The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Leica dm4000b microscope

Manufactured by Leica camera
Sourced in Germany, United States, Canada

The Leica DM4000B is a high-performance microscope designed for advanced laboratory applications. It features a modular design that allows for customization to meet the specific needs of various research and analysis tasks. The microscope provides excellent image quality and optical performance, enabling detailed observation and examination of samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

71 protocols using leica dm4000b microscope

1

Immunohistochemical Localization of Matrix Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Deparaffinized 10 μm sections of the mantle tissues, previously fixed for 24 h in Davidson fixative, were permeabilized for 10 min in TBST. Tissues were then incubated for 1 h in saturating medium (1% BSA, TBS) at room temperature. Then, samples were incubated with the anti-matrix antibody (1:100) for 1 h in TBST–BSA 1% at room temperature (RT). After rinsing in saturating medium, samples were incubated for 2 h at RT with HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:10000, Huaxingbio Science, China). Finally, samples were observed with a DM-4000B Leica microscope. A control experiment was performed without the first antibody step22 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Amoeba-Mycobacterium Internalization Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Amoeba cultures seeded onto glass chamber slides at 80–100% confluence in 712 PYG media were infected with MAP at MOI of 10 and incubated for 1 h at 25 °C. Slides were washed three times with PBS to remove extracellular bacteria, heat fixed, and stained using Kinyoun acid-fast protocol for visualization of intracellular mycobacteria on a DM4000B Leica microscope under bright field. In addition, because the carbol-fuchsin stain (part of the Kinyoun acid-fast kit) emits red autofluorescence, we labeled MAP with carbol-fuchsin for 1 h. Bacteria were washed three times with PBS and infect amoeba. After 1 h infection, amoeba was washed with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min and images were captured on a Leica DM4000B fluorescent microscope (Leica) with QCapture Pro7 software (QImaging; Surrey, BC, Canada) and using the brightfield and Texas Red filters.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Synchronized Nematode Infection Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NGM plates were prepared as described above, or supplemented with 400 µM 5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine, a DNA synthesis inhibitor which allows for the synchronization of worm cultures (FUdR; Sigma-Aldrich; St. Louis, MO, USA) (Mitchell et al., 1979 (link)). Agar plates with and without FUdR were seeded with 108 MAH-td104, heat-killed MAH, or the appropriate MAH mutant strain as per experimental design, and inoculated with equal volume synchronized nematode cultures at the L4 stage of growth. At 1, 3, and 5 days post-inoculation, worms were collected in M9 salt solution, pelleted, and anesthetized using 70% ethanol. Samples were spotted onto glass slides, and visualized on a DM4000B Leica microscope. Images were captured and analyzed using QCapture Pro7 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Anatomical Analysis of F2-Hybrid EOs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The EOs were subjected to anatomical examinations via light microscopy. Three F2-hybrids were fixed shortly after death by immersion in 4% formalin and the caudal peduncle was cut off. Dehydration and embedding in paraffin followed conventional techniques (Mulisch and Welsch 2010 ). The EO was sectioned serially at 4–6 µm thickness in the transverse or sagittal plane using a Leica 2035 Biocut microtome. Sections were mounted on glycerin/albumin-coated slides. Following deparaffination and rehydration, sections were stained with Azan or HE (Mulisch and Welsch 2010 ), dehydrated and coverslipped with DePeX mounting medium (Sigma-Aldrich). Sections were investigated with a Leica microscope DM4000B. Pictures were taken and processed using the Leica DFC 480 camera together with the Leica IM software version 4.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunofluorescence Microscopy of Plant Cell Wall

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunofluorescence microscopy, each sample was sectioned using a Leica vibratome (VT1000S, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) to yield 60–80-µm transversal cuts. The sections were washed three times in PBS using a 24-well plate and blocked with MP/PBS for 1 h. The sections were then incubated with a primary monoclonal antibody for 1 h. The samples were probed with three different monoclonal antibodies: (a) xylan CRCC M140 antibody [35 (link)] diluted 1:10 in MP/PBS; (b) arabinoxylan LM11 antibody [36 (link)] diluted 1:10 in MP/PBS; and (c) MLG antibody [44 (link)] diluted 1:1500 in MP/PBS. After antibody binding, the samples were washed three times with PBS and incubated with secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor 514—Sigma/Aldrich anti-mouse for CRCC M140 and MLG and Alexa Fluor 568—Sigma/Aldrich anti-rat for LM11), both diluted 1:10,000 in MP/PBS. The sections were visualized with a Leica microscope (DM 4000 B) under YFP filter for Alexa Fluor 514 and TX2 filter for Alexa Fluor 568. Sections treated only with secondary antibody were used as negative controls. Images were processed with ImageJ software (version 10.2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

NSUN2 Expression in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The TMA with 125 NPC patients were purchased from Superbiotek (Shanghai, China). IHC determined the expression of NSUN2 in NPC and normal tissues as previously described (16 (link)). After deparaffinizing and blocking endogenous peroxidase, the slides were incubated with antibody against NSUN2 (1:800 dilution, 20854-1-AP, Proteintech, Wuhan, China). Arrays were then washed with PBS and incubated for 30 min with the EnVision™+ Dual Link System-HRP (Dako, Carpinteria, CA). After rinsing thrice with PBS for 3 min each time, the slides were incubated with DAB reagent (Dako, Carpinteria, CA) for 3–5 min and evaluated under a light microscope. The TMA were then counter-stained with hematoxylin and observed under a Leica microscope (DM4000b, Wetzlar, Germany). The results were evaluated independently by two blinded pathologists according to the following scoring criteria: 0, negative; 1, weak; and 2–3, strong. The degree of staining was scored as the proportion of the positive staining area relative to the whole cancerous area: 0, <5%; 1, 5–25%; 2, 26–50%; 3, 51–75%; and 4, >75%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Histological Analysis of Mouse Testis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The histology of mouse testicular tissue fragments (S2 File, Panel A) was described and categorized according to the table in S2 File—Panel B and plotted in the graph (S2 File, Panel C).
Images from domestic cat testis sections of 6 animals and one hundred and fifty organ culture samples (n = 6 x 5 conditions x 5 time points) were taken with a Leica camera (DFC480) coupled to a Leica Microscope (DM4000B) at 200x magnification. After random selection of approximately 50% of the images taken from each sample, Image J software was used to quantify all PGP9.5 positive cells present in the image (corresponding to germ cell number, as all germ cells present in the tissue were labeled by PGP9.5) and the area (measured in arbitrary units) covered by seminiferous tubules, necrotic and interstitial tissue using a grid with 1.5 square inches. The area covered by the different types of tissue was represented as percentage of the total area measured (% of seminiferous tubules, % of necrotic tissue and % of interstitial tissue and the number of germ cells were normalized in terms of the area covered by seminiferous tubules (number of germ cells divided by area of seminiferous tubules).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Histological Examination of Electrical Organs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The EOs were subjected to anatomical examinations via light microscopy. For the preparation of the histological slides, the fish were euthanized by an overdose of ethylenglycolmonophenylether and the caudal peduncle was cut off. The tissue was fixed by immersion in 4% formalin in the case of small fish or in 10% formalin in larger fish. Fixed tissue of larger fish was decalcified with 7.5% EDTA (pH 7.4). Dehydration and embedding in paraffin followed established protocols (Mulisch and Welsch 2010 ). The EO of each specimen was sectioned serially at 4–6 µm either in the transverse or the sagittal plane using a Leica 2035 Biocut microtome. Sections were mounted on glycerin/albumin-coated slides. Following deparaffinization and rehydration, sections were stained with Azan or HE (Mulisch and Welsch 2010 ), dehydrated and coverslipped with DePeX mounting medium (Sigma-Aldrich). Sections were investigated with a Leica microscope DM4000B. Pictures were taken and processed by using the Leica DFC 480 camera together with the Leica IM software version 4.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Detailed Morphological Examination of Specimens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Examinations and descriptions of the specimens were made under a Leica MZ6 stereo microscope. Descriptions, macrosetae pattern and female internal genitalia preparation follow Giroti & Brescovit (2018) (link). Measurements are in millimeters (mm), except those of the internal female genitalia. External morphology photographs were taken with a Leica DFC 500 digital camera attached to a Leica MZ16A stereo microscope; extended focal range photos were composed with Leica Application Suite ver. 3.8. Internal female genitalia photographs were taken with a Leica DFC 425 digital camera attached to a Leica DM 2500 microscope and stacked using Combine ZP 1.0 software. Illustrations were made using a Leica DM 4000 B microscope with camera lucida attached. Geographical coordinates are given in degrees (DMS). The map on Fig. 1 was treated with Esri (www.esri.com) and QGIS (ver. 2.18.28) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Histological Analysis of Tissue Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissues were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin or with reticulin to assess for fibrosis. Blood smears were fixed in methanol and stained in Giemsa and May-Grunwald solutions.
Images of histological slides were obtained on a Leica DM4000B microscope (Leica) equipped with a Leica DFC320 color digital camera (Leica).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!