The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Flashsmart

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, Germany

The FlashSmart is a compact and automated lab equipment designed for rapid sample analysis. It efficiently performs elemental analysis on a variety of organic and inorganic samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

22 protocols using flashsmart

1

Elemental Composition Analysis of Levan

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The element compositions of native and modified levan were characterized by CHNS elemental analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, FlashSmart) according to methodology described in ISO 16948:2015.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Oxidized Chitosan Synthesis and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
OCS was synthesized according to a slightly modified reporting procedure [40 (link)]. After dissolving 5 g of CS in 100 mL of distilled water, it was reacted with 3.5 g of NaIO4 in the dark at room temperature, and stirring was continued for 6 h. Total of 2.5 mL of ethylene glycol was added to the flask and stirred for 1 h. Distilled water was dialyzed for 3 days to remove residual periodate and ethylene glycol. A white foam material was obtained after the purified product was lyophilized. The actual aldehyde content of OCS was measured by elemental analyzer (Thermo Flash Smart, Milan, Italy), and the oxidation degree was found to be 53.6%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Elemental Analysis of Tea Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The elemental composition (C, H, N) of ground tea samples was determined using an ThermoScientific FlashSmart analyser. C, H, N was determined for selected tea bags with duplicates from each burial site. Elemental analysis of tea bags that were unburied but HWE and unburied and not HWE was also conducted (Table SII).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Biofilm Biomass Elemental Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The biomass component of the biofilm was assessed for the relative percentage of the main biomass building elements: C, H, N, S and O. For an effective quantification of the relative percentage of each element in the microorganisms, the pellet obtained after EPS extraction was washed with mili-Q water to remove the salts from the EPS extraction solution. Cells were afterwards freeze dried and, after this heat treatment, the elemental composition of the cells grown in each bioanode was assessed with the elemental analyzer (Flash Smart, Thermo Scientific, The Netherlands).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Spectroscopic Analysis of Superoxide Anion Scavenging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EPR spectra were recorded at room temperature with a Bruker A300 spectrometer for detection of superoxide anion, using a center magnetic field at 3500.00 G, sweep width at 150.00 G, microwave power at 3.99 mW, and modulation amplitude at 1.000 G with scanning field and switching time operating for 30 s and 40 ms respectively. The NMR spectra were recorded on a JEOL‐ECX 500 instrument (500 MHz for 1H, 125 MHz for 13C) using DMSO‐d6 as the solvent. Tetramethylsilane (δ=0) and DMSO‐d6 (δ=40.1) served as internal standards for 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectral experiments, respectively. The mass spectral analysis was performed on Waters XevoTQ‐XSMs Apparatus. The element analysis (FlashSmart, ThermoFisher, Germany) was used to identify compound composition. UV spectra were recorded at room temperature, using an UV‐Vis spectrophotometer (UV759S) equipped with the wavelength in the range of 200 nm to 800 nm (Techcomp, Shanghai, China). HPLC equipped with DAD detector was utilized to monitor the whole process of superoxide‐anion scavenging in the presence of bioflavonoids as potential scavengers (Shimadzu LC20AT, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Biochemical Analysis of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We followed a modified version of the method by Gao et al. (Gao et al. 2021 (link)) to quantify the free amino acids (FAAs) content. Briefly, 0.4 g of finely chopped and thoroughly mixed samples were homogenized in 8 mL of sulfosalicylic acid (4%, w/v) and centrifuged at 3 °C for 10 min at 12,000 g. The resulting supernatant was filtered through a 0.22 µm membrane filter after undergoing another round of centrifugation with the same condition. Subsequently, an automatic amino acid analyzer (S-433D, Sykam, Eresing, Germany) was employed to analyze the filtered supernatant for FAA determination.
In accordance with the Chinese National Standard GB/T 5009.5-2016, we conducted an assessment of the protein content. Specifically, we employed a Kjeldahl apparatus (Hanon Technologies CO., Ltd. Shandong, China) for protein content determination. Total sugar and reducing sugar contents were assessed using ultraviolet spectroscopy (Shanghai Metash Instruments CO., Ltd. Shanghai, China). Starch content was determined through an iodine colorimetry method. Additionally, we utilized an Elemental Analyzer (Flash Smart, Thermo Fisher, America) to detect the chemical elements, including carbon (C), hydrogen (H), sulfur (S), and nitrogen (N).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Soil Physicochemical Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The soil EC was determined in a mixture with soil: water ratio of 1:5 (w/v) using EC meter (DDSJ-308A, Leici, China). The soil total carbon (TC) and total nitrogen (TN) concentrations were measured using a CHNS/O elemental analyzer (FlashSmart, Thermo Fisher, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Grass Growth Monitoring Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Grass seed (3.2 g) was planted into pots of 10.5 cm diameter and 12 cm depth with 300 g of topsoil compost from a well-mixed bag, bought from a local garden centre. Each set of three replicate pots (15 total) was placed in individual trays to ensure that any water drainage did not mix with or contaminate neighbouring pots. The grass was cut with hand scissors to 2 cm shoot length for each harvest. Pots were watered with 40 mL of DI H2O twice a week to account for water uptake and evaporation. The fertilisation and harvest cycle for the grasses is outlined in Table 2. The grass from each harvest was dried at 65 °C for 48 h and weighed. The nitrogen % of harvests 1, 2 and 3 were analysed using a Thermo Fisher Scientific Flash SMART with a stainless-steel column and prepacked quartz reaction tube.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Combustion Heat Analysis of Biomass and Yeast

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Combustion heat was calculated to represent the energy stored in substances. The combustion heat of glucose and ethanol are − 2804 kJ/mol and − 1366.8 kJ/mol, respectively. The combustion heat of biomass and yeast extract was estimated by Mendeleev’s empirical formula. Their elemental compositions were measured by Elemental Analysis (Flash Smart, ThermoFisher, China). After calculation, the estimated combustion heats of biomass and yeast extract were − 18,654.11 kJ/kg and − 15,473.58 kJ/kg, respectively. The electrical energy released by MFC was calculated by integrating the power density with time.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Soil Biogeochemical Properties and Enzyme Activities

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this study, 12 indices of soil samples were determined, namely pH, soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), available nitrogen (AN), available phosphorus (AP), nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N), ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N), β-1,4-glucosidase (BG), N-acetyl-β -D-glucosaminidase (NAG), acid phosphatase (LCP), and leucine aminopeptidase (LAP). Soil pH was determined in suspension with a water-to-soil ratio of 2.5:1 using a pH meter (PHC-3C, Leici, Shanghai, China). SOC, TN, TP, AN, and AP were determined using the method described by Bao (2000 ). SOC and TN were determined using an automatic elemental analyzer (FlashSmart, Thermo Fisher, USA). TP, AN, and AP were determined on a continuous flow analyzer (Flowsys, Systea, Italy). Nitrogen and ammonium nitrogen in the soil were extracted with potassium chloride solution according to ISO standards and determined with a continuous flow analyzer (Flowsys, Systea, Italy). Soil enzyme activity was analyzed for BG, NAG, LCP, and LAP according to the method of Jiao et al. (2022 (link)) and determined with UV-visible spectrophotometer (Specord 200 Plus, Analytik, Germany), with active units expressed as IUg−1 units.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!