The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ltq xl ion trap mass spectrometer

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The LTQ XL ion-trap mass spectrometer is a laboratory instrument designed for high-performance mass spectrometry analysis. It features a linear ion trap mass analyzer that can perform accurate mass measurements and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) experiments.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

25 protocols using ltq xl ion trap mass spectrometer

1

Quantitative Mass Spectrometric Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ESI-MS and MS/MS data was acquired with an LTQ XL ion-trap mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ion (ESI) source (Thermo Scientific, USA). The samples were injected into electrospray ion source via a 2 μL Rheodyne loop in a stream of 50% methanol at a flow rate of 100 μL min−1. The spray voltage was set at 4000 V, with a sheath gas (nitrogen gas) flow rate of 20 arb, an auxiliary gas (nitrogen gas) flow rate of 5.0 arb, a capillary voltage of 37 V, a tube lens voltage of 250 V, and a capillary temperature of 300 °C, positive ion mode scan, scan range is m/z 200–2000. MS/MS analysis was carried out using helium (He) as the collision gas, a normalized collision energy degree of 35–45% and an isotope width of m/z 2.00. The ESI-MS and MS/MS data were acquired with LTQ Tune software Xcalibur (Thermo). Other parameters were acquiescent.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

LC-MS/MS Data Extraction for GNPS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To acquire the LC–MS/MS data for GNPS analysis, the fermentation broth of US43/pL-hcdR2 was enriched using macroporous absorbent resin 4006 column and eluted by 30% and 80% acetone aqueous, respectively. The eluent of 80% acetone was concentrated under pressure, and then was fractioned by flash ODS column. The fractions containing herbicidins were combined to yield the crude extract. Then the crude extract was analyzed on an Agilent 1200 instrument (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) coupled to an LTQ XL ion trap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), using a VP-ODS column (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm, SHIMADZU), with a 1 mL/min, 60 min gradient elution (the same as above). LC–ESI(+)MS/MS data, acquired at a collision energy of 35 eV as .raw file format, were converted to .mzXML file format using MS convert program of ProteoWizard 3.0 and uploaded to MassIVE server (massive.ucsd.edu). The data are analyzed using GPNS molecular networking tool following the instruction provided in the website of https://gnps.ucsd.edu/ProteoSAFe/static/gnps-splash2.jsp. The resulting spectral networks are visualized using Cytoscape version 3.5.1 [30 (link)], where nodes represented precursor mass.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative LC-MS/MS analysis of protein digestion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Digestion was performed in U-bottom 96-wells microtiter plate. 33-mer was diluted in citrate phosphate buffer (pH 5) to 5 mg/ml, mixed with E40 diluted in the same buffer (1:48 enzyme vs substrate molar ratio) and incubated at 37 °C. At the time point 0, 15, 30 and 60 minute aliquots (10 µl) were taken, and reactions were stopped by boiling for 3 minutes before being analyzed by LC-MS/MS.
Samples were analyzed by HPLC system Accela Instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA) coupled to both UV detector and LTQ-XL ion trap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Samples were diluted with 90 μl Milli-Q water and 10 μl loaded through a column Aeris Peptide 3.6 μm XB-C18 150 × 2.1 mm, (Phenomenex, Torrance CA, USA). Eluent A was 0.1% acetic acid (v/v) in Milli-Q water, eluent B was acetonitrile. The separation was carried out at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min (room temperature), with a linear gradient from 10% to 40% of solution B over 15 minutes. The column effluent was split to give a flow rate of 80 μl/min and 20 μl/min into the UV detector and ESI source respectively. The mass spectrometer operated in data-dependent mode and all spectra were acquired in the positive ionization mode with an m/z scan range of 200e2000. MS and MS/MS spectra were elaborated using the Proteome Discoverer 2.0 (Thermo Fisher).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Collagen Hydroxylation in OI Fibroblasts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Collagen was collected from culture media from control and OI patient fibroblasts treated with 100ug/ml ascorbic acid for 4 days. Type I procollagen chains were extracted by heat denaturation at 90°C in SDS–PAGE sample buffer, resolved on 6% SDS-PAGE gels (28 (link)), and digested with trypsin in gel (29 ). Subsequently, collagenase-generated peptides were separated by reverse-phase HPLC and hydroxylation of N- and C-telopeptides were analyzed individually (C8, Brownlee Aquapore RP-300, 4.6 mm × 25 cm) with a linear gradient of acetonitrile:n-propanol (3:1 v/v) in aqueous 0.1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid (30 (link)). Individual fractions were analyzed by LC–MS. Peptides were analyzed by electrospray LC-MS using an LTQ XL ion-trap mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) equipped with in-line liquid chromatography using a C4 5 mm capillary column (300 mm × 150 mm; Higgins Analytical RS-15M3-W045) eluted at 4.5 ml/min. The LC mobile phase consisted of buffer A (0.1% formic acid in MilliQ water) and buffer B (0.1% formic acid in 3:1 acetonitrile:n-propanol, v:v). An electrospray ionization source introduced the LC sample stream into the mass spectrometer with a spray voltage of 3 kV. Proteome Discoverer search software (Thermo Scientific) was used for peptide identification using the NCBI protein database.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Tandem Mass Spectrometry Protocol for Peptide Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The digestate obtained from the SDS-PAGE gel slices were analyzed by nanoflow liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (nanoLC-MS/MS) using an LTQ-XL ion-trap mass spectrometer (Thermo, Fremont, CA, USA). Reversed phase columns were packed in-house to approximately 7 cm (100 μmi.d.) using 100 Å, 5 μM Zorbax C18 resin (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) in a fused silica capillary with an integrated electrospray tip. A 1.8 kV electrospray voltage was applied via a liquid junction upstream of the C18 column. Samples were then injected into the C18 column using a Surveyor autosampler (Thermo, Fremont, CA, USA). The column was washed with buffer A [5% (v/v) ACN, 0.1% (v/v) formic acid] for 10 min at 1 μL/min before each loading. Peptides were subsequently eluted from the C18 column with 0–50% Buffer B [95% (v/v) ACN, 0.1% (v/v) formic acid] over 58 min at 500 nL per min followed by 50–95% Buffer B over 5 min at 500 nL per min. The column eluate was then directed into a nanospray ionization source of the mass spectrometer. Spectra were scanned over the range 400–1500 amu. Automated peak recognition, dynamic exclusion window set to 90s38 (link) and tandem MS of the top six most intense precursor ions at 35% normalization collision energy were performed using Xcalibur™ software (version 2.06) (Thermo, Fremont, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Configuring LC-MS System for Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The configuration and operation for Liquid Chromatography / Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS) are platform-specific. All the settings described here are based on a system consisting of a Thermo Finnigan Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography system (UPLC) with a refrigerated auto sampler, and a Thermo Scientific LTQ XL Ion Trap Mass Spectrometer (ITMS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Modified RNAs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified 30-nucleotide and 60-nucleotide RNA with different uridine modifications were analyzed at Novatia, LLC using on-line desalting, flow injection electrospray ionization on an LTQ-XL ion trap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and analyzed with ProMass Deconvolution software from Novatia, LLC (https://www.enovatia.com/our-products/promass/?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIoZS6xKDn-AIViNrICh3peATrEAAYASAAEgLRNPD_BwE).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Reverse Phase UHPLC-MS Analysis of Ubiquitin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Both Ub and pUb were dialyzed to H2O. Protein samples were loaded via U-pick up injection mode onto an Agilent Zorbax 300SB-C3 5 μm 150 mm by 0.5 mm column. The Dionex Ultimate 3000 ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) system (NCS-3500RS pump and WPS-3000PL autosampler) was used for reverse phase chromatography where solvent A was 100% H2O and 0.1% formic acid (FA), and solvent B was 100% acetonitrile (ACN) and 0.1% FA. High-performance liquid chromatography was run in the capillary flow mode with a flow rate of 12 μl/min. A 25-min linear gradient was used (0 to 2 min, 10% B; ramped to 90% B in 13 min, held at 90% B for 5 min, ramped back to 10% B in 1 min, and last held at 10% B for 4 min). The coupled Thermo LTQ-XL ion trap mass spectrometer was operated in a scanning mode using Xcalibur v2.6 software. The global parameters were as follows: ion source, ESI; ionization mode, positive; spray voltage, 5000 V; ion transfer tube temperature, 275°C; sheath gas 8, auxiliary gas 1; tube lens, 135 V; automatic gain control (AGC) target was 3 × 104; maximum injection time was 10 ms; data type was profile; and scan range was 500 to 200 mass/charge ratio (m/z). Raw files were loaded into and processed by software Protein Deconvolution (Thermo).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Collagen Extraction and Proteomic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Collagen was prepared from minced E18.5 calvaria. Type I α-chains were extracted by heat denaturation (90C) in SDS-PAGE sample buffer, resolved on 6% SDS-PAGE gels,(32 (link)) cut from gels and digested with trypsin in-gel.(33 (link))Calvarial tissue was also digested with bacterial collagenase as described.(34 (link)) Collagenase-generated peptides were separated by reverse phase HPLC (C8, Brownlee Aquapore RP-300, 4.6 mm × 25 cm) with a linear gradient of acetonitrile:n-propanol (3:1 v/v) in aqueous 0.1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid.(35 (link)) Individual fractions were analyzed by LC-MS.
Peptides were analyzed by electrospray LC/MS using an LTQ XL ion-trap mass spectrometer, (Thermo Scientific) equipped with in-line liquid chromatography on a C4 5um capillary column (300 um × 150 mm; Higgins Analytical RS-15M3-W045) and eluted at 4.5 μl/min. The LC mobile phase consisted of buffer A (0.1% formic acid in MilliQ water) and buffer B (0.1% formic acid in 3:1 acetonitrile:n-propanol v/v). An electrospray ionization source (ESI) introduced the LC sample stream into the mass spectrometer with a spray voltage of 3kV. Proteome Discoverer search software (Thermo Scientific) was used for peptide identification using the NCBI protein database.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Protein Identification via Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After co-immunoprecipitation, samples were resolved using a 10% Tris-Glycine SDS-PAGE and proteins were visualized using PageBlue (Thermo Scientific, 24620). Bands of interest were cut out from the gel and digested with trypsin (50ng/μl in 50 mM NH4HCO3 buffer, PH 8.0). The peptides were analyzed, as previously described [40 (link)], by capillary LC-tandem mass spectrometry in a LTQ XL ion trap mass spectrometer (ThermoScientific, San Jose, CA) fitted with a microelectrospray probe. The data were analyzed with the ProteomeDiscoverer software (ThermoScientific, version 1.4.1), and the proteins were identified with SequestHT against a target-decoy nonredundant human or mouse proteins database obtained from Uniprot. The following parameters were used: trypsin was selected with proteolytic cleavage only after arginine and lysine, number of internal cleavage sites was set to 1, mass tolerance for precursors and fragment ions was 1.0 Da, considered dynamic modifications were + 15.99 Da for oxidized methionine. Peptide matches were filtered using the q-value and Posterior Error Probability calculated by the Percolator algorithm ensuring an estimated false positive rate below 5%. The filtered Sequest HT output files for each peptide were grouped according to the protein from which they were derived.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!