The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Quantstudio 5 real time system

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, China

The QuantStudio 5 Real-Time PCR System is a flexible and scalable real-time PCR instrument designed for a wide range of applications. It offers reliable performance and advanced thermal cycling capabilities to support quantitative and qualitative gene expression analysis, genotyping, and other real-time PCR applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

19 protocols using quantstudio 5 real time system

1

Comprehensive RNA Extraction and qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted using the SteadyPure Universal RNA Extraction Kit (Accurate Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Hunan, China; Cat# AG21017) in line with the instructions of the manufacturer. Later, the extracted total RNA was quantified and prepared into cDNA through reverse transcription using the Evo M-MLV RT Premix for qPCR (Accurate Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Hunan, China; Cat# AG11706). RT-qPCR was later performed using the QuantStudio 5 Real-Time System (Life Technologies) with SYBR Green Premix Pro Taq HS qPCR Kit (Accurate Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Hunan, China; Cat# AG11701). Each PCR procedure was run in duplicate. All gene expression data were calculated using the 2–ΔΔCT method and normalized to β-ACTIN. The primer sequences for target genes are summarized in Supplementary Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of hVICs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from hVICs using TaKaRa MiniBEST Universal RNA Extraction Kit (Takara, 9767) and from human aortic valves using Trizol (Invitrogen, 1596026) according to the manufacturers' instructions. RNA was quantified and reverse transcribed using PrimeScript™ RT Master Mix (Takara, RR036A). Quantitative RT-PCR was performed with SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (Takara, RR820A) in the QuantStudio 5 real-time system (Life technologies). Each PCR was run in triplicate. All gene expression data were calculated using the 2 -ΔΔCT method and normalized against GAPDH. The control values were expressed as 1 to indicate a precise fold change value for each gene of interest. The primer sequences for target genes are summarized in Supplementary material Table V.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cultivation and Quantification of Gut Microbiota

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
P. copri (DSM18205), blood agar base, and sterile defibrinated sheep whole blood were acquired from Mingzhou Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Ningbo, China). Both L. murinus (BNCC194688) and MRS medium (lactic acid bacterial culture medium) were purchased from BeNa Culture Collection (Beijing, China). The above bacteria were cultured in an anaerobic culture tank (volume: 2.5 L, Mitsubishi, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with anaerobic gas-producing bags and indicators to provide an anaerobic environment. Colonies were cultured using Gram stain to determine the bacterial species. Bacterial DNA was extracted using the TIANamp Bacteria DNA Kit (Tiangen Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). qPCR was performed using a QuantStudio® 5 Real-Time System (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and the cyclic conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 5 min, 40 cycles at 95 °C for 10 s, 56 °C for 20 s, and 72 °C for 30 s. Eub was used as an internal reference to calculate the relative expressions using the 2−ΔΔCt calculation method. The primer sequences used are shown in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Immune Cell Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Expression levels of EspIgR in the differently treated hemocytes were determined with quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR; primers shown in Table S1) using a QuantStudio 5 Real-Time System (Applied Biosystems, USA) and SYBR Premix Ex Taq (Tli RNaseH Plus; TaKaRa, Osaka, Japan). Reaction conditions were used as following: 94 °C for 3 min, then 40 cycles at 94 °C for 10 s and 60 °C for 1 min, followed by melting from 65 to 95 °C. The gene expression levels were derived by the 2−ΔΔCT calculation method and normalized to the control group. Three independent experiments were performed and the results are presented as mean ± SD
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

One-Step RT-qPCR for Norovirus Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The transcripts (5 µL RNA) were subjected to a one-step RT-qPCR using a QuantiFast Pathogen RT-PCR + IC Kit with published norovirus GI and GII probes and primers (Table 1). The assay was performed without the RT enzyme to assess the amount of DNA in the in vitro transcription products. The kit's internal control was used to monitor the efficiency of target amplification and all real-time RT-qPCR assays in the study were performed on a QuantStu-dio™ 5 real-time system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The RNA concentration was measured using the Qubit™ RNA XR Assay Kit (Invitrogen, Eugene, OR, USA) on Qubit® 3.0 Fluorometer and the RNA stocks were aliquoted and stored at -80 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Validating miRNA Targeting of HLA-G

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For validation experiments, we selected the four miRNAs most likely to target the HLA-G gene (NG_029039.1) and messenger RNA (NM_002127.5) based on the sequence alignment analysis (RNAhybrid v.2.2) (Krûger, Rehmsmeier, 2006 (link)). The representative scheme showing the interaction site between HLA-G and the four miRNAs selected for validation was constructed using the ApE v2.0.61 software (https://jorgensen.biology.utah.edu/wayned/ape/). The TaqMan Advanced miRNA cDNA Synthesis Kit (Life Technologies, Foster City, California, USA), TaqMan Advanced miRNA Assay (reference: miR-191-5p; targets: miR-5096, miR-4516, miR-4488, miR-486-5p; Life Technologies), and TaqMan Fast Advanced Master Mix (Life Technologies) were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions to evaluate the miRNA expression. Reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) assays were performed in a SimpliAmp Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA) and quantitative PCR (q-PCR) in a QuantStudio 5 Real-Time System (Applied Biosystems) and 7500 Real-Time System (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multiplex RT-PCR for Arboviruses Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RT-PCR was performed using the ZDC Multiplex Kit from the Institute of Molecular Biology of Paraná with 38 μl of eluate, in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommended protocol (www.ibmp.org.br/en-us/). In this protocol [28 ], a standardized 96-well microplate is subdivided into four isometric subgroups of 24 wells for the respective target arboviruses: DENV-1/4, DENV-2/3, CHIKV, and ZIKV. Each of these four subgroups on the plate is composed of 23 wells to test the samples (38 µl/4 subgroups = 9.5 µl of sample eluate for each subgroup), and one positive control from the kit itself. For the real-time PCR (qPCR) probes, the ZDC kit uses three triplex reactions and two duplex reactions in the same plate: DENV-1 (HEX), DENV-4 (FAM), and internal control (Quasar 670); DENV-3 (HEX), DENV-2 (FAM), and internal control (Quasar 670); CHIKV (FAM) and internal control (HEX); and ZIKV (FAM) and internal control (HEX) [29 (link)].
RT-PCR was amplified using the QuantStudio 5 real-time system (http://thermofisher.com/) at 51 °C for 30 min, followed by 95 °C for 15 min and 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 60 s. Results were analyzed using the company’s software, and considered positive when the cycle threshold was ≤ 36 for the analyzed virus and ≤ 28 for the internal control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative gene expression analysis from blood

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA preparation from blood collected in PAX tubes was performed using PAXgene Blood RNA kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (QIAGEN). cDNA was subsequently prepared from 500 ng RNA using Quantitect Reverse Transcription Kit (QIAGEN) according to standard protocols.
Gene expression was analyzed by reverse-transcription quantitative real-time PCR (Rt-qPCR) run on a QuantStudio™ 5 real-time system (Thermo Fisher) with TaqMan® reagents. The qPCR cycler was programmed to run an initiation step 50 °C for 2 min and 95 °C for 2 min followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 1 s and annealing/extension at 60 °C for 20 s. We used TaqMan® fast advanced master mix at a concentration of 1X and 200 ng cDNA for each reaction, together with TaqMan® gene expression assays HS00427620_ml (TATA-box binding protein, TBP), HS00914057_ml (Importin 8, IPO8) and HS01031979_ml (MERTK) at a concentration of 1X (Thermo Fisher). MERTK expression levels were normalized to the two housekeeping genes, TBP and IPO8, and then to a randomly selected control sample to obtain relative gene expression levels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Transcriptional Analysis of Cell Wall Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted either from the top 2 cm of stem tissue at growth stage 6.0 or from whole stems at growth stage 9.0 using the RNeasy Kit (Qiagen). cDNA was synthesized using SuperScript IV Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen). Quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis was conducted to measure the transcript levels of FLA11, FLA12, primary wall cellulose synthesis genes CESA1, CESA3, and CESA6, SCW cellulose synthesis genes CESA4, CESA7, and CESA8, xylan backbone synthesis genes IRX9, IRX10, and IRX14, lignin synthesis genes PAL1, PAL2, C4H, 4CL1, REF8, HCT, CCoAOMT1, CCR1, F5H1, COMT1, and CAD5, and SCW TFs NST1 and NST3, as outlined in Table S1. Transcript levels of each gene were assessed using a relative quantitative method (Livak & Schmittgen, 2001 (link)), with two or three biological replicates from two or three independent transformed lines, and three technical replicates in a QuantStudio 5 Real‐Time System with 384 wells (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) using PowerUp SYBR Green Master Mix (2X) Universal (A25742; Thermo Fisher) in 10 µl reactions. Transcript levels were normalized against housekeeping gene ACT2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative PCR of Yeast Transcripts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two microliters RNA was used to generate cDNA using Transcriptor (Roche), random hexamer primer, and the manufacturer's instructions. cDNA was used either undiluted, 1/20, or 1/100 for quantitative PCR (qPCR) depending on the gene analyzed. Gene-specific qPCR was performed in triplicate using primers near the 5’ end of the gene. qPCRs were assembled in 5 μl reaction mixtures in a 384-well plate using 2X Power SYBR green master mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and reactions were run on the QuantStudio5 Real-Time System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Relative amounts of DNA were calculated using a standard curve generated from 10-fold serial dilutions of purified genomic DNA ranging from 10 ng to 0.001 ng. Relative amounts of S. cerevisiae transcript were normalized to S. pombe tubulin transcripts. All values are expressed relative to that of either wild type +SM or the Spt3/7 deg +SM strain, which were set to 1.0. Each experiment was performed in two biological replicates (cultures collected on separate days) and three technical replicates (independent measurements of the same qPCR sample). Values for technical replicates were averaged which gave a single value for each biological replicate. The final result is a mean of biological replicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!