The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

49 protocols using amersham ecl prime detection reagent

1

Immunoblotting of Glycosylated and Deglycosylated TLR4

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein lysate was separated using SDS-PAGE and blotted onto an Immobilon-P membrane (Fisher Scientific UK Ltd.). The membrane was probed with monoclonal rabbit antibodies for FLAG (1:1000, Sigma-Aldrich, F2555) and β-actin (1:10,000, New England Biolabs, 4970L), and incubated with peroxidase conjugated Pierce goat anti-rabbit IgG, H+L (1:2500, Fisher Scientific Ltd., 31462) secondary antibody. Bands were visualized using Amersham ECL Prime detection reagents (GE Healthcare UK Ltd.) developed on Kodak Biomax XAR film. Size of glycosylated TLR4 (120 kDa) and deglycosylated TLR4 (110 kDa) is based on da Silva Correia et al. [48 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

LCMV Glycoprotein Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transfected cells were incubated for 48 h, washed with 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and 1 mM EDTA, collected (600 × g, 4°C, 15 min), and lysed on ice with 1% NP-40 lysis buffer and complete protease inhibitors (RPI Corp.). Clarified lysates (10,000 × g, 4°C, 15 min) were separated under reduced and denatured SDS-PAGE conditions and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. For LCMV glycoprotein complex detection, the anti-GP2 (83.6) and anti-SSP (SP7) antibodies have been described previously (18 (link), 55 (link), 56 (link)). We also used anti-HA (Sigma), anti-actin (Millipore), goat anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase (HRP), and goat anti-rabbit HRP (Jackson ImmunoResearch) antibodies. Blots were processed using the Amersham ECL Prime detection reagents (GE Healthcare) and were developed using the Bio-Rad ChemiDoc XRS system. Densitometry quantification was performed using ImageJ (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Visualization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pellets from VLP isolation, beads from coimmunoprecipitation (CoIP), or cells transfected for NP expression were suspended in SDS-PAGE loading buffer with reducing agent and run on a 12% gel. Following electrophoresis, gels were transferred to nitrocellulose using a semidry apparatus (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Blocking was done using 5% nonfat dry milk in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.2% Tween 20 (PBS-Tween 20). All incubations with antibody were done in 5% milk, and washes were done using PBS-Tween 20. Blots were visualized using Amersham ECL prime detection reagents (GE Healthcare United Kingdom Limited, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom) and the Chemi-Doc XRS gel documentation system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunoblot Analysis of Cellular Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunoblot analysis was performed as described previously [6 (link),16 (link)]. In brief, cells were washed once with ice-cold PBS to remove serum proteins and lysed with 1× PhosphoSafe lysis buffer (Merck Millipore). Following clearance of the lysates by centrifugation, their total protein content was determined with the DC Protein Assay (BioRad). Proteins were fractionated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on mini-PROTEAN TGX any-kD precast gels (BioRad) and blotted to PVDF membranes. Membranes were blocked with nonfat dry milk or bovine serum albumin and incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. After washing and incubation with HRP-linked secondary antibodies, chemoluminescent detection of proteins was done on a ChemiDoc XRS+ System with Image Lab Software (BioRad) with Amersham ECL Prime Detection Reagent (GE Healthcare, Munich, Germany). The signals for the proteins of interest were normalized to those for the housekeeping gene GAPDH.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Western Blotting for Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Our Western blotting procedure was described in detail earlier [16 (link),17 (link),43 (link)]. Total protein concentrations were determined with the DC Protein Assay (BioRad). Proteins were fractionated by PAGE on mini-PROTEAN TGX any-kD precast gels and blotted onto PVDF membranes. The primary antibodies included anti-HSP90 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany, #sc-13119), anti-Rac1b (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany, #09-271), anti-E-cadherin and anti-Cip1/WAF1 (BD Transduction Laboratories, Heidelberg, Germany, #610181 and #610233, respectively), anti-Snail and anti-phospho-ERK1/2 (Cell Signaling Technology, Frankfurt/Main, Germany, #4719 and #4370, respectively), anti-ERK1/2 (R&D Systems, Wiesbaden, Germany, #AF1576), anti-GAPDH (14C10, Cell Signaling Technology, #2118), and anti-β-actin (Sigma). Incubation with HRP-linked secondary antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology, anti-rabbit, #7074, and anti-mouse, #7076) was followed by chemoluminescent detection of proteins on a ChemiDoc XRS+ System with Image Lab Software (BioRad) using Amersham ECL Prime Detection Reagent (GE Healthcare, Munich, Germany). The signals for the proteins of interest were normalized to bands for the housekeeping genes GAPDH or HSP90.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Cell Lysis and Immunoblotting Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell lysis and immunoblotting were essentially performed as described previously [8 (link),9 (link),10 (link)] with minor modifications. Proteins were fractionated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on TGX Stain-Free FastCast gels (BioRad, Munich, Germany). Following blotting and antibody treatment, chemoluminescent detection of proteins was carried with a ChemiDoc XRS+ System with Image Lab Software (BioRad) with Amersham ECL Prime Detection Reagent (GE Healthcare, Munich, Germany). The signals for the proteins of interest were normalized to either the total amount of protein in the same lane (when using the TGX Stain-Free FastCast gels), or to bands for the housekeeping gene GAPDH. Significant differences (p < 0.05)-calculated with the unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test–denoted by bars above the respective cell lines. The antibodies used were Rac1b (#09-271, Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany), E-cadherin (#610181) and Rac1 (#610650) (BD Transduction Laboratories, Heidelberg, Germany), GAPDH (14C10, #2118, Cell Signaling Technology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany), Vimentin (clone V9, #V6630, Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany), and HA (clone 12CA5, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Western Blot Analysis of T Cell Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following cytokine stimulations, proteins were extracted from CD4+ T cells and separated into cytosol and nuclear fractions using NE-PER™ Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The samples were separated on 8 or 10 % SDS-PAGE gel, transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane. The membrane was blocked with blocking buffer (TBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 (TBS-T) and 5% nonfat dry milk). After 3 washes with TBS-T, the membrane was incubated overnight with primary antibodies at 1: 1,000–1: 4,000 dilutions in blocking buffer at 4 °C. After 3 washes with TBS-T, the membrane was incubated with corresponding secondary antibody at 1: 4,000 dilution in blocking buffer for 1 h. After 3 washes with TBS-T, the proteins were visualized using Amersham ECL Prime Detection Reagent (GE Healthcare). The primary antibodies used were: α-Tubulin (sc-69969, Santa Cruz); NF-κB p65 (sc-8008, Santa Cruz); NF-κB p105/p50 (ab32360, Abcam); SMAD3 (ab28379, Abcam); TFIIB (sc-225, Santa Cruz). The secondary antibodies used were: anti-mouse IgG (#7076, Cell Signaling Technology); anti-rabbit IgG (#7074, Cell Signaling Technology).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Protein Extraction and Western Blotting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blots were performed as previously described (Chia et al., 2017 (link)). Protein extracts were prepared using the trichloroacetic acid (TCA) extraction protocol. Cells were collected by centrifugation and re-suspended in cold 5% w/v TCA for at least 10 min. Samples were washed with acetone, then completely air-dried. Cells were resuspended with protein breakage buffer (50 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 1 mM EDTA, 2.75 mM dithiothreitol (DTT)) and disrupted using 0.5 mm glass beads and a Mini Beadbeater (Biospec). Two volumes of protein extract were mixed with 1 volume of SDS-PAGE sample buffer (187.5 mM Tris (pH 6.8), 6.0% v/v β-mercaptoethanol, 30% v/v glycerol, 9.0% v/v SDS, 0.05% w/v Bromophenol blue) and denatured at 95°C for 5 min. After SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (4%–20% gradient), proteins were transferred onto PVDF membranes. The membranes were blocked in blocking buffer (1% w/v BSA, 1% w/v non-fat powdered milk in phosphate buffered saline with 0.01% v/v Tween-20 (PBST) buffer) before incubation with primary antibodies in blocking buffer overnight at 4°C. Membranes were washed in PBST buffer and incubated with anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG HRP-linked antibodies in blocking buffer. Protein levels were detected using Amersham ECL Prime detection reagent and an Amersham Imager 600 instrument (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Phosphorylation of Zap-70 in Activated Mouse T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isolated mouse T cells were obtained as described above. One million cells were resuspended in 30 μl of 10% FBS medium or 10% delipidated FBS medium with CD3/CD28 activation beads in a bead-to-cell ratio of 1∶1. After 2 min of incubation, cells were mixed by pipetting up and down 5 times in RIPA buffer (Sigma-Aldrich) containing complete, Mini protease inhibitor cocktail tablet (Roche Diagnostics) Proteins were extracted by freeze and thaw three times and then centrifuged at 13793 g for 20 min at 4°C. Protein concentrations were determined by Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific). Ten μg of protein were loaded on a 12% SDS-Page gel and then transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was blocked with 5% BSA and then probed with anti phospho-Zap-70, anti Zap-70 or anti α-tubulin (Cell Signaling) as primary antibody and ECL HRP labelled anti rabbit IgG (GE Healthcare) as secondary antibody. Amersham ECL Prime detection reagent (GE Healthcare) was used to visualize protein bands.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Lysates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lysates were prepared by adding Laemmli sample buffer then incubated at either 100°C for 5 minutes (whole cell lysates) or 60°C for 20 minutes (membranes and maleimide-PEG samples). Samples were then resolved using 1.5mm thick, 12% polyacrylamide gels and electrophoresed at 50mA. Proteins were transferred to PVDF at 250mA. Blots were blocked for 1 hour with 5% non-fat dry milk (w/v) in Tris-buffered saline/0.1% Tween20 (TBST) then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies in 5% non-fat dry milk (w/v) in TBST at 1:1000 dilutions. Membranes were then washed three times for 15 minutes at room temperature with TBST. HRP-coupled secondary antibodies were diluted 1:30,000 in TBST with 1% non-fat dry milk (w/v) in TBST and blots were incubated for either 1 hour at room temperature (FLAG, GAPDH) or overnight at 4°C (ORMDL, SPTLC1, Calnexin). Blots were washed three times for 15 minutes at room temperature with TBST followed by 5 minutes in dH2O then visualized with Amersham ECL-Prime detection reagent (GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh, PA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions using Hyblot CL Film (Denville Scientific, Meuchen, NJ). Densitometry was done using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!