The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Optomotry device

Manufactured by Cerebral Mechanics
Sourced in Canada

The OptoMotry device is a laboratory equipment used for measuring optokinetic responses in animals. It consists of a virtual cylinder and an overhead camera that tracks the animal's head movements in response to rotating visual stimuli.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

7 protocols using optomotry device

1

Measuring Visual Acuity in Rodents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Visual acuity was assessed as the optomotor response (OMR) using the OptoMotry device from Cerebral Mechanics (Medicine Hat, Alberta, Canada). OptoMotry is a non-invasive behavioral test that measures visual acuity in mice and rats (Prusky, Alam, Beekman, & Douglas, 2004 (link)). This test causes minimal stress to the rodents. Briefly, a single mouse was placed on a platform within the OptoMotry device. Video monitors surrounding the rodent displayed gratings that moved around the rodent, periodically reversing direction. These stimuli evoked optomotor reflexes, causing the rodent to turn its head if the grating was visible. A camera above the rodent was used to detect these responses, and to determine the spatial frequency and/or contrast thresholds needed to generate a response.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating Visual Function in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
OMR measurements were performed periodically (Figure 1) using the OptoMotry® device from Cerebral Mechanics, in parallel with OCT and cSLO measurements. Spatial frequency was monitored as a parameter for visual function. The spatial frequency threshold was determined by randomly changing the spatial frequency to identify the threshold at which the mouse could track, as previously described (15 (link), 17 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Assessing Visual Perception in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice underwent visual psychophysical testing using the OptoMotry device (CerebralMechanics, Inc. Cat# D430) to assess spatial frequency threshold and contrast sensitivity as previously described [8 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Optokinetic response assessment in killifish

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess recovery of primary vision, adult killifish of 6‐weeks‐, 12‐weeks‐, 18‐weeks‐, and 24‐weeks‐old were subjected to an optokinetic response test (Van houcke et al., 2017 (link)) at 0, 2, 4, 7, 10, 14, 18, 35, 42, 55, and 60 days following bilateral ONC. First, fish were anesthetized briefly in 0.03% Tris‐buffered tricaine. After positioning them in a custom‐made glass chamber, a continuous water flow was provided, allowing the fish to reawaken and breathe while being immobilized. The glass chamber was then placed in an OptoMotry device (Cerebral Mechanics) for assessment of visual acuity. The maximal spatial frequency provoking an optokinetic reflex of each fish was determined, while velocity and contrast were kept fixed at 15 deg/s and 100%, respectively. Each trial was initiated with a spatial frequency of 0.02 (c/d), which increased stepwise following a staircase model. One day on beforehand, fish were allowed for an adaptation period in the system. For every age group, the optokinetic reflex of at least six fish was followed up (with exception of 6‐weeks‐old fish at 10 dpi (n = 5) and of 24‐weeks‐old fish at 18 dpi (n = 4)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Evaluating Visual Function in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were evaluated using the OptoMotry device from Cerebral Mechanics (Medicine Hat, Alberta, AB, Canada). Briefly, the individual mouse was placed on the central platform inside the chamber, and computer monitors surrounding the mouse projected a virtual stimulus in the form of a sine wave. Animals tracked the grating with head and neck movements in the direction of grid rotation clockwise or counterclockwise. The system measured visual function in each eye separately because motion in the temporal to the nasal direction of either eye elicited a tracking response. A camera above monitored the behavior of the mouse, allowing the rater to detect the response in corporal and give a score of yes or no. To examine visual acuity, spatial frequency thresholds (cycles per degree) were measured by systematically increasing the spatial frequency of the grating (decreasing the bar width) at full contrast until mice could no longer track. The rotation speed was fixed at 12 degrees per second, and the data were managed and generated by the software. Data are presented as responses from both eyes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Visual Psychophysical Testing in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice underwent visual psychophysical testing using the OptoMotry device (CerebralMechanics, Inc., D430) to assess spatial frequency threshold and contrast sensitivity as previously described (Baba et al., 2018b) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Tracking Zebrafish Visual Recovery After Optic Nerve Injury

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate visual recovery after ON injury, adult zebrafish were subjected to an optokinetic response test at various time points after bilateral ONC, more specifically at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 16, 18, 20, 23, 25, 27, and 32 dpi. Per age group, 6 fishes were thus followed up over a consecutive period of 32 days. Fish were anesthetized briefly in 0.02% buffered tricaine to enable positioning in a custom-made glass chamber. Next, a continuous water flow was provided, reawakening the fish and allowing them to breathe while immobilized. The flow-through chamber was then placed in an Opto-Motry device (Cerebral Mechanics) for visual stimulation (Mueller and Neuhauss, 2010) . Visual acuity was assessed by determining the maximal spatial frequency of the fish, while velocity and contrast were kept fixed at 10 deg/s and 100%, respectively. After an adaptation period of 40 seconds, each trial was initiated with a spatial frequency of 0.02 (c/d), which increased stepwise following a staircase model.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!