The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using model lsm710

1

Quantifying Autophagic Flux by LC3 Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells cultured on Lab-Tek II chamber slides were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 15 min, and blocked with 2% BSA for 30 min. Cells were then incubated with anti-LC3 antibody (Cell Signaling, Beverley, MA, USA) overnight followed by FITC-conjugated anti-IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA) at room temperature for 1 h. DAPI was used for counter-staining. Images were taken with a laser-scanning confocal microscope (Model LSM710, Zeiss, Jena, Germany). LC3 morphology was assessed by an independent viewer in a blind manner. For each independent experiment, 5–10 random high-power fields (at least 50 cells in total) were surveyed. Cells were arbitrarily categorized into punctate LC3+ and LC3- groups (as guidance, LC3 punctation induced by amino-acid starvation was used as a positive control). We also counted the average number of LC3 puncta in individual cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Macrophage Foam Cell Formation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RAW264.7 or differentiated THP-1 cells were cultured on Lab-Tek II chamber slides (Thermo Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) and loaded with DiI-Ac-LDL (30 µg ml−1) for 2, 4 or 8 hr. Then cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 20 min. After 3 rinses, cells were counterstained with DAPI. Fluorescent images were obtained with a confocal microscope (Model LSM710, Zeiss, Jena, Germany) at 549 nm excitation and 565 nm emission. To assess macrophage transformation into foam cells, we analyzed the accumulation of intracellular lipid droplets using Oil Red O staining. Briefly, cells cultured on slides were loaded with ox-LDL (80 µg ml−1) for 48 hr, then cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and stained with Oil Red O (0.3% dissolved in isopropyl alcohol) for 15 min at room temperature. Hematoxylin was used for counterstaining. Slides were evaluated by light microscopy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Visualizing A. hydrophila Biofilm Formation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For microscopic visualization of A. hydrophila biofilm formation, the A. hydrophila cells could form biofilm on glass slides (1 × 1 cm) placed in 24 wells MTP supplemented with and without NA (93.75–750 μg/ml), and they were incubated for 24 h at 30°C in static condition. After incubation, the glass slides were washed with distilled water and processed as follows.
For light microscopic visualization, the glass slides were washed with distilled water and stained with a 0.4% CV solution for 3 min. The stained-glass slides were then washed with distilled water, air dried, and then mounted on a microscopic slide with the biofilm directed upwards and imaged using a light microscope (Nikon Eclipse Ti 100, Tokyo, Japan) at a magnification of ×400 (Sivaranjani et al., 2018 (link)).
For confocal laser scanning microscopic (CLSM) analysis, the glass slides were washed with distilled water and stained with 0.1% acridine orange solution (w/v) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, United States) for 1 min. The stained-glass slides were washed with distilled water and air dried at room temperature. Then, the stained slides were imaged using CLSM (Model LSM 710, Carl Zeiss, Germany) at ×200 magnification (Bakkiyaraj and Karutha Pandian, 2010 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating Phytol's Antibiofilm Potential

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the antibiofilm potential of phytol, the light and confocal laser scanning microscopic (CLSM) analyses were done by following the method of Srinivasan et al. (2017a (link)). After the growth of S. marcescens biofilm with and without of phytol on 1 × 1 cm glass slides, the planktonic cells were removed by washing with distilled water. Then the glass slides were stained with 0.4% crystal violet and 0.2% acridine orange for light and confocal microscopes, respectively. After 2 min of incubation, the excess stain was removed by distilled water wash and biofilms on glass slides were imaged under light (Nikon Eclipse Ti 100, Tokyo, Japan) and CLSM (Model LSM 710, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) at a magnification of 400 × and 200×, respectively. The Z-Stack CLSM images were analyzed using COMSTAT software to obtain the average thickness, biofilm biomass and surface to volume ratio of the phytol treated and untreated S. marcescens biofilm (Heydorn et al., 2000 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Visualizing Avo3-GFP Localization in Yeast

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Yeast cells expressing Avo3-GFP (excitation λmax 489 nm; emission λmax 508) were grown to mid-exponential phase in synthetic medium lacking Trp, mounted onto 1% agarose pads, and viewed immediately at 23°C using a confocal microscope (Model LSM 710; Zeiss) equipped with a 100× oil-immersion objective (1.40 NA), excited with an argon laser at 488 nm at 2.3% power (100 mW), and emission monitored using a bandpass filter (495–550-nm window). Images were acquired with an iXon3 EM-CCD camera (Andor) using Metamorph software (Molecular Devices) and processed using ImageJ (Collins, 2007 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunofluorescence Staining of PDCD4

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 15 min. After incubation overnight at 4°C with anti-PDCD4 antibodies (1∶600), cells were washed with PBS and incubated for 1 hr with Alexa 647-conjugated (1∶200) secondary antibodies and washed with PBS. Nuclei were stained with DAPI for 8 min. Cells were examined under a laser-scanning confocal microscope with a 40X objective (oil immersion) (Model LSM710, Zeiss, Jena, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Visualizing Cell Spreading and Motility

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were pretreated with drugs or vehicle in serum-free medium for 1 hr. Then the cells were replated in 8-well Lab-Tek II chamber slides (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and further incubated with the same treatment agent for 1 hr. Cells were fixed, stained with Rhodamine phalloidin (from Cytoskeleton, Denver, CO, USA), counterstained with DAPI, and observed under a confocal microscope (Model LSM710, Zeiss, Jena, Germany). The spreading response was evaluated by measuring the average cell area using Image-Pro Plus 6.0 software (Media Cybernetics, Rockville, MD, USA). For each experiment, 150–200 cells from different random fields were analyzed. To monitor the cell motility behaviour in real-time, TIME cells were pretreated with PTP1B inhibitor or vehicle for 1 hr, harvested and re-suspended in serum free medium and seeded in 6-well plates at a concentration of 105 cells per well, and allowed to adhere for 3 min. Digital videos were recorded for 20 minutes under a phase contrast light microscope (Olympus Lifescience, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a Cannon digital camera.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

BrdU Proliferation Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proliferation was detected using the 5-Bromo-2′-deoxy-uridine Labeling and Detection Kit I (Roche Diagnostics Corp, Indianapolis, IN, USA). Cells were treated with BrdU (10 µM) for 6 hr before harvesting and were rinsed and fixed for 30 min at −20°C with Ethanol fixative. After washed in the Washing buffer, they were stained with Anti-BrdU working solution at 4°C overnight, washed and incubated with Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated anti-mouse antibody for 30 min at 37°C and DAPI for 8 min at room temperature as a counterstain for the nucleus. The stained cells were examined using a laser-scanning confocal microscope with a 20X objective (Model LSM710, Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Proliferation was assessed based on the percentage of nuclei exhibiting BrdU incorporation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Intracellular ROS Measurement Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Intracellular ROS was measured with DCFH-DA (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) fluorescence. Cells were incubated with 5 μM DCFH-DA at 37 °C for 20 min in Hanks' balanced salt solution. After staining, cells were rinsed with saline and recovered in complete ECM and immediately detected with a laser-scanning confocal microscope (Model LSM710, Zeiss, Jena, Germany). The fluorescent intensity was measured with Image-Pro Plus software (Media Cybernetics, Atlanta, GA, USA). In separate experiments, DCFH-DA fluorescence was quantified by transferring cells to a 96-well white-walled plate and detecting the fluorescent signal with a Varioskan Flash plate reader (Thermo Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Intracellular ROS Measurement in Cardiomyocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) fluorescence (Life Technologies) was used to measure intracellular ROS. Cardiomyocytes were incubated with 5 mM DCFH-DA for 20 min at 37°C in Hank's balanced salt solution, rinsed with PBS, recovered in complete Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, and analyzed immediately with a laser-scanning confocal microscope (Model LSM710; Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Fluorescence intensity was measured using Image-Pro Plus software (Media Cybernetics, Atlanta, GA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!