The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using mouse igg1

1

Modulating Wound Healing in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse model of Vγ1D was implemented by intraperitoneal injection of 200 μg anti-Vγ1 Ab (clone 2.11; BioXcell, USA) 3 days before wound excision. Vγ4D was generated by anti-Vγ4 Ab (clone UC3-10A6; BioXcell, USA). Control mice were intraperitoneally administrated isotype control (armenian hamster IgG) (BioXcell, USA). Neutralization mouse models were conducted by injecting subcutaneously into wound margin 0, 1, and 2 days following excision with 20 μg/wound of anti-IGF-1 Ab (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), anti-IL-17A Ab (clone 17F3; BioXcell, USA), anti-IFN-γ Ab (clone XMG1.2; BioXcell, USA), anti-IL-1β Ab (clone B122; BioXcell, USA), anti-IL-23 Ab (clone BE0051; BioXcell, USA), anti-CCL20 Ab (clone 114906; R&D Systems, USA), respectively. IL-17A neutralization of low and high doses was performed by 2 and 200 μg/wound of anti-IL-17A Ab, respectively. Isotype control mice received equivalent doses of isotype Abs subcutaneously. Isotype control Abs of IGF-1, IL-17A, IL-1β, IL-23, CCL20 are poly goat IgG, mouse IgG1, armenian hamster IgG, rat IgG2, and rat IgG1 (BioXcell), respectively. Mouse models of recombinant cytokine addition were generated by subcutaneously injecting rIGF-1/rIL-17A/rIL-1β/rIL-23 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) with the doses of 2, 20, 200 ng/wound, respectively, in the wound margin. Control mice were administrated with sterile PBS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Neutralizing Antibodies for Mouse Cytokines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Neutralizing antibodies to mouse TNF (rat anti-mouse; clone XT3.11) and IL-17A (mouse anti-mouse; clone 17F3) were in vivo grade from Bio X Cell (Lebanon, NH, USA). Mouse anti-mouse TWEAK neutralizing antibody (clone mP2D10) was produced by Biogen, Inc. Isotype control antibodies were rat IgG1, mouse IgG1, and mouse IgG2a, all from Bio X Cell (Lebanon, NH, USA) for the TNF, IL-17A and TWEAK neutralizing antibodies, respectively. All recombinant human cytokines, TWEAK, TNF, and IL-17A, were from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibody characterization and in vivo use

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 314.8 mAb (mouse IgG1 anti-human ICOS) has been described before.21 Isotype controls (mouse IgG1, MOPC-1; rat IgG2b, LTF-2) and anti-Gr1 mAb (rat IgG2b, RB6-8C5) were purchased from BioXcell (West Lebanon, NH, USA). The MT807R1 recombinant Ig consisting of rhesus IgG1k constant regions and CDRs derived from the anti-human CD8 antibody M-T807 grafted into rhesus variable framework regions and was provided by the Nonhuman Primate Reagent Resource (NIH contract HHSN272200900037C and grant RR016001). The antibody was expressed in vitro using serum-free medium and purified by protein-A affinity chromatography. Endotoxin was <1EU/mg. Cyclophosphamide (CTX, Sigma Aldrich) was prepared extemporaneously according to supplier technical data sheet, i.e to 20 mg/ml of injectable water. All reagents were injected intraperitoneally.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Modulating CD4+ T cell subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fresh or frozen PBMC from healthy donors cells were cultured in 96 well flat-bottomed plates in RPMI supplemented with 10% human AB serum (Mediatech, VA) and 2.4 mM L-glutamine. Frozen PBMC were rested overnight before stimulation. Cells were stimulated with either 1 µg/mL (PBMC) or 2 µg/mL (lymph node T cells) functional grade anti-CD3 (OKT3; eBiosciences) in the presence of belatacept (100 µg/mL; Bristol-Myers Squibb, NY) or human IgG1-Fc control (BioXCell, Lebanon, NH), or with anti-CD3/CD28 Dynabeads (Invitrogen) in the presence of 10 µg/mL anti-CTLA-4 (BN13; BioXCell, Lebanon, NH) or mouse IgG1 (BioXCell, Lebanon, NH), as indicated. Cells were washed twice with media and restimulated with PMA/Iono for 4 h as described above. CD4+ T cell subsets were defined by the following gating strategy: CD45RA+ Th1, CD4+CD45RA+IFN-γ+; CD45RA Th1, CD4+CD45RA IFN-γ+; CD45RACCR6+ Th17, CD4+CD45RACCR6+IL-17+. The change in frequency of CD4+ populations was calculated as (% Cytokine+ Blockade/% Cytokine+ IgG)×100 of the indicated population.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

B16 and 4T1 Tumor Models for Antibody Blockade

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were washed and resuspended in sterile PBS. For most intravenous and subcutaneous B16 experiments, 2 × 105 cells in 200 μl were injected. For some intravenous injection experiments (noted in figure legend), 2 × 104 B16 cells in 200 μl were injected. For intravenous and subcutaneous 4T1 experiments, 1 × 105 cells in 200 μl were injected. Subcutaneous tumor growth was measured using calipers, and tumor volume was estimated using the formula V = (L*W2)/2. Tumor growth in the lungs from intravenous injection was quantified via macroscopic examination. For antibody blockade experiments, anti-KLRG1 (clone 1F10, generated as described below, 200 μg/mouse), anti-PD-1 (clone RMP1-14, BioXcell Cat# BE0146, 200 μg/mouse), or control antibody (rat IgG2a, BioXcell Cat# BE0089, 200 μg/mouse, mouse IgG1, BioXcell Cat# BE0083, 200 μg/mouse) were intraperitoneally injected on day 7, 10, 13, and 16 post-tumor cell injection. Animals were monitored daily and tumor growth was measured every third day. Animals were euthanized on day 21 post-intravenous injection and on day 19 or 22 post-subcutaneous injection or when tumor volume reached 2000 mm3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immune Profiling of Tumor Microenvironment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PD-L1 (1:400; Cell Signaling Technology; #13684), CD47 (1:200; Sigma; HPA044659), GAPDH (1:2000; Cell Signaling Technology; #5174), CD3 (1:200; Thermo Fisher; 14-0038-80), CD4 (1:150; Thermo Fisher; 14-0041-82), CD8 (1:100; Thermo Fisher; 14-0081-82), SIRPα (1:200; Abcam; ab267409), CD20 (1:100; Abcam; ab78237), FoxP3 (1:300; Abcam; ab20034), Ki-67 (1:200; Abcam; ab16667), EGFR (1:50; Cell Signaling Technology; #2085), p-ERK (1:400; Cell Signaling Technology; #3074), total-ERK (1:500; Cell Signaling Technology; #4695), β-catenin (1:200; Abcam; ab32572), CD68 (1:100; Abcam; ab213363), EMA (1:300; Abcam; ab109185), Anti-CD47 antibody (Clone: MIAP301) (100μg/day in vivo; BioXcell), Anti-CD47 antibody (Clone: B6H12) (10μg/mL in vitro and 100μg/day in vivo; BioXcell), isotype control (mouse IgG1, BioXcell).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Depletion and inhibition of viral infection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were infected with 107 PFUs intranasally (i.n.) for WR and subcutaneously (s.c.; flank skin) for MVA, unless mentioned otherwise. Body weights were measured daily, and animals were sacrificed upon losing more than 30% of their initial weight. For CD8 T cell depletion studies, mice were injected intraperitoneally with 200 μg of anti-CD8β antibody (Clone 53-5.8: BioXCell BE0223) or isotype control (Clone HRPN: BioXCell BE0088) at day −6 and −3 and 100 μg at day 0, 4 and 8 of WR challenge. For IFNAR1 inhibition, 400 μg of anti-IFNAR-1 antibody (Clone MAR1-5A3: BioXCell BE0241) or isotype control (mouse IgG1: BioXCell BE0083) was administered intraperitoneally at 6 h before and after both MVA and WR infection (4 times in total).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

In vivo Murine Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For infection experiments, mice were i.n. challenged with 5 × 104 CFUs of K. pneumoniae in 30 μl of sterile PBS. For in vivo antibody-mediated blocking experiments, mice were intraperitoneally (i.p.) injected with the following antibodies 24–48 h before infection: αMR1 (150 μg/mouse; clone 26.5; Biolegend, Mouse IgG2a), αIFNAR1 (200 μg/mouse; clone MAR1-5A3; BioXCell, Mouse IgG1), αSiglecH (150 μg/mouse; clone 440c; BioXCell, Rat IgG2b), or their respective isotype controls: Mouse IgG2a (150 μg/mouse; clone MOPC-173; Biolegend), Mouse IgG1 (200 μg/mouse; clone MOPC-21; BioXCell), and Rat IgG2b (150 μg/mouse; clone LTF-2; BioXCell). When indicated, MAIT cell expansion in vivo was performed through a repeated i.n. inoculation (3×) of 5-OP-RU (100 μM) and LPS (17.4 μg/mouse; Invivogen).
Bacterial loads were determined by counting CFUs after plating 100-fold dilution series of tissue homogenates obtained from bacteria-infected mice. Colonies were counted at 24 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Evaluating 14-25-9 for HNSCC Tumor Inhibition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To study the effect of 14-25-9 on tumor growth, we employed PDX models
from two HNSCC patients. Mice were randomly allocated to three groups (n=5). On
day 0, mice were given 250cGy total body irradiation by x-ray (45 (link)). On day 1, mice from two groups were infused IV
with 5 million NK92-NKp44-1-GFP cells. Vehicle group received 15mg/Kg of mouse
IgG1 (BioXcell, USA, cat noBE0083) and treatment group received 15mg/Kg of
14-25-9 IV on day 1 and every other day for 10 days. Both groups also received
10μg/mouse human recombinant IL2 (modified and lab produced) IP in three
rounds- on day 1, 3 and 5. The third group received only the IL2 on the same
schedule. Tumor volumes were measured every other day using digital calipers. At
the end of the experiment on day 10, tumor volumes were measured, mice were
sacrificed, and tumors were excised for further immunohistochemical
analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Anti-TIGIT Antibody Treatment During LCMV Infection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were injected i.p. with either 100 μg mouse IgG1 (BioXCell) or anti-TIGIT Abs (1G9 or 1B4 clone) as described previously31 (link). Injections were given on days 0, 2, 4, 10, 17, and 24 after infection if not stated otherwise during chronic LCMV infection. The treatment regimen was shortened accordingly during acute infections.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!