The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

19 protocols using tetracycline

1

Antibiotic Susceptibility Test of CRAB

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotics susceptibility of isolates was determined using the disk diffusion method according to CLSI guidelines [17 ] and against the following antibiotics: imipenem (10 mg), ceftazidime (30 mg), ceftriaxone (30 mg), amikacin (30 mg), gentamicin (10 mg), tetracycline (30 mg), piperacillin/tazobactam (110 mg), ampicillin/sulbactam (20 mg), ciprofloxacin (5 mg), levofloxacin (5 mg) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (25 mg) (Mast Group Ltd, UK). The CRAB was defined when the isolate was resistant to imipenem [16 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Salmonella Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic susceptibility profiling of the Salmonella isolates was determined by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method [16 (link)]. Seven different antibiotics were used in this study, namely, tetracycline (30 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole (25 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), nalidixic acid (30 μg), ampicillin (10 μg), and ceftriaxone (30 μg) (Mast Group Ltd, Merseyside, UK). Antimicrobial susceptibility was done on Muller Hinton agar (Mast Group Ltd, Merseyside, UK) and Escherichia coli ATCC 25329 control strain was used. The diameter of zonal clearance was measured in millimeters and results were recorded as susceptible (S), intermediate (I), and resistant (R) according to CLSI, performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing [17 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of K. pneumoniae Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out for all K. pneumoniae isolates for 12 antibiotics using standard disk diffusion test according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (CLSI) (14 ). The antibiotic disks used in the study were imipenem (10 ug), meropenem (10 ug), piperacillin (30 ug), piperacillin-tazobactam (100-10 ug), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 ug), ceftazidime (30 ug), cefepime (30 ug), ampicillin-sulbactam (10–10 ug), aztreonam (30 ug), ciprofloxacin (5 ug), gentamicin (10 ug), and tetracycline (30 ug) (MAST Group Ltd, Merseyside, UK). Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were used as quality controls strains for antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Enterococci

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antimicrobial susceptibilities of 175 E. faecalis and 67 E. faecium strains were examined by using the disk agar diffusion (DAD) method in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines.17 18 Erythromycin (15 µg), Tetracycline (30 µg), Ciprofloxacin (5 µg), Vancomycin (30 µg), Teicoplanin (30 µg), Norfloxacin (10 µg), Nitrofurantoin (300 µg), Quinopristin-Dalfopristin [Synercid (15 µg)] (Mast Co., UK), Chloramphenicol (30 µg), Gentamicin (10 µg), Linezolid (30 µg), and Ampicillin (10 µg) (HiMedia Mumbai Co., India) were used for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST).
In addition, minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of the glycopeptide antibiotics i.e. Vancomycin and Teicoplanin (Sigma-Aldrich, Poole, Co., UK) against the E. faecalis and E. faecium isolates were determined using the microdilution broth method.17 18
E. faecalis ATCC 29212 (Vancomycin sensitive), E. faecalis ATCC 51299 (vanB positive), E. faecalis E206 (vanA positive) were used as quality control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Methicillin Resistance Screening in S. aureus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The disk diffusion method using cefoxitin (30 μg) disk in Mueller-Hinton agar (Merck, Germany) according to the CLSI was applied for the screening of methicillin resistance isolates. In addition, PCR assay was used for the detection of mecA gene.12
The Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method was used to determine the susceptibility of the isolates against penicillin, ceftriaxone, amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin, kanamycin, tetracycline, linezolid, teicoplanin, ciprofloxacin, rifampicin, quinupristin-dalfopristin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (Mast Co., UK) based on the CLSI recommendation (CLSI 2019). The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value for vancomycin, mupirocin, tigecycline, and fusidic acid was determined using the broth microdilution method. Results for fusidic acid and tigecycline were interpreted according to the European Committee for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (EUCAST) breakpoints (http://www.eucast.org). Low-level and high-level mupirocin resistance (LLMUPR, HLMUPR) were defined if MIC values of 8–256 µg/mL and ≥512 µg/mL were obtained. S. aureus strains ATCC 25923, ATCC 43300 and ATCC 29213 were used as reference strains.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling of Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples were tested for their susceptibility against a panel of 11 antibiotics by using a standard disc diffusion method46 (link). The antibiotics tested were the following: oxacillin (1 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), mupirocin (20 µg), amoxicillin (10 µg), erythromycin (15 µg), tetracycline (10 µg), cefoxitin (30 µg), cefepime (30 µg), fusidic acid (10 µg), penicillin (1 unit) and chloramphenicol (30 µg) (Mast Group, Merseyside, UK). Antibiotic profiles of each isolate ware determined according the recommendation of the Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC)46 (link),47 .
In addition, the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for oxacillin and cefoxitin were determined using E-tests (Biomerieux, Basingstoke, UK)46 (link),47 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The methicillin resistance of 40 S. aureus isolates were tested by using the Oxacillin agar screen method on the Muller Hinton agar modified by adding NaCl (4 %) + Oxacillin (6 µg/ml) (Dhanalakshmi et al. 2012 ). The strains that could grow on this medium were then tested to be revealed whether they carry the mecA gene (Kot et al. 2020 (link); Ubukata et al. 1989 (link)), as described in the next section.
The disc diffusion method was conducted to determine the antibiotic resistance pattern of the identified methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains to Vancomycin (30 µg), Ciprofloxacin (5 µg), Erythromycin (15 µg), Tetracycline (30 µg), Gentamycin (10 µg), Ceftriaxone (30 µg), Amikacin (30 µg), Mupirocin (5 µg), Oxacillin (30 µg), Chloramphenicol (30 µg) and Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 µg) purchased from MAST Group, Merseyside, UK.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed by using Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute recommendations (CLSI) [8 ]. The antimicrobial disks tested were ampicillin (AMP), cefoxitin (FOX), cefazolin (CFZ), ceftriaxone (CRO), cefotaxime (CTX), ceftazidime (CAZ), cefepime (FEP), amoxicillin-clavulanate (AMC), aztreonam (ATM), gentamicin (GEN), streptomycin (STR), amikacin (AMK), nalidixic acid (NAL), ofloxacin (OFX), ciprofloxacin (CIP), levofloxacin (LVX), chloramphenicol (CHL), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), tetracycline (TET), azithromycin (AZM), imipenem (IPM) and meropenem (MEM) (Mast Co., Bootle, Merseyside, UK). Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as the quality control strain. The MDR was defined as resistance to 3 or more unrelated antibiotics [9 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Kirby–Bauer disc-diffusion method on Mueller–Hinton agar was used to test the susceptibility of the isolates against amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin, kanamycin, tetracycline, erythromycin, clindamycin, linezolid, teicoplanin, ciprofloxacin, rifampicin, quinupristin-dalfopristin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (Mast Co., Bootle, UK) based on the CLSI guideline. Susceptibility to vancomycin, mupirocin, tigecycline and fusidic acid was assessed by the broth microdilution method to determine the MIC titre. The European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints was used to determine MIC titres of fusidic acid and tigecycline (EUCAST 2018). The results of other antibiotics were interpreted by using the CLSI 2018 breakpoints. Low-level and high-level mupirocin resistance (LLMUPR, HLMUPR), inducible macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin group B (iMLSB) and constitutive (cMLSB) macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin group B were identified based on the CLSI guideline. Susceptibility testing was quality controlled using S. aureus ATCC 25923, ATCC 43300 and ATCC 29213 strains. Powders of antibiotics were all obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St Louis, MO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiling of E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antimicrobial susceptibility test was done with the disk diffusion method (Bauer et al, 1966) using Mueller–Hinton agar (Difco). Initially, an emulsion of sample in saline solution was prepared by adjustment to the 0.5 McFarland turbidity standards. The susceptibility of the E. coli strains was tested in relation to several antibiotics, including: chloramphenicol (CAF) (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), gentamycin (10 μg), trimethoprim (1.25 μg-sulfamethoxazole 23.75 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), streptomycin (10 μg) and tetracycline (30 μg) (Mast Group Ltd., Merseyside, UK). Using sterile tweezers, commercially available antibiotic disks were placed individually on the surface of Mueller-Hinton agar. After 24 h of incubation at 35°C, the strains were scored as “susceptible”, “intermediate”, or “resistant” to each antibiotic based on the measurement of the inhibition zone, as recommended by clinical laboratory standard institute (CLSI).26
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!