The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Rabbit anti 53bp1

Manufactured by Cell Signaling Technology
Sourced in United States

Rabbit anti-53BP1 is a primary antibody that binds to the 53BP1 protein. 53BP1 is a DNA damage response protein that plays a role in the cellular response to double-strand DNA breaks.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

17 protocols using rabbit anti 53bp1

1

Quantification of DNA Double-Strand Breaks

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA DSBs were quantified in spatially (three-dimensionally = 3D) fixed cells by the means of high-resolution ICM detection of co-localized γH2AX and 53BP1 repair foci as described earlier [16 (link),20 (link)]. Briefly, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (10 min, at room temperature RT) prior to irradiation (0 min PI, non-irradiated controls) and in several time points PI covering a long (48 h) PI period (5 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 24 h and 48 h PI). Cells were permeabilized in 0.2% Triton X-100/PBS (15 min, RT) and immunoassayed with mouse antiphospho-H2AX (serine 139) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany, cat. no.: 05-636) and rabbit anti-53BP1 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA, cat. no.: 4937) primary antibodies to simultaneously detect the γH2AX and 53BP1. Antiphospho-H2AX antibody was visualized with the secondary FITC-conjugated donkey anti-mouse antibody and anti-53BP1 antibody with Cy3-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit antibody (both Jackson Laboratory, West Grove, PA, USA, cat. no.: 715-095-150 and 711-165-152). Chromatin was counterstained with 1 μM TO-PRO-3 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) prepared in 2× saline sodium citrate (SSC). After brief washing in 2× SSC, Vectashield medium (Vector Laboratories, Burlington, Ontario, Canada) was used for sample mounting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Analysis of DNA Damage Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells harvested, pelleted at 1,500 rpm at 4°C for 5 min and lysed with whole cell lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, and cocktail protease inhibitors). Protein concentration was determined using the Bradford assay (Sigma). Protein bands were separated on a NuPAGE 4–12% Bis-Tris Gel (Invitrogen). Proteins were electrotransferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane in 1X NuPAGE transfer buffer. After blocking with 5% skimmed milk solution in 1% Tris-Buffered saline with Tween 20 (TBST) buffer, the membranes were immunoblotted with mouse anti-Flag antibody (Sigma, #F3165, 1:1000), rabbit anti-TDP-43 (Proteintech, #10782-2-AP, 1:1000), mouse anti-phospho-Histone H2.AX (S139) (EMD Millipore, #16-193, 1:1000), rabbit anti-H2.AX (Cell Signaling Tech, #2595, 1:1000), rabbit anti-phospho-ATM (S1981) (Abcam, #ab81292, 1:800), rabbit anti-ATM (Abcam, #ab32420, 1:1000), rabbit anti-phospho-53BP1 (S1778) (Cell Signaling Tech, #2675, 1:1000), rabbit anti-53BP1 (Cell Signaling Tech, #4937, 1:1000), and mouse anti-β-actin (Proteintech, #66009-1-Ig, 1:5000) antibodies. Protein bands were visualized by probing with corresponding HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies and developed with enhanced chemiluminescence reagent in Odyssey (LI-COR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunofluorescence Staining of Naïve CD4 T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Naïve CD4 T cells were isolated and cultured as described above, followed by immunofluorescence staining using a method described previously6 (link). Rabbit anti-53BP1 (Cell Signaling) and mouse TRF1 (Thermo Fisher) were used as primary antibodies and anti-rabbit IgG-Alexa Fluor 488 and anti-mouse IgG- Alexa Fluor 555 (Invitrogen) were used as secondary antibodies. Then, cells were washed and mounted with DAPI Fluoromount-G (SouthernBiotech, Birmingham, AL). Images were acquired with a confocal laser-scanning inverted microscope (Leica Confocal, Model TCS sp8, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

DNA Damage Foci Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were grown in chamber slides, treated, fixed, immunostained, and analyzed as previously described [60 (link)]. Cells with more than 10 foci were determined as positive. The primary antibodies used were mouse anti-γH2AX (Abcam) at a dilution of 1:2,000, rabbit anti-53BP1 (Cell Signaling) at a dilution of 1:500, and rabbit anti-RPA70 (Cell Signaling) at a dilution of 1:500. Secondary anti-mouse Alexa 555 and anti-rabbit Alexa 488 were from Invitrogen and were used at a dilution 1:1000.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunofluorescence Imaging of γH2AX and 53BP1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were treated, washed in PBS and allowed to attach to glass 8-well chamber slides (LAB-TEK, Thermo Fisher Scientific, North Ryde, Australia). Subsequently cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (ProSciTech, Kirwan, Australia) for 10 minutes at room temperature and permeabilized by incubation in 0.15% Triton-X100 in 1%BSA/PBS for 10 min at room temperature. Blocking was performed by incubation in 1%BSA/PBS for 10 min at room temperature followed by overnight incubation with mouse monoclonal anti-γH2AX (#80312, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, Massachusetts, 1:200) and rabbit anti-53BP1 (#88439, Cell Signaling, 1:1000) in 1%BSA/PBS at 4°C in a humid environment. Secondary anti-mouse-Alexa-Fluor 488 (Life Technologies, Thermo Fisher Scientific, 1:500) and/or anti-mouse-Alexa-Fluor 647 (Life Technologies, Thermo Fisher Scientific, 1:500) in 1%BSA/PBS was added for 1h at room temperature. Slides were stained for 30 min with DAPI as a nuclear stain followed by mounting. Cells were visualized using the Leica TCS SP8 DLS confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems, Macquarie Park, Australia) and images were analysed using the Leica Application Suite Advanced Fluorescence (LAS AF) software (Leica microsystems) and ImageJ/FUJI software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying DNA Damage and Repair Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were plated in 35 mm glass-bottomed dishes (Mattek, MA, USA). Samples were fixed in 4% PFA, permeabilized in 0.2% Triton X-100 and treated with DNaseI (Roche, West Sussex, UK). Cells were blocked in 1% BSA, 2% FCS in PBS before staining with rabbit anti-phospho-H2Ax S139 (γH2Ax), rabbit anti-RAD51, rabbit anti-53BP1, anti-phospho-BRCA1 (S1524), rabbit anti-phospho-p53 (S15) or mouse anti-phospho-ATM (S1981) (Cell Signaling, MA, USA) with goat anti-rabbit Alexafluor488 or goat anti-mouse Alexfluor546 as secondary antibodies (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Samples were imaged using a Zeiss LSM710 inverted confocal microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Automated quantification of foci in 100-300 nuclei per experiment was carried out using CellProfiler 2.0 (Broad Institute, MA, USA). Formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) in vivo blocks were sectioned and antigen retrieved for RAD51 (pH9 Tris-EDTA) or 53BP1 (pH6 citrate buffer). Antigen retrieved slides were blocked, stained, imaged and quantified as outlined for in vitro samples above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunofluorescence Imaging of DNA Damage Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
U2OS cells were plated on glass coverslips in 6-well tissue culture-treated plates (Greiner Bio-one) overnight and then switched into plain or drugged media consisting of either 5.0 ng/mL PMA, 50.0 μM Etoposide, 5.0 μM NSC95397, or 10.0 μL DMSO for 24 hours. Cells were then fixed in 4% PFA for 15 minutes and permeabilized with 1% Triton-X 100 in PBS for 5–10 min at 4°C. Cells were then blocked with immunofluorescence (IF) block buffer (3% BSA in PBS) for 1 hour and incubated with primary antibodies: rabbit anti-γH2A.x (Cell Signaling 9718, 1:2000), rabbit anti-RPA32 (GeneTex GTX113004 1:2000), or rabbit anti-53BP1 (Cell Signaling S1778, 1:2000) overnight at 4°C. Coverslips were washed three times with PBS then incubated with secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor 488 or 594) and Hoechst 33342 (1:2000) for 1 hour. Coverslips were then washed three times with PBS and mounted onto slides with ProLong Gold Antifade Mountant (Invitrogen) and sealed when dried. Images were obtained with a ZEISS LSM 980.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Telomere Localization and Mitochondrial Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To investigate FAP‐mCer3‐TRF1 location on telomeres, the J1.1/FAP‐mCer3‐TRF1 cells were fixed in 2% PFA for 20 min, followed by permeabilization with 0.3% Triton X‐100 in PBS for 10 min. After blocking with 5% BSA in PBS for 1 h, the J1.1/FAP‐mCer3‐TRF1 cells were incubated with rabbit anti‐GFP antibody (Sigma‐Aldrich) and mouse anti‐TRF2 antibody (Novus Biologicals) at 4°C overnight. The cells were washed three times with PBS containing 0.1% Tween‐20, and then stained with anti‐rabbit IgG‐Alexa Fluor 488 and anti‐mouse IgG‐Alexa Fluor 555 (Thermo Scientific) at room temperature for 1 h, and then washed and mounted with DAPI Fluoromount‐G (SouthernBiotech). To investigate the mitochondrial localization of mito‐FAP‐mCer3, the E6‐1/mito‐FAP‐mCer3 cells were pre‐stained with MitoTracker Red CMXRos, and then stained with rabbit anti‐GFP antibody followed by incubation with anti‐rabbit IgG‐Alexa Fluor 488. To investigate DNA damages on telomeres, the J1.1/FAP‐mCer3‐TRF1 and E6‐1/mito‐FAP‐mCer3 cells were treated three times with MG2I and light exposure, stained with rabbit anti‐53BP1 (Cell Signaling) and mouse anti‐TRF2, incubated with respective secondary antibodies. Images were acquired with Leica DMi8 Confocal System (Leica Confocal).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunofluorescence Imaging of DNA Repair Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CD4+ T cells were isolated and cultured as described above. The cells were fixed in 2% PFA for 20 min, permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 min, blocked with 5% BSA in PBS for 1 h, and then incubated with rabbit anti-53BP1, anti-Ku70, anti-RAD51, or anti-TOP1cc antibody and mouse anti-TRF1 antibody (Cell Signaling) at 4°C overnight. The cells were washed three times with PBS with 0.1% Tween-20, stained with anti-rabbit IgG-Alexa Fluor 488 and anti-mouse IgG- Alexa Fluor 555 (Invitrogen) antibodies at room temperature for 1 h, and then washed and mounted with DAPI Fluoromount-G (SouthernBiotech, Birmingham, AL). Images were acquired with a confocal laser-scanning inverted microscope (Leica Confocal, Model TCS sp8, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunofluorescence Staining of Fibroblasts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fibroblasts were grown on sterilized glass coverslips coated with 50 μg/ml fibronectin (F1141, Sigma‐Aldrich) and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 20 min. Following fixation, cells were rinsed in PBS, permeabilized in PBS + 0.3% Triton X‐100 for 7 min, and then blocked in 10% FBS + PBS for 1 h. Both, primary and secondary antibodies were diluted in PBS + 0.05% Tween‐20 containing 5% FBS as follows. Primary antibodies: rabbit anti‐53BP1 (4937, Cell Signaling Technology), 1:100; mouse anti‐p21 (SC‐6246, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), 1:800; mouse anti‐Aurora B (Aim‐1; 611082, BD Biosciences), 1:500; rabbit anti‐cGAS (15102, Cell Signaling Technology), 1:200; mouse anti‐Hec1 (ab3613, Abcam), 1:1,500; mouse anti‐Plk1 (SC‐17783, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), 1:2,000; rabbit anti‐MCAK 49, 1:5,000; mouse anti‐α‐Tubulin (T5168, Sigma‐Aldrich), 1:1,500; human anti‐centromere antibody (ACA; kindly provided by Dr. W. C. Earnshaw), 1:3,000; rabbit anti‐Aurora B phospho T232 (600‐401‐677, ROCKLAND), 1:1,000; mouse anti‐Retinoblastoma (554136, BD Biosciences), 1:100. Secondary antibodies: Alexa Fluor‐488, Alexa Fluor‐568 and Alexa Fluor‐647 (Life Technologies), all 1:1,500. DNA was counterstained with 0.5 μg/ml DAPI (Sigma‐Aldrich) and coverslips mounted on slides with proper mounting solution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!