The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

44 protocols using microflex lrf 20

1

MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Protein Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The procedure was performed as previously described.
23 (link) Briefly, the purified G1D7 antibody was bound to M‐270 epoxy magnetic beads (Dynabead Antibody Coupling Kit; Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The G1D7‐bound protein band from MDM‐MB‐231 cell lysates was digested with trypsin and subjected to matrix‐assisted laser desorption ionization time‐of‐flight analysis (Microflex LRF 20; Bruker Daltonics). Spectra were acquired at 300 shots per spectrum over an m/z range of 700–4000 and calibrated through two‐point internal calibration using trypsin auto‐digestion peaks (m/z 842.5099, 2211.1046). The peak list was generated using the Flex Analysis 3.0 software. The threshold used for peak‐picking was as follows: a minimum resolution of monoisotopic mass was set at 500, and the signal‐to‐noise ratio (S/N) was established at 6. The search program MASCOT, developed by Matrixscience (http://www.matrixscience.com/), was used for protein identification via peptide mass fingerprinting. The following parameters were used for the database search: trypsin as the cleaving enzyme, a maximum of one missed cleavage, iodoacetamide (Cys) as complete modification, oxidation (Met) as partial modification, monoisotopic masses, and a mass tolerance of ±0.2 Da.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Protein Identification by Peptide Mass Fingerprinting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For identification of components of the 62-kDa band on SDS-PAGE (Fig. 1F) by peptide mass fingerprinting (PMF) with MALDI-TOF MS, the in-gel-digested protein sample was mixed with α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid in 50% acetonitrile and 0.1% TFA and subjected to MALDI-TOF MS (Microflex LRF 20, Bruker Daltonics) as described (42 (link)). Spectra were collected from 300 shots per spectrum over m/z range 600 to 3000 and calibrated by two-point internal calibration using trypsin auto-digestion peaks (m/z 842.5099, 2211.1046). Peak list was generated using Flex Analysis 3.0. Threshold used for peak-picking was as follows: 500 for minimum resolution of monoisotopic mass, 5 for S/N. The search program Mascot (43 (link)) developed by Matrixscience (http://www.matrixscience.com/) was used for protein identification by PMF. The following parameters were used for the database search: trypsin as the cleaving enzyme, a maximum of one missed cleavage, iodoacetamide (Cys) as a complete modification, oxidation (Met) as a partial modification, monoisotopic masses, and a mass tolerance of ±0.2 Da. PMF acceptance criteria are probability scoring. Detailed Mascot search parameters are summarized in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Proteomic Analysis of HSF-1 Interactome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HSF-1 immunoprecipitation assay was performed using Dynabeads® Co-Immunoprecipitation Kit (Novex, USA). Total cell lystaes were incubated with 5 mg of antibody-coupled magnetic Dynabeads® M-270 Epoxy beads and the HSF-1-pull down products were subjected to 10% denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by immunoblotting. To identify proteins by peptide mass fingerprinting, protein bands were excised, digested with trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI), mixed with a-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid in 50% acetonitrile/0.1% trifluoroacetic acid, and subjected to MALDI-TOF analysis (Microflex LRF 20, Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA). Peak list was generated using Flex Analysis 3.0 followed by protein identification using MASCOT, Matixscience (http://www.matrixscience.com).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Protein Identification by Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For protein identification by PMF, protein spots were excised, digested with trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), mixed with a-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid in 50% acetonitrile/0.1% TFA, and subjected to MALDI-TOF analysis (Microflex LRF 20, Bruker Daltonics). Spectra were collected from 300 shots per spectrum over the m/z range of 600–3000 and calibrated by two-point internal calibration using trypsin auto-digestion peaks (m/z 842.5099, 2211.1046). The peak list was generated using Flex Analysis 3.0. The threshold used for peak-picking was as follows: 500 for a minimum resolution of monoisotopic mass, 5 for S/N. The search program MASCOT, developed by Matrixscience, was used for protein identification by PMF. The following parameters were used for the database search: trypsin as the cleaving enzyme, a maximum of one missed cleavage, iodoacetamide (Cys) as a complete modification, oxidation (Met) as a partial modification, monoisotopic masses, and a mass tolerance of ±0.1 Da. The PMF acceptance criteria involve probability scoring.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

MALDI-TOF MS Protein Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The protein band of interest was excised from the gel and analyzed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (Microflex LRF 20, Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany). The peptide masses were entered into Mascot (http://www.matrixscience.com/), and the NCBI database was searched to identify the protein.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry for Protein Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein spots were excised, digested with trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI), mixed with α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (CHCA; Sigma-Aldrich) in 50% acetonitrile/0.1% trifluoroacetic acid, and used for MALDI-TOF analysis (Microflex LRF 20, Bruker Daltonics) as described by Fernandez et al. [29] . Spectra were collected from 300 shots per spectrum over an m/z range of 600-3000 and calibrated using a two-point internal calibration of trypsin autodigested peaks (m/z 842.5099, 2211.1046). The peak list was generated using Flex Analysis 3.0. The threshold used for peak-picking was 500 for the minimum resolution of monoisotopic mass and 5 for S/N. The search program MASCOT, developed by Matrixscience (http://www.matrixscience.com), was used, and the MASCOT probabilitybased MOWSE (molecular weight search) score was calculated for PMF. For the database search, the following parameters were used: trypsin included as the cleaving enzyme, a maximum of one missed cleavage, iodoacetamide (Cys) as a complete modification, oxidation (Met) as a partial modification, monoisotopic masses, and a mass tolerance of ± 0.1 Da. The PMF acceptance criteria were based on probability scoring as follows: -10*Log (P), where P is the probability that the observed match is a random event, and a score greater than 62 is significant (p<0.05).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Spectroscopic Characterization of Labeled DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All solvents and reagents were purchased from commercial sources and used as received. 1H /13C NMR spectra were recorded with a Bruker Avance 400 spectrometer, using tetra-methyl-silane as a reference. The solvent for spectroscopic studies was of spectroscopic grade and used as received. UV–Vis spectra were measured with Helios Gamma and Cary 100 UV–Vis spectrophotometers. Fluorescence spectra were recorded with HORIBA scientific SAS and PTI spectrophotometers. High-resolution mass spectra were obtained from a Bruker Microflex LRF20 matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF). IR spectra were measured with Nicolet Impact 400D spectrophotometer. The unlabelled and labelled DNA oligonucleotides (see Table S1) were purchased from IDT DNA purified in HPLC grade, and the labelling dyes were 5’-FAM (FAM: 6-carboxyfluorescein) and 3’-TAMRA (TAMRA: 6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine). All concentrations of oligonucleotides were estimated by UV absorption using the extinction coefficients and expressed in strand molarity. Ligands were dissolved in DMSO to give 5 mM stock solutions. All solutions were stored at − 20 °C and defrosted and diluted immediately before use in the suitable buffer to the appropriate concentrations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Protein Identification by Peptide Mass Fingerprinting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For protein identification by peptide mass fingerprinting (PMF), protein spots were excised, digested with trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), mixed with α cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid in 50% acetonitrile/0.1% trifluoroacetic acid, and subjected to matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) analysis (Microflex LRF 20; Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA). Spectra were collected from 300 shots per spectrum over an m/z range of 600–3,000 and calibrated by two-point internal calibration using trypsin autodigestion peaks (m/z 842.5099, 2,211.1046). A peak list was generated using Flex Analysis 3.0 (Bruker Daltonik, Bremen, Germany). The threshold used for peak-picking was as follows: 500 for minimum resolution of monoisotopic mass, 5 for S/N. The MASCOT search program (http://www.matrixscience.com/) was used for protein identification by PMF. The following parameters were used for the database search: trypsin as the cleaving enzyme, a maximum of one missed cleavage, iodoacetamide (Cys) as a complete modification, oxidation (Met) as a partial modification, monoisotopic masses, and a mass tolerance of ±0.1 Da. PMF acceptance criteria was based on probability scoring.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Identifying Protein Interactors of DJ1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To identify partner proteins of DJ1, scrutinized gels were scanned on a UMAX Power Look 1120 (Maxium Technologies, Akron, OH, USA). Separated interacting partners were identified by protein mass fingerprinting (PMF). For this, excised protein bands were digested with trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and mixed with α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid in 50% acetonitrile/0.1% TFA, followed by MALDI-TOF analysis (Microflex LRF 20, Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA) as described by Fernandez et al. 23 (link) using MASCOT (Mascot Sever 2.3) developed by Matrix science (http://www.matrixscience.com) as the search programme. trypsin as the cleaving enzyme, a maximum of one missed cleavage, iodoacetamide (Cys) as a complete modification, oxidation (Met) as a partial modification, monoisotopic masses and a mass tolerance of ±0.1 D were used as parameters for the database search.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Peptide Mass Fingerprinting for Protein Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were identified by peptide mass fingerprinting (PMF). Protein spots were excised, digested with trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), and mixed with α cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid in 50% acetonitrile/0.1% TFA for MALDI-TOF analysis (Microflex LRF 20, BrukerDaltonics, Billerica, MA, USA) as described by Fernandez et al [14 (link)]. Spectra were collected from 300 shots per spectrum over the 600~3000 m/z range and calibrated by a two-point internal calibration using trypsin auto-digestion peaks (m/z 842.5099, 2211.1046). The peak list was generated by Flex Analysis 3.0 software, with a peak selection threshold of 500 for the minimum resolution of monoisotopic mass and 5 for S/N. Protein identification by PMF was performed using the search program MASCOT, developed by Matrix Science (http://www.matrixscience.com/). The following parameters were used for the database search: trypsin as the cleaving enzyme, a maximum value of one missed cleavage, iodoacetamide (Cys) as a complete modification, oxidation (Met) as a partial modification, monoisotopic mass, and a mass tolerance for peptide ion (m/z) of ±0.1 Da. PMF acceptance criteria were based on probability scoring.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!