The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using dcp bio1

1

PTEN-AIF Interaction and Modification Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Recombinant full-length PTEN, AIF, and its mutants were expressed in E. coli using the SUMO-fusion expression system (Life Sensor, Tokyo, JP) and purified by nickel chelating, ion exchange, and gel filtration columns as reported 67 (link). Recombinant proteins were kept in 50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.8. Incubation reaction was carried out by incubating PTEN and AIF alone or together in the presence of 200 μM NADH (Sigma-Aldrich) and protease inhibitors PMSF and cocktail at 4°C for 1 h. Afterward, the mixtures were prepared under reducing or non-reducing condition and analyzed with Western blots. For DCP-Bio1 (KeraFAST, Boston, MA) labeling, the mixtures were incubated with 500 μM DCP-Bio1 in the presence of 50 mM IAA at 4°C for additionally 1 h. Finally, the mixtures were prepared under reducing condition and analyzed with Western blots.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Detecting IL-17A Induced Oxidative Stress in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were switched to serum-free medium for 2 hours; in the final hour, cells were preincubated with 1 mM DCP-Bio1 (Kerafast, Boston, MA) in serum-free medium for 1h at 37° C. Medium containing DCP-Bio1 was removed, and fresh serum-free medium containing 100 ng/ml IL-17A was added to cells for indicated times. Cells were then fixed in 4% formalin and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X100 in PBS for 10 min. The permeabilized cells were blocked in 5% BSA in PBS for 1h. The cells were then incubated with fluorescently labeled streptavidin (1:2000, SA alexa fluor 647) and the nucleus was counterstained with DAPI (1:4000). Cell images were acquired using a Zeiss LSM 510 META Confocal Laser Scanning Imaging System. All images were taken at 20× magnification. The image files were converted to tiff format and brightness and contrast were adjusted equally in all images.
Alternatively, cells were harvested in the presence of dimedone to detect oxidized cysteines in cell lysates according to a previously described method [37 ]. In brief, cells were serum-deprived for 2h, and then stimulated with IL-17A and lysed in buffer containing 1mM dimedone. Excess dimedone was removed using Micro Bio-spin 6 columns (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, and extent of sulfenic acid labeling was assessed using anti-dimedone antibody (Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Profiling Protein Sulfenylation and Perthiosulfenylation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For analysis of protein sulfenylation (Cys-SOH) and perthiosulfenylation (Cys-SSOH), cells were lysed in Western solubilization buffer (WSB) containing 1 mM DCP-bio1 (Kerafast or EMD Millipore Sigma), 200 U/mL catalase (Worthington, Lakewood, NJ) and 10 mM N-ethylmaleimide (Sigma) and incubated for 1 h on ice. Equal amounts of cell lysates were mixed with Laemli sample buffer, either in the presence or absence of 25 mmol/L DTT for 30 min, and separated by 10% SDS-PAGE for Western blotting with streptavidin-peroxidase (see below). For analysis of specific proteins of interest, excess DCP-bio1 reagent was removed from DCP-bio1-derivatized lysates by 6 successive washes with 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) on Amicon Ultra-0.5 Centrifugal Filter Devices (Millipore). DCP-bio1-tagged proteins were subsequently collected with high capacity NeutrAvidin-agarose beads (Pierce) and washed successively with 1% SDS, 4 mol/L urea, and 1 mol/L NaCl [28] (link). Beads were then washed with 100 mmol/L ammonium bicarbonate either in the presence or absence of 10 mmol/L DTT for 30 min to assess the difference of sulfenic acid and perthiosulfenic acid tagged proteins.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Redox Signaling Pathway Antibody Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies to phospho-p65 (ser536) (3033), total p65 (8242), Trx1
(2429), Trx2 (14907), HO-1 (5061), NQO1 (62262), TXNIP (c14715), SIRT6 (12486),
TBP (8515), Histone 3 (9715) and β-tubulin (2146) were purchased from
Cell Signaling Technology. Antibodies purchased from Abcam were to Prx1
(ab109506), Prx2 (ab109367, Prx3 (ab73349), Prx4 (ab59542), Prx6 (ab73350),
PrxSO2/3 (ab16830), Nrf2 (ab62352), and β-actin (ab8226).
The antibody to LDH was purchased from Fitzgerald (20-LR22) and the antibody to
H3K9ac was from Millipore (06-942). The antibody to Srx was a kind gift from Dr.
Sue Gho Rhee (Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea). The TXNIP antibody used
for IHC was from Proteintech (18243-1-AP). The antibody to AhpC was purified
from rabbit serum (33 (link)). Salmonella
typhimurium AhpC C165S protein was purified and expressed as previously
described (Poole et al, 1996) and AhpC C165S was reduced and labeled with biotin
maleimide as described (33 (link)). DCP-Bio1 was
purchased from Kerafast. Menadione, H2O2, EX-527,
N-ethylmaleimide (NEM), D-alanine, Flavin adenine dinucleotide disodium salt
hydrate (FAD), iodoacetamide (IAM), and catalase were purchased from Sigma
Aldrich. Dithiothreitol (DTT) was purchased from Life Technologies/Thermo Fisher
Scientific. Endotoxin-free recombinant fibronectin fragment (FN-f) was expressed
and purified as described (29 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Adenanthin Stimulation of SMMC-7721 and HL-7702 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SMMC-7721 and HL-7702 cells were stimulated with 9 μM adenanthin at 37 °C for 1 h. Cells (1 × 106) were collected and quenched with 500 μl lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.5% NP40, 0.5% Triton X-100, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 50 mM NaF, 10 mM IAA, 20 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM Na3VO4, 10 mM NEM, 100 μM DTPA and 200 U/ml catalase). The cell lysate was incubated on ice for 1 h, and then sonicated and centrifuged. DCP-Bio 1 (100 μM; EE0021, KeraFAST, Boston, MA, USA) were added into supernatant from the cell lysates. After 1 h incubation, the samples were collected for western blot.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Protein Sulfenylation Analysis in NCI-H292 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NCI-H292 cells, a human pulmonary mucoepidermoid carcinoma cell line, were originally obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), grown in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin at 37 °C and 5% CO2, seeded at 100,000 cells/well in 24-well plates (Corning), and serum starved overnight.22 (link),25 (link) For in situ analysis of protein sulfenylation (−SOH), cells were preloaded with 5 mM DYn-2 reagent21 (link) (Kerafast) for 15–30 min, and subsequently stimulated with ATP (Sigma, St. Louis, MO; 100 µM) for 10 min. Cells were then lysed in chelator-free HEPES lysis buffer and clicked to biotin-azide (Kerafast) using established protocols (Supplementary Information). As an alternative approach to detect sulfenylated proteins, cells were lysed with western solubilization buffer containing 1 mM DCP-bio1 (Kerafast), as described previously24 (link),25 (link). FLAG-tagged Src and mutants were purified using Anti-FLAG M2 magnetic beads (Sigma) and eluted with 3× FLAG peptide (Sigma) as per manufacture’s protocol (Supplementary Information).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

YFP-OGG1 Localization and Oxidative Stress

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells expressing YFP or YFP‐OGG1were pretreated with or without 10 mM of NAC for 60 minutes then exposed to TNFα for 60 minutes. Whole cell lysates were made in an ice‐cold de‐oxygenized buffer containing 50 mM of Tris‐HCl (pH 7.5), 50 mM of NaCl, 1 mM of EDTA, 1 mM of EGTA, 1% of Nonidet P‐40, 2.5 mM of sodium pyrophosphate, protease inhibitor mixture (Sigma), 100 µM of diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, 5 mM of iodoacetamide, 200 units/mL catalase, and 0.1 mM of 3‐(2,4‐dioxocyclohexyl)propyl 5‐((3aR,6S,6aS)‐hexahydro‐2‐oxo‐1H‐thieno[3,4‐d]imidazol‐6‐yl) pentanoate (DCP‐Bio1; KeraFAST, Inc, Boston) as documented previously.25, 33 The supernatants of whole cell extracts were incubated with 30 µL of GFP beads at 4°C for 3 hours. The immunoprecipitates were resolved by SDS‐PAGE, and OGG1‐DCP‐Bio1 was detected by biotin antibody.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Sulfenic Acid Formation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sulfenic acid formation was examined using aLA samples (100 μM, in 10 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4) with or without photo-oxidation and glutathionylation treatment, and papain (100 μM, in 10 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 treated with 10 mM H2O2) as a positive control. Protein samples were mixed with the sulfenic acid-selective chemical probe DCP-Bio1 (Kerafast, Boston, MA; 100-fold molar excess over protein concentration), then subjected to separation by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with a streptavidin–HRP conjugate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

EGFR Cysteine Redox Status Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cysteine oxidation status of EGFR was determined by derivatization with sulfenic acid probe DCP-bio1 (Kerafast, Boston, MA), cell pre-loading with biotinylated glutathione ethyl ester (BioGEE), or derivatization with EZ-link Iodoacetyl-LC-biotin (Pierce, Rockford, Ill), to assess sulfenylation, S-glutathionylation, and cysteine thiol status, respectively. Biotin-tagged proteins were purified with NeutrAvidin-agarose beads and analyzed by Western blotting with α-EGFR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Sulfenylation Profiling of Cellular Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sulfenylation was performed as described previously [22 (link)]. Briefly, cells were lysed in lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100) supplemented with 1 mM DCP-Bio1 (EE0028, Kerafast, Boston, MA, USA), 0.1 mM N-Ethylmalemide, 0.1 mM iodoacetamide and protease inhibitors. Samples were kept in ice for 30 min sonication and centrifuged at 12,000 g for 20 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was transferred to a tube and rotated for 1 h at room temperature to allow for labeling of sulfonic acids. After incubation, protein was precipitated by acetone and centrifuged at 12,000 g for 5 min. The pellet was washed by 70% acetone and suspended in a non-supplemented lysis buffer. 1 mg of total protein was added to 50 μL slurry of streptavidin beads. Then, beads were rotated overnight at 4 °C. After 24 h, beads were centrifuged at 1000 g for 3 min, supernatant was discarded and beads were washed with 1 mL of lysis buffer. This washing step was repeated three times and beads were eluted in 30 μL of reducing 2 × LDS buffer (Life Technologies). For detection of sulfonation, anti-sulfonate antibody (ab176487, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) was applied.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!