The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Tegaderm transparent film dressing

Manufactured by 3M
Sourced in United States

Tegaderm™ transparent film dressing is a sterile, single-use medical device made of transparent polyurethane film. It serves as a protective barrier against external contaminants while allowing visual inspection of the wound site.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using tegaderm transparent film dressing

1

Wound Healing and S. aureus Infection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were shaved on a dorsal patch of skin as in 2.6 and then a single 5mm skin punch was made using a circular biopsy punch under anesthesia. Mice were injected subcutaneously with Buprenorphine-SR for pain management post wounding (ZooPharm, Fort Collins, CO). Mice were treated 24h later with vehicle or 1,25(OH)2D3 as in part 2.6 directly onto the wounded area. The following day 8×105 CFU of S. aureus Rosenbach strain were applied in a 10μl volume to the wound, and the mice were bandaged with non-stick gauze and Tegaderm™ transparent film dressing (3M™, St. Paul, MN). Bandages were removed 24h post infection and mice were monitored daily. At 2 days post infection, the mice were treated again with either vehicle or 1,25(OH)2D3 at the wound site. At 5 days post infection, mice were euthanized and a 10mm circular biopsy of the skin was taken at the wound site. The skin samples were placed in 1ml PBS and homogenized using steel 2.4mm beads in a Precellys 24 homogenizer. The lysate was then serially diluted and plated on tryptic soy agar plates to enumerate surviving S. aureus bacteria.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of Adhesive Patches

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Monolithic patches consisting of a backing and a DURO-TAK 87-2852 drug matrix and drug-in-matrix patches consisting of a backing, a DURO-TAK 87-2852 drug matrix, and a MG 7-9850 SSA skin contacting layer were prepared (refer to Section 2.4). Patches as well as commercial products, Tegaderm transparent film dressing (3M, St. Paul, MN, USA), and Mepitel One (Molnlycke Health Care AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) were applied on ex vivo full-thickness porcine skin. Samples were removed from the skin, and the adhesive sides were gold coated for 30 s using a sputter coater (DII-29010SCTR Smart Coater, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) and imaged using a benchtop SEM (JCM-6000Plus, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Silk-Elastin Wound Dressing Application

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The target ulcer is debrided in the operating room using a scalpel, scissors, and a curette under appropriate anesthesia. After hemostat and irrigation, the study device is applied to the surface of the wound and covered with a wound dressing, which the investigator/sub-investigator chooses from the following: polyurethane film dressing (3M Tegaderm Transparent Film Dressing; 3M, Maplewood, Minnesota, USA), silicone-faced wound dressing (SI-Aid; ALCARE, Tokyo, Japan), low-adherent absorbent dressing (Melolin; Smith & Nephew, Hull, UK), and polyurethane form dressing (Hydrosite thin type; Smith & Nephew). If the investigator/sub-investigator is afraid of overproducing wound exudate that causes poor hydrogel formation of silk-elastin, the investigator/sub-investigator applies not the study device but a wound dressing or an ointment. In this case, the investigator/sub-investigator applies the study device on the day after the surgery. Antibiotics are administered intravenously before and after the surgery.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Rapid Microfluidic Cortisol Assay Development

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cellulose papers (CFP42‐457) were purchased from STERLITECH., Inc, USA as the wicking pads. The flexible TPE layer (9984 Diagnostic Microfluidic Surfactant Free Medical Hydrophilic Film), biocompatible adhesive (Medical Tape 1522, Double Sided Transparent Polyethylene), transparent acrylate adhesives (Microfluidic Diagnostic Tape, 9969 Adhesive Transfer Tape), and a waterproof adhesive layer (Tegaderm Transparent Film Dressing) were provided by 3M, Co, USA. The PSA (AR care @8939 as a polyester film with a double‐sided medical pressure‐sensitive adhesive) was purchased from Adhesives Research., Inc, USA. The lateral flow nitrocellulose (Vivid 90 LFNC, VIV92503R, the wicking rate of 70–110 s cm−4) was provided by PALL., Co, NY, USA, and the microfiber glass (Grade 121,) was supplied by Ahlstrom‐Munksjö., Co, Finland. The Human Cortisol ELISA Kits were purchased from two suppliers: LS‐F10024 purchased from Life Span Biosciences., Co, USA, and ab108665 purchased from Abcam., Ltd, Canada.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Thermocompression Molding of PLA Microneedles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A roll of 1.75 mm diameter PLA filament was purchased from Sondori, South Korea, and cut into lengths of ≤1 cm with scissors for thermocompression molding. A sheet of PTFE (3 mm thick) was purchased from Mirae International Trading, Gunpo, South Korea. The release agent (Easy-Lease™) was used to enable PLA microneedles to be detached from PTFE molds after thermocompression molding and was purchased from Easy Composites Ltd., Longton, UK. Adhesive film (Tegaderm™ transparent film dressing), which was used to attach the microneedle sensor to skin, was purchased from 3M, South Korea, and phosphate buffered saline (PBS 1X) was from Lonza, Switzerland.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Topical and Subcutaneous Anesthesia Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This was studied for eight subjects (mean age 29 ± 12 years, five males and three females), with several participating in other sets of observations (n = 6). The experimental protocol consisted of positive impulses (at two intensities: 0 and +6 dB) and tendon hammer taps applied over C7 while both standing and kneeling. After completion of the baseline observations, local anaesthetic was applied over C7 either topically (n = 5) or via subcutaneous injection (n = 3). Topical anaesthesia was applied over a 6 × 7 cm area using 5 % EMLA cream (AstraZeneca Australia, North Ryde) and secured with Tegaderm transparent film dressing (3 M Health Care, MN). Subcutaneous administration was carried out using 3–4 ml of 2 % lignocaine hydrochloride (Pfizer Australia, West Ryde) injected to 4–6 sites around the usual stimulation site. Skin sensation was assessed approximately 45–60 min postapplication using neurological examination pins (Neurotips, Owen Mumford Inc., GA). Overall, the anesthetised region was approximately 5 cm × 6 cm and included the area of the applied stimuli. The subjects were then retested.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Simultaneous Wearable Activity Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four different activity monitors were simultaneously used for this study: ActiGraph wGT3X-BT (ActiGraph, Ft. Pensacola, FL, USA), ActivPAL3c VT (PAL Technologies, Glasgow, UK), GENEActiv Original (Activinsights Limited, Kimbolton, Cambridgeshire, UK), and DynaPort MM+ (McRoberts B.V., The Hague, The Netherlands). Each monitor was set to its default settings and worn as recommended by the manufacturer.
ActiGraph wGT3X-BT (46 × 33 × 15 mm, 19 g) was sampled at the default setting of 30 Hz (with the low-frequency extension filter applied) and worn around the waist on the mid-axillary line of the right hip using an elastic band. ActivPAL3c VT (35 × 53 × 7 mm, 15 g) was sampled at 20 Hz and mounted on the right anterior mid-thigh (at 50% femur length, the latter being the distance between the trochanter major and the lateral femur epicondyle) using Tegaderm™ transparent film dressing (3M Health Care, St. Paul, MN, USA). GENEActiv Original (43 × 40 × 13 mm, 16 g) was worn on two locations, each having its own sampling frequency: non-dominant wrist using medical tape (100 Hz) and left anterior mid-thigh (at 50% femur length using Tegaderm™ transparent film dressing; 60 Hz). Finally, DynaPort MM+ (106.6 × 58 × 11.5 mm, 55 g) was worn on the middle of the lower back using an elastic band and was sampled at 100 Hz (Figure 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Self-Made Covered Stent Fabrication

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An appropriate length of 3 M™ Tegaderm™ transparent film dressing (frame type 1624 W, 3 M Company, USA) was cut according to the length of stent ( which was usually 2 mm shorter than the stent), this film formed the outer layer of the self-made covered stent, and the cut transparent film was then wrapped around the surface of the stent(the parts of the stent that are not covered at both ends should be of the same length) [4 ], which was a self-made covered stent. In this experiment, the stent was wrapped 1–5 layers with film, and the expansion of the stent of wrapping different number layers with the film in vitro was observed to select the best number of layers, and then according to the best number of layers a covered stent was made for animal experiments. The stents used in this study were all drug-eluting stents(DES)(firehawk, MicroPort Medical, Shanghai).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Adhesive Tape Application Procedure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prior to application, ThermoTape and Tegaderm Transparent Dressing Film (10.1cm×10m, 3M, US) were prepared in 2.5×5.1cm samples. ThermoTape was prepared with a liner system that allowed for a similar application style as Tegaderm, where the adhesive is not touched during application. A 2.5×5.1cm section of KRT (2.5cm×5m, 3M, US) was peeled from the roll and cut at the time of tape application.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Adhesive Tape Application Procedure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prior to application, ThermoTape and Tegaderm Transparent Dressing Film (10.1cm×10m, 3M, US) were prepared in 2.5×5.1cm samples. ThermoTape was prepared with a liner system that allowed for a similar application style as Tegaderm, where the adhesive is not touched during application. A 2.5×5.1cm section of KRT (2.5cm×5m, 3M, US) was peeled from the roll and cut at the time of tape application.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!