The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

163 protocols using bcecf am

1

Quantifying Tumor Cell Adhesion and Damage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
B16-F10 cells were loaded with 2′,7′-bis(2-carboxyethyl)-5,6-carboxyfluorescein acetoxymethyl ester (BCECF-AM, Life Technologies) (106 cells were incubated in 1 ml of HEPES buffered DMEM containing 50 µg of BCECF-AM and 5 µl of Me2SO for 20 min at 37°C). Further cell processing and assays were performed as previously described [28] (link). The number of adhering tumor cells was quantified by arbitrary fluorescence units using a Fluoroskan Ascent FL (Labsystems, Manchester, UK) based on the initial number of B16-F10 cells added to the HSE culture [28] (link). Damage to B16-F10 cells during their in vitro adhesion to the HSE was measured as previously described [28] (link) using tumor cells loaded with calcein-AM (Life Technologies).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Fluorescence-based Intracellular pH Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Measurements of pHi were performed using the pH-sensitive fluorescent dye 2,7-bis- (2-carboxyethyl)-5-(and-6)-carboxyfluorescein (BCECF-AM, Invitrogen) 15 (link). In brief, Cells were incubated at room temperature with Ringer solution (154 mM NaCl, 2.2 mM CaCl2, 5.6 mM KCl, 2.4 mM NaHCO3, 2 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4) containing 2 µM BCECF-AM (Invitrogen) for 10 min. The fluorescence intensity was detected by lympus Provis fluorescence microscope (Nikon Eclipse Ti-SR) in same exposure time and calculated by Image-Pro Plus 6.0 software. pH calibration was performed after each experiment by the nigericin (MedChemExpress) technique. A ten-point in situ pH calibration (6.4 to 8.2) was performed in sodium-free calibration buffer (125mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 20 mM HEPES and 10 µM nigericin).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fluorescent Dye Application Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
α-Naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) was purchased from Duchefa; L-kynurenine (kyn) from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA); and BCECF-AM, FM4-64, MDY-64 and propidium iodide (PI) from Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA, USA). All chemicals except PI were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). NAA and Kyn were applied in solid one-half MS medium, the dyes BCECF-AM, FM4-64 and MDY-64 in liquid one-half MS medium, and PI in distilled water.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Measuring Intracellular pH in HEK293 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
pHi of HEK293 cells was measured in cells grown on coverslips coated with PEI. The coverslips were placed in a custom designed chamber on the stage of a microscope fluorometer and loaded with the fluorescent pHi probe BCECF using esterified BCECF‐AM (Life Technologies) at room temperature for 20 min. The composition of the solution used for dye loading and each of the various buffered solutions used is shown in Table 1. In each experiment, the fluorescence excitation ratio (500/440 nm; 530‐nm emission) obtained from 200 cells was averaged. The bathing solutions continuously perfused the coverslips at 2 ml/min (37°C). At the end of each experiment, the intracellular fluorescence excitation ratio was calibrated using 5 mM valinomycin (Sigma‐Aldrich) and 26 mM nigericin (Sigma‐Aldrich). In all groups as in the lysosomal measurement experiments, the cells were bathed in the Hepes‐buffered solution followed by either bicarbonate‐buffered, bicarbonate/carbonate (carbicarb)‐buffered or THAM‐buffered solutions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Measurement of Intracellular pH using BCECF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Internal (cytoplasmic) pH was measured using the membrane-permeant, pH-sensitive fluorescent probe 2,7-bis-(2-carboxyethyl)-5-carboxyfluorescein acetoxymethyl ester (BCECF-AM, Life Technologies) as described previously 30 (link). Experiments were done with or without CBS at 500 µg/mL. Experiments were also completed at 40 µg/mL and 80 µg/mL CBS with the same results (data not shown). Experiments were initiated at pH 7.4, then after about 175 seconds, HCl was added to drop the pH to 4.5.
Each experiment was calibrated independently. Once the fluorescence of the internal BCECF had been measured, 150 nM of the protonophore 3,3,4,5-tetrachlorosalicyanilide (TCS) was added to equilibrate the internal pH with that of the medium. HCl was then added to obtain minimum fluorescence of the dye, followed by the addition of NaOH to obtain maximum fluorescence of the dye. The internal pH was calculated using the equation: pHi=pKa+log(((RRA)/(RBR))×(FA(λ2)/FB(λ2))) where pKa = pKa of BCECF = 6.98, R = value at 502 nm/value at 436 nm for each data point, RA = ratio at minimum fluorescence, RB = ratio at maximum fluorescence, FA(λ2) = minimum fluorescence at 436 nm, and FB(λ2) = maximum fluorescence at 436 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Cell-Ligand Binding Assay for ICAM-1 and LFA-1/Mac-1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
V-bottom well binding assay was performed as we previously described
[3 (link)]. Briefly, CHO-K1 cells WT, or
stably transfected with human ICAM-1 or mouse ICAM-1 were stained with
2’,7’-bis-(2-carboxyethyl)-5-(and 6-)-carboxyfluorescein,
acetoxymethyl ester (BCECF-AM) (Life Technologies; Chelmsford, MA, USA).
V-bottom wells were coated with 5 µg/mL of human (or mouse) LFA-1 or
Mac-1 (R&D Systems; Minneapolis, MN, USA). Some of the wells were then
co-incubated with fibrinogen. BCECF-AM stained cells were incubated in V-bottom
wells with 1 mM Mg2+/Ca2+, or 1 mM
Mn2+/Ca2+ at 37 °C for 30 min. Then plates
were centrifuged at 200 × g for 5 min. Cells that did
not bind to plated ligand were accumulated at the center of the well.
Fluorescence was read with excitation 485 nm and emission 538 nm. The binding
% was defined as [(fluorescence intensity of CHO-K1 WT cell
samples)-(fluorescence intensity of CHO-K1 human (or mouse) ICAM-1 stable cell
samples)]/(fluorescence intensity of CHO-K1 WT cell samples) × 100
(%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Monocyte Adhesion to Endothelial Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PM2.5-treated or untreated HUVECs were co-cultured with BCECF/AM (Life Technologies)-labeled monocytic U937 cells. The adhesion of U937 cells to the endothelial cells were evaluated either by photography under the confocal microscopy (ZEISS, LSM510 META) or flow cytometry (BD Biosciences, FACSCalibur)-based quantitative analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cell-Ligand Binding Assay for ICAM-1 and LFA-1/Mac-1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
V-bottom well binding assay was performed as we previously described
[3 (link)]. Briefly, CHO-K1 cells WT, or
stably transfected with human ICAM-1 or mouse ICAM-1 were stained with
2’,7’-bis-(2-carboxyethyl)-5-(and 6-)-carboxyfluorescein,
acetoxymethyl ester (BCECF-AM) (Life Technologies; Chelmsford, MA, USA).
V-bottom wells were coated with 5 µg/mL of human (or mouse) LFA-1 or
Mac-1 (R&D Systems; Minneapolis, MN, USA). Some of the wells were then
co-incubated with fibrinogen. BCECF-AM stained cells were incubated in V-bottom
wells with 1 mM Mg2+/Ca2+, or 1 mM
Mn2+/Ca2+ at 37 °C for 30 min. Then plates
were centrifuged at 200 × g for 5 min. Cells that did
not bind to plated ligand were accumulated at the center of the well.
Fluorescence was read with excitation 485 nm and emission 538 nm. The binding
% was defined as [(fluorescence intensity of CHO-K1 WT cell
samples)-(fluorescence intensity of CHO-K1 human (or mouse) ICAM-1 stable cell
samples)]/(fluorescence intensity of CHO-K1 WT cell samples) × 100
(%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Investigating ICAM-1 Binding Kinetics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
V-bottom plates were coated with 2 μg ICAM-1/ml (R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN) using standard protocols. HEK cells transfected with Mac-1 were stained with 2′,7′-bis-(2-carboxyethyl)-5- (and 6-)-carboxyfluorescein acetoxymethyl ester (BCECF-AM; Life Technologies) and incubated in HBS containing 10 mM EDTA, 1 mM MgCl2/CaCl2 or 1 mM MnCl2 with or without isoflurane or sevoflurane at indicated concentrations at 37°C for 30 min. Following incubation, the plates were centrifuged at 200 × g for 5 min. Cells that did not bind to ICAM-1 were accumulated at the center of the well. Fluorescence was read at excitation = 485 nm and emission = 538 nm to assess HEK cell binding to ICAM-1. ICAM-1 binding percentage was defined as [(fluorescence intensity of EDTA sample) − (fluorescence intensity of samples)]/[fluorescence intensity of EDTA sample] × 100 (%). In some experiments, 5 μg/ml of LFA-1 or Mac-1 protein (a generous gift from Dr Timothy Springer [Boston Children's Hospital]) was coated on the 96 well V-bottom plates and HEK cells transiently transfected with ICAM-1 were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

THP-1 Adhesion to HRMEC Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HRMEC cells were cultivated until they reached confluence. Cells were stimulated in a starvation medium containing endothelial basal medium with 0.5% bovine serum albumin with and without TNF-α and golimumab for three hours. THP-1 cells were labeled with the fluorescent live-stain BCECF-AM (B3051; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) at 37°C for one hour and 20,000 THP-1 cells were added onto the HRMEC monolayer and incubated for 30 minutes. Nonadherent THP-1 cells were washed off with phosphate-buffered saline solution and cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. Imaging and subsequent image analysis was done with the Opera Phenix High-Content Screening System and Harmony software (Perkin Elmer, New York, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!