The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sas software

Manufactured by SAS Institute
Sourced in United States, Japan, Austria, Germany, United Kingdom, France, Cameroon, Denmark, Israel, Sweden, Belgium, Italy, China, New Zealand, India, Brazil, Canada

SAS software is a comprehensive analytical platform designed for data management, statistical analysis, and business intelligence. It provides a suite of tools and applications for collecting, processing, analyzing, and visualizing data from various sources. SAS software is widely used across industries for its robust data handling capabilities, advanced statistical modeling, and reporting functionalities.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 040 protocols using sas software

1

Analyzing Behavioral and Neural Responses to Song Stimuli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to examine Paradigm and Song Pair effects (SAS software, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). To compare individual normalized behavioral responses, behavioral rates, and delay times between Song Types (Popular, Unpopular), and Populations (MS, SS), and the interaction between these variables, we used two-way ANOVA (SAS software version 9.4); Population differences based on Song Type were analyzed with one-way ANOVA. Delay times were non-normally distributed based on Shapiro-Wilk's analysis; we therefore log transformed these data prior to ANOVA testing. We also used multivariate ANOVA (MANOVA) statistics to analyze behavioral measures collectively across Populations (SAS software version 9.4). Normalized cell proportions for each auditory forebrain region were analyzed with two-way ANOVA (SAS software). For MLd, ZENK intensity measures were compared directly for Song Type with one-way ANOVA (SAS software version 9.4). We used one-way ANOVA to test for differences in the abundance of ovarian follicle categories between MS and SS females, and linear regression to test for relationships between ovarian follicle status, Delay times, and catFISH results (SAS software version 9.4).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Tumor Characteristics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative data were expressed as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). The survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Empirical distribution was used to illustrate the distribution of the variables measured (such as NLR and AGR), and it was calculated with MATLAB, version R2017b from MathWorks, Inc. (Natick, MA, USA). Statistical analysis was performed with the SAS software (SAS Institute; Cary, NC, USA) using one-way ANOVA followed when appropriate, by a contrast test to compare none, benign, and grade 1 tumors vs. grade 2 and grade 3 tumors. Normality of data was analyzed using the Fisher-Pearson standardized third moment coefficient (35 (link)); a logarithmic transformation was needed to approach normality. Homogeneity of variance was analyzed using Levene's test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (36 (link), 37 ) was performed with the SAS software (SAS Institute; Cary, NC, USA) to determine the cutoff value. Principal component analysis (PCA) (38 (link), 39 (link)) was performed with the SAS software (SAS Institute; Cary, NC, USA). For PCA analysis, variables were standardized by subtracting their mean value and dividing by their standard deviation. Differences were considered statistically significant at a value p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Obtained data were analyzed as a CRD by using the GLM procedure of SAS software (SAS, 2002 ). The linear and quadratic models were analyzed by the REG procedure of SAS software (SAS, 2002 ). Statistical significance was accepted at p<0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Optimal Ambient Temperature for Goose Growth

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA procedure of SAS software (SAS Institute Inc., 2003 ), with pen used as the experimental unit for analysis. When temperature treatment was significant, means were compared using Duncan's multiple comparison procedure of SAS software (SAS Institute Inc., 2003 ). The linear and quadratic polynomial contrasts were performed to determine the effects of ambient temperature on performance and a probability level of P ≤ 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
The upper critical temperature was estimated by broken-line regression (Huynh et al., 2005 (link)). The upper critical temperature was designated as the inflection point temperature above which the goose response started to change. The broken-line model was provided as follows: y = l + u (x-r); Where y = goose response (28-day-old body weight or weight gain), x = ambient temperature (°C), r = breakpoint between two lines which was defined as the optimal ambient temperature, u = the slope of the curve, l = maximum or minimum response if x < r and y = l + u (x- r) if x ≥ r.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Avian Defensin and Immune Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are expressed as means ± SD. The statistical significance was assessed by using SAS software (1996) as previously described (Li et al., 2015 (link)). Correlation between the relative gene expression of immune molecules and NDV was performed using Pearson’s tau using SAS software (1996) , and P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
The nucleotide sequences of both of anser_AvBD7 and anser_AvBD12 obtained in current study are available from GenBank under the accession numbers KR018386 (anser_AvBD7) and KR018387 (anser_AvBD12). The nucleotide sequences of anser_AvBD4, anser_AvBD16, TLR1, FASLG and iNOS are shown in detail in Supplementary Figure S2–S6 in the Supplementary Materials, due to nucleotide sequences of them are shorter than 200 bp.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Parasitism, Emergence, and Development of T. pretiosum

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data on the parasitism, emergence, and egg-to-adult period of T. pretiosum were submitted to the Kolmogorov and Bartlett tests to verify the normality of their residuals and the homogeneity of their variances, respectively. The data that met these assumptions were then submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA). When there were two treatments, the Student’s t-test was used to compare different treatment conditions to each other, and when there were more than two treatments the Student-Newman-Keuls test was used (P < 0.05). When the data did not meet the requirements for ANOVA, the most adequate transformation was used, and if they still did not present normal residuals and homogeneous variances the data were then submitted to non-parametric tests. For the non-parametric tests, the Wilcoxon test was used to compare two treatments and the Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare three or more treatments (p < 0.05). All analyses were conducted using the SAS software25 .
Survival curves were also constructed using survival data at specific ages, and were compared according to the Kaplan-Meyer methodology26 (link) and analyzed using SAS software25 .
The frequency data from the choice tests were analyzed using Proc FREQ25 and interpreted by the chi-square (χ2) test, in which 1:1 was the null hypothesis assumed if the parasitoid had no preference for one host over the other.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Effective Connectivity Patterns in Healthy Older Adults

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To identify systematic variation (i.e., subgroups) among healthy older adults with respect to their patterns of effective connectivity, we performed in MATLAB (ver. 2019a) a k‐means clustering analysis with the ONCs' cortical and subcortical summary variables. Selecting these summary variables (i.e., cortical and subcortical) enabled us to include all SN effective connections in an efficient way. The appropriate number of clusters were identified based on the best average silhouette values per number of cluster groups and a visual check of the cluster silhouette plots. To identify how bvFTD patients' estimates for the cortical and subcortical summary variables differed from the ONC estimates, we then used the smallest pairwise Euclidean distance between centroids of the ONC clusters and the bvFTD estimates to establish cluster membership of the bvFTD group based on the ONC clusters. Next, we identified linear models using SAS software (ver. 9.4) for the ONC group and for the full sample to test whether cluster membership could predict performance on the RSMS EX score in health and in disease. Finally, we established whether a significant difference existed between ONC cluster membership and bvFTD cluster membership using a χ2 analysis using SAS software (ver. 9.4) as well. Scripts for these analyses are available in GitHub (Rijpma, 2021c (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Detailed GTPγS Binding Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GTPγS binding assays were performed in duplicate or triplicate, and the data were analyzed using SAS software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Concentration response curves were calculated using nonlinear regression analysis to fit a sigmoid maximal effect model using SAS software (SAS Institute), and concentrations yielding half-maximal effects (EC50) were determined from the curve. The EC50 values of each drug are represented as the geometric mean and 95% confidence interval (CI). All data acquired in vivo are expressed as the arithmetic mean ± standard error (S.E.). The significance of changes in peripheral lymphocyte counts were analyzed by comparing the vehicle control and treated groups using Dunnett's multiple comparison test and the 50% effective dose (ED50) values were calculated using the linear regression method with the lymphocyte number in the vehicle-treated group defined as 100%. Cumulative clinical scores of EAE model animals were analyzed by comparing the vehicle control and treated groups using Dunnett's multiple comparison test, and the differences in maximum clinical scores in EAE model animals between groups were analyzed using Steel's multiple comparison test. The differences in airway responses between control and ASP4058-treated or fingolimod-P-treated rats were analyzed using Student's t test or Dunnett's multiple comparison test, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Statistical Analysis of Dietary Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The experimental data were analyzed by the general linear model procedure of SAS software (SAS Institute, 2003). When dietary therapy was significant (p<0.05), the mean values were compared by Duncan’s multiple comparison program (SAS Institute, 2003) of SAS software. The probability level of p< 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Determining Optimal Ambient Temperature for Geese

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data obtained from the experiment were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with SAS software (SAS Institute Inc., 2003 ), with pens used as the experimental units for analysis. When temperature treatment was significant, means were compared using Duncan's multiple comparison procedure of SAS software (SAS Institute Inc., 2003 ). Linear and quadratic polynomial contrasts were performed to determine the effects of ambient temperature on performance and a probability level of P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
The upper critical temperature was estimated by broken-line regression (Huynh et al., 2005 (link)). The upper critical temperature was designated as the inflection point temperature above which the goose response started to change. The broken-line model was provided as follows: y = l + u (x- r), where y = goose response (feed intake or weight gain), x = ambient temperature (°C), r = breakpoint between two lines (defined as the optimal ambient temperature), u = the slope of the curve, and l = maximum or minimum response if x < r and y = l + u (x- r) if x ≥ r.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!