The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

29 protocols using jsm 5900

1

Structural and Compositional Analysis of Mg Mesh

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To observe the microstructure and the chemical composition of specimens, the untreated Mg mesh, PEO-treated Mg mesh and PEO/HT-treated Mg mesh were identified through the scanning electron microscopy microscope (SEM; JSM-5900, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) in conjunction with the energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS; Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). The cross-sectional analysis for the coating layer of the PEO-treated Mg mesh and PEO/HT-treated Mg mesh was conducted using the field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, SU-70; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) after ion milling. Phase identification of the untreated Mg mesh, PEO-treated Mg mesh and PEO/HT-treated Mg mesh were analyzed using the X-ray diffractometer (X’pert Powder, PANalytical, Almelo, The Netherlands) with 2θ ranging from 10° to 90° by Cu-Kɑ (λ = 0.154060 nm) at a step of 0.03°. In all of the above tests, three samples per group were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Alkaline-Hydrothermal Mg Surface Modification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Magnesium foils (99.9% high purity) (Goodfellow, England), 100 mm × 100 mm × 0.1 mm in dimensions, were prepared by rolling and used as the substrate. The Mg foil was subjected to laser microprocessing to form a Mg mesh with a diameter of 10 mm and hole diameter of 0.4 mm. According to the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard (G1-03), chemical cleaning procedures were performed to remove the surface corrosion products and revitalize the surface. The Mg samples were directly placed into a beaker filled with a solution containing 0.25 mol/L Ca–ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (C10H12CaN2Na2O8) and 0.25 mol/L KH2PO4, and the solution was adjusted to a pH value of 8.9 with NaOH. The alkaline-hydrothermal treatment was conducted at 90°C for 2 h.
The microstructure and morphology of the CaP coating were identified using scanning electron microscopy (SEM; JSM-5900, JEOL, Japan). The cross-section of surface-modified Mg was sputtered with platinum coating, following which the cross-sectional morphological microstructure was observed using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM; SU-70, HITACHI, Japan), while the elemental composition of the designated localized area on the cross-section was investigated using energy dispersive spectroscopy with FE-SEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibacterial Ginger-Hydrogel Coating Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibacterial effect of the ginger(fraction)-hydrogel coating was determined based on bacterial growth (%) on the surface. Five hundred microliters of each suspension was added to a 24-well plate with ginger(fraction)-hydrogel-coated surfaces. After incubating the bacteria at each condition, 100 μL aliquots were taken from each group and their absorbance was measured using an ELISA microplate reader at a wavelength of 600 nm. Bacterial growth was calculated as follows:
To observe the morphology of bacteria by scanning electron microscopy (SEM; JSM-5900, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan), the bacteria grown on the surface were fixed in 25% glutaraldehyde for 2 h. After washing with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), staining was performed with a 1% osmium tetroxide solution for 2 h. The sample was then gradually dehydrated in 30%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, and 100% of ethanol for 10 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Hydrogel Morphology Analysis via SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To identity
the morphology of hydrogels, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images
were taken. Samples were immersed in PBS buffer at 37°C for 24
h to swell fully and then lyophilized overnight; after that, the cross-sections
of dried hydrogels were prepared using a blade and coated with a thin
layer of sputtered gold for 120 s. The cross-sectional morphology
of the hydrogel samples was determined using a scanning electron microscope
(JSM-5900, JEOL, Japan). ImageJ software (Nation Institutes of Health,
Bethesda, MD, USA) was used to analyze the pore size and distribution
through SEM images.37 (link),38 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Magnesium Alloy Corrosion Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The variation of Mg alloy by corrosion can be analyzed by measuring the mass loss in a solution where the media volume-to-surface area ratio is at least 50 mL/cm2 of HBSS44 (link). Thus, each specimen was immersed in 500 mL of HBSS and kept in an incubator with 5% CO2 at 37 °C for 1 week and 2 weeks, respectively. After the immersion test, the specimens were removed from HBSS and dried at room temperature. The corrosion morphology and components of the surface were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM; JSM-5900, JEOL, Japan), and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS; 7274, Oxford Instruments, England).
To measure the mass loss, the corrosion products on the surface were removed by soaking in chromic acid solution. The acid solution was manufactured by mixing 200 g/L of chromic acid, 10 g/L of silver nitrate (AgNO3), and 20 g/L of barium nitrate [Ba(NO3)2] according to American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) G145 . The average and standard deviation of three measurements was calculated for each group. The corrosion rate was calculated using the following equation according to ASTM G31–7246 : C=(KW)/(ATD) where C is the corrosion rate (mm year−1, mmpy), the constant K is 8.76 × 104, W is the mass loss (g), A is the specimen area exposed to solution (cm2), T is the time of exposure (h), and D is the density of the material (g/cm3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

SEM Analysis of Biofilm Development

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For SEM analysis, the 46-h-old biofilms were washed three times with 0.1 M cacodylate buffer and fixed with a 3% glutaraldehyde solution for 1 h, followed by post-fixation with a 1% osmium tetroxide solution for 1 h24 (link). The biofilms were dehydrated using a graded ethanol series (30–100%) and penetrated with nitrogen gas. Finally, the biofilm samples were sputter-coated with gold–palladium and observed by SEM (JSM-5900, Jeol, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Hydrogels and Silver Nanoparticle Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hydrogels were characterized by FTIR-ATR spectroscopy in a Nicolet iS5 Thermo scientific (USA) with 16 scans from 4000 to 650 cm−1. The size of synthesized AgNPs was determined by dynamic light scattering using Malvern Zetasizer Nano S, and their shape was determined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JEOL JSM-5900, Tokyo, Japan) operating at 200 kV. Solid-state crosspolarization magic angle spinning carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance (CP/MAS 13C-NMR) was used to analyze the structure of grafted films in a Bruker Avance III HD at 400 MHz. Tensile test specimens of hydrogels were adequately cut for analysis of mechanical properties of samples according to ASTM standards. For this analysis, were used hydrogels freshly prepared; samples were evaluated in an AGS-X-Shimadzu extensometer under the following conditions: 44% moisture, an extensional speed of 10 mm/min at room temperature. The measurements were carried out by triplicate for each sample, and data of a specific sample were plotted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of Mussel Shell Powder

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chemical composition of mussel seashells powder was determined by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF, ARL ADVANT’XP). In addition, the particle size distribution of the mussel shell powder was measured by using a laser particle size analyzer (Malvern, Mastersizer 2000). Rigaku D/Max-2500 XRD, Cu-Kα (1.541874 Å) was used to investigate the phase structure of the prepared samples.
The physical properties of CCNPs were tested by the following characterization: particle morphology disclosed through a scanning electron microscope (SEM, JEOL JSM-5900); and the thickness of CCNPs were considered by atomic force microscope (AFM, Veeco Autoprobe CP Research).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Ultrastructural Analysis of Fungal Hyphae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Afte exposing to DMAB(P)-Ch, the fungal hyphae were briefly washed in sterile water. Primary fixation of fungal hyphae was done with 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde buffered with 0.01 M phosphate buffered saline for 4 h at 4°C. Post fixation was done with 1% osmium tetroxide (Tedpella, Redding, CA) in 0.05 M PBS pH-7.2 for 2 h. Samples briefly washed with distilled water at room temperature and kept at 4°C with 0.5% uranyl acetate (EMS, Hatfield, USA). Samples were dehydrated with graded ethanol series 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90% and three changes of 100% ethanol 10 min for each alcohol dilution. The samples were kept in a vacuum desiccator until they were completely dry. Samples were placed on a stub coated with carbon electron conductive tape. Sputter coated with platinum for 120 s and examined under scanning electron microscope (JEOL JSM-5900, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Pitaya Epicarp Ultrastructure and Alternaria Infection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pitaya epicarp for each coating and control were cut into 4 mm × 10 mm samples and immersed in 5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde for 24 h. Then, samples were fixed with OsO4 1% (w/v) for 2 h, dehydrated in a graded alcohol series, and covered with carbon and gold before examination in a JEOL JSM-5900 (LV, Tokyo, Japan) microscope [41 (link)]. Fresh fruit was inoculated with spore suspension of 1 × 104 spores·mL−1 of Alternaria sp. (Culture Collection of Centro de Biotecnología Genómica of Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Reynosa Tamaulipas, Mexico) by a puncture and stored at 10 °C and 80% of RH for 9 days. Samples were taken and prepared for SEM analysis as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!