The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using fv10 asw 3.0 viewer

1

Immunofluorescence Staining of Phospho-Ser675-β-catenin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded on glass cover slips in a separate 24-well plate. After treatment, cells were fixed in methanol at −20 °C, washed with cold PBS containing Ca2+/Mg2+ (PBS++), permeabilized in 0.2% Triton X-100 and blocked with 10% BSA. The slides were incubated for 2 h at room temperature with primary rabbit anti-phospho-Ser675-β-catenin (1:200), followed by a 1 h incubation in the dark with an anti-rabbit Alexa Flour 488 conjugated antibody (1:500) and DAPI for nuclei visualization. Stained cells were imaged with a confocal laser scanning microscope (FV10i, Olympus, Japan) at a magnification of 60x. The images were analyzed using the provided analysis software (FV10-ASW 3.0 Viewer, Olympus, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunofluorescence Assay for FOXO1 in A549 and H1975 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A549 and H1975 cells cultured on glass coverslips were submitted to fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde (30 min) and Triton X-100 treatment (0.1%; 10 min, 4 °C). Goat serum was used for blocking (1 h, 37 °C), and the cells were incubated with rabbit anti-FOXO1 (1:100) at 4 °C overnight. The cells were then washed with cold PBS 3 times and incubated with FITC-linked goat anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (1 h, RT). After counterstaining with DAPI (1 μg/ml) for 10 min, images were captured on an Olympus confocal microscope at 200 × (CLSM, FV1000, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), equipped with a band-path filter set (Olympus). The emission signal was recorded with a CCD camera. The fluorescent signals were recorded and analyzed using Olympus-analyzer software (FV10-ASW3.0 Viewer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying c-Fos and GABA Colocalization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images of c-Fos staining were acquired with a Nanozoomer (Hamamatsu Photonics) and the regions of interest (ROIs) were manually selected according to the mouse brain atlas60 . The sections were anatomically matched to the mouse brain atlas and the settings for image acquisition were kept constant. The number of c-Fos-positive neurons was counted using a customized Matlab program, SpotDetection. The program determined the number of c-Fos-positive neurons and the size of the mask area. The normalized value of each section = [number of c-Fos-positive neurons/mask area (pixel number)] × 105, and the mean normalized value for each ROI was calculated. The analysis was performed blind to the tissue genotype. To quantify the colocalization of GABA and ß-gal, images were acquired using a FV-1000 Olympus confocal microscope. The ROIs were selected manually according to the mouse brain atlas60 . The number of cells was counted manually using ImageJ. The colocalization was judged manually under the FV10-ASW3.0 Viewer (Olympus). 400x magnification images were used to analyze the cortex, zona incerta, thalamus and amygdala. 100x magnification images were used to analyze the hippocampus due to the sparse and limited number of ß-gal positive cells in the hippocampus.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Cell Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunofluorescence, rabbit antibodies of ATXN2L (Sigma-Aldrich), E-cadherin (Cell Signaling), and vimentin (Cell Signaling), and mouse antibody G3BP1 (Abcam) were used. Immunofluorescence staining was performed as previously described3 (link). Cells were seeded onto glass-bottom dish and fixed by polyformaldehyde. Cellular membrane was permeabilized by 0.2% Triton X-100/phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution. After blocked by 0.5% Tween-20/PBS for 1 h, dish was incubated with antibodies against ATXN2L, E-cadherin, vimentin, or G3BP1 for 12 h. Then cells were incubated by secondary antibodies, and nucleus were stained by 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. Cells were observed by Olympus FV10i Olympus laser confocal system (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), and analyzed by FV10-ASW 3.0 Viewer (Olympus). Staining intensity were half quantified using Image-Pro Plus 6.0 (Media Cybernetics, Bethesda, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Thioflavin S Staining of Amyloid Deposits

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sections were rinsed in a 0.1 M PBS and mounted on slides, air dried, placed in Citri-Solv for 10 min, and hydrated in a series of ethanol solutions (100/95/70/50%) followed by dH2O (2 × 1 min) (Bussière et al., 2004 (link); Guntern et al., 1992 (link); Rajamohamedsait and Sigurdsson, 2012 (link)). Sections were incubated in a filtered 1% aqueous thioflavin S solution (Sigma, T1892) followed by dehydration in a graded series of ethanol solutions. Next, sections were placed in a filtered 1% Sudan Black B solution (Sigma, 19,966–4, dissolved in 70% ethanol) to eliminate autofluorescence and placed in Citri-Solv. Cover glass was applied with a hydrophilic mounting media, and slides were stored at 4°C for 48 h before images were taken at 20x (N. A. 0.7) on an Olympus FV1000 Laser Scanning Confocal Microscope using Olympus FV10-ASW 3.0 Viewer. The excitation filter (DM 458/515) was selected based on available lasers and optimal excitation (~440–470 nm) and emission wavelengths for thioflavin S (~515–550 nm) (Schweers et al., 1995 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Visualizing Singlet Oxygen Production

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SOSG (Molecular Probes Inc. Eugene, OR, USA) was applied to the U266 cells in order to visualize 1O2 production. Cell suspension treated with H2O2 was incubated with 50 μM SOSG for 30 min in dark. Following incubation, U266 cells were gently washed with 20 mM K-buffer, and consequently the 1O2 imaging was performed by a confocal laser scanning microscope, Fluorview 1000 (Olympus Czech Group, Prague, Czech Republic). The transition images were obtained by transmitted light detection module with 405 nm excitation with a near-ultraviolet (UV) laser diode and Nomarski DIC filters (Olympus). Simultaneously visualized fluorescence channel resulted from excitation by a 488 nm line of argon laser, representing the signals for SOSG fluorescence detected by 505–525 nm emission filter set. The proper intensity of lasers was set according to unstained samples at the beginning of each experiment54 (link). The integral distribution of signal intensity (ranging from 0 to 4095 levels of brightness) within the images was evaluated using software FV10-ASW 3.0 Viewer (Olympus).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Dentin and Vasculature in Teeth

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorescent images were obtained using a confocal laser scanning microscope (FV3000; Olympus). Imaris software (Bitplane) was used to obtain orthogonal views and create a 3D video from multislice Z-stack images. Quantification of dentin thickness and odontoblast height was measured at the maximal points in the tooth sections. Measurement of vessel area, filopodia number, and Osx+ cells was conducted in 300 × 300-µm fields of view in each sample using the FV10-ASW 3.0 Viewer (Olympus) and ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunofluorescence and Live Cell Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the immunofluorescence analysis, the cells were plated onto coverslips coated with 0.1% gelatin (Sigma Aldrich) in 12-well plates and fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde (PFA) (Songon, Shanghai) at room temperature. The fixed cells were permeabilized with cold ethanol, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.2% Triton X-100, or PBS containing 0.5% saponin. Nonspecific binding sites were blocked by incubating the coverslips with 3% BSA for 20 min. The fixed cells were incubated with primary antibodies for 1–2 h and with the appropriate Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h before mounting. The slides were visualized under a confocal or fluorescence microscope. The images were further analyzed with the FV10-ASW 3.0 viewer software.
For live cell imaging, the cells were grown in 35-mm glass-bottom dishes (MatTek or Nest) and staged into a heated incubation chamber with CO2. The cells were imaged using an Olympus FV-10 confocal microscope or a fluorescent microscope, and the images were acquired with the FV10-ASW 3.0 viewer (Olympus) or Metamorph (Molecular Devices) software. The image stacks or movie files were further processed with ImageJ software. A phase microscope was used for vacuole imaging and counting. The vacuole sizes were calculated with blind method in digitally enlarged images on a computer screen using a scale ruler.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Vascular and Lymphatic Features

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorescent images were obtained using a confocal laser scanning microscope (FV1000; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Quantification of cells or parameters of interest was conducted in a 1250 × 1250 µm field of view for vessel density and %LV area, and a 200 × 200 µm field of view for counting EdU+ cells using FV10-ASW 3.0 Viewer (Olympus). To quantify the fluorescent intensity of indicated antibodies (Tfe3, CD31, Pdpn, Vegfr3, and Lyve1) using the Image J software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA), we measured the “Mean” values in randomly chosen four 50 × 50 µm fields of view in each image and were averaged. Blood-filled lymphatics were counted as the number of cross sections of LV tubes containing one or more erythrocyte in the entire embryo or tail section in scanned images. To get the serial images for z-stack slices, multiple slices horizontally imaged from the same field of view at 0.3-μm intervals were captured.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Cell Populations and Vascular Parameters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorescent images were obtained using a confocal laser scanning microscope (Olympus, FV3000). Obtained images were analysed using FV10-ASW 3.0 Viewer (Olympus). Cells or substances of interest were quantified in the entire area of the epiphysis, in a 600 × 600 µm2 field of view (FOV; to count OSX+ and c-Kit+ cells and to quantify relative intensity of immunofluorescence), or in a 1-mm length of the vascular front (to count tip-cell filopodia). To measure the distance between HSCs and ECs, two HSCs were randomly picked per scanned image. ImageJ software (the US National Institutes of Health) was used to quantify the indicated areas in scanned images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!