The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

15 protocols using facsaria iiu sorter

1

Comprehensive Flow Cytometry Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell staining for flow cytometry (FACS) analysis and sorting was performed at 4°C, in the dark, for 20–30 min, with the exception of anti-CCR7 antibody (BioLegend) staining that required incubation at 37°C for a minimum of 30 min. To exclude dead cells, either Hoechst 33258 (Sigma-Aldrich) or viability dye eFluor 506 (eBioscience) was used. FACS analysis of TECs and DCs was performed using BD LSR II and BD FACSymphony A5 cytometers, respectively. A BD FACSAria IIu sorter was used for cell sorting. BD FACSDiva software and FlowJo V10 software (Treestar) were used for FACS data analysis. For the purpose of tSNE analysis, the same amount of CD11c+ TdTOM+ cells from each model was concatenated by using the FlowJo concatenate function. The final tSNE was calculated by FlowJo opt–SNE plugin. Total TEC counts in Figure 1e were obtained by analyzing the whole fraction of CD45 MACS-enriched cells. Calculation of the ratios in Figures 1g and 2g is described in the ‘Results’ section and figure legends. The entire list of FACS staining reagents is provided in Supplementary file 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

SSBP2 Expression in Hematopoietic Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BM mononuclear cells enriched by centrifugation or depleted of lineage-committed cells through magnetic-activated cell separation were stained for SSBP2. LinSca1+c-Kit+ (LSK) cells were purified by staining the Lin cells with anti-Sca1–PE and anti-c-Kit– FITC antibodies (BD Pharmingen) followed by cell sorting using a BD FACS Aria IIu sorter. Cells were centrifuged onto slides and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 20 min, which was followed by permeabilization and then staining with rabbit polyclonal anti-SSBP2 antibody or mouse anti-LDB1 antibody (Molecular Probes) as detailed previously (26 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were harvested with Accutase® (Corning, Catalog # 25-058-CI) and stained with anti-human CD44-FITC (BD Pharmingen), anti-human CD24-PB (Exbio) and anti-human EpCAM-APC (Biolegend) antibodies, as per manufacturer-recommended dilutions for 1 h at room temperature on a rotary shaker. Cells were analyzed in the presence of propidium iodide (1 µg/mL) using a BD LSR Fortessa (BD Biosciences). After doublet discrimination and compensation for spectral overlap, samples were analyzed using FlowJo Software v10.0.7 (BD Biosciences). For sorting, anti-human EpCAM-PerCP/Cy5.5 (Biolegend) antibody was used and cells were sorted using a BD FACS Aria IIu sorter (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation of Murine Neutrophils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells from the BM were isolated by centrifugation from the femurs and tibias of the animals, whereas spleens were mashed on 100 µm nylon cell strainer. After centrifugation, red blood cells were eliminated by treatment with ACK buffer (0.155 mM NH4Cl, 1 mM KHCO3, 0.1 mM EDTA) and filtered on a 40 µm nylon cell strainer. After ACK treatment, cells were filtered on a 40 µm nylon cell strainer. For neutrophil isolation, a first enrichment with EasySep™ Mouse CD11b Positive Selection kit (StemCell technologies, Grenoble, France) was performed followed by cell sorting of CD45+ CD11b+ Ly6G+ F4/80- cells on an ARIA IIu FACS sorter (Becton Dickinson, Le Pont-de-Claix, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Isolation and Purification of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells from the bone marrow were isolated by centrifugation from the femurs and tibias of the animals, whereas spleens were mashed on 100 µm nylon cell strainer. After centrifugation, red blood cells were eliminated by treatment with ACK buffer (0.155 mM NH4Cl, 1 mM KHCO3, 0.1 mM EDTA) and filtered on a 40 µm nylon cell strainer. Cells from tumors of mammary glands 4 and 9 were isolated following a modified protocol from Dr J. Stingl [32 (link)]. Briefly, mammary glands or mammary tumors were minced with scalpels and digested using Tumor Dissociation Kit (Miltenyi, Paris, France) following manufacturer recommendations. After ACK treatment, cells were filtered on a 40-µm nylon cell strainer.
For neutrophil isolation, a first enrichment with EasySep™ Mouse CD11b Positive Selection kit (StemCell technologies, Grenoble, France) was performed followed by cell sorting of CD45+ CD11b+ Ly6G+ F4/80− cells (for neutrophils) and CD45+ Ly6G− F4/80+ (for macrophages) on an ARIA IIu FACS sorter (Becton Dickinson, Le Pont-de-Claix, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Flow Cytometry Analysis of Breast Cancer Stem Cell Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For staining of the luminal and basal cell surface markers CD24 and
CD44, respectively, 1x106 freshly harvested cells were washed with
cold PBS and pelleted. Cell pellets were dissolved in
100µl of 1xPBS and incubated in the presence of
1µg of APC anti-human CD24 [ML5] (BioLegend-311118)
and 1µg of PE anti-mouse/human CD44 [IM7]. Cells were
incubated with the antibodies in the dark for 30min at 4°C and washed
twice with cold 1xPBS. Cell populations were analyzed using CytoFLEX Flow
Cytometer (Beckman Coulter). Additionally,
CD44high/CD24low and
CD44low/CD24high primed cells were sorted in a BD
Biosciences FACS Aria IIu sorter. FACS sorted cells were used for in
vivo
experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cell Sorting and qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were purified using a FACSAria IIu sorter (BD Biosciences). RNA was extracted from FACS-sorted cells by using the ReliaPrep RNA Cell Miniprep System (Promega) and cDNA synthesis was performed with the RevertAid Reverse Transcriptase kit (Thermo Fisher) as indicated by the manufacturer. qPCR analysis was performed in triplicate using TaqMan-Probe mixes (Applied Biosystems; listed in Table S5) with TaqMan gene expression mastermix (Applied Biosystems). qRT-PCR data were acquired on a StepOnePlus Real-Time thermocycler (Applied Biosystems) and analyzed with the StepOne Software version 2.3. Results were calculated by applying the ΔΔCT-method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cell Cycle Analysis of TSC and iXTE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TSC and iXTE cells were grown in serum-containing medium for 5 days. After that, the cells were dissociated using 0.25% trypsin and processed using a CyStain UV Precise T kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Sysmex Deutschland GmbH). The DNA content was analyzed using a FACSAria IIu sorter (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

FACS-based Cell Sorting for PDGFRα and CD40

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were dissociated using 0.05% trypsin and resuspended in PBS supplemented with 3% FCS (dilution buffer). For sorting cells based on PDGFRα and CD40 expression, the cells were incubated with the respective antibodies (table S2) for 1 hour on ice and washed three times with dilution buffer to remove traces of unbound antibodies. After that, the cells were resuspended in the dilution buffer and subjected to sorting in FACSAria IIu sorter (BD Biosciences). Single viable cells were first selected on the basis of FSC and SSC gating, and either PDGFRα+ and Venus+ cells or PDGFRα+ and CD40+ cells were collected depending on the experimental setup. FlowJo software was used for data analysis and plotting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

RNA Extraction and qPCR Analysis from FACS-Sorted Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were purified using a FACS Aria IIu sorter (BD). RNA was extracted from FACS‐sorted cells by using the ReliaPrep RNA Cell Miniprep System (Promega). Residual genomic DNA was digested using DNase I (Thermo Fisher). cDNA synthesis was performed with the RevertAid Reverse Transcriptase (RT) kit (Thermo Fisher) as indicated by the manufacturer. Removal of genomic DNA was verified by PCR on RNA samples subjected to cDNA synthesis in absence of RT. Quantitative (q)PCR analysis was performed by using the TaqMan‐probe mixes (Applied Biosystems), enlisted in Appendix Table S11, together with TaqMan‐gene expression mastermix (Applied Biosystems). qPCR data were acquired on a StepOnePlus real‐time thermocycler (Applied Biosystems) in triplicates and analyzed with the StepOne Software v2.3. Results were calculated by applying the ΔΔCT‐method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!