The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

47 protocols using cary 100 uv vis

1

Quantifying Soluble Carbohydrates and Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total soluble carbohydrates were determined on five leaves for each treatment by the anthrone method, as reported in Hedge and Hofreiter [104 ]. The absorbance was measured at 630 nm using a spectrophotometer (UV-VIS Cary 100, Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The amount of soluble carbohydrates in the extracts was expressed as mg Glucose equivalents g−1 FW (mg Glu eq g−1 FW) using a Glucose standard curve.
Protein extraction was carried out on five fresh leaf samples ground in liquid nitrogen, according to Wang et al. [105 (link)]. Total protein content was quantified by Bradford colorimetric assay [106 (link)], measuring the sample absorbance at 595 nm by a spectrophotometer (UV-VIS Cary 100, Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Using a BSA standard curve, the protein concentration was expressed as µg BSA (bovine serum albumin) equivalents g−1 FW.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Polyphenol and Flavonoid Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total polyphenols were evaluated as described by Sun et al. (1998) [29 (link)]. An aliquot of methanolic extract was mixed with 1:1 (v/v) 10% Foli–-Ciocálteu and 1:5 (v/v) 700 mM Na2CO3 and the solution was stored in the dark for 2 h. The absorbance was detected by a spectrophotometer (UV-VIS Cary 100, Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) at 765 nm. The total polyphenol content was calculated by means of a gallic acid standard curve and expressed as mg Gallic Acid Equivalents (GAE) g−1 FW.
Flavonoids were quantified accordig to Moulehi et al. (2017) and Dewanto et al. (2002) [30 (link),31 (link)]. Briefly, an aliquot of supernatant was added to 75 μL of 5% NaNO2 (sodium nitrite). After, 150 μL of 10% AlCl3 (aluminum chloride) and 500 μL NaOH (1 M), distilled water was added to the mixture up to a final volume of 1.525 mL. The absorbance was quantified spectrophotometrically (spectrophotometer UV-VIS Cary 100, Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) at 510 nm. Flavonoid concentration was estimated using a catechin standard curve as mg Catechin Equivalents per gram of fresh weight (mg CE g−1 FW). Statistical analysis was performed on 8 technical replicates by t-test, using GraphPad Prism8 software Prism software, version 8.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Total Polyphenol Content

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total polyphenol content was measured according to the reported procedure [31 (link)]. Briefly, 0.25 g of powered sample was extracted with aqueous 80% methanol, at 4 °C (for 30 min) and then centrifuged at 11,000 rpm for 5 min. Extracts were combined with 1:1 (v/v) 10% Folin–Ciocalteu phenol reagent and water. After 3 min, 700 mM Na2CO3 solution was added to the resulting mixture in 5:1 (v/v). Samples were incubated for 2 h in darkness. Then, the absorbance at 765 nm was measured with a spectrophotometer (UV-VIS Cary 100, Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Gallic acid was used as a standard. Calibration curve was constructed analysing standard solutions in the interval of concentration 5–500 ppm. The total polyphenols concentration was calculated and expressed as gallic acid equivalents (mg GAE g−1 FW) from the calibration curve (R2 = 0.996) using gallic acid.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antioxidant Capacity Evaluation by FRAP Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antioxidant capacity was evaluated by FRAP (Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power) assay, as reported by George et al. (2004) [32 (link)]. Briefly, 0.25 g of powdered sample was extracted with 5 mL of methanol/water solution (60:40 v/v). After 1 h on ice, the extracts were centrifuged at 4 °C for 15 min at 14.000 rpm. After, an aliquot of 150 µL t was added to the FRAP reagents (2.5 mL of 300 mM acetate buffer pH 3.6, 250 µL of 10 mM triperidoltriazine (TPTZ), and 250 µL of 12 mM FeCl3), and stored in the dark for 1 h. The absorbance was detected at 593 nm spectrophotometrally (UV-VIS Cary 100, Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The antioxidant capacity was calculated using a Trolox standard curve and expressed as µmol Trolox equivalents (µmol TE g−1 FW). Statistical analysis was performed on 8 technical replicates by t-test, using GraphPad Prism software, version 8.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Leaf Water Status and Pigment Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The leaf water status was assessed measuring the relative water content RWC = (FW − DW)/(TW − DW), where FW and TW are the fresh and turgid weight, respectively. DW represents the dry weight after oven-drying the leaves at 80 °C to constant weight. TW was determined under a vapor-saturated atmosphere dipping the petiole in water and keeping leaves darkened at 4 °C for 24 h.
Photosynthetic pigments (total chlorophylls and carotenoids) were extracted from samples collected at midday, in ice-cold 100% acetone with a mortar and pestle and centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 5’ (Labofuge GL, Heraeus Sepatech, Hanau, Germany). The absorbance of supernatants was quantified spectrophotometrically (UV-VIS Cary 100, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) at wavelengths of 470, 645, and 662 nm. The pigment content was calculated according to Lichtenthaler [36 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Determination of Total Polyphenol Content

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total polyphenol content was measured following the procedure reported in Costanzo et al. [23 (link)]. An aliquot (274 μL) of a suitable diluted methanol sample was added to 274 μL of the Folin–Ciocalteu reagent. The mixture was shaken and allowed to stand for 3 min, before adding 1.452 mL of 700 mM sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) solution. Samples were incubated for 2 h in darkness. Then, the absorbance was measured at 765 nm by a spectrophotometer (UV-VIS Cary 100, Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The total polyphenol content was calculated using gallic acid standard curve and expressed as mg Gallic Acid Equivalents (GAE) g−1 FW.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Measuring Antioxidant Capacity via FRAP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antioxidant analysis was carried out by the ferric reducing antioxidant power assay (FRAP). Powdered fresh leaf samples 250 mg each (homogenized in a TissueLyser LT after freezing in liquid nitrogen), were mixed with 60:40 (v/v) methanol/water solution and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C. Then, acetate buffer was added to the extract (1:16 300 mM pH 3.6); The acetate buffer contained a mix of tripyridyltriazine (TPTZ) (10 mM TPTZ in 40 mM HCl, 1:1.6) and FeCl3 (1:16 12 mM FeCl3). After 1 h of incubation at 4 °C, the absorbance was measured at 593 nm with a spectrophotometer (UV-VIS Cary 100; Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) using Trolox (6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid) as standard. The antioxidant capacity was expressed as μmol Trolox equivalents for mg of fresh sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) assay was performed as reported in George et al. [27 (link)]. Fine, powdered samples (0.25 g) were extracted in 5 mL of methanol/water solution (60:40 v/v) and then centrifuged at 14.000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C after 1 h on ice. Successively, 150 µL of extract was added to 2.5 mL of 300 mM acetate buffer, 250 µL of 10 mM tripyridyltriazine (TPTZ), and 250 µL of FeCl3 (FRAP reagents) and incubated in the dark for 1 h. Sample absorbance was read spectrophotometrically at 593 nm (UV-VIS Cary 100, Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). A Trolox standard curve was used for evaluating the antioxidant capacity expressed as µmol Trolox equivalents (µmol TE g−1 FW).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Measuring Antioxidant Capacity via FRAP Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antioxidant analysis was carried out using the ferric reducing antioxidant power assay (FRAP) according to [47 (link)]. Homogenized fresh leaf samples, 250 mg each, were resuspended with 60:40 (v/v) methanol/water solution and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C. Then, acetate buffer containing 10 mM tripyridyltriazine (TPTZ) in 40 mM HCl, (1:1.6) and 12 mM·FeCl3 (1:16) was added to the extract (1:16 300 mM pH 3.6); After 1 h of incubation at 4 °C, the absorbance was measured at 593 nm with a spectrophotometer (UV-VIS Cary 100; Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) using Trolox (6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid) as standard. The total antioxidant capacity was expressed as μmol Trolox equivalents per mg of fresh sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

FRAP Assay for Antioxidant Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antioxidant activity was evaluated by the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) assay, as described in George et al. [35 (link)]. Briefly, 0.25 g of powdered sample was mixed with 5 mL of 60:40 (v/v) methanol/water solution. The extracts were kept for 1 h on ice and then centrifuged at 14.000 rpm for 15 min, at 4 °C. An aliquot (150 μL) of extract was mixed with the FRAP reagents (2.5 mL of 300 mM acetate buffer pH 3.6, 250 μL of 10 mM tripyridyltriazine (TPTZ) and 250 μL of 12 mM FeCl3) and incubated for 1 h in the dark. Finally, the absorbance was measured at 593 nm by a spectrophotometer (UV-VIS Cary 100, Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The antioxidant capacity was calculated using a Trolox standard curve and expressed as μmol Trolox equivalents (μmol TE g−1 FW).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!