE healthcare), immunoblotted with monoclonal anti-Myc (BioLegend, 1:1000) or polyclonal anti-DDDDK-tag (Rabbit IgG, 1:1000, MBL, PM020) antibodies, and detected by the SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Pierce).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation with Histone Modifications

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells fixed with 1% formaldehyde were subjected to ChIP as previously described6 (link) with oligonucleotides as listed in Supplementary Table 2. The following histone antibodies were used: anti-H3K36me3 (Abcam ab9050), anti-acetyl H4 (Millipore 06–598), anti-acetyl H3 (Millipore 06–599), anti-myc (BioLegend 626802) and anti-H3 (Abcam ab1791). Except for H3 acetylation, all ChIP-seqs included S. pombe “spike-in” added at 10% relative to Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromatin.
Precipitated DNAs were analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR using THUNDERBIRD® SYPR qPCR Mix (TOYOBO) and CFX96 cycler (Bio-Rad). The DNA libraries for ChIP-seq were prepared using Accel-NGS 2 S Plus DNA Library Kit (Swift Biosciences) and sequenced on the HiSeq2500 platform (Illumina) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Western blot protein detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were transferred to low-fluorescence PVDF membranes (Bio-rad) at 90min at 200mA at 4°C. Membranes were blocked in 1:1 mixture of 1XPBS: Intercept PBS blocking buffer (LiCor) and then incubated with anti-PAP (Sigma, P1291, lot 92557) or anti-MYC (Biolegend, 626802, lot B274036) at 1:1,000 either overnight at 4°C or 90 min at RT. Membranes were washed 4X in the presence of 0.2% Tween-20 and then incubated with fluorescent anti-mouse (800nm, Rockland, 610-145-003, lot 34206) and anti-rabbit (680nm, Cell Signaling, 5366P, lot 9) at 1:5,000 and 1:15,000 respectively for 1hr at RT. Membranes were washed 4X as above, transferred to 1X PBS and imaged on a LiCor Odyssey CLx imager.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Epitope-tagged Protein Expression in Yeast

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primer sequences are given in Table S3. Genotypes of all yeast strains are given in Table S4. ADE2-MOP/FLOP and TRP1-HOP constructs were liberated from plasmid vectors by digestion with SacI + KpnI and transformed into yeast with the selection of -ade or -trp medium as appropriate. DNA was introduced into yeast by lithium acetate transformation with an appropriate selection [23 (link)] and was confirmed by PCR. The expression of all epitope-tagged proteins was confirmed by Western blot analysis of whole cell protein extracts produced by TCA precipitation, using the following monoclonal antibodies: anti-FLAG (Sigma M2, Cat#F1804, St. Louis, MO, USA), anti-MYC (BioLegend 9E10, Cat#626802, San Diego, CA, USA), or anti-HA (Thermo-Fisher 12CA5, Cat#11583816001, Waltham, MA, USA; or BioLegend 16B12, Cat#901514).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatin immunoprecipitations (ChIP) was carried out as previously described (9 (link)) with oligonucleotides as listed in Supplelmentary Table S2. 2.0 μl of anti-Rpb3 (BioLegend 626802), 1.0 μl of anti-acetyl H4 (Upstate 06-598), 1.0 μl of anti-H3 (Abcam 1791), or 2.0 μl of anti-myc (BioLegend 65004) was bound to either Protein G or Protein A agarose beads. Binding for anti-Rpb3, anti-H3 and anti-myc or for anti-acetyl H4 was done overnight in FA lysis buffer containing 275 mM NaCl or in FA lysis buffer with 1 M NaCl, respectively. Precipitates were washed with the same buffer, once with FA lysis buffer containing 500 mM NaCl for anti-Rpb3, anti-H3 and anti-myc or with FA lysis buffer containing 1.5 M NaCl for anti-acetyl H4, once with 10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0), 0.25 M LiCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, and once with TE (10 mM Tris–HCl [pH 8.0], 1 mM EDTA). Precipitated DNAs were analyzed by real-time quantitative PCR using iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-rad) and CFX96 cycler (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Protein Interaction Profiling in Plants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cDNAs of PARP1, PARP2, PARG1, PARG2, UBC13A, UBC13B, PDI1, PDI2, PDI3, and PDI4 were cloned into the Gateway destination vector pGWB405 with a C-terminal GFP tag and/or pGWB417 with a C-terminal 4×myc tag, and the resulting constructs were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101(pMP90). Leaves of 3- to 4-week-old N. benthamiana plants were agroinfiltrated with Agrobacterium cultures at an OD600 of 0.4. For flg22 treatment, 1 μM flg22 was infiltrated into leaves 1 h prior to harvest. Samples were harvested 2 days after agroinfiltration, and total proteins were prepared in extraction buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.2% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, and plant protease inhibitor cocktail at 1:100). Immunoprecipitation was carried out with GFP-Trap magnetic beads (ChromoTek) at 4°C for 1 h with gentle rotation, followed by three washes with extraction buffer without protease inhibitors. The precipitated proteins were eluted with the SDS loading buffer, subjected to SDS-PAGE, immunoblotted with anti-myc (BioLegend) or anti-GFP (TaKaRa) antibody, and detected using SuperSignal West Dura or Femto Chemiluminescent Substrates (Thermo Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antibody-Based Protein Detection Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibodies used are as follows: anti-Myc (Bio Legend-626802), anti-FLAG-HRP (Roche-6952, Sigma-A8592), anti-FLAG (Sigma-F3165), anti-FLAG-HRP (Roche-6952), anti-Cse4 (polyclonal rabbit antibody against recombinant Cse4), anti-H2A (Active Motif-39235), anti-Pgk1 (Invitrogen-459250), anti-ubiquitin (Covance-MMS257P), anti-HA (Covance-PRB101P), anti-FLAG beads (Sigma-F2426), secondary antibodies were HRP linked, anti-rabbit IgG (from donkey) and anti-mouse IgG (from sheep) (GE Healthcare, NA934V and NA931V, respectively).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!