The significant difference between Ki of BminOBP3 with undecanol and Ki of T-OBP3 with undecanol was analyzed by Student’s t-test using SPSS statistics software 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Spss statistics software 17
Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States
SPSS Statistics software 17.0 is a comprehensive and powerful analytics tool designed for data management, analysis, and reporting. It provides a wide range of statistical techniques to help users gain insights from their data. The software is widely used in various industries and research fields to support decision-making processes.
Automatically generated - may contain errors
Lab products found in correlation
5 protocols using spss statistics software 17
1
Comparative Analysis of Odorant Binding Proteins
2
Morris Water Maze Assessment
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
All the data are presented as mean ± SEM from at least three independent experiments. Morris water maze was analyzed with repeated measurements ANOVA. Comparisons between the periodontitis and the control group were evaluated by the Student’s t-test. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS Statistics software (17.0). Differences with P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
3
Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
SPSS statistics software 17.0 (SPSS, United States) was used for all quantitative analyses. Data are presented as the means ± SE of the number (n) of samples analyzed in all experiments. Data with one variable were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with the Newman–Keuls post hoc test. Data with two variables were analyzed using two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test when appropriate. When significantly unequal variance existed, the data were transformed prior to statistical analysis. Statistical significance was established with α = 0.05, *indicates “p < 0.05”, **indicates “p < 0.01” and ***indicates “p < 0.001”.
4
Evaluating Nursing Student Satisfaction with Software
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
After consulting and surveying experts, 4 tests were considered for the software. In order to better understand the entities and software operation, the use-case, activity, and sequence diagrams were drawn up using visual paradigm for Unified Modeling Language software. Graphic design was done by the Adobe Photoshop and JQuery mobile software and coding was done in the google android studio environment. After completion, the software was distributed to 83 nursing students, and they were asked to work 1 week with that. In order to assess and evaluate students’ satisfaction, Questionnaire for User Interface Satisfaction (QUIS) 7.0[16 ] questionnaire was used to assess the applicability of the software. According to the software features, some unrelated items were removed, and the questionnaire with 20 questions and Likert scale 9-0 were adjusted. The questionnaires included the general user's perspective on working with the system (5 questions), the screen (4 questions), the system's terminology and information system (3 questions), system learning capabilities (5 questions), and overall system capabilities (3 questions). After collecting questionnaires, the data were entered into IBM SPSS 17 Statistics software and analyzed.
5
One-way ANOVA and Student's T-test Analysis
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS17 Statistics software (IBM Corporation, NY) using one-way ANOVA and student’s T test. A probability of p<0.05 was considered to be significant. All the data are shown in mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!