The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Viia7 real time pcr machine

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom

The ViiA7 real-time PCR machine is a laboratory instrument used for the amplification and detection of nucleic acid sequences in real-time. It is designed to perform quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

104 protocols using viia7 real time pcr machine

1

Gene Expression Analysis of Stem Cell Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TEC RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Micro Kit (QIAGEN, Germany). RNA was stored at −80°C until use. Reverse transcription of mRNA was performed with the High Capacity Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems). Real‐time PCR for Oct4, Foxn1, and Dll4 was performed with Fast SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) using the Viia‐7 Real‐Time PCR machine (Applied Biosystems). The following primers were used: GAPDH (5′‐ACGGCAAATTCAACGGCACAG‐3′ fwd, 5′‐ACACCAGTAGACTCCACGACATAC‐3′ rev); Oct4 (5′‐ACATCGCCAATCAGCTTGG‐3′ fwd, 5′‐AGAACCATACTCGAACCACATCC‐3′ rev); Foxn1 (5′‐CTCGTCGTTTGTGCCTGAC‐3′ fwd, 5′‐TGCCTCTTGTAGGGGTGGAAA‐3′ rev); and Dll4 (5′‐AGGTGCCACTTCGGTTACAC‐3′ fwd, 5′‐GGGAGAGCAAATGGCTGATA‐3′ rev). For Dll1, AIRE, and PSMB11 RT‐PCR was performed using TaqMan Gene expression Assays (Applied Biosystems) and the EagleTaq Universal Master Mix (Roche). All PCR reactions were performed in MicroAmpOptical 96‐well reaction plates (Applied Biosystems) in a final volume of 20 μl and run on the Viia‐7 Real‐Time PCR machine (Applied Biosystems). Relative quantification of genes was performed with the 2−ΔΔCt method, normalized to GAPDH and expressed as fold change relative to the untransduced sample used as control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative PCR Analysis of BCAA Metabolizing Enzymes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
mRNA levels of BCAA metabolizing enzyme related genes in SAT and AA tissues were measured by quantitative PCR by employing optimal reference gene pairs which was validated as previously described (39 (link)). Primer information used for the study are provided in Table 8. Powdered tissue samples were homogenized in Ribozol (N580-CA, Amresco, OH, USA). RNA was isolated as per the manufacturer's instructions and QIAxcel Advanced System (Qiagen, Toronto, ON) was used to determine the RNA quality and quantity. One microgram of RNA of was used to synthesize cDNA using qScript cDNA supermix (CA101414-104, Quanta Biosciences). qPCR analysis was performed using PerfeCTa SYBR green Supermix Low ROX (Quanta Biosciences, MA, USA) and a ViiA7 real-time PCR machine (Thermo Fisher Scientific, CA, USA) as detailed previously (39 (link)). qBase + software (Biogazelle) was used to quantify mRNA expression (39 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative PCR Optimization and Validation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
qPCR analyses were performed in 96-well plates on a ViiA7 Real-time PCR machine (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and the reactions contained 2 μl of cDNA template, 5 μl of PerfeCTa SYBR green Supermix Low ROX (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 0.25 μM for each forward and reverse primer targeting RG candidates (Table 1), and nuclease free water in a total volume of 10 μL. qPCR reactions were initiated by denaturation at 95 °C for 20 s, followed by 40 cycles of amplification. The thermal cycling profile consisted of denaturation at 95 °C for 1 s and annealing and extension at 60 °C for 2 s with subsequent acquisition of fluorescence data. A melting curve was generated (95 °C for 15 s, 65 °C for 1 min, 95 °C for 15 s) to discriminate between specific and non-specific amplification products (in all cases the ramp time was 1 °C/s). All qPCR reactions were run in duplicate; amplification efficiencies were calculated for each primer pair by standard curves using 8 points of 10-fold dilution series from standards obtained for each candidate gene ranging from 108 to 101 copies/µL (Table 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative gene expression analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted from unsorted, FACS-sorted d2EGFP+ and d2EGFP cells of d2EGFP TBX4B and d2EGFP TBW 11.50 clones using RNeasy plus mini kit (Qiagen). cDNA was synthesised from RNA using transcriptor first strand cDNA synthesis kit (Roche) with random hexamer primers. Each RNA sample included a no reverse transcriptase (RT) control to confirm the absence of genomic DNA. A master mix containing template cDNA, gene-specific primers and Fast SYBR Green master mix (ThermoFisher Scientific) was used on a ViiA 7 real-time PCR machine (ThermoFisher Scientific) for kinetic PCR amplification. LinRegPCR method [62 (link)] was used to determine the relative abundance of target mRNAs. The gene-specific values were normalised to their corresponding 18S rRNA values, which served as the internal PCR control. The gene-specific primers are listed in the S2 Table.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying miR-27a and DPYD mRNA Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from HEK293T cells 48 h after transfection with a miR-27a mimic using the TRIZOL method, as previously described [41 (link)]. For miRNA levels, reverse transcription was performed with the TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription Kit, according to manufacturer’s instructions, followed by real-time PCR using TaqMan assays (miR-27a: assay ID 000408 and U6 SNRNA assay ID 001973). To determine mRNA levels of DPYD and GAPDH, cDNA was created using the iScript reverse transcription kit (BioRAD). Real-time PCR was performed using SYBR green reagents and specific primers (DPYD forward: GGTGGTGATGTCGTTGGTTT, DPYD reverse: GCAGAAACGGAAGCTCCATA, GAPDH forward: ACCACAGTCCATGCCATCAC, GAPDH reverse: TCCACCACCCTGTTGCTGTA). All real-time PCR was performed using a Viia7 Real-Time PCR machine (ThermoFisher). Relative expression was calculated using the ΔΔCT method, with U6 siRNA and GAPDH used as housekeeping genes for miR-27a and DPYD, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantification of LPA Receptor mRNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LPA receptor mRNA levels in tissues and cells were determined using qPCR using validated optimal reference gene pairs as previously described [28 (link)]. Primer information for LPA receptor and reference genes is provided in Table 2. Ground tissue samples and harvested cells were homogenized in Ribozol (Amresco), RNA was isolated as per the manufacturer’s instructions, and RNA quality and quantity were examined using a QIAxcel Advanced System (Qiagen). cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of RNA using qScript cDNA supermix (Quanta Biosciences) and cDNA samples were stored at −20°C until further use. qPCR analysis was performed in 96-well plates using PerfeCTa SYBR green Supermix Low ROX (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and a ViiA7 real-time PCR machine (Thermo Fisher Scientific) as detailed previously [28 (link)]. mRNA levels were quantified using gbase + software (Biogazelle) [28 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative PCR analysis of gene expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA from hippocampal tissue and cortex was isolated using TRI reagent (Invitrogen). Reverse transcription on 1 ​μg RNA was performed using SensiFAST™ cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bioline) according to manufacturers’ instructions. Primers were designed to span an exon-exon junction and sequences are listed in (Table S1). qPCR was performed on a Viia 7 Real-Time PCR machine (ThermoFisher Scientific) using SYBR green detection (Bioline). Transcript levels were normalized to the geometric means of the reference genes Pgk1 (phosphoglycerate kinase 1) and Wdr33 (WD repeat domain 33). Candidate reference genes were obtained using the RefGenes tool (Genevestigator®, Nebion) and validated against commonly used reference genes. The geNorm algorithm (qbase+, Biogazelle) was used to select two reference genes with the most stable expression in the tissue of interest (Hellemans et al., 2007 (link); Willems et al., 2008 (link)). The comparative Ct method was used to calculate relative gene expression (Schmittgen and Livak, 2008 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative PCR analysis of NF-κB genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative PCR with reverse transcription (RT–qPCR) analysis of NF-κB-responsive genes was undertaken as previously described61 (link). In brief, the TRIM5−/−CypA−/− cell line was modified to express inducibly either VACV TAP-tagged-L3 or empty vector. These cells were seeded in 12-well plates at a density of 6 × 105 cells per well; the next day, these cells were incubated in medium without serum for 3 h and then either mock-treated or treated with doxycycline (150 ng ml−1) for 4 h in triplicate. Total RNA was extracted from the cells and cDNA was synthesized by reverse transcription using oligo-dT primers (Thermo Fisher). The mRNA levels of the NF-κB-responsive genes NFKBIA, CCL2, CXCL8, CXCL10, IL6 and the housekeeping control gene GAPDH were measured by qPCR using Fast SYBR Green master mix (Thermo Fisher) and a ViiA 7 real-time PCR machine (Thermo Fisher). The fold induction of the mRNA levels was calculated by the 2−ΔΔCt method using induced T-REx-293 empty vector and GAPDH as the internal control. The primers used in the qPCR are listed in Supplementary Table 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Analysis of Transcriptional Regulators in Prostate Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from LNCaP cells by using TRIZOL Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Next, total RNA (2 µg) was reverse-transcribed into cDNA by using GoScript Reverse Transcription Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Subsequently, RT-PCR was conducted in Thermal Cycler (T100, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). PCR products were electrophoresed in agarose gel, visualized by EtBr-imaging (GelDoc XR+; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The quantitative PCR (qPCR) was conducted using FastSYBR Green qPCR Master Mix (Life Technologies) and Viia7 real-time PCR machine (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Changes in expression levels were calculated as the ratio of the treated sample to control samples. All samples were normalized to the expression of the GAPDH mRNA.
Primers used for PCR were as follows: AHR: 5′-TCAAATCCTTCCAAGCGGCA-3′ (Sense) and 5′-ACAGTTATCCTGGCCTCCGT-3′ (Antisense); AR: 5′-CAGGTGGAGGCAAATCTTCGT-3′ (Sense) and 5′-CCTGCAATCTGCCAATGG-3′ (Antisense); ARNT: 5′-GGTTTGGCAGCACACTCTATG-3′ (Sense) and 5′-ACAGTTATCCTGGCCTCCGT-3′ (Antisense); CYP1A1: 5′-CAAGGGGCGTTGTGTCTTTG-3′ (Sense) and 5′-GTCGATAGCACCATCAGGG-3′ (Antisense); GAPDH: 5′-CGGAGTCAACGGATTTGGTCGTAT-3′ (Sense) and 5′-AGCCTTCTCCATGGTGGTGAAGA-3′ (Antisense).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Gene Expression Profiling in Stress-Tolerant and Stress-Sensitive Wheat Genotypes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stress-tolerant genotype DBA Aurora and stress-sensitive genotype L6 (based on the rank summation index in Table 1) were selected for gene expression analysis. Flag leaf samples from each treatment group were collected at 5, 15, 25, 35 and 45DPA with sterile razor blades and were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Three biological replicates were collected for each treatment at each time-point. Total RNA was extracted using the Tri reagent (Sigma-Aldrich) and treated with TURBO DNase (ThermoFisher Scientific) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration and quality of RNA samples were measured on a NanoDrop Lite spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher Scientific). RNA integrity was assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis and Bioanalyzer. cDNA was synthesized using the MystiCq microRNA cDNA Synthesis Mix Kit (Sigma-Aldrich) as previously described24 (link). qPCR analysis of miR160a and the ARFs (ARF8 and ARF18), miR396b and the HSP90s (CL1Contig1941, Contig102950, KukriC15_415)24 (link),38 (link) was performed using the PowerUp SYBR Green Master Mix (ThermoFisher Scientific) on a ViiA7 Real-Time PCR machine as previously described24 (link),38 (link). GAPDH was used as the reference gene. Primer sequences used in the study are included in Supplementary Table S4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!