The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

15 protocols using accucore c18 resin

1

LC-MS/MS Analysis of Peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Both unfractionated samples were each analyzed 20 times consecutively on an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer operated in positive-mode with a Proxeon EASY-nLC 1200 liquid chromatograph (Thermo Fisher Scientific) as described previously.2 (link) Peptide fractionation was performed on a 100 μm inner diameter microcapillary column packed with 35 cm of Accucore C18 resin (2.6 μm, 150 Å, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Approximately 1 μg of peptide was loaded onto the column for LC–MS/MS analysis.
Separation occurred across a 90 min gradient from 4% to 35% acetonitrile in 0.125% formic acid. The flow rate was set to 525 nL/min over the gradient. To prevent carry over, the 20 analyses of the human only sample (H) were queued first followed by the 20 analyses of the human + 10% yeast spike-in sample (HY).
A data dependent Top Speed (3 s) method was used to collect spectra: high resolution MS1 spectra (Orbitrap resolution: 120 000; mass range: 350–1400 Th; and automatic gain control (AGC) target: 4 × 105; maximum injection time 50 ms) and high resolution MS2 spectra (Quadrupole isolation window: 1.6 Th; Orbitrap resolution: 7500; HCD energy: 30%; AGC target: 5 × 104; maximum injection time: 22 ms). Dynamic exclusion was enabled with a duration time of 120 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Orbitrap Fusion Lumos LC-MS/MS Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All LC-MS/MS experiments were performed on an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) coupled with a Proxeon EASY-nLC 1200 LC pump (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Peptides were separated on a 100µm inner diameter microcapillary column packed with 35cm of Accucore C18 resin (1.8µm, 100Å, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Peptides were separated using a 2 hour gradient of 6–33% acetonitrile in 0.125% formic acid with a flow rate of ~400nL/min. Each analysis used an MS3-based TMT method as described previously29. MS1 data was acquired at a mass range of m/z 350 – 1350, resolution 120,000, AGC target 5 × 105, maximum injection time 150ms, and with a dynamic exclusion of 120 seconds for the peptide measurements in the Orbitrap.
Data dependent MS2 spectra were acquired in the ion trap with a normalized collision energy (NCE) set at 35%, AGC target set to 2.2 × 104 and a maximum injection time of 120ms. MS3 scans were acquired in the Orbitrap with a HCD collision energy set to 55%, AGC target set to 5.5 × 105, maximum injection time of 200ms, resolution at 15,000 and with a maximum synchronous precursor selection (SPS) precursors set to 10.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Mass Spectrometry-based Proteomics Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were collected using an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA) coupled with a Proxeon EASY-nLC 1200 LC pump (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Peptides were separated on a 100 μm inner diameter microcapillary column packed with 35 cm of Accucore C18 resin (2.6 μm, 100 Å, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Peptides were separated using a 3 hours gradient of 6–22% acetonitrile in 0.125% formic acid with a flow rate of ~400 nL/min. Each analysis used an MS3-based TMT method as described previously described 40 (link).The data were acquired using a mass range of m/z 400 – 1400, resolution at 120,000, AGC target of 1 × 106, a maximum injection time 100 ms, dynamic exclusion of 180 seconds for the peptide measurements in the Orbitrap. Data dependent MS2 spectra were acquired in the ion trap with a normalized collision energy (NCE) set at 35%, AGC target set to 2.0 × 105 and a maximum injection time of 120 ms. MS3 scans were acquired in the Orbitrap with an HCD collision energy set to 45%, AGC target set to 1.5 × 105, maximum injection time of 200 ms, resolution at 50,000 and with a maximum synchronous precursor selection (SPS) precursors set to 10.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Orbitrap Fusion Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were analyzed on an Orbitrap Fusion mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA) coupled to a Proxeon EASY-nLC 1200 liquid chromatography (LC) pump (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Peptides were separated on a 100 μm inner diameter microcapillary column packed with 35 cm of Accucore C18 resin (2.6 μm, 150 Å, ThermoFisher). For each analysis, approximately 2 μg of peptides were separated using a 150 min gradient of 8 to 28% acetonitrile in 0.125% formic acid at a flow rate of 450–500 nL/min. Each analysis used an MS3-based TMT method71 ,72 , which has been shown to reduce ion interference compared to MS2 quantification73 . The data were collected as described previously using an SPS-MS3 method74 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Proteomic Mass Spectrometry Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mass spectrometry data was collected using a Q Exactive or LTQ Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupled with a Famos Autosampler (LC Packings) and an Accela 600 liquid chromatography (LC) pump (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Peptides were separated onto a 100 μm inner diameter microcapillary column packed with ~0.5 cm of Magic C4 resin (5 μm, 100 Å, Michrom Bioresources) followed by ~20 cm of Accucore C18 resin (1.6 μm, 150 Å, Thermo Fisher Scientific). For each analysis, we loaded ~2 μl onto the column. Peptides were separated using a 50-minute gradient of 8 to 30% acetonitrile in 0.125% formic acid with a flow rate of ~300 nL/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Our MS data were collected similar to as described previously38 (link). In brief, we used a Q Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA) coupled with a Famos Autosampler (LC Packings) and an Accela600 LC pump (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Peptides were separated on a 100 μm inner diameter microcapillary column packed with ∼25 cm of Accucore C18 resin (2.6 μm, 150 Å, Thermo Fisher Scientific). For each analysis, we loaded ~1 μg onto the column.
Peptides were separated using a 1 h gradient of 5–25% acetonitrile in 0.125% formic acid with a flow rate of ∼300 nl/min. The scan sequence began with an Orbitrap MS1 spectrum with the following parameters: resolution 70,000, scan range 300–1500 Th, automatic gain control (AGC) target 1 × 105, maximum injection time 250 ms, and centroid spectrum data type. We selected the top 20 precursors for MS2 analysis which consisted of HCD high-energy collision dissociation with the following parameters: resolution 17,500, AGC 1 × 105, maximum injection time 60 ms, isolation window 2 Th, normalized collision energy 30, and centroid spectrum data type. The underfill ratio was set at 1%, which corresponds to a 1.1 × 104 intensity threshold. In addition, unassigned and singly charged species were excluded from MS2 analysis and dynamic exclusion was set to automatic.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Mass Spectrometry-based Proteomics Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were collected using an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA) coupled with a Proxeon EASY-nLC 1200 LC pump (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Peptides were separated on a 100 μm inner diameter microcapillary column packed with 35 cm of Accucore C18 resin (2.6 μm, 100 Å, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Peptides were separated using a 3 hours gradient of 6–22% acetonitrile in 0.125% formic acid with a flow rate of ~400 nL/min. Each analysis used an MS3-based TMT method as described previously described 40 (link).The data were acquired using a mass range of m/z 400 – 1400, resolution at 120,000, AGC target of 1 × 106, a maximum injection time 100 ms, dynamic exclusion of 180 seconds for the peptide measurements in the Orbitrap. Data dependent MS2 spectra were acquired in the ion trap with a normalized collision energy (NCE) set at 35%, AGC target set to 2.0 × 105 and a maximum injection time of 120 ms. MS3 scans were acquired in the Orbitrap with an HCD collision energy set to 45%, AGC target set to 1.5 × 105, maximum injection time of 200 ms, resolution at 50,000 and with a maximum synchronous precursor selection (SPS) precursors set to 10.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Receptor Proteomics using Orbitrap Fusion LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All LC-MS/MS receptor proteomic experimental data was collected using an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) coupled with a Proxeon EASY-nLC 1200 LC pump (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Peptides were separated on a 75µm inner diameter microcapillary column packed with 35 cm of Accucore C18 resin (2.6µm, 100Å, ThermoFisher Scientific). Peptides were separated using a 3hr gradient of 6–27% acetonitrile in 0.125% formic acid with a flow rate of 400nL/min. Each analysis used an MS3- based TMT method as described previously (McAlister et al., 2014 (link)). The data were acquired using a mass range of m/z 350 – 1350, resolution 120,000, AGC target 1 × 106, maximum injection time 100 ms, dynamic exclusion of 120 seconds for the peptide measurements in the Orbitrap.
Data dependent MS2 spectra were acquired in the ion trap with a normalized collision energy (NCE) set at 35%, AGC target set to 1.8 × 104 and a maximum injection time of 120ms. MS3 scans were acquired in the Orbitrap with a HCD collision energy set to 55%, AGC target set to 1.5 × 105, maximum injection time of 150ms, resolution at 15,000 and with a maximum synchronous precursor selection (SPS) precursors set to 10.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Proteomics via TMT-MS3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mass spectrometry data were collected using an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer (Thermo Fischer Scientific) equipped with a Proxeon EASY-nLC 1000 liquid chromatography (LC) system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Peptides were separated on a 100μm inner diameter microcapillary column packed with ~35 cm of Accucore C18 resin (2.6μm, 150 Å, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Approximately 2ug peptides were separated using a 2.5 h gradient of acidic acetonitrile. We used the multinotch MS3-based TMT method (McAlister et al., 2014 (link)). The scan sequence began with a MS1 spectrum (Orbitrap analysis; resolution 120,000; mass range 400−1400 Th). MS2 analysis followed collision-induced dissociation (CID, CE = 35) with a maximum ion injection time of 150 ms and an isolation window of 0.5 Da. The 10 most abundant MS1 ions of charge states 2-6 were selected for MS2/MS3 analysis. To obtain quantitative information, MS3 precursors were fragmented by high-energy collision-induced dissociation (HCD, CE = 55) and analyzed in the Orbitrap (resolution was 50,000 at 200 Th) with a maximum ion injection time of 150 ms and a charge state-dependent variable isolation window of 0.7 to 1.2 Da (Paulo et al., 2016 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Orbitrap mass spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were analyzed on an Orbitrap Fusion mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA) coupled to a Proxeon EASY-nLC 1200 liquid chromatography (LC) pump (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Peptides were separated on a 100 μm inner diameter microcapillary column packed with 35 cm of Accucore C18 resin (2.6 μm, 150 Å, ThermoFisher). For each analysis, approximately 2 μg of peptides were separated using a 150 min gradient of 8–28% acetonitrile in 0.125% formic acid at a flow rate of 450–500 nL/min. Each analysis used an MS3-based TMT method,170 (link),171 (link) which has been shown to reduce ion interference compared to MS2 quantification.172 (link) The data were collected using the SPS-MS3 method.173 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!