The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using casin

1

Inhibiting Cdc42 Activation in SVZ Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pirl1-related compound 2 (CASIN, Sigma)67 (link) was used to block Cdc42 activation in vivo and in vitro at a concentration of 2.4 mg/kg (referred to as CASIN) and 5 µM (referred to as CASIN 5 µM), respectively. To test the efficacy of CASIN on SVZ cells, mice received a single CASIN injection (2.4 mg/kg) and 6 h later SVZ tissue was isolated to determine active Cdc42-GTP levels. For label retention experiments using CASIN, mice were injected with BrdU (60 mg/kg) five times/3 h apart and then subjected to a 30-day chase period. At the end of the BrdU chase period, mice received CASIN injections (two times, 3 days apart at 2.4 mg/kg on day 30 and day 33) and animals were killed on day 36 to perform the analysis of BrdU LRCs in the SVZ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Optimizing Drug-Induced Senescence Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All drugs used were reconstituted and stored as directed by the supplier (etoposide, 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT), mitomycin C, and CASIN—all from Sigma-Aldrich; AZD8055—Selleckchem). For routine drug treatment, cells were seeded in complete media and allowed to bed down overnight, before media were aspirated and replaced with drug-supplemented complete media. For drug treatment in co-culture assays, cells were seeded directly into drug-supplemented complete media. Optimum concentrations and dosing periods for induction of senescence without cell killing were selected according to previously published experiments [19 (link)–22 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cellular Imaging Reagents Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5-(N-Ethyl-N-isopropyl) amiloride (EIPA), blebbistatin, casin, chlorpromazine, cytochalasin D, dynasore, filipin complex, gefitinib (Iressa), genistein, IPA-3, nocodazole, NSC23766, rottlerin, salirasib, wortmannin, Y11, FluoromountTM, polyethylene glycol 8000 and Sepharose® 6B were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Alexa Fluor® 633-conjugated transferrin, Lysine fixable Dextran-Texas Red®, 70,000 MW, Alexa Fluor® 594-conjugated cholera toxin subunit B and rhodamine phalloidin were from Molecular Probes, Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation and Culture of Rat Pulmonary Microvascular Endothelial Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PMVECs were isolated from normal SD rat lungs as previously described.20 Experimental data were obtained from cells between passages two to six. PMVECs were divided into two groups as follows: the sham group consisted of PMVECs that were cultured in DMEM supplemented with normal rat serum (5%); and the CBDL group consisted of PMVECs that were incubated in DMEM containing 5% CBDL rat serum (1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks) for 24 hours.
For drug treatment groups, PMVECs were added with 0.05 μM PTEN inhibitor BpV(pic) (Abcam,Cambridge, UK) or 5 μM Casin (Sigma‐Aldrich) for 24 hours in different groups. PMVECs were transfected at 70% confluence for 36 hours with 50 nM short interfering (si)RNAs targeting rat AX2 or a negative control siRNA (NC siRNA) using HiPerfect reagent (Qiagen). Briefly, the siRNA was complexed with 20 μL of transfection reagent and diluted with M199 to 120 μL. Complete fresh medium was added at 3 hours after transfection, and the cells were further incubated for 24‐36 hours before administration of subsequent treatments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Transwell Assay for Cell Migration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell migration was examined using a Transwell chamber assay with 24‐well chambers (pore size 8 μm; Corning). For drug treatment groups, PMVECs were added with 5 μM Casin (Sigma‐Aldrich) for 24 hours in different groups. Approximately 500 μL of DMEM medium containing 5% serum was added to the lower wells, and PMVECs were seeded at 10 × 104 cells onto the upper wells containing 300 μL of DMEM medium without serum. The chambers were subsequently incubated for 12 hours and 24 hours at 37°C. The cells were fixed in 4% polyoxymethylene solution for 5 minutes and stained with 1% crystal violet. The migrated cells were manually calculated in three random microscopic fields using a fluorescence microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Modulating Macrophage Inflammation via CDC42 and JNK

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Murine macrophage RAW264.7 was brought from FuHeng BioLogy (Shanghai, China). RAW264.7 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (Basal Media, Shanghai, China) with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) at 37 °C with 95% air, 5% CO2. To build cell model of inflammation, cells were exposed to 100 ng/mL LPS (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 24 h. Cells were pre-exposed to 1 μM CASIN (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 6 h to selectively inhibit CDC42 activity, and pre-treated with 1 μM and 5 μM selective JNK inhibitor SP600125 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 6 h to selectively inhibit JNK pathway; DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) was treated as controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantification of Rho GTPase Activity in PMVECs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The preparation of GST fusion proteins and the pull down assay for active Rac1, Cdc42 and RhoA was performed according to a previously reported procedure.23 Briefly, PMVECs were grown in six wells culture‐plates for 2 days and stimulated with 5% normal or CBDL rat serum (4 weeks). For treatment groups, PMVECs were added with 0.05 μM PTEN inhibitor BpV(pic) (Abcam) or 5 μM Casin (Sigma‐Aldrich) for 24 hours in different groups. After treatment, the cells were washed with ice‐cold PBS and scraped into 0.3 mL of lysis buffer. The lysates were cleared by centrifugation. A sample from the supernatant was set aside for determination of total level of GTPases, and equal volumes of lysates were then incubated with Rhotekin‐RBD –agarose (for RhoA‐GTP) or PAK‐1 PBD–agarose (for Cdc42 or Rac1‐GTP) for 1 hour at 4°C followed by three washes with lysis buffer. The beads were boiled in sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) sample buffer. Total amounts of Rho proteins from cell lysates were separated by SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and measured by Western blotting using specific antibodies. The amount of the GTP‐bound form was normalized to the total amount of Rho GTPase in cell lysates. All experiments were performed three times independently.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Cell Proliferation by Ki-67

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell proliferation was measured and quantified by Ki‐67 staining following each treatment. PMVECs were added with 5 μM Casin (Sigma‐Aldrich) for 24 hours in different groups.Six‐μm‐thick paraffin sections of fixed PMVECs were blocked by 10% bovine serum albumin for 2 hours. Next, the sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibody, Ki‐67 (1:1000,abcam, Cambridge, MA, ab15580).For immunofluorescence staining of Ki‐67, fluorescence‐tagged secondary antibody and 4′, 6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole were used. The section was investigated using a confocal microscope. Each assay was performed three times in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Chlamydia Invasion Assay with Inhibitors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HeLa229 cells were prepared in 24-well plates with 12 mm coverslips, and invasion assays were performed essentially as described (9 (link)). Density gradient purified EBs were used at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 20. Where appropriate, host cells were treated with medium containing 100 µM EIPA, 20 µM casin, 25 µM wiskostatin, 25 µM Ehop-016, or 200 µM CK666 (all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich) for 15 min prior to infection. Cultures were either mock treated or maintained with inhibitors during infection and subsequent incubation. Infections were done on ice with rocking for 1 h and then shifted to 37°C for 45 min. The cultures were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and extracellular or intracellular EBs were differentially labeled with murine LPS-specific or rabbit MOMP antibodies, respectively. Detection was accomplished with secondary antibody conjugated to Alexa-594 (anti-mouse) or Alexa-488 (anti-rabbit). Percentages of invaded chlamydiae were computed by enumeration of internal and external chlamydiae in 10 fields of view. The percentage EB internalization was calculated via the formula ([total EBs – external EBs]/total red EBs) × 100 = percent (%) invasion.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Analyzing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Migration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In vitro migration in response to SDF-1α was analyzed as previously described47 (link). Lin cells (1 × 105) from FL of E14.5 Hem-1+/+ and Hem-1−/− embryos were pre-incubated with vehicle or 10 µM CASIN (Sigma) for 2 h to inhibit the activity of CDC42. They were plated in the upper well of a 24-well Transwell chamber separated with a filter containing 5.0 μm pore size (Corning, Corning, NY, USA) in IMDM medium with 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA). After a 4-h incubation against an SDF-1 gradient (100 ng/ml) in the lower chamber, all cells that migrated through the filter were collected. These cells were then stained with c-Kit-APC and Sca-1-PE and analyzed using an LSRII flow cytometer (BD Bioscience) for the percentages of LSK cells within PI-negative cells. The numbers of migrating LSK cells were calculated by multiplying the total number of migrating Lin cells by the percentage of migrating LSK cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!