The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Fastprep 24 5g instrument

Manufactured by MP Biomedicals
Sourced in United States, Germany, China

The FastPrep-24 5G Instrument is a high-speed benchtop homogenizer designed for efficient and rapid sample preparation. It utilizes high-speed shaking to disrupt cells and tissues, enabling efficient extraction of nucleic acids, proteins, and other biomolecules from a variety of sample types.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

64 protocols using fastprep 24 5g instrument

1

SARS-CoV-2 RNA Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All tissues were homogenized in RPMI medium by using the FastPrep-24 5G Instrument (MP Biomedicals, Schwerte, Germany), and disposable homogenizer beads (Zymo Research Bashing Bead Lysis Tubes, Freiburg, Germany) were used to avoid contamination. We placed 200 mg of each tissue/organ in 1000 µl RPMI-1640 (Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Thermo Fisher Scientific GmbH, Dreieich, Germany). After a centrifugation step (2 min, 12,000 rpm), the supernatants were collected for the determination of the viral load. RNA extraction was performed by using the QIAcube RNeasy Viral Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's guide. qRT-PCR was performed using RIDAgene (r-biopharm, Darmstadt, Germany) with the Rotor-Gene Q (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) to detect the E-gene of SARS-CoV-2 by determining the cycle threshold (Ct) value. The RNA standard curve, prepared by amplification of the positive control with the RIDAgene (r-biopharm, Darmstadt, Germany) kit, was applied for quantification. SARS-CoV-2 RNA is represented as the decadic logarithm of the number of copies/ml. The following scale was applied: very high (>104 copies/ml), high (103–104 copies/ml), moderate (102–103 copies/ml), low (101–102 copies/ml), and below the detection limit (bdl).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

CXCL16 Quantification in Murine Lungs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The left side of the lung from each mouse was homogenized in 500 μl of T-PER™ tissue protein extraction reagent (ThermoFisher Scientific) containing proteinase inhibitor using a FastPrep-24™ 5G Instrument (MP Biomedicals). The lung homogenates were assayed using the mouse CXCL16 ELISA kit (ThermoFisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Mtb H37Rv RNA Isolation and qRT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA from Mtb H37Rv wild type was isolated from an equivalent of 20 mL of culture at an OD600 = 0.4. Cultures were spun down at 3200 rpm for 10 min, resuspended in 1 mL TRIzol (Invitrogen), and subjected to bead beating by using a FastPrep-24 5G instrument (MP Biomedicals; twice for 45 s each, 5 min on ice between pulses). RNA was purified using the PureLink RNA mini kit with the Turbo DNA-free kit (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s instructions with on-column DNAse treatment (Invitrogen). cDNA was synthesized from 500 ng of total RNA with the SuperScript III first-strand synthesis system (Invitrogen) by using random primers (Promega). Quantitative PCR was performed using the FastStart Essential DNA Green Master (Roche) on a LightCycler 96 real-time PCR system (Roche) (for primers, see Supplementary Table 3). Relative expression of transcripts was determined by the ΔΔCQ method as compared with 16S rRNA, which was uniformly expressed in our Mtb strains. cDNA was synthesized from at least two independent RNA samples and qRT-PCR was performed at least twice, in triplicate wells, for each cDNA sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Mycobacterium bovis BCG Protein Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
M. bovis BCG wild type or mutant cultures were grown to mid-log phase in independent biological replicates and 100 mL of culture (adjusted to OD600 = 0.4) was harvested by centrifugation at 3400 × g for 20 min at 277 K, washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and pelleted again. For the western blotting experiments, mid-log cultures were adjusted to OD600 = 0.2 in fresh media and subjected to POA treatment (1 or 4 mM), the equivalent of 100 mL OD600 = 0.4 was harvested at specified time points. The cell pellets were resuspended in 600 µL lysis buffer (50 mM Tris/Hcl pH 7.5, 5% (vol/vol) glycerol, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 1% n-dodecyl β-D-maltoside (w/vol), 1× complete EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche)), transferred to a lysis matrix B tube (MP Biomedicals) and homogenized using a FastPrep-24 5 G instrument (MP Biomedicals). The cell debris was pelleted by centrifugation at 13,000 × rpm for 10 min at 277 K and the supernatant (about 400 µL) was collected and stored at 193 K until further use. The protein concentration was determined by a BCA protein assay kit (Pierce).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

RNA Extraction from Artery Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extraction of RNA was performed with the same method for both the microarray and PCR. The RNA was isolated with the Nucleospin miRNA isolation kit (Machery-Nagel, Düren, Germany), following the manufactures instructions for extraction of total RNA. The artery-samples were first homogenized in in Lysing matrix D tubes containing 1.4 mm ceramic spheres (MP Biomedicals, CA, USA) and lysis buffer (ML buffer) from the NucleoSpin kit on dry ice in a FastPrep-24™ 5G instrument (MP Biomedicals, USA) with 3x20sec cycles.
After RNA extraction, the amount of RNA was quantified using a NanoDrop 2000 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, MA, USA). A ratio of sample absorbance at 260 nm and 280 nm in the range of 1.7 to 2.1 was accepted. The RNA which was to be used for microarray analysis was concentrated with a Scan Speed 32 speed vacuum concentrator (Labogene, Denmark). The concentration and quality of the concentrated RNA was determined with a NanoDrop ND1000 spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Thermal Stability of Encapsulated Bioactives

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The thermal stabilities of the encapsulated bioactive compounds were evaluated using a thermostatic water bath at 90 °C for up to 60 min. A 1 mL suspension of the cells with encapsulated compounds and 1 mL of juice alone were added to the prewarmed 20 mL glass vials (Thermo Scientific™ B780020, Waltham, MA, USA) and incubated in the dark for 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 40, and 60 min. The concentration of the total antioxidant contents in the juice sample and the cell encapsulated sample were maintained the same. After the treatment, 1 mL acidified methanol was added to each vial. Bead-beating at 6.0 m/s for 30 s for 3 times (FastPrep-24™ 5G Instrument, MP Biomedicals, Irvine, CA, USA) was then carried out to facilitate thorough extraction. Finally, the homogenized samples were sonicated using a bath sonication device (Branson 2510 Ultrasonic Cleaner, Branson Ultrasonics Corp., Danbury, CT, USA) for 10 min. The methanolic extract was then centrifuged to remove cell debris and the supernatant was used for subsequent anthocyanin measurement and total antioxidant capacity quantification as described in Section 3.6 and Section 3.7
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Measuring ATP Levels in Tissue Slices

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The viability of the slices was determined by measuring ATP levels [39 (link)]. The slices were collected separately; each slice was put into 1 mL of ethanol solution (70% (v/v) containing 2 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, pH 10.9), immediately frozen and stored at −80 °C until further analyses. After thawing, the slices were homogenized with the FastPrep-24 5G Instrument (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA) and centrifuged for 5 min at 12,000× g at 4 °C. ATP content was measured in supernatant using the ATP Bioluminescence Assay Kit CLS II (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) in a black 96-well plate according to the manufacturer's protocol using plate reader Tecan Infinite M200 (Tecan Group, Männedorf, Switzerland) and a standard ATP calibration curve. The concentration of ATP was corrected for the total protein content from the remaining sample pellet. The sample pellet was dissolved in 200 μL of 5 M NaOH for 30 min at 37 °C after dilution by water to 1 M NaOH. The protein content was estimated using the BCA assay kit, using bovine serum albumin for the calibration curve.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Nematode-Associated Bacteria in Ladybird Beetles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nematode-associated bacteria were identified by comparing the bacterial communities of H. axyridis beetles from three different rearing groups: nematode-free greenhouse-reared, laboratory-reared, and nematode-infected greenhouse-reared beetles. For each rearing group, three beetles were surface sterilised with 80% ethanol and 0.3% bleach, and dissected individually in sterile PBS. Body fluids and/or nematodes in PBS were transferred to individual reaction tubes and centrifuged briefly before homogenization with three 2.3-mm zirconium/glass beads (BioSpec Products) in a FastPrep-24™ 5G instrument (MP Biomedical) at 10 m/s for two periods of 45 s. We then transferred 100-µl extracts onto lysogeny broth agar plates and incubated them at 37 °C for 2 days. We amplified the 16S SSU rRNA gene from a total of 90 colonies (ten colonies per beetle sample) using the universal 5′ primer 27F (5′-AGA GTT TGA TCM TGG CTC AG-3′) and universal 3′ primer 1492R (5′-CGG TTA CCT TGT TAC GAC TT-3′). The positive PCR products (from 73 colonies) were treated with Exonuclease I (New England Biolabs) and Shrimp Alkaline Phosphatase (Sigma-Aldrich) for enzymatic removal of excess nucleotides and primers prior to direct sequencing and the obtained sequences were analysed as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

RNA Extraction from Frozen Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All fresh frozen tissues were placed in lysis buffer with lysing matrix Z (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA) and homogenized using the FastPrep-24™ 5G Instrument (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA). The RNA was then extracted using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA integrity was assessed using the RNA Nano 6000 Assay Kit and the Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Soil Microbiome DNA Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In a 2-ml screw cap tube containing 500 mg of 0.1-mm silica spheres (MP Biomedical, Solon, OH, USA), 200 mg of cecal content, and 700 μl of lysis buffer [Tris-HCl 500 mM pH 8, EDTA 100 mM pH 8, NaCl 100 mM, SDS 1% (w/v)] were mixed together. A 900-μl volume of lysis buffer was used as a negative control. A mechanical lysis step was performed using a FastPrep-24™ 5G Instrument (MP Biomedical) for three runs of 60 s each, at 6 m/s. Samples were kept on ice during 5 min between each run. A second step involving thermal lysis was carried out on the samples that were heated for 20 min at 95°C and kept for 5 min on ice at the end of the procedure. The supernatant was collected after a centrifugation at 18,000 × g for 15 min and a standard phenol/chloroform purification protocol was used to complete the DNA extraction (11 (link)). The DNA concentration of each sample was measured using a QFX Fluorometer (Froggabio, Toronto, ON), and the purity of those samples was assessed using a Nanodrop 1000 (Fisher, Ottawa, ON) device. DNA samples were stored at −20°C until analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!