The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Qtrap 5500

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in Germany, United States

The QTRAP 5500 is a hybrid triple quadrupole linear ion trap mass spectrometer designed for sensitive and quantitative analysis of small molecules. It combines the benefits of triple quadrupole and linear ion trap technologies to provide high-performance analytical capabilities.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using qtrap 5500

1

HPLC-MS/MS Analysis of APM Hydrolysis Products

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A triple
quadrupole ion trap tandem mass spectrometer (MS/MS; Sciex QTRAP 5500)
was coupled to an Agilent 1290 series HPLC to determine APM hydrolysis
products. To understand the differences between solutions containing
APM and CS, we analyzed the hydrolysis products of APM when APM and
CS were separately dissolved in ultrapure water and authentic tap
water at 5, 15, and 25 min. The details of the HPLC-MS/MS method for
hydrolysis products, including instrument parameters, are described
in Text S3 and Table S1.
DCBQ was
determined in prepared samples using a triple quadrupole ion trap
tandem mass spectrometer (MS/MS; Sciex QTRAP 5500) coupled to an Agilent
1290 series HPLC. The HPLC-MS/MS with the multiple reaction monitoring
(MRM) mode was adapted from previously reported studies.28 (link) The method can detect four HBQs, however, DCBQ
was the only product detected in all samples. The Supporting Information
(Text S4 and Table S2) provides the details
of the HPLC–MS/MS methods for the analysis of DCBQ, including
instrument parameters, system control, data collection, and MRM ion-pair
transitions. DCBQ was quantified using standard addition, as described
in Text S5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Identification of Nonvolatile Compounds in Ethanolic Extract of A. sessilis Stem

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The nonvolatile compounds in the ethanolic extract of A. sessilis's stem were identified using the AB Sciex 5500 QTrap LC-MS/MS with Agilent Technologies 1290 series UHPLC. The extract was diluted in equal volume of methanol and water. The separation was performed using the column Phenomenex Synergi Fusion 100 mm × 2.1 mm × 3 μm held at 25°C with the enhanced MS (EMS) parameters as follows: nebulizer gas (N2) temperature 500°C, flow rate 10 L/min, pressure 40 psi, and capillary voltage 4500 V, with the scanning range of 100–1000 m/z for full scan and 50–1000 m/z for MS/MS scan. The fragmentor voltage was 135 V, and injection volume for all samples was 10 μL; they were 100–1000 m/z for full scan and 50–1000 m/z for MS/MS scan. Solvent A was water with 0.1% formic acid and 5 mM ammonium formate, and solvent B was acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid and 5 mM ammonium formate. The gradient elution was performed as follows: 5% B to 95% B from 0.01 min to 10.0 min, hold for 2 min and back to 10% B in 0.1 min, and reequilibrated for 3 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Bacterial Metabolite Extraction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To prepare samples for metabolite extraction, strains were inoculated in triplicate in 120 mL of Luria Bertani high salt media (LBS; per litre composition: 10 g tryptone, 5 g yeast extract, 20 g NaCl, 50 ml 1 M tris pH 7.5, 3.75 ml 80 % glycerol and 950 mL dH2O). When cultures reached an OD580 of 1.0, they were pelleted at 10,000 xg for 10 min at 4 °C. Pellets were re-suspended in 10 mL of ice-cold phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) and cells were pelleted again under the same conditions. The supernatant was discarded and pellets were snap-frozen with liquid nitrogen. Bacterial cells were lyophilized for 24 h (Labconco model 7740020) and were analyzed by the Biotechnology Center at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (Metabolomics Center, Roy J. Carver Biotechnology Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign). The approach used was a two-step LC/MS (Applied Biosystems 5500 QTrap with Agilent 1200 LC, Agilent Technologies, CA and Applied Biosystems CA) followed by targeted identification of differentially expressed metabolites using quadrupole time of flight (Q-TOF) MS/MS. Three technical replicates were used for this analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

LC-MS/MS Quantification of Anabaenopeptins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LC-MS/MS system was composed of Agilent 1200 HPLC (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) and a QTRAP5500 tandem mass spectrometer. The compounds were separated in a Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Gradient elution (0.6 mL·min–1) was performed with the same mobile phases as in the preparative analysis. The turbo ion spray operated at 550 °C; voltage, 5.5 kV; nebuliser gas pressure, 60 psi; curtain gas pressure, 20 psi. To determine the content of the samples, an IDA (information-dependent acquisition) mode was used, and ions within the m/z range 500–1250 and intensity higher than 5 × 105 cps were fragmented. The assessment of the relative content of APs in the extract was performed in multiple reaction monitoring mode (MRM). The following transitions were monitored: 807→402, 231, 120 for anabaenopeptin AP806Ne (m/z 807); 821→448, 248, 120 for AP820Ne (m/z 821); 835→448, 248, 120 for AP SA6 (m/z 835); and 837→448, 248, 120 for AP836Ne (m/z 837). The collision energy was 60 eV, and the dwell time was 100 msek.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Analyzing Soil Nutrient and Phytohormone Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Physicochemical (nutrient contents and pH) and biological (enzymatic activities and concentrations of IAA and Trp) variables were measured in the dissolved phase of the soil samples. After three generations of Arabidopsis cultures (Fig. 1a), soil samples were then collected randomly from each pot, air-dried, homogenized, and sieved to obtain particles < 1 mm. The activity of soil enzymes (β-glucosidase, chitinase, urease, and nitrate reductase) and soil N content (NH4+ and NO3 contents) were subsequently measured using 0.5 g of soil (n = 4) following the manufacturer’s instructions of corresponding commercial reagent kits (COMIN, Suzhou, China). The concentrations of two key metabolites (IAA and Trp) were measured in the soil dissolved phase. Five grams of soil was mixed with 5 g of NaCl and 20 mL of acetonitrile for 5 min, followed by centrifugation at 1000g for 10 min. The concentrations of IAA and Trp in the supernatants were measured by Liquid Chromatography-Electrospray Ionization-Mass/Mass Spectroscopy (LC-ESI-MS/MS, Q-Trap 5500, Agilent Technologies, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Targeted Metabolite Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were fixed then stored at −80°C freezer, then dried with N2 blowing. MeOH:water mix with an internal standard (2C13 Ace-CoA) in each sample. Samples were diluted with buffer before SPE on water HLB plate. Sample was eluted with MeOH. The LC/MS analysis was performed on AB Sciex Qtrap 5500 coupled to Agilent UPLC/HPLC system. All samples are analyzed by Agilent proshell 120 SB-C18 column 100 Å, 2.7 μm, 2.1 mm × 100 mm coupled to an Agilent UPLC/HPLC system, which was operated at a flow rate of 450 uL/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Phytohormone Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantifications of phytohormone levels were conducted according to a method described previously (Wu et al., 2007 (link)). In brief, at 2 d and 4 d post infiltration, approximately 500 mg infiltrated leaves from 10 individual plants with the same treatment were harvested and pooled to generate one biological replicate. Samples were homogenized in 1 mL acetonitrile (1% famic acid). Four nanogram of D4-SA, D6-JA, 1 ng JA-Ile-D6 to were added to the aqueous extraction solvent as internal standards. All samples were then vortexed for 2 min and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C. Eight hundred microlitres of supernatants was collected and evaporated to dryness using a vacuum concentrator to dry. Residues were resuspended in 200 µL of acetonitrile: H2O (1:1, v/v) and centrifuged at 14,000 g for 10 min. The supernatants were then collected and analyzed with a high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry system (Agilent 1290 Infinity LC, QTRAP 5500, AB SCIES). Wheat leaves incubated with the pEDV6 empty vector were used as control groups. There were five biological replicates for each treatment and time point.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Fecal SCFA Analysis by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As in our previous studies7 (link),108 (link)–112 (link), fecal SCFAs were measured using LC–MS/MS at the University of Illinois-Chicago Mass Spectrometry Core using previously published methods113 (link),114 (link). The LC–MS/MS analysis was completed on an AB Sciex Qtrap 5500 coupled to the Agilent UPLC/HPLC system. All samples were analyzed by Agilent poroshell 120 EC-C18 Column, 100 Å, 2.7 µm, 2.1 mm × 100 mm coupled to an Agilent UPLC system, which was operated at a flow rate of 400 µl/min. A gradient of buffer A (H20, 0.1% Formic acid) and buffer B (Acetonitrile, 0.1% Formic acid) was applied as 0 min, 30% of buffer B; increase buffer B to 100% in 4 min; maintain B at 100% for 5 min. The column was then equilibrated for 3 min at 30% B between the injections with the MS detection in negative mode. The MRM transitions of all targeted compounds include the precursor ions and the signature production ion. Unit resolution is used for both analyzers Q1 and Q3. The MS parameters, such as declustering potential, collision energy, and collision cell exit potential, are optimized in order to achieve optimal sensitivity. SCFAs are presented as individual SCFAs (μg/g), including butyric acid, propionic acid, acetic acid, and valeric acid, as well as total SCFAs (sum of 4).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Targeted SRM Peptide Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A targeted Selected Reaction Monitoring (SRM) approach was performed using the QTRAP® 5500 interfaced with a capillary HPLC system (Agilent 1200, Palo Alto, Calif). 10 μL of each sample was injected and directly loaded onto an Agilent C18 column (Zorbax SB-C18, 5 μm 150×0.5 mm) with 5% ACN, 0.1% FA at 30 μL/min for 3 min, as described [28 ]. SRM assay optimization and data analysis were performed with the aid of Skyline v2.2 software [36 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Amino Acid Extraction and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Amino acids were extracted using boiling water as described.69 (link) The resulting extract (200 μl per sample) was loaded onto a 3-kDa Amicon Ultra 0.5-ml filtering device. The samples were spun at 14,000 × g for 45 min at 4°C. Amino acids were separated and quantified using known quantities of amino acid standards that were run before and after samples by LC-MS/MS as described (AB Sciex QTRAP 5500, Foster City, CA and Agilent 1290 LC Infinity II LC System, Santa Clara, CA)69 (link) with minor modifications. A 40-μl aliquot of extract was added to a vial containing 860 μl of nano-pure water and 100 μl of 10 mM hydrochloric acid, and 10 μl of the diluted sample was injected onto the column. The declustering potentials of glutamate, phenylalanine, and proline were modified to 150 V, 150 V, and 160 V, respectively, to avoid saturation of the mass spectrometer detector.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!