The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

28 protocols using jpk nanowizard 3

1

Characterizing Hydrogel Fiber Microstructure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFM imaging was performed to characterize the microstructure of the different hydrogels at the fiber level. A 100 μl sample from each hydrogel composition (n = 3) was deposited on a silica sample holder and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. After gelation, the hydrogel's top surface was carefully removed using gentle air blowing/drying to allow the imaging of the internal network. Agilent 5500 with MAC III controller and JPK Nanowizard 3 AFM systems were used for morphological imaging in intermittent contact mode in air. A sharp microlever probe MSNL-F (f = 120 kHz, k = 0.6 N/m, tip radius of curvature < 12 nm) was used. The AFM topography images were leveled, line-corrected, and measured (height and roughness profiles) using Gwyddion48 (link). A fiber extraction algorithm, ct-FIRE49 (link), was applied to the AFM images to characterize the fiber diameter, length, straightness, and alignment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Measuring Cardiomyocyte Contractility with AFM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Atomic force microscope (JPK NanoWizard 3, JPK, Berlin, Germany), combined with an inverted light microscope (IX-81S1F-3, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), was used to obtain mechanocardiograms of beating EBs as previously described (Pesl et al., 2014 (link); Caluori et al., 2019 (link); Pribyl et al., 2019 (link)). Drug response tests were performed after initial equilibration in Tyrode's solution, followed by addition of 70 μM metoprolol, 10 min of stabilization time, and then 10 min of measurement. Isoproterenol (1 μM) was subsequently added into the solution, and mechanocardiograms were measured after 20 min of stabilization. The mechanical properties of beating EBs were expressed as force of contraction in nN as previously described (Pesl et al., 2014 (link)); however, the values were relativized for final comparison.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Atomic Force Microscopy of Hydrogel Fibers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Freshly
cleaved mica sheets were rinsed with deionized water and dried under
a nitrogen flow. For the pregelation samples, a drop of the viscous
solution (10 mM) was deposited on the mica sheet. For gel samples,
a mica sheet was placed on the top of the gel (10 mM) for 1 min, washed
with water, and dried under a gentle stream of nitrogen. AFM images
were acquired using JPK Nanowizard 3 (JPK, Germany) in air at room
temperature under AC mode. The scans were acquired at a 512 ×
512 pixel resolution using ACTA-SS probes (k ∼37
N/m, AppNano, Scientec, France), a drive frequency of ∼254
kHz, a set point of ∼0.5 V, and a scanning speed of 1.0 Hz.
Images were analyzed using the JPK data processing software. The fiber
diameter was determined from the generated AFM images using the ImageJ
software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Topography Imaging of Gel Structures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The gels were placed on clean glass coverslips and dried under vacuum. Topography images of the structures were taken using a JPK NanoWizard®3 (JPK Instruments, Berlin, Germany) working in AC mode. Si3N4 cantilever probes with a nominal spring constant of 3 Nm−1 and a resonance frequency of 75 kHz were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Atomic Force Microscopy Topographic Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) topographic imaging was employed to measure the roughness of the samples. Imaging was performed on a JPK NanoWizard 3 (JPK Instruments AG) operated in ac mode using ACTA cantilevers (spring constant ≈40 N/m, resonance frequency ≈300 kHz; Applied NanoStructuresInc.). Image processing was carried out with JPK SPM Data Processing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Force Spectroscopy of Lipid Bilayers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Force spectroscopy measurements were carried in aqueous solution at RT to determine the forces of lipid bilayers in PBS buffer using JPK NanoWizard 3 (JPK Instruments AG, Berlin, Germany). Cantilevers (OBL-10, nominal spring constant of ∼6 pN nm−1 and nominal tip radius of 30 nm from Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany) were UV-ozone treated (Pro Cleaner Plus; BioForce Nanoscience, Virginia Beach, VA) for 30 min and calibrated using thermal method. The calibration was first done in air against mica and then in PBS buffer. The calibration software provided in the JPK instrument recorded the new spring constant and deflection sensitivity that was used further. A deviation of 10–20% from the company mentioned spring constant was observed. The force curves obtained (approach speed of 1 μm/s) were processed using JPK Data Processing software (version 5.0.91) and analyzed using a home-written MATLAB (The MathWorks, Natick, MA) script. To determine the peak adhesive forces, a histogram of the forces obtained was plotted and Kernel density estimation (KDE) method (nonparametric method for multivariate distribution analysis) was applied (with Gaussian kernel) to determine the peak position.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Nanomaterial Characterization Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns were obtained on a JEOL-1011 (100 kV). Samples for the TEM analysis were prepared by drop-casting 10 μL dispersion of nanocrystals diluted in toluene onto carbon-coated copper or titanium TEM grids followed by solvent evaporation. High resolution (HR) TEM images were obtained with a Philips CM 300 UT microscope operated at 200 kV. X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were performed with a Philips X'Pert System with Bragg–Brentano geometry, equipped with a copper anode (Kα X-ray wavelength of 0.154 nm). Samples were prepared by drop-casting the colloidal nanocrystal solution onto silicon wafer substrates (<911> or <711> cut) with subsequent solvent evaporation. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements were performed on a JPK Instruments system (JPK Nano Wizard 3) in intermittent contact mode. UV-VIS-NIR absorption spectra were obtained with a Cary 5000 spectrophotometer equipped with an integration sphere.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Microsphere Mechanical Characterization by AFM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mechanical characterization of microspheres was measured by AFM on a JPK Nanowizard 3 (JPK instruments, Germany) coupled with an inverted microscope (NIKON Ti, Nikon Instruments) keeping a constant temperature through a Petri Dish Heater (JPK instruments, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Probing Polymerized Proptose Emulsions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mechanical properties of the polymerized proptose emulsions were performed in aqueous suspension using an AFM (JPK NanoWizard 3 from JPK, Berlin, Germany) equipped with qp‐BioAC CB1 cantilever (uniqprobe, NanoWorld AG) with a spring constant of 0.2 N m−1, 7 µm tip height, and 8 nm tip radius. Sample preparation included a coating of the glass coverslip with a positively charged poly‐l‐ornithine solution for 20 min, followed by washing with Milli‐Q water. Particle suspension was allowed to settle down for 15 min before scanning. 3D‐scanner with 15 µm piezo‐driven stroke in the z‐direction and 100 µm in the x‐ and y‐direction was used. 5 × 5 µm size was scanned with different set points at 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 nN (for the block copolymer membranes) and 1, 2, 3, and 4 nN (for the polymerized zone). Data processing was performed using JPK Data processing software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Topographic Analysis of Surfaces by AFM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The topographies of all surfaces were analyzed by atomic force microscopy (AFM) using a JPK NanoWizard 3 (JPK GmbH, Berlin, Germany) and HQ:NSC15/AlBS cantilevers (MikroMasch, Wetzlar, Germany) in intermittent contact mode in air. The images had a size of 5 × 5 µm 2 and a resolution of 1024 × 1024 px. All AFM images were processed using Gwyddion (version 2.51) [22] (link) and the RMS surface roughness Sq was obtained for each image. The Sq values were averaged over four images and the standard deviations are given as errors.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!