The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Flame ionization detector

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States

The Flame Ionization Detector (FID) is a widely used analytical instrument in gas chromatography. It detects and measures the concentration of organic compounds in a sample by ionizing the compounds in a hydrogen-air flame and measuring the resulting electrical signal.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

29 protocols using flame ionization detector

1

GC/MS and GC/FID Analysis of Salvia Essential Oils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The qualitative GC/MS analyses of Salvia apiana and Salvia officinalis essential oil samples were conducted using a 7890A gas chromatography coupled with a 5977A mass selective detector (EIMS), and the quantitative GC/FID analyses were conducted using a 5977A gas chromatograph with a flame ionization detector (Agilent Technologies, USA). Prior to the chromatographic analysis the oil samples (10.0 μL) were diluted with acetone (1:80 v/v). For GC/MS analysis the diluted sample was injected with a split/splitless injector (model 7693, Agilent) into the DB-5 ms 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm capillary column (Agilent J&W), at a split ratio of 1:10. The injection volume was 1 µL and the injection temperature was set at 250 °C. The carrier gas (helium) flow was 1.1 mL min−1. The oven temperature increased from 50 to 280 °C at a 7 °C min−1 rate and was kept at 280 °C for 20 min. The GC/FID analyses were conducted using the DB-5 30 m × 0.32 mm × 0.25 μm column with the same oven temperature and the same injector parameters as in the GC/MS analysis. The flow of carrier gas (helium) was 1.5 mL min−1. The obtained data were compared with retention indices and spectra from NIST Library 11.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Fatty Acid Profiling by GC-FID

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each sample was weighed to four decimals, and then placed in a glass tube with 1 mL of n-hexane and 1 mL of 15% BF3 in methanol. All the samples were placed in a water bath at 80 °C for 20 min. The samples were neutralized with 1 g of sodium hydrogen sulfate monohydrate, and 1 mL of the upper phase was transferred to a 2 mL vial, and 1 μL of each sample was injected into the Agilent 7890 Gas Chromatograph with the Flame Ionization Detector (Agilent Technologies, Inc. Headquarters, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The separation of the fatty acid methyl esters was carried out with the DB-Wax capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d. × 0.25 μm film thickness; Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The injector temperature was set to 250 °C and used in splitless mode; the helium was used as the carrier gas with a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The initial oven temperature was 100 °C and was increased to 180 °C at a rate of 7 °C/min with 5 min of isothermal regime, followed by 180–240 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min with another 10 min of isothermal time. The identification of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) was achieved by comparing their retention times to the known standards. The results are expressed as % of total fatty acids.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Mouse Brain Fatty Acid Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fatty acid profiles of mouse brain tissues were analyzed using gas chromatography as described previously79 (link). Briefly, tissues were homogenized by grinding in liquid nitrogen, and subjected to fatty acid methylation by mixing with 1 ml of hexane and 1 ml of 14% BF3/MeOH reagent at 100 °C for 1 h. Fatty acid methyl esters were extracted in the hexane phase, and then the fatty acid profiles were analyzed using a fully automated HP6890 gas chromatography system equipped with a flame-ionization detector (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The fatty acid peaks were identified by comparing relative retention times with commercial mixed standards (Nu-Chek Prep, Elysian, MN, USA), and the area and its percentage for each peak were analyzed using GC Chemstation software. Data were analyzed using a two-tailed Student’s t-test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Infant Stool SCFAs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Of the total cohort, we had 23 samples available for SCFA quantification (NW = 12 [GDM-NW = 5, No GDM-NW = 7; EWG-NW = 4, No EWG-NW = 8] and OW/OB = 11 [GDM-OW/OB = 6, No GDM-OW/OB = 5; EWG-OW/OB = 5, No EWG-OW/OB = 6]). Infant stool samples were weighed and diluted to equivalency with acidified water (pH 2.5) containing 1 mmol ethyl-butyric acid per liter as an internal standard. Samples were sonicated for 10 min, incubated at room temperature for 10 min, and then centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min at room temperature. Supernatant was collected, re-centrifuged, and stored at −80°C until analysis, as previously (12 (link), 45 (link)). Samples were analyzed using a 6890 series gas chromatograph with flame ionization detector (Agilent). Samples were injected at a 10:1 split ratio; the inlet was held at 228°C and the transfer line was held at 230°C. Separation of SCFAs was achieved on a 30m TG-WAX-A column (0.25-mm ID, 0.25-mm film thickness; Thermo Scientific) by using a temperature program as previously (45 (link)). Acetate, propionate, and butyrate were quantified using standards of commercially purchased compounds and samples were adjusted for extraction efficiency differences by normalizing to the internal standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fatty Acid Composition Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The IMF content was measured using the Soxhlet extraction method as previously outlined (Duan et al., 2016a (link)). The free fatty acid concentrations were measured as described in detail (Li et al., 2017a (link)). The fatty acid composition of LD muscle was measured as previously described (Li et al., 2015 (link)). Lipids were extracted from the LD muscle samples by the benzene-petroleum ether (1:1, vol/vol) procedure. Fatty acid methyl esters were prepared using 0.4 mol/L KOH/methanol solution, then determined by an Agilent 6890N gas chromatographer equipped with a flame ionization detector (Agilent Technologies) and A CP-Sil 88 fused silica open tubular capillary column (100 m × 0.25 nm; Chrompack). The method of gas chromatography analysis was as follows: original temperature was set at 45 °C for 4 min, raised to 175 °C at 13 °C/min, held at 175 °C for 27 min, warmed from 175 to 215 °C at 4 °C/min, and then held at 215 °C for 35 min. The injector and detector temperatures were stabilized at 250 °C. The carrier gas was hydrogen and the flow rate was set at 30 mL/min. The concentration of individual fatty acids was quantified by the precise standard and expressed as a percentage of the total fatty acids.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Methylation and GC Analysis of Fatty Acids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BVL or BVL-7 was methylated by adding 1:1 hexane and 14% boron trifluoride/methanol and heated at 100°C for an hour. Fatty acids methyl esters were analyzed by a fully automated 6890N Network Gas Chromatography equipped with a flame-ionization detector (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA). Individual fatty acid was determined by retention time using a reference standard, GLC461 (Nu-Chek Prep, Elysian, MN).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Fatty Acid Profiling in Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fatty acid composition of serum, anterior tibialis, quadriceps, epididymal fat pad and liver was measured by gas chromatography and flame ionization detection of fatty acid methyl esters. Tissue lipids were extracted with chloroform/methanol (2:1, vol/vol) and sonication. Extracted lipids were hydrolyzed with 0.5 N methanolic NaOH, and fatty acids were methylated with 10% (w/w) methanolic boron trifluoride. The solvent was removed, and the residue was reconstituted in isooctane and analyzed on a 7890A gas chromatograph equipped with a 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.15 mm DB-225 column and flame ionization detector (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA).27 (link) Sample peaks were identified by comparison with authentic standards (Nu-Chek-Prep Inc., Elysian, MN, USA). Results of fatty acid methyl ester analysis values were determined by weight percentage reports based on the retention times and peak responses of authentic standards (not detected less than 50 ng per peak).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cis- and Trans-Fatty Acid Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Methyl esterification of the cis‐ and trans‐fatty acids was performed according to Zribi et al. (2014). Cis‐ and trans‐fatty acid compositions were analyzed using the Agilent 7890N GC instrument coupled with a flame ionization detector (Agilent Technologies Inc.). A nonpolar fused‐silica capillary column (HP‐88, 100 m × 0.25 mm × 0.20 μm) was used for gas chromatography (GC) analysis. Helium was used as a carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.5 ml/min. A split ratio was set as 1:30. The temperature program was as follows: Initial temperature set at 120°C was on hold for 1 min, after which it was increased to 180°C at 20°C/min; next, the speed was set as 5°C/min, and finally, the column temperature was increased to 220°C and held for 5 min. Both the detector and injector port temperatures were maintained at 260°C. The fatty acids were identified from retention time comparison versus mixed standards run under the same conditions. They were quantified according to percentage peak area ratio. The final results were expressed as the percentages of individual fatty acids.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Fatty Acid Profiling of Diets and Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fatty acid profiles of mouse diets and tail and colon tissues were analyzed by gas chromatography (GC), as described previously [18 (link),97 (link)]. Briefly, tissue or food samples were ground to powder under liquid nitrogen and subjected to total lipid extraction and fatty acid methylation by 14% boron trifluoride (BF3)-methanol reagent (Sigma-Aldrich) at 100 °C for 1 h. Fatty acid methyl esters were analyzed using a fully automated HP5890 gas chromatography system equipped with a flame-ionization detector (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The fatty acid peaks were identified by comparing their relative retention times with the mixed commercial standards (NuChek Prep, Elysian, MN, USA), and the area percentage for all resolved peaks were analyzed by using a PerkinElmer M1 integrator. The fatty acids examined as total n-6 PUFA with GC include: Linoleic acid (C18:2n6), Gamma-linolenic acid (C18:3n6), Eicosadienoic acid (C20:2n6), Dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid (C20:3n6), Arachidonic acid (C20:4n6), Docosadienoic acid (C22:2n6), Adrenic acid (C22:4n6) and Docosapentaenoic acid (22:5n6). The fatty acids examined as total n-3 PUFA with GC include: α-Linolenic acid (C18:3n3), Eicosatrienoic acid (C20:3n3), Eicosapentaenoic acid (C20:5n3), Docosapentaenoic acid (C22:5n3), and Docosahexaenoic acid (C22:6n3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cecal Short Chain Fatty Acid Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The concentrations of the short chain fatty acids (SCFAs), including acetate, propionate, butyrate, isobutyrate and n-valerate, and isovalerate in the cecal content were determined as follows. Two milliliters of supernatant were prepared by reconstituting all cecal content of each mouse in 0.01 M PBS followed by centrifugation at 9000 g for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was acidified with a 1/10 volume of 50% H2SO4 and extracted with ethyl ether. The concentrations of SCFAs were determined in the organic phase using an Agilent 6890 N gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA) equipped with a polar HP-FFAP capillary column (0.25 mm × 0.25 mm × 30 m) and flame ionization detector (Agilent Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA). Helium was used as the carrier gas. The initial oven temperature was 120 °C, which was maintained for 16 min and then raised to 122 °C at 5 °C / min, increased to 250 °C at 30 °C / min, and held at this temperature for 3 min. The detector temperature was 270 °C, and the injector temperature was 260 °C. Data handling was performed with an Agilent ChemStation (version G2070AA, Agilent Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!