The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss software package for windows version 22

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS software package for Windows version 22.0 is a statistical analysis software tool developed by IBM. It provides a comprehensive set of features for data management, analysis, and visualization. The software is designed to help users analyze and interpret data effectively.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

12 protocols using spss software package for windows version 22

1

Statistical Analysis Methods in Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical differences were assessed using the χ2 or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables. In addition, the Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess continuous variables. Survival outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Univariable and multivariable survival analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression model to generate a hazard ratio. A P-value lower than 0.05 (<0.05) was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS software package for Windows, version 22.0 (IBM Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Survival Analysis of Clinical Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
OS was divided into analyses conducted at 5 and 10 years of follow-up and over the entire period. Time of follow-up was calculated from the date of diagnosis until the occurrence of the event of interest (death) or until censure (ie, women who remained alive at the end of the follow-up time were censored).
The database was constructed and the statistical analysis conducted using the SPSS software package for Windows, version 22.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY) and MedCalc for Windows, version 18.11 (MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium). The qualitative variables were described using frequency distributions and percentages. The distribution of survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and compared between the groups using the log-rank test, with 95% CIs. Cox regression analysis was used for the univariable and multivariable analysis. First, all the potential prognostic variables were tested, each by using the univariable Cox regression model. The prognostic variables with a significance level of P < .2 were considered as candidates for the multivariable analysis. In addition, interaction between the variables was tested, and none returned significant values. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Clinical and demographic characteristics were summarized by the mean and standard deviation for continuous variables and count and percent for categorical variables. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS software package for Windows (version 22.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Coronary Vessel Dimensions and Cardiovascular Disease

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis of the present study was done using the SPSS software package for Windows version 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Mean/median/mode with respective intervals were used to express coronary vessel dimensions and percentages. This helped for presenting categorical data. Coronary artery diameters were indexed (adjusted) to BSA using the formula, mean CAM in mm/BSA m2 (mean diameter mm/m2 BSA). Independent t-test, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used for metric data. Post-hoc tukeys test was used for multiple comparisons. Independent variables were gender and BMI and dependent variables were coronary vessel size and CAD.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Placental Thickness and Associated Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were analyzed using the SPSS software package for Windows version 22.0 (SPSS Inc.). Mean and standard deviation, frequency, and percentage were used to describe the data. relationship between placental thickness and the studied variables was evaluated using Spearman correlation analysis. The significance level in this study was set at less than 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Surgical Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was processed using the SPSS software package for Windows, Version 22 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY). The demographic and perioperative characteristics were summarized using descriptive analyses, and all qualitative values are presented as mean ± SD unless stated otherwise. The Student t test or Mann–Whitney U test was used for continuous variables, whereas the and Pearson χ2 test was used for categorical variables. All P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. The Kaplan–Meier estimator was used for survival estimation and the log-rank test was used for survival comparison. Cox proportional hazard regression modeling was conducted to examine the strength of association between the covariates and survival time. All analyses were performed using a 2-tailed a-value of 0.05, and either P < 0.05 or the 95% confidence interval (CI) was considered to indicate a statistically significant value.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Perioperative Data Analysis in SPSS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was processed using the SPSS software package for Windows, version 22 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). The demographic and perioperative characteristics were summarized using descriptive analyses, and all qualitative values are presented as median and interquartile range (IQR) unless stated otherwise.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Survival Analysis of Smoking Cessation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were conducted using the SPSS software package for Windows, Version 22 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA) and STATA version 11 (STATA Corporation, College Station, TX, USA). Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviations or median and interquartile range (IQR). Qualitative variables are presented as numbers and percentages.
The Kaplan–Meier method was used to calculate observed survival, while log-rank statistics was used to compare the differences in survival curves. Furthermore, multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to determine the influence of the programs and factors affecting cessation survival rate. Variables of P < 0.2 provided a basis for the proportional hazard assumptions and were entered into the Cox regression model using a forward likelihood ratio method. All probability tests were two-tailed with a P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
In this study, recitative smoking was considered as a countable event and inpatients that died or remained nonsmokers until the end of study were considered as censor. Variable time to event was assessed based on the moment that inpatients entered to study until the moment they started (or did not start) smoking again.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Evaluating Parasitic Infection Reduction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Using the SPSS software package for Windows (version 22) [23 ], descriptive statistics for body condition score, FAMACHA score, and faecal egg count was calculated. To compare values of investigated variables between day 0 and day 12 for each group, a Wilcoxon signed-rank test for dependent samples was used. Faecal egg counts among the groups before and after supplementation were compared using an independent samples Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunett’s T3 post hoc test.
To determine the percentage of Strongylid eggs shedding reduction in samples after the supplementation, we calculated the mean number of eggs in the samples from each group before supplementation (T1) and after supplementation (T2), and used the equation [25 (link), 27 ]:
Egg reduction %=100×1-T2T1.
The 95% confidence intervals were calculated with the eggCounts on-line analysis program [25 (link), 46 (link)], using the Two samples paired model procedure (http://shiny.math.uzh.ch/user/furrer/shinyas/shiny-eggCounts/).
Eggs of other parasites and coccidian oocysts were found only in small numbers in some animals and were therefore not included in the statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Parasitic Burden and Cell Alterations in Ponies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microsoft Office Excel 2010 software was used for data recording then IBM SPSS for Windows software package version 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analyses. The Esperia ponies were divided into five groups: group C + T included all the animals at day 0, groups CD0 and CD14 referred to the control group on day 0 and day 14, respectively, and groups TD0 and TD14 referred to the treated animals on day 0 and day 14, respectively. A statistical subanalysis was performed by dividing the groups C + T and TD0 according to the EPG and then according to age of the individuals (up to 6 years and equal or higher to 6 years). The parasitic burden ranges of the groups were chosen by making multiple comparisons to verify if there were ranges within which the CAs increased or decreased significantly. Age groups were established according to Wójcik and Smalec [25 (link)].
Student’s t-test was used to compare the structural percentage and cells with the CA percentage in all groups. The independent-sample t-test (Mann–Whitney test) was used to compare the means of the quantitative variables in the groups [26 (link)]. A Spearman correlation was performed between FEC and CAs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!