The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using mouse anti ocn

1

Immunohistochemistry of Bone and Intestine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The bone and intestinal sections were immersed in 10 mM citrate buffer for antigen retrieval. The bone sections were blocked and incubated with the mouse anti-OCN (1:1,000, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA). The intestinal sections were blocked and incubated with anti-Claudin-2 overnight at 4°C. After washing with PBS, the sections were incubated with goat anti-mouse antibody (1:1000, Abcam) or rabbit anti-mouse antibody (1:1000, Abcam) at room temperature for 1 hour. The osteoid matrix areas were measured using Image J software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). Five microscopic fields were chosen randomly from each sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Osteogenic Differentiation on Titanium

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the purpose of evaluating how osteogenic differentiation could be influenced by titanium surfaces, cells were seeded at 2 × 104 cells/cm2 on these disks. After 72 h of culture, the standard culture medium was replaced with the osteogenic medium (α-MEM, 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 mg/mL di streptomycin, 100 nM dexamethasone, 10 mM di β-glycerophosphate, all from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). After 3 weeks of induction, immunofluorescence analysis was performed in order to assess the expression of typical differentiation markers, such as RUNX-2 and osteocalcin (OCN). The following primary antibodies were used, at a 1:50 dilution: rabbit anti-RUNX-2, mouse anti-OCN (Abcam, Cambridge, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Histological Analysis of Rat Calvarial Bone

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After μCT scanning at week 8, we sacrificed the rats and removed the calvarial bones. The bone specimens were fixed in 4% aqueous phosphate formaldehyde for 3 days at room temperature and subsequently decalcified by immersing in Osteosoft® (Merck) for 14 days. Decalcified specimens were washed in PBS before undergoing dehydration, paraffin embedding, and sagittal slicing into 10-μm-thick sections. Sections were then rehydrated and stained with H&E.
Alternatively, rehydrated sections were subjected to trypsin treatment for 1 h at 37°C for antigen retrieval, followed by blocking in 5% skimmed milk and immunohistochemical staining. The primary antibodies were rabbit anti-BSP (1:200, Abcam) and mouse anti-OCN (1:200, Abcam). The secondary antibodies were goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP (1:5000, GeneTex) and goat anti-mouse IgG-HRP (1:5000, Invitrogen). The sections were developed with hydrogen peroxide and 3,3′‐diaminobenzidine (Sigma) and counterstained with Eosin for visualization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating Osteogenic Differentiation of hDPSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to evaluate the ability of SLA titanium and CERID surfaces to affect osteogenic differentiation, hDPSCs were seeded onto disks (3 × 103 cells/cm2) and cultured under standard conditions for 72 h. Subsequently, standard culture medium was replaced with osteogenic medium (α-MEM, 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 mg/mL di streptomycin, 100 nM dexamethasone, 10 mM di β-glycerophosphate, 100µM ascorbic acid, all from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). After 3 weeks of induction, the expression of osteogenic markers, RUNX2, osteopontin (OPN) and osteocalcin (OCN), was assayed through immunofluorescence analyses. Rabbit anti-RUNX2, mouse anti-OPN and mouse anti-OCN (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) primary antibodies were incubated at a 1:50 dilution and revealed with anti-rabbit AlexaFluor546 and anti-mouse Alexa fluor488 secondary antibodies (1:200; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI [26 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Evaluating Osteogenic Differentiation on BGMS10 Surfaces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to evaluate the ability of the BGMS10 surfaces to influence osteogenic differentiation, cells were seeded at approximately 2.5 × 103 cells/cm2 on these disks. After one week of culture, the standard culture medium was replaced with the osteogenic medium (α-MEM, 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 mg/mL di streptomycin, 100 nM dexamethasone, 10 mM di β-glycerophosphate, all from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). After 3 weeks of induction, the expression of typical differentiation markers, such as RUNX2, osterix (Osx), osteopontin (OPN) and osteocalcin (OCN), was investigated by immunofluorescence analyses as described above. The following primary antibodies were used, at a 1:100 dilution: rabbit anti-RUNX2, mouse anti-OPN, mouse anti-OCN (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and rabbit anti-Osx (Gene-Tex, San Antonio, TX, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunofluorescence Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For fixing, 30-minute incubation was carried out in 4% paraformaldehyde. For permeabilization, incubation was carried out with 0.4% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS for 20 minutes. Blocking was done by incubating 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 hour at room temperature, and the primary antibody β-actin (mouse antiactin, 1:1000, Sigma-Aldrich), OCN (mouse anti-OCN, 1:100, Abcam), FAPB4 (rabbit anti-FABP4, 1:100, Abcam), and collagen II (mouse anti-collagen II, 1:100, Abcam) were incubated overnight at 4°C. Finally, the FITC-conjugated secondary antibody (donkey antirabbit, goat anti-mouse, Abcam) was incubated for 3 hours in room temperature. The stained samples are observed using confocal laser-scanning microscopy (CLSM) (M780; Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!